Patterns and magnitude of flow alteration in California, USA

Freshwater Biology (Wiley) | December 27th, 2017

The importance of the natural flow regime to stream and river health has received growing attention over the last two decades. Quantifying natural river flows has become

The importance of the natural flow regime to stream and river health has received growing attention over the last two decades. Quantifying natural river flows has become an essential component of water resource planning, including assessments of water supplies (Vicuna,Maurer, Joyce, Dracup, & Purkey, 2007; Wurbs, 2005), reservoir operations (Hejazi, Cai, & Ruddell, 2008) and drought risk (Meko,Therrell, Baisan, & Hughes, 2001). Understanding the natural flow regime is also crucial for managing stream ecosystems.

Paying for Infrastructure: California’s Choices

Public Policy Institute of California (PPIC) | January 16th, 2009

PPIC’s At Issue series focuses on issues important for California now and in the future. Financing infrastructure has traditionally been difficult for the state, and cu

PPIC’s At Issue series focuses on issues important for California now and in the future. Financing infrastructure has traditionally been difficult for the state, and current economic woes are likely to make it even more challenging. In this At Issue, PPIC research director Ellen Hanak analyzes the impediments to infrastructure financing and describes funding reforms such as loosening the supermajority rules for local infrastructure funding, financing investment through user fees, and expanding public-private partnerships. She outlines how these reforms could improve the state’s ability to build for the future.

Paying for Water in California

Public Policy Institute of California (PPIC) | March 6th, 2014

California faces serious funding gaps in five key areas of water management—including safe drinking water in small, disadvantaged communities; flood protection; managem

California faces serious funding gaps in five key areas of water management—including safe drinking water in small, disadvantaged communities; flood protection; management of stormwater and other polluted runoff; aquatic ecosystem management; and integrated water management. These gaps amount to $2 billion to $3 billion a year. But bold efforts by state and local leaders can pave the way to sustainable solutions for California’s critical water resources.

Paying it Forward: The Path Toward Climate-Safe Infrastructure in California

Climate-Safe Infrastructure Working Group | September 1st, 2018

Persistent spatial structuring of coastal ocean acidification in the California Current System

Nature Portfolio (Springer Nature) | May 31st, 2017

The near-term progression of ocean acidification (OA) is projected to bring about sharp changes in the chemistry of coastal upwelling ecosystems. The distribution of OA e

The near-term progression of ocean acidification (OA) is projected to bring about sharp changes in the chemistry of coastal upwelling ecosystems. The distribution of OA exposure across these early-impact systems, however, is highly uncertain and limits our understanding of whether and how spatial management actions can be deployed to ameliorate future impacts. Through a novel coastal OA observing network, we have uncovered a remarkably persistent spatial mosaic in the penetration of acidified waters into ecologically-important nearshore habitats across 1,000 km of the California Current Large Marine Ecosystem. In the most severe exposure hotspots, suboptimal conditions for calcifying organisms encompassed up to 56% of the summer season, and were accompanied by some of the lowest and most variable pH environments known for the surface ocean. Persistent refuge areas were also found, highlighting new opportunities for local adaptation to address the global challenge of OA in productive coastal systems.

Perspectives and Guidance for Climate Change Analysis

California Department of Water Resources (DWR) | August 14th, 2015

California's water managers face a climate that changes and is changing as a result of both natural and anthropogenic influences. In some settings and for some variables,

California's water managers face a climate that changes and is changing as a result of both natural and anthropogenic influences. In some settings and for some variables, California’s natural climate variability still dominates anthropogenic influences and will continue to do so for the foreseeable future. In other cases, anthropogenic influences are already evident in important aspects of California's climate. Much research is still required to unravel this tangled web of atmospheric interactions. In any case, California water planning under a changing climate needs to recognize that the causes of variations and changes include both anthropogenic and natural drivers. This technical information record summarizes the scientific and technical guidance and perspectives of the California Department of Water Resources’ (DWR’s) Climate Change Technical Advisory Group (CCTAG) on the use of climate models and associated technical tools for water resource planning. DWR values the work of the members of the CCTAG and will consider this advice as it moves forward in developing specific actions. DWR empaneled this CCTAG in February 2012 to advise DWR on the scientific aspects of climate change, its impacts on water resources, the use of planning approaches and analytical tools, and the development of adaptation responses. DWR requested specific assistance with developing: • A set of future climate scenarios and analysis procedures appropriate for DWR planning. • An approach to extreme climate change scenarios to provide “stress tests.” • Interim guidance on modeling extreme weather events that cause flooding (time permitting within the tenure of the CCTAG).

Petaluma Valley Groundwater Sustainability Plan

Petaluma Valley Groundwater Sustainability Agency | December 8th, 2021

Due to size, this file has been divided Part 1, Part 2, Part 3, Part 4, Part 5, Part 6, Part 7

Due to size, this file has been divided Part 1, Part 2, Part 3, Part 4, Part 5, Part 6, Part 7

Physical and Hydrologic Assessment of the Carmel River Watershed California

California State University, Monterey Bay (CSUMB) | November 1st, 2004

The Carmel Watershed is a terrestrial jewel in the California landscape. Its forested headwaters harvest rain from the Pacific storms each winter, providing a nat

The Carmel Watershed is a terrestrial jewel in the California landscape. Its forested headwaters harvest rain from the Pacific storms each winter, providing a natural cascade of resources enjoyed by human residents and the broader ecosystem. Although the Carmel River is not currently listed as “impaired” by the State of California, there have been significant human impacts that could lead to impaired waters. These impacts are now recognized and defined in this report so that remediation and future management policies can be developed. This report is one facet of the Carmel Watershed Assessment orchestrated by the Carmel River Watershed Conservancy. We assess the physical and hydrologic components of the watershed, chiefly focusing on two major classes of problems, water quantity and excess sediment. Both of these issues are important when considering human needs and the needs of the broader ecosystem, including endangered aquatic and riparian species. The Carmel Watershed has finite annual rainfall as its only water resource. That resource is currently stretched too thin, leaving new urban, suburban, rural, and industrial development in and around the watershed at odds with pre-existing water appropriation and environmental requirements (e.g., SWRCB, 1995a; 1995b). Certain kinds of common land-uses and road designs supply excess sediment above natural background rates. Some of the major problems in the watershed are summarized below, in no particular order. Demand for water far exceeds water supply, leading to many related subordinate problems, including diminished surface water for endangered steelhead trout. Extensive urbanization exists within the regulatory 100-year floodplain and in the dam-failure inundation zone. Excess sediment is generated from a very large number of dirt roads, some of which are abandoned, some of which out of compliance with grading ordinances, but most of which are clearly within regulations. Nearly all sub-road drainage culverts are undersized, leading to downstream erosion, whether related to dirt roads, paved roads, or highways. Excess sediment is generated by a great number of bare road cuts on dirt roads, paved roads, and highways. Excess sediment is generated in the Los Chupines and Sycamore Creek drainages by soil slip, gullies, unstable stream banks, and roads. Many of those issues are related to cattle impacts. Excess sediment is generated in a great number of incised streams that have tall, exposed banks. San Clemente Dam is unsafe owing to sediment burden and proximity to active faults. Decommissioning the San Clemente Dam will likely lead to a significant shift in river morphology and flood response, owing to the restoration of historic bedload transport rates. Los Padres Dam is rapidly infilling with sediment and is also close to active faults. Watershed impairment is the result of incremental, permitted, changes that have a large cumulative impact on the watershed. Closer adherence to the Carmel Valley Master Plan (CVMP, 1996; Appendix C) and County ordinances will foster resource sustainability and aesthetic living conditions. Among the salient points in that document are the following guidelines for development (CVMP, 1996). 1. Preserve the rural character of the Carmel Valley 2. Protect all natural resources with emphasis on biological communities, agricultural lands, the Carmel River and its Riparian corridor, air quality and scenic resources. We note that the large-scale negative impacts we describe in the Carmel Watershed mainly resulted from the cumulative effects of small, insignificant, permitted landscape or hydrologic alterations (e.g., Dunne et al., 2001). With that in mind, guidelines for sustainable resource use could begin with an agreed upon ultimate level of resource use, depletion, or degradation, beyond which, no further landscape or hydrologic alterations will be permitted. Using water supply as an example, the best strategy for sustainability is to determine the total cumulative resource usage, and then stop permitting further requests for resource use when the agreed upon cumulative impact is met—the concept of water rights appropriation. This same “cumulative impact” management strategy could be applied to other cumulative watershed impacts, such as total miles of dirt road per square mile of watershed area, or total area of impervious cover per square mile of watershed area. These strategies can be applied once a cumulative impact target has been established upon sound science, and codified by stakeholder agreement. Considering that the cumulative negative impacts in the watershed are the net result of innumerable, insignificant modifications, we can predict that innumerable, small positive restorative efforts in the watershed would eventually produce large positive impacts on watershed health including water quality and quantity.

Pilot Projects to Increase Colorado River System Water in Lake Powell and Lake Mead

U.S. Bureau of Reclamation (USBR) | January 14th, 2022

From calendar year 2015 through 2018, 64 projects were implemented in the Upper Basin resulting in an estimated 47,280 acre-feet of Colorado River System water conserved

From calendar year 2015 through 2018, 64 projects were implemented in the Upper Basin resulting in an estimated 47,280 acre-feet of Colorado River System water conserved in the Upper Basin at a cost of $8.5 million or $180.23 per acre-foot on average. From January 2015 through December 31, 2019 in the Lower Basin, 16 projects were implemented which will result in 175,347 acre-feet of Colorado River System water in Lake Mead by 2035, at a cost of approximately $29.8 million or $170.14 per acre-foot on average. The Pilot Program successfully demonstrated that voluntary, compensated water conservation projects can conserve water for Colorado River System storage to help mitigate the impacts of drought.

Piru Basin Groundwater Sustainability Plan

Fillmore and Piru Basins Groundwater Sustainability Agency | December 16th, 2021

The Piru Basin (the Basin) is managed (along with the downslope Fillmore Basin) by the Fillmore and Piru Basins Groundwater Sustainability Agency (Agency). The Basin is p

The Piru Basin (the Basin) is managed (along with the downslope Fillmore Basin) by the Fillmore and Piru Basins Groundwater Sustainability Agency (Agency). The Basin is planned to remain sustainable over the Sustainable Groundwater Management Act (SGMA) implementation and sustainability period, based on the current understanding of historical, current (2019), and projected (2022 through 2072) groundwater conditions in relation to the sustainability indicators specified in SGMA. A sustainability indicator refers to any of the effects caused by groundwater conditions occurring throughout the basin that, when significant and unreasonable, cause undesirable results. The Agency, with consideration of feedback from active stakeholder engagement, has identified and planned for the prevention of significant and unreasonable undesirable results.