Forests and Water in the Sierra Nevada: Sierra Nevada Watershed Ecosystem Enhancement Project

University of California, Merced (UC Merced) | November 21st, 2011

In this white paper on the Sierra Nevada Watershed Ecosystem Enhancement Project (SWEEP), we make the case that upstream management of Sierra Nevada forests can significa

In this white paper on the Sierra Nevada Watershed Ecosystem Enhancement Project (SWEEP), we make the case that upstream management of Sierra Nevada forests can significantly increase the value of downstream water resources by shifting water towards higher value uses and optimizing the timing of runoff. The focus of this paper is on the west-side mixed-conifer forests at elevations of about 1500-3600 m (5000-12,000 ft), which are highly productive owing to the availability of sufficient water, predominance of above-freezing temperatures and presence of other conditions necessary for growth.  California has a Mediterranean climate, with wet winters and dry summers. Precipitation falling as rain on Sierra Nevada forests enters the soil and is partitioned between evapotranspiration and runoff. Much of the rainfall leaves the forest as evapotranspiration, owing to ample water storage in the subsurface and temperatures that allow growth year round. At higher elevations, e.g. above elevations of 1800-2100 m depending on both latitude and microclimate, which are dominated by snow rather than rain, the snowpack provides an important seasonal storage of water that, together with subsurface-water storage, provides the water needed for forest growth over the summer and fall. Forest thinning to reduce vegetation and thus evapotranspiration will result in a higher fraction of precipitation, particularly snowmelt, leaving the mountain forest as runoff. Historically, the unique character of Sierra Nevada forests was defined by its tall trees, relatively mild climate and low forest density. In many areas, current forest densities are much higher than historical values. Forest thinning can also influence the timing of snowmelt and runoff. That is, a less-dense canopy can allow snow to reach the ground rather than be held in the canopy; and strategic spacing of forest openings will limit early season sunlight reaching the forest floor and retard snowmelt.  In this paper we review the forest hydrology literature relevant to management of conifer forests in the Sierra snow zone, as that management affects the timing and amount of snowmelt runoff. In order to understand the conceptual and practical challenges, we summarize the key elements of forest energy budget, with specific reference to the Sierra Nevada, and describe several relevant case studies. Although principles that govern the mountain water cycle are well known and models of water and energy balance are informed by field measurements in some areas, there is a severe knowledge gap that limits quantitative predictions of the effects of forest thinning on Sierra Nevada water and energy cycles. Nevertheless, generalizations from reviews of paired catchment studies carried out elsewhere suggest that Sierra Nevada conifer forests contain ecological attributes with a high potential for water-yield gains. Historical studies of forest harvesting in the Sierra Nevada have shown increases of between 14 and 34% in snow accumulation. Treatments that increase snow accumulation help increase water yield during low flows, when water resources’ economic and ecosystem values are highest.  Preliminary estimates based on average climate information suggest that in the Sierra Nevada, treatments that would reduce forest cover by 40% of maximum levels across a watershed could increase water yields by about 9%. Note that this white paper focused on forest management effects on the water balance. Impacts on wildlife habitat, forest health, and fire behavior were not analyzed. The projections and models reported here are designed to describe the potential for modifying water yield and timing. Before implementation of any strategy, a wider consideration of the consequences on forest structure and function would be necessary.  Because of the potential for water-yield increases and extended snow storage, the SWEEP project has developed a plan to evaluate forest thinning related to water yield in representative headwater catchments in the Sierra Nevada, as a basis for extending these treatments to broader areas of the Sierra Nevada. To that end, we outline an experiment that could be carried out in the Onion Creek Experimental Forest, Tahoe National Forest, Placer County, California that could test silvicultural treatments designed to modify the water balance of mixed-conifer, snow-dominated catchments. The treatments are based on a leaf area index (LAI) approach (O’Hara 1998) to forest management, which is well-suited to water yield and timing objectives. Our initial estimates are that treatments could increase water yield as much as 16% and extend snow storage, i.e. delay snowmelt, by days to weeks. 

Geology of the Northern Sacramento Valley, California

California Department of Water Resources (DWR) | September 22nd, 2014

This study describes the complex geology of the northern Sacramento Valley, focusing on the Late Cenozoic geologic formations and structures that compose or influence the

This study describes the complex geology of the northern Sacramento Valley, focusing on the Late Cenozoic geologic formations and structures that compose or influence the valley’s fresh groundwater aquifer formations. The California Department of Water Resources (DWR) acquired geologic data from groundwater observation well drilling operations that were conducted in the valley over the last 15 years. Using the observation well drilling data, DWR evaluated and classified the lithology of the subsurface sediments, implemented petrographic sand provenance analyses on lithologic sediment samples, and reviewed associated geophysical logs from each bore hole. In addition, DWR conducted an extensive literature review of published and unpublished data and then integrated the data to produce this geologic report, map, and cross sections that describe the geology of the northern Sacramento Valley. Results from the lithologic logging, petrographic analyses, and data review show that the heterogeneous sediments of the northern Sacramento Valley’s most productive groundwater-bearing geologic formations, the Tehama Formation and the Tuscan Formation, intermix in the subsurface in various areas near the center of the valley. The results also show that toward the westward and eastward extents of the valley, the sediments of the formations become more unified in composition due to the proximity of their respective sediment source areas. However, because of the depositional environment of the geologic formations, sediment sizes within the formations can be discontinuous and intermittent in places, resulting in variable groundwater aquifer zones within the geologic formations. Additional data are needed to further define the northern Sacramento Valley aquifer system. Drilling and installing groundwater observation wells in areas of little or no data can provide the information needed to determine the extent and variability of the valley’s groundwater aquifers. Groundwater level data supplied by the observation wells can provide valuable information for monitoring aquifer conditions, for determining the change in groundwater levels over time, and for assessing the ability of groundwater to move through the geologic aquifer sediments. In addition, a textural analysis of formational sediments using lithologic cuttings and/or driller’s well logs could be performed to better identify aquifer production zones. In summary, the geology of the northern Sacramento Valley is diverse and has a widely varied historical sequence of earth-shaping events. It includes periods of time when much of the area was below sea level, multiple and distinct periods of volcanic activity, several periods of mountain building, and intermingled periods of massive erosion and deposition. Analyses of the data illustrate the heterogeneity of the groundwater-bearing geologic formations in the subsurface, and the intermixing of formational sediments toward the center of the northern Sacramento Valley, resulting in a region with great geologic and hydrogeologic complexity.

Gold Extraction Processes

Scientific American | October 31st, 1896

FROM very early times the ancients were attracted the beautiful color, the brilliant luster and the indestructibility of gold, and spared no pains in the endeavor to acqu

FROM very early times the ancients were attracted the beautiful color, the brilliant luster and the indestructibility of gold, and spared no pains in the endeavor to acquire it. In the code of Menes, who reigned in Egypt some 2,000 years before the time of Moses, the ratio of value between gold and silver is mentioned, one part of gold being declared equal in value to two and a half parts of silver, and it is, therefore, clear that the extraction of both metals from the deposits containing them must have been carried on before that time. It is indeed probable that gold was the first metal observed and collected, since it occurs in fragments of all sizes in loose sand, and the operations of collecting the larger pieces and melting them together are so simple. Among the rock carvings of Upper Egypt there are several illustrative of the art of washing auriferous sands by stirring and working them up by the hand in hollowed-out stone basins, and subsequently melting the gold in simple furnaces with the aid of mouth blowpipes. The earliest of these carvings is supposed to date back to about 2,500 B.C. However, in ancient times, gold appears to have been mainly derived from India, and that country continued to supply most of the gold used in Europe until the discovery of America by Columbus.

Hydrologic Modeling Goals and Objectives for Yolo County

Water Resources Association of Yolo County, California Department of Water Resources (DWR) | May 16th, 2002

The Water Resources Association of Yolo County (WRA) has entered into a Memorandum of Understanding (MOU) with the California Department of Water Resources (DWR) to coo

The Water Resources Association of Yolo County (WRA) has entered into a Memorandum of Understanding (MOU) with the California Department of Water Resources (DWR) to cooperatively investigate conjunctive use opportunities in Yolo County. As part of the MOU, DWR is assisting the WRA to develop goals and objectives for a combined groundwater and surface water model of Yolo County, including a modeling strategy. As DWR’s contractor, WRIME, Inc., in collaboration with the DWR, WRA, and other consultants with modeling experience/knowledge about Yolo County, conducted the modeling assessment study.

Importance of subsurface water for hydrological response during storms in a post-wildfire bedrock landscape

Nature Portfolio (Springer Nature) | June 29th, 2023

Improving the Health of California’s Headwater Forests

Public Policy Institute of California (PPIC) | September 18th, 2017

California’s headwater forests are not thriving under current management practices, and changes are needed to make them more resilient to periodic drought and long-term

California’s headwater forests are not thriving under current management practices, and changes are needed to make them more resilient to periodic drought and long-term climate change. More active management of these lands is needed to improve forest health, reduce the risk of major wildfires and pest infestations, and maintain the flow of benefits provided by this critical natural infrastructure. Decades of fire suppression, an emphasis on short-term management priorities, weather extremes, and a warming climate have set the stage for the decline in forest resilience. Two-thirds of the state’s surface water supply originates in these mountainous forests. California stands to lose timber production, wildlife habitat, recreational opportunities, and water supply if this vital natural infrastructure continues to decline. Management options exist—prescribed fire, managed wildfire, mechanical thinning, and forest pest treatments—that can help rebuild resilience in these forests and prepare them for a challenging future.

Instream Flow Studies for the Protection of Public Trust Resources: A Prioritized Schedule and Estimate of Costs

California State Water Resources Control Board (SWRCB) | February 18th, 2011

Chapter 5 of the 2009-10 Seventh Extraordinary Session (SB X7 1, Simitian) directs the State Water Resources Control Board (State Water Board) to submit to the Legislatur

Chapter 5 of the 2009-10 Seventh Extraordinary Session (SB X7 1, Simitian) directs the State Water Resources Control Board (State Water Board) to submit to the Legislature, by December 31, 2010, a prioritized schedule and estimate of costs to complete instream flow studies for two categories of rivers and streams, by two specific deadlines: 1) high priority rivers and streams in the Delta watershed that were not covered in the Board’s “Final Report on Development of Flow Criteria for the Sacramento-San Joaquin Delta Ecosystem” by 2012; and 2) all major rivers and streams outside the Sacramento River watershed by 2018. The definition of the two stream categories is ambiguous. There are a number of tributaries that are both in the Delta watershed and outside the Sacramento River watershed, including the San Joaquin, Calaveras, Cosumnes, and Mokelumne Rivers. The State Water Board interprets the first category to mean all Delta and Sacramento River tributaries not covered under the Board’s “Final Report on Development of Flow Criteria for the Sacramento-San Joaquin Delta Ecosystem.” Two additional schedules are prioritized for “all major rivers and streams outside the Sacramento River watershed.” This report identifies 138 rivers and streams for instream flow studies. The total estimated cost to conduct scientific instream flow studies for the high priority rivers and streams tributary to the Delta is $32.46 million. The total estimated cost to conduct scientific instream flow studies for the high priority rivers and streams outside the Delta watershed is $107.25 million. The detailed schedules and costs are preceded with a few short discussions on the timelines given in the directive, the organization of schedules, the cost estimates for instream flow studies, and cost estimates for the next logical step: setting instream flow objectives.

Inter-Basin Transfers Extend the Benefits of Water From Forests to Population Centers Across the Conterminous U.S.

American Geophysical Union (AGU) | May 12th, 2022

Clean water from forests is commonly used to supply drinking water to communities both within and outside basin boundaries through inter-basin transfers (IBTs). Here, we

Clean water from forests is commonly used to supply drinking water to communities both within and outside basin boundaries through inter-basin transfers (IBTs). Here, we modified the Water Supply Stress Index (WaSSI) model to provide estimates of mean water yield and the proportion of mean flow originating on forested lands at the 12-Digit Hydrologic Unit Code scale across the conterminous United States (CONUS). We accounted for the benefits of forests for drinking water supply and receiving populations through IBTs by incorporating a new IBT database, surface intake location information for public drinking water systems, and modeled water yield from forests. We compiled the new database of 594 IBTs ranging from 0.01 million m3 yr−1 to 8,900 million m3 yr−1, for a total transferred volume of 116,894 million m3 yr−1. According to our results, forested lands comprised 28.7% of the total land area across CONUS, but contributed 46% of the total surface water yield. Approximately 125.5 million people derived more than 10% of their surface drinking water supply from forested lands, and 83.1 million people received more than 50% of their surface drinking water supply from forested lands. Of those 83.1 million people receiving more than 50% of their surface drinking water supply from forested lands, 19.4 million people obtained some (≥0.01%) of that water through IBTs. We conclude that accounting for IBTs is critical to accurately assess the contribution of forested watersheds for surface drinking water supply. Hydrologic models for assessment and decision making must include IBTs to fully account for the effects of climate change and human population dynamics on water resource availability at watershed to regional scales. Results from this study can aid water resource and forest managers in developing integrated watershed management plans at a time when climate change, population growth, and land use change threaten water supplies.

Los Angeles Department of Water & Power response to Mono Lake Committee Request for a Drought Emergency Regulation

California State Water Resources Control Board (SWRCB) | January 11th, 2023

Management of the Colorado River: Water Allocations, Drought, and the Federal Role

Congressional Research Service (CRS) | September 7th, 2022