Shop – California Water Library

Page

Showing
171-181 of 223

Per Page

Sort By

Simulated Effects of Future Water Availability and Protected Species Habitat in a Perennial Wetland, Santa Barbara County, California

Water (MDPI) | April 21st, 2025

Summary

This study evaluates the potential water availability in Barka Slough and the effects of changing hydrological conditions on the aquatic habitat of five protected species

This study evaluates the potential water availability in Barka Slough and the effects of changing hydrological conditions on the aquatic habitat of five protected species.

View Document Download Now Email

Small Populations in Jeopardy: A Delta Smelt Case Study

Social Science Research Network (SSRN) | February 21st, 2021

Summary

Under §7 of the federal Endangered Species Act, federal agencies must ensure that actions they authorize, fund, or carry out are “not likely to jeopardize the continue

Under §7 of the federal Endangered Species Act, federal agencies must ensure that actions they authorize, fund, or carry out are “not likely to jeopardize the continued existence of any endangered species or threatened species or result in the destruction or adverse modification of habitat of such species.” For species with low and declining populations, applying this standard is legally and scientifically difficult. The U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (FWS) faced this problem in its recent biological opinion (BiOp) analyzing impacts to threatened Delta smelt from water project operations in the California Delta. FWS concluded the “species’ recent abundance trends strongly suggest it is in the midst of demographic collapse,” and most recent surveys to locate smelt have failed to find them. Nevertheless, FWS approved agency actions that will likely increase extinction risk for Delta smelt. This Comment illustrates, through a case study of the Delta smelt BiOp, the difficulties in making ESA jeopardy determinations for species on the brink of extinction. We conclude that the myriad challenges inherent in conservation of some small and declining populations make reasoned §7 analysis difficult, bordering on impossible.

View Document Download Now Email

South-Central California Coast Steelhead Recovery Plan

National Marine Fisheries Service (NMFS) | December 19th, 2013

Summary

The goal of this Recovery Plan is to prevent the extinction of South-Central California Coast steelhead (Oncorhynchus mykiss) in the wild and to ensure the long-term pers

The goal of this Recovery Plan is to prevent the extinction of South-Central California Coast steelhead (Oncorhynchus mykiss) in the wild and to ensure the long-term persistence of viable, self-sustaining, populations of steelhead distributed across the South-Central California Coast Steelhead (SCCCS) Distinct Population Segment (DPS). It is also the goal of this Recovery Plan to ensure a sustainable South-Central California steelhead sport fishery through the restoration of a suite of viable steelhead populations across the SCCCS DPS. Recovery of the SCCCS DPS will require the protection, restoration, and maintenance of a range of habitats throughout the DPS in order to allow the natural diversity of O. mykiss to be fully expressed (e.g., anadromous and resident forms, timing and frequency of runs, and dispersal between watersheds).

View Document Download Now Email

State of the Salmonids: Status of California’s Emblematic Fishes 2017

University of California, Davis (UC Davis) | August 1st, 2017

Summary

California has, or had, 32 distinct kinds of salmonid fishes. They are either endemic to California or at the southern end of their ranges. Most are in serious decline:

California has, or had, 32 distinct kinds of salmonid fishes. They are either endemic to California or at the southern end of their ranges. Most are in serious decline: 45% and 74% of all salmonids will likely become extirpated from California in the next 50 and 100 years, respectively, if present trends continue. Our results suggest that California will lose more than half (52%) of its native anadromous salmonids and nearly a third (30%) of its inland taxa in just 50 years under current conditions. Climate change is a major overarching threat driving population declines throughout California and strongly affects the status of 84% of all salmonids reviewed. In addition, dams, agricultural operations, estuary alteration, non-native species, production hatcheries, and myriad other human-induced threats have contributed to declines. 81% of salmonids in California are now worse off than they were in 2007, when the previous version of this report was prepared. The changes in species status are the result of the 2012-2016 historic drought, improved data collection and review, and an improved understanding of climate change impacts. Returning these iconic species to sustainable levels requires access to productive and diverse habitats which promote the full range of life history diversity necessary to weather change. We recommend (i) protecting and investing in fully functioning watersheds such as the Smith River and Blue Creek, (ii) protecting and restoring source waters such as Sierra meadow systems, groundwater, and springs so that the impacts of climate change are reduced, (iii) restoring function and access to once productive and diverse habitats such as Central Valley floodplains, coastal lagoons, and estuaries, (iv) adopting reconciliation ecology as a basis for management in human dominated landscapes, (v) improving habitat connectivity and passage to historical spawning and rearing habitat, and (vi) improving salmonid genetic management throughout California.

View Document Download Now Email

Status Review of California coho salmon north of San Francisco

California Department of Fish and Wildlife (CDFW) | May 9th, 2002

Summary

On July 28, 2000, the Fish and Game Commission (Commission) received a petition to list coho salmon north of San Francisco as an endangered species under provisions of th

On July 28, 2000, the Fish and Game Commission (Commission) received a petition to list coho salmon north of San Francisco as an endangered species under provisions of the California Endangered Species Act (CESA). The Commission referred the petition to the Department of Fish and Game (Department) on August 7, 2000, for evaluation. The Department found that the information in the petition was sufficient to indicate the action may be warranted and recommended the Commission accept the petition. The petition was accepted by the Commission on April 5, 2001. On April 27, 2001 the Commission published a Notice of Findings in the California Regulatory Notice Register declaring coho salmon a candidate species, thereby starting the candidacy period. The Department solicited information and undertook a status review of the species using the best scientific information available. This report contains the results of the Department’s status review and recommendations to the Commission. The Department evaluated the status separately for the two coho salmon Evolutionarily Significant Units (ESU) that occur in California: Southern Oregon/Northern California Coast Coho ESU (SONCC Coho ESU - those populations from Punta Gorda north to the Oregon border) and the Central California Coast Coho ESU (CCC Coho ESU - those populations from San Francisco Bay north to Punta Gorda). This approach is consistent with previous listings, the federal approach to species’ evaluation, and the generally accepted biological criterion that a species is “a group of interbreeding organisms that is reproductively isolated from other such groups.”

View Document Download Now Email

Steelhead Restoration and Management Plan for California

California Department of Fish and Wildlife (CDFW) | February 1st, 1996

Summary

This document will serve as the blueprint for the Department's efforts to restore this prized, and oftentimes overlooked, resource. Restoration of California's anadrom

This document will serve as the blueprint for the Department's efforts to restore this prized, and oftentimes overlooked, resource. Restoration of California's anadromous fish populations is mandated by The Salmon, Steelhead Trout, and Anadromous Fisheries Program Act of 1988 (SB 2261) which states that it is a policy of the State to significantly increase the natural production of salmon and steelhead by the end of the century. SB 2261 directs the Department to develop a program that strives to double naturally spawning anadromous fish populations by the year 2000. Steelhead management is often included in, and sometimes lost within, management of the more economically important Pacific salmon. Recognizing this, several legislators along with prominent angling organizations urged the Department to incorporate a Statewide Steelhead Restoration Plan into the initial elements of the SB 2261 program. Thus, the development of the Steelhead Restoration and Management Plan for California (Steelhead Plan) has been an important feature of the SB 2261 program since its inception in 1988. Various organizations, principally California Trout, Inc. and Trout Unlimited, remain committed to assisting the Department in its efforts to recover steelhead populations and eagerly await the publication of the Steelhead Plan so that implementation of the identified restoration measures can begin. Many other angling and conservation organizations are committed to the Steelhead Plan and have corresponded with the Department during its development. Governor Pete Wilson pointed out in his Water Policy Statement of April, 1992, the urgent need for a long-term, comprehensive water policy that includes safe, reliable water supplies for cities and farms and sufficient water to restore fish and wildlife resources. The goals and recommendations set forth in the Steelhead Plan are consistent with this latter aspect of the Governor's Water Policy. Because steelhead are present within the range of all other anadromous salmonid species in California, and because they use a greater portion of a particular river system than do other anadromous fish, restoration of steelhead habitat will have a salutary effect on many other anadromous fish species as well. The Steelhead Plan is one in a series of documents developed by the Department to address the mandated doubling policy stated above. Restoring Central Valley Streams, A Plan for Action was published in 1993 and presents a multi-species approach to restoration of anadromous fish populations in the Central Valley. The Steelhead Plan dovetails with, and is an integral component of, this Action Plan. The Steelhead Plan identifies the life history requirements and needs of an important element of Central Valley anadromous fish ecosystems.

View Document Download Now Email

Strontium isotopes reveal ephemeral streams used for spawning and rearing by an imperiled potamodromous cyprinid Clear Lake hitch Lavinia exilicauda chi

Marine and Freshwater Research (CSIRO Publishing) | April 18th, 2019

Summary

Identification of habitats responsible for the successful production and recruitment of rare migratory species is a challenge in conservation biology. Here, a tool was d

Identification of habitats responsible for the successful production and recruitment of rare migratory species is a challenge in conservation biology. Here, a tool was developed to assess life stage linkages for the threatened potamodromous cyprinid Clear Lake hitch Lavinia exilicauda chi. Clear Lake hitch undertake migrations from Clear Lake (Lake County, CA, USA) into ephemeral tributary streams for spawning. An aqueous isoscape of strontium isotopic ratios (87Sr/86Sr) was constructed for Clear Lake and its watershed to trace natal origins and migration histories of adult recruits. Aqueous 87Sr/86Sr differentiated Clear Lake from 8 of 10 key tributaries and clustered into 5 strontium isotope groups (SIGs) with 100% classification success. Otolith 87Sr/86Sr showed all five groups contributed variably to the population. The age at which juveniles migrated from natal streams to Clear Lake ranged from 11 to 152 days (means.d.,4334 days) and was positively associated with the permanency of natal habitat. This information can be used by resource managers to develop conservation actions for Clear Lake hitch. This study demonstrates the utility of strontium isotopes in otoliths as a tool to identify important freshwater habitats occupied over the lifespan of an individual that would otherwise be challenging or impossible to trace with other methods.

View Document Download Now Email

Summary & Evaluation of California Coastal Chinook Salmon and Northern California Steelhead 2016

National Marine Fisheries Service (NMFS) | April 11th, 2016

Summary

Many West Coast salmon and steelhead (Oncorhynchus sp.) stocks have declined substantially from their historic numbers and now are at a fraction of their historical abund

Many West Coast salmon and steelhead (Oncorhynchus sp.) stocks have declined substantially from their historic numbers and now are at a fraction of their historical abundance. There are several factors that contribute to these declines, including: overfishing, loss of freshwater and estuarine habitat, hydropower development, poor ocean conditions, and hatchery practices. These factors, among others, led to the National Marine Fisheries Service‘s (NMFS) listing of 28 salmon and steelhead stocks in California, Idaho, Oregon, and Washington under the Federal Endangered Species Act (ESA). The ESA, under section 4(c)(2), directs the Secretary of Commerce to review the listing classification of threatened and endangered species at least once every five years. After completing this review, the Secretary must determine if any species should be: (1) removed from the list; (2) have its status changed from threatened to endangered; or (3) have its status changed from endangered to threatened. NMFS completed a 5-year status review in 2011 and concluded the status for threatened California Coastal (CC) Chinook salmon and Northern California (NC) steelhead should remain as threatened (NMFS 2011a, NMFS 2011b). This document summarizes NMFS’s current 5-year review for the threatened CC Chinook salmon and NC steelhead.

View Document Download Now Email

Summary & Evaluation of Central California Coast Coho Salmon 2016

National Marine Fisheries Service (NMFS) | April 14th, 2016

Summary

Many West Coast salmon and steelhead (Oncorhynchus sp.) stocks have declined substantially from their historic numbers and now are at a fraction of their historical abund

Many West Coast salmon and steelhead (Oncorhynchus sp.) stocks have declined substantially from their historic numbers and now are at a fraction of their historical abundance. There are several factors that contribute to these declines, including: overfishing, loss of freshwater and estuarine habitat, hydropower development, poor ocean conditions, and hatchery practices. These factors collectively led to the National Marine Fisheries Service‘s (NMFS) listing of 28 salmon and steelhead stocks in California, Idaho, Oregon, and Washington under the Federal Endangered Species Act (ESA). The ESA, under section 4(c)(2), directs the Secretary of Commerce to review the listing classification of threatened and endangered species at least once every five years. After completing this review, the Secretary must determine if any species should be: (1) removed from the list; (2) have its status changed from threatened to endangered; or (3) have its status changed from endangered to threatened. The most recent listing determinations for most salmon and steelhead occurred in 2011. NMFS completed a 5-year status review in 2011 and concluded the status for endangered Central California Coast (CCC) coho salmon should remain the same. This document summarizes NMFS’s current 5-year review for the endangered CCC coho salmon.

View Document Download Now Email

Summary & Evaluation of Central California Coast Steelhead 2016

National Marine Fisheries Service (NMFS) | April 12th, 2016

Summary

Many West Coast salmon and steelhead (Oncorhynchus sp.) stocks have declined substantially from their historic numbers and now are at a fraction of their historical abund

Many West Coast salmon and steelhead (Oncorhynchus sp.) stocks have declined substantially from their historic numbers and now are at a fraction of their historical abundance. There are several factors that contribute to these declines, including: overfishing, loss of freshwater and estuarine habitat, hydropower development, poor ocean conditions, and hatchery practices. These factors collectively led to the National Marine Fisheries Service‘s (NMFS) listing of 28 salmon and steelhead stocks in California, Idaho, Oregon, and Washington under the Federal Endangered Species Act (ESA). The ESA, under section 4(c)(2), directs the Secretary of Commerce to review the listing classification of threatened and endangered species at least once every five years. After completing this review, the Secretary must determine if any species should be: (1) removed from the list; (2) have its status changed from threatened to endangered; or (3) have its status changed from endangered to threatened. The most recent listing determinations for most salmon and steelhead occurred in 2011. NMFS completed a 5-year status review in 2011 and concluded the status for threatened Central California Coast (CCC) steelhead should remain the same. This document summarizes NMFS’s current 5-year review for the threatened CCC steelhead.

View Document Download Now Email

← Prev

Page : 18

Type

Biological Opinion (41)
Book/Textbook (2)
Case study (1)
Conference proceedings (3)
Environmental Documents (26)
Fact sheet (1)
Guidance Document (1)
Handbook/Guide (2)
Issue Paper (1)
Journal Article (24)
Legal document (6)
Letter (3)
magazine (9)
Memo (1)
Model (14)
NGO Position Paper (2)
Plan (17)
Policy (8)
Policy Brief (2)
Report (85)
Research Article (5)
Research Brief (1)
Science Panel Report (10)
Strategy (4)
Technical Report (10)
Water Right Decision (1)
White Paper (1)

Topic

Adaptive Management (34)
Agriculture (8)
Basic Information (1)
California Water Fix/BDCP/Delta Conveyance (9)
Climate Change (8)
Drought & Hydrology (4)
Ecosystem & Species Management (193)
Ecosystem Restoration (26)
Environmental Justice (2)
Estuary News (9)
Federal Water Quality (2)
Fisheries (145)
Flood Management (14)
Geochemistry (2)
Geohydrology (7)
Geohydrology (1)
Groundwater (9)
Infrastructure (3)
Integrated Regional Water Management (2)
Invasive Species (2)
Levees (2)
Modeling (16)
Planning & Management (23)
Policy (8)
Pollutants (2)
Sacramento-San Joaquin Delta (133)
Salinity (13)
Science Management (10)
State Water Quality (1)
Storage (1)
Stormwater (1)
Transfers & Markets (1)
Tribal Water Issues (10)
Upper Watershed Management (8)
Water & Energy (3)
Water Project Operations (84)
Water Quality (59)
Water Quality Monitoring (3)
Water Rights, Water Law (8)
Water Supply (8)
Wetland Mitigation (5)

Keywords

adaptive management (13)
adjudicated basins (1)
agricultural drainage (3)
agriculture (3)
agriculture wa (1)
agriculture water use and efficiency (1)
allocations (1)
anadromous fish (105)
basic information (1)
basin characterization (2)
biological opinion (BiOp) (23)
Central Valley (6)
Central Valley Project (CVP) (62)
climate change (5)
Colorado River (1)
dam removal (3)
Delta conveyance (3)
drought (5)
economic analysis (1)
ecosystem management (103)
ecosystem restoration (11)
endangered species (223)
Estuary News (9)
fisheries (127)
flood management (9)
floodplain restoration (9)
flows (20)
Great Basin Aquifer (1)
groundwater dependent ecosystems (1)
Groundwater Exchange (8)
groundwater pumping impacts (5)
groundwater-surface water interaction (4)
habitat restoration (12)
history (1)
infrastructure (1)
invasive species (1)
land use (1)
levees (5)
mitigation (3)
modeling (11)
monitoring (25)
native fish (136)
outreach and engagement (1)
pesticides (4)
planning and management (16)
pollutants (2)
public trust doctrine (1)
risk assessment (1)
Sacramento–San Joaquin Delta (137)
salinity (12)
science management (11)
sea level rise (1)
snowpack (1)
State Water Project (SWP) (58)
storage (1)
stormwater (6)
streams (2)
transboundary aquifers (1)
tribal water issues (12)
upper watershed management (5)
water management - see planning and management (1)
water markets (1)
water project operations (88)
water quality (44)
water rights (9)
water supply (3)
water transfers (1)
wetlands (6)

Publisher

American Association for the Advancement of Science (AAAS) (1)
American Chemical Society (ACS) (1)
American Fisheries Society (AFS) (4)
American Geophysical Union (AGU) (1)
Bay Institute (4)
Bureau of Land Management (BLM) (1)
CALFED (1)
California Department of Fish and Wildlife (CDFW) (15)
California Department of Water Resources (DWR) (19)
California Energy Commission (CEC) (1)
California Natural Resources Agency (CNRA) (1)
California State Water Resources Control Board (SWRCB) (3)
Canada Department of Fisheries and Oceans (DFO) (1)
Congressional Research Service (CRS) (7)
County of Ventura (1)
Delta Stewardship Council (Delta Council) (31)
Ecological Modelling (Elsevier) (1)
Ecological Society of America (Wiley) (2)
Environmental Forensics (Taylor & Francis) (1)
Federal Register (1)
Interagency Ecological Program (IEP) (1)
Legislative Analyst's Office (LAO) (1)
Marine and Freshwater Research (CSIRO Publishing) (1)
Metropolitan Water District of Southern California (MWD) (1)
Mount Shasta Bioregional Ecology Center (1)
National Academy of Sciences (NAS) (6)
National Marine Fisheries Service (NMFS) (27)
National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) (1)
Nature Conservancy (1)
Nature Portfolio (Springer Nature) (1)
Pacific Fishery Management Council (5)
PLOS (2)
Public Policy Institute of California (PPIC) (5)
Sacramento Regional County Sanitation District (RegionalSan) (1)
San Francisco Baykeeper (1)
San Francisco Estuary Institute (SFEI) (3)
San Francisco Estuary Partnership (SFEP) (8)
San Joaquin River Restoration Program (1)
Scott River Water Trust (1)
Siskiyou Farm Bureau (1)
Social Science Research Network (SSRN) (1)
Supreme Court Economic Review (1)
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (USACE) (1)
U.S. Bureau of Reclamation (USBR) (13)
U.S. Department of the Interior (DOI) (2)
U.S. District Court, Northern District of California (1)
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) (1)
U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (FWS) (8)
U.S. Geological Survey (USGS) (12)
United States District Court, Central District of California (1)
United States District Court, Eastern District of California (1)
University of California, Davis (UC Davis) (9)
Water (MDPI) (2)
Winnemem Wintu (1)

Basin

Bristol Valley 7-008 (1)
Cadiz Valley 7-007 (1)
Clear Lake Cache Formation 5-066 (1)
Death Valley 6-018 (2)
Fenner Valley 7-002 (1)
Klamath River Valley - Lower Klamath 1-002.02 (3)
Klamath River Valley - Tulelake 1-002.01 (3)
Middle Amargosa Valley - 6-020 (3)
San Antonio Creek Valley 3-014 (1)
San Fernando Valley 4-012 (1)
San Gabriel Valley 4-013 (1)
San Luis Rey Valley - Lower San Luis Rey Valley 9-007.02 (1)
Upper Santa Ana Valley - Chino 8-002.01 (1)
Upper Santa Ana Valley - Cucamonga (8-002.02) (1)
Upper Santa Ana Valley - Cucamonga 8-002.02 (1)
Upper Santa Ana Valley - Rialto-Colton 8-002.04 (1)
Upper Santa Ana Valley - Riverside-Arlington 8-002.03 (1)
Upper Santa Ana Valley - San Bernardino 8-002.06 (1)
Upper Santa Ana Valley - San Timoteo 8-002.08 (1)
Upper Santa Ana Valley - Temescal 8-002.09 (1)
Upper Santa Ana Valley - Yucaipa 8-002.07 (1)

Hydrological Region

Central Coast (11)
Colorado River (3)
Lower Basin States and Mexico - Colorado River (2)
National (2)
North Coast (26)
North Lahontan (3)
Sacramento River (147)
San Francisco Bay (123)
San Joaquin River (132)
South Coast (10)
South Lahontan (5)
Tulare Lake (4)
Upper Basin States - Colorado River (1)

Reset

Search for:

CONTACT