Geology of the fresh ground‐water basin, Central Valley, California, with texture maps and sections

U.S. Geological Survey (USGS) | July 17th, 1986

The Central Valley of California, which is about 400 miles long and averages about 50 miles wide, comprises about 20,000 square miles. Geologically, the valley is

The Central Valley of California, which is about 400 miles long and averages about 50 miles wide, comprises about 20,000 square miles. Geologically, the valley is a large asymmetric trough that is bounded by granitic, metamorphic, and marine sedimentary rocks of pre-Tertiary age. The trough has been filled with as much as 6 vertical miles of sediment in the San Joaquin Valley and as much as 10 vertical miles of sediment in the Sacramento Valley; these sedi- ments range in age from Jurassic to Holocene. Some volcanic rocks and deposits crop out in the valley, but of those only the Tuscan Formation in the northeastern part of the Sacramento Valley is of major importance to the fresh ground-water basin. Post-Eocene continental rocks and deposits contain most of the fresh water in the Central Valley; they crop out virtually over the whole valley and in most places overlie or contain saline water at depth. Continental rocks and deposits of Tertiary age include the Mehrten Formation. The Mehrten is of great importance to the fresh ground-water basin of the Central Valley and yields large quantities of water to wells. Although continental rocks and deposits of Tertiary and Quaternary age compose a number of formations and informal deposits, in total they constitute the major aquifer of the Central Valley. In most places, similarity in sediment type between the continental deposits and some underlying rocks and deposits and even between separate units of continental rocks and deposits makes mapping of subsurface geologic contacts difficult if not practically im- possible. In this respect, a unit that can be mapped on the surface is difficult to delineate in the subsurface, and, although such a unit can be called an aquifer, it merges with similar units in the subsurface to form a major, widespread aquifer. Continental rocks and deposits of Tertiary and Quaternary age include (1) the Kern River Formation; (2) the Laguna Formation; (3) the Tulare Formation; (4) the Tehama Formation; and (5) a number of younger formations, as well as some informally named deposits. These deposits and formations also include lacustrine and marsh deposits, which are much thicker and more extensive in the San Joaquin Valley than in the Sacramento Valley. These continental rocks and deposits generally crop out as wide belts along the flanks of the Central Valley and range in thickness from 0 foot along the flanks to about 15,000 feet in the extreme southern part. In general, the rocks and deposits consist of a heterogeneous mixture of generally poorly sorted clay, silt, sand, and gravel; in some places they consist of more consolidated sediments, such as mudstone and sandstone. Yields to wells from these rocks and deposits, except the lacustrine and marsh deposits, range from about 20 gallons per minute to 4,500 gallons per minute. Lacustrine and marsh deposits crop out in the San Joaquin Valley but not in the Sacramento Valley. Beneath Tulare Lake bed in the San Joaquin Valley, the lacustrine and marsh deposits, which constitute a thick plug of clay and silt from which lenses of clay and silt emanate at irregular intervals, are in places more than 3,600 feet thick. The lens mapped as the E Clay in the San Joaquin Valley is the most extensive lacustrine clay in the entire Central Valley and includes the Corcoran Clay Member of the Tulare Formation. More recent mapping has shown that the E Clay in the extreme southern part of the valley is shallower than previous reports had indicated; therefore, in this report the clay is referred to as the modified E Clay. Perhaps the expansion of lakes and the resulting deposition of extensive clays in the San Joaquin Valley occurred principally because of a large downwarping basin beneath an area known as Tulare Lake bed, and perhaps a similar expansion and deposition did not occur in the Sacramento Valley because a similar downwarping basin probably had not developed there. Continental deposits of Quaternary age crop out chiefly along the major rivers and streams of the valley as well as other low-lying areas; the deposits include river deposits, flood-basin deposits, and sand dunes. River deposits, including channel and flood-plain depos- its, are considered to be the most permeable deposits in the valley; in general, they are not tapped by wells. Flood-basin deposits consist largely of fine-grained beds that restrict the vertical movement of water. Sand dunes are not considered important aquifers because they generally lie above the water table. The large, asymmetrical, northwestward-trending structural trough of the Central Valley is the principal structure controlling the occurrence and movement of ground water in the area. Because the flanks of the valley are higher than its axis, recharge from tributary rivers and streams has caused heads in the ground water along the flanks to be higher than those along the axis. Therefore, the overall ground-water movement in the Central Valley is from the flanks toward the axis and from there toward the delta area. Secondary structures in the valley, such as arches and faults, also influence the occurrence and movement of ground water. As it is used in this report, "texture" means the proportion of coarse-grained to fine-grained sediment in sedimentary rocks and deposits. In the Central Valley, most of the deposits for which data are available generally contain no more than 40 to 60 percent of coarse-grained sediment, where coarse-grained sediment includes clayey and silty sand and gravel. Texture columns, maps, and sections, in depth intervals of 300 feet, show that the alluvial deposits of the Central Valley are a heterogeneous mixture whose character ranges over short distances and depths from chiefly fine-grained to chiefly coarse-grained and vice versa. Nevertheless, some areas are underlain chiefly by fine-grained sediment and others by coarse-grained sediment; sediments of like size in an area indicate that sources and depositional environment probably were similar for long periods of time.

Gone with the flow

Bay Institute | August 1st, 2010

The Bay Institute's primer Gone with the Flow describes in plain language how runoff flowing from the mountain watersheds ringing California’s Central Valley provided c

The Bay Institute's primer Gone with the Flow describes in plain language how runoff flowing from the mountain watersheds ringing California’s Central Valley provided coldwater paradises for salmon returning to their native streams; turned lowland rivers and their floodplains into a rich source of food and shelter for young fish; mingled in the Delta’s complex maze of marshes and sloughs; and created a vast expanse of brackish water habitat essential for estuarine creatures in the upper reaches of San Francisco Bay. The primer also explains how the lack of access to most upland streams now forces migratory fish to cope with undesirable, often lethal flow conditions; how runoff in lowland rivers has been shifted from spring to summer, or even almost completely cut off in the San Joaquin basin, with disastrous consequences for the environment; how reverse flows in Delta channels kill hundreds of millions of aquatic organisms each year; and how the Bay is now in a permanent ecological drought because of the diversion of half its freshwater inflow.

Grassland Groundwater Sustainability Agency Groundwater Sustainability Plan

Grassland Groundwater Sustainability Agency (GGSA) | January 17th, 2020

*Cover gives draft date of December but consulting engineer signature is for 1/17/2020

*Cover gives draft date of December but consulting engineer signature is for 1/17/2020

Grassland Groundwater Sustainability Agency Revised Groundwater Sustainability Plan

Grassland Groundwater Sustainability Agency (GGSA) | July 8th, 2022

This GSP, including the Common Chapter, has been revised (changes are shown in Appendix G) to address items of concern raised by DWR in its initial “Incomplete” Deter

This GSP, including the Common Chapter, has been revised (changes are shown in Appendix G) to address items of concern raised by DWR in its initial “Incomplete” Determination Letter dated January 21, 2022. Every effort was made to ensure that this revised GSP and the revised Common Chapter are consistent. In the event of an inconsistency, the revised Common Chapter controls. The Grassland Plan Area will continue to be sustainable by maintaining the historically balanced groundwater system in order to avoid causing significant and unreasonable undesirable impacts to beneficial users of groundwater as they relate to the six sustainability indicators. The Plan Area participants are committed to continued coordination with neighboring GSP areas and neighboring subbasins in order to aid in the localized and statewide groundwater sustainability goals as defined by each GSP and Subbasin. Due to size, this file has been divided. Part 1, Part 2, Part 3, Part 4, Part 5, Part 6, Part 7

Gravelley Ford Water District Groundwater Sustainability Plan

Gravelly Ford Water District (GFWD) | August 12th, 2019

Gravelly Ford Water District Groundwater Sustainability Plan

Gravelly Ford Water District (GFWD) | March 19th, 2023

In 2022, the Technical representatives for the four GSPs representing the seven GSAs in the Madera Basin started meeting to revise the four GSP Plans to resolve deficienc

In 2022, the Technical representatives for the four GSPs representing the seven GSAs in the Madera Basin started meeting to revise the four GSP Plans to resolve deficiencies identified by the DWR in their review of the four GSP plans as stated in the September 2022 Incomplete determination letter. During the period from September 2022 through March 2023 the group also had meetings with DWR staff to establish direction on the recommendations in the DWR Incomplete letter. This Incomplete letter established a 180-day period to provide a revised GSP to address the deficiencies. The Technical group developed a corrective action plan to address the items identified by DWR staff in the Incomplete letter to address the noted deficiencies. During the last quarter of 2022 and the first quarter of 2023 the four GSPs revised their individual plans to coordinate approaches and methodologies that would provide similar language and approach across the Madera Subbasin, those items being: • Resolve the potential deficiencies identified by DWR in their September 2022 incomplete determination letter, and discussed during five DWR consultation meetings between November 2022 and January 2023; • Summarize the progressive implementation actions taken by the GSAs since submission of the GSP in January 2020; • Recognize the Madera Subbasin GSAs’ clear and formal commitment to fund and implement a Domestic Well Mitigation Program beginning no later than January 1, 2024, including the execution of a memorandum of understanding (MOU); and • Reaffirm their commitment to implementing the GSP and achieving sustainable groundwater conditions by 2040.

Gravelly Ford Water District Groundwater Sustainability Plan

Gravelly Ford Water District (GFWD) | June 28th, 2022

This Plan is for the Gravelly Ford Groundwater Sustainability Area, one of seven components of the Madera Subbasin. It encompasses approximately 8,500 acres; its boundari

This Plan is for the Gravelly Ford Groundwater Sustainability Area, one of seven components of the Madera Subbasin. It encompasses approximately 8,500 acres; its boundaries are coterminous with those of the Gravelly Ford Water District (District). Grape vineyards, nut tree groves, and on-farm rural residences are the only land uses in the Area. The District has from the beginning bee’n a conjunctive use operation with the import of surface water for both recharge and irrigation. The management of this operation has been to utilize the maximum amount of available surface waters prior to using groundwater for the production of crops.

Greater Kaweah Groundwater Sustainability Agency 2022 First Amended Groundwater Susteainability Plan

Greater Kaweah Groundwater Sustainability Agency (GKGSA) | July 20th, 2022

Due to size, this file has been divided. Part 1, Part 2, Part 3, Part 4, Part 5, Part 6, Part 7, Part 8, Part 9, Part 10

Due to size, this file has been divided. Part 1, Part 2, Part 3, Part 4, Part 5, Part 6, Part 7, Part 8, Part 9, Part 10

Ground Water in the Central Valley, California - A Summary Report

U.S. Geological Survey (USGS) | June 1st, 1991

The agricultural productivity of the Central Valley depends on irrigation. Half of the 22 million acre-feet of irrigation water applied annually is ground water. The va

The agricultural productivity of the Central Valley depends on irrigation. Half of the 22 million acre-feet of irrigation water applied annually is ground water. The valley is a long, narrow structural trough filled with about 32,000 feet of sediment in the south and as much as 50,000 feet in the north. Nearly all the fresh ground water is contained in the continental rocks and deposits younger than Eocene age. Streamflow, an important factor in recharging the aquifer system, is influenced by precipitation in the mountains surrounding the valley. The majority of recharge from infiltration of streamflow occurs on the east side of the valley. Ground-water pumpage, which greatly exceeds the natural recharge rate, has dramatically altered the ground-water flow in the Central Valley. During the 1960's and 1970's, the recharge rate was more than five times that of the predevelopment period and was largely derived from percolation of imported surface water or recirculated pumped ground water rather than precipitation and recharge from streams. Prior to development, most ground water was discharged as evapotranspiration; however, in recent years, most discharge has been well pumpage. Computer simulation of the Central Valley aquifer system suggests that the total flow through the system has increased from about 2 million acre-feet per year to nearly 12 million acre-feet per year. The vertical movement of ground water has been artificially enhanced by many of the 100,000 irrigation wells that contain long intervals of perforated casing. When unpumped, these wells permit vertical flow between permeable layers within the aquifer system. The total fresh ground water presently (1986) in storage in the upper 1,000 feet of the aquifer system is about 800 million acre-feet. During the 1960's and 1970's, ground water in storage was depleted at an average rate of 800,000 acre-feet annually. In the San Joaquin Valley from the 1940's to the late 1960's, substantial withdrawals of ground water were accompanied by hundreds of feet of head decline. This head decline caused inelastic compaction of fine-grained beds, resulting in land subsidence that is unequaled anywhere else in the world. More than one-half of the San Joaquin Valley (or about 5,200 square miles) underwent subsidence of more than 1 foot. In one location, subsidence exceeded 29 feet. Within the areas of heavy withdrawals, subsidence is greatest where the aquifer system contains thick sections of montmorillonite clay. Land subsidence created engineering and economic problems, including damage to canals and drainage systems, and loss of irrigation wells caused by casing failure. More recently (since the drought of 1976-77), surface-water imports have increased, ground-water pumpage has decreased, and in places, ground-water levels have recovered. Land subsidence has virtually ceased; however, it could resume with increased pumpage, if water levels decline below previous lows. Ground-water quality in the Central Valley is generally influenced by the water from streams that are a major source of recharge. In general, water on the east side of the valley and from east-side streams contains low concentrations of dissolved solids compared to water on the west side and from west-side streams. Concentrations of dissolved solids in ground water generally are lower in the northern part of the valley than in the southern part. There are, however, localized exceptions in many places through the valley. Local concentrations of boron, chloride, and nitrate in the ground water of the Central Valley are large enough to be a problem either to crops or humans. Human activities have some influence on the concentration and location of water-quality problems in the valley. Significant increases in concentrations of dissolved solids and, specifically, dissolved nitrate indicate that ground-water quality is degrading as a result of increasing application of fertilizer in agricultural areas and the growth of urban population. Pesticides such as dibromochloropropane (DBCP) as well as selenium and other trace elements in agricultural drainage water cause ecological and health problems in the San Joaquin Valley.

Ground-Water Flow in the Central Valley, California

U.S. Geological Survey (USGS) | June 15th, 1989

The agricultural productivity of the Central Valley is dependent on the availability of water from irrigation. About 7.3 million acres of cropland in the Central Valley

The agricultural productivity of the Central Valley is dependent on the availability of water from irrigation. About 7.3 million acres of cropland in the Central Valley receives about 22 million acre-feet of irrigation water annually. One half of this irrigation water is supplied by ground-water, which amounts to about 20 percent of the Nation's ground-water pumpage. Ground water is important as a stable supply of irrigation water because of the high variability of surface-water supplies in the Central Valley. This large ground-water development during the past 100 years has had major impacts on the aquifer system, such as decline in water levels, land subsidence, depletion of the aquifer storage, and increase in recharge. The flow conditions before and during development were simulated on a regional scale using a three-dimensional finite-difference flow model. The Central Valley is a large (20,000-square-mile) structural trough filled with poorly permeable marine sediments that are overlain by coarser continental sediments. In general, previous investigators have conceptualized the northern one-third of the valley the Sacramento Valley as a water-table aquifer and the southern two-thirds the San Joaquin Valley as a two-aquifer system separated by a regional confining clay layer. A somewhat different concept of the aquifer system was suggested during this study by analyses of water-level measurements, texture of sediments interpreted from electric logs, and flow model simulations. Vertical hydraulic head differences are found through out much of the Central Valley. Early in development, flowing wells and marshes were found throughout most of the central part of the valley. More than 50 percent of the thickness of the continental sediments is composed of fine-grained lenticular deposits that are discontinuous but are distributed throughout the stratigraphic section in the entire Central Valley. The concept presented in this report considers the entire thickness of the continental deposits as one aquifer system which has varying vertical leakance that depends on several factors, including amount of fine-grained sediments. The average horizontal hydraulic conductivity is about 6 feet per day, and the average thickness of the continental deposits is about 2,400 feet. Irrigation use, which averaged 22 million acre-feet of water per year during 1961-77, increased evapotranspiration about 9 million acre-feet per year over its predevelopment value. This is a large figure compared with the average annual surface-water inflow to the Central Valley of 31.7 million acre-feet per year. Precipitation on the valley floor is mostly lost to evapotranspiration. The overall post-development recharge and discharge of the aquifer system was about 6 times greater than the predevelopment estimated values. The increases of pumpage associated with development mostly in the San Joaquin Valley have caused water-level declines that exceed 400 feet in places and have resulted in the largest known volume of land subsidence due to fluid withdrawal in the world. Water in aquifer storage declined about 60 million acre-feet from predevelopment to 1977; 40 million acre-feet were derived from the water-table zone, 17 million acre-feet from compaction of sediments, and 3 million acre-feet from elastic storage. During 1961-77, ground water withdrawn from aquifer storage averaged about 800,000 acre-feet per year. The flow model constructed during this study was calibrated principally in accordance with the hydrologic data observed during 1961-75 because little predevelopment data were available for analysis. An explicit algorithm to simulate land subsidence was developed and calibrated. The simulated land subsidence was within 6 percent of the estimated observed volume; however, the time lag associated with this type of subsidence was not adequately simulated. Simulated water level changes averaged 2.6 and 12 feet higher than observed water level changes for the water table and the lower pumped zones, respectively, and the standard deviation of the simulated changes minus the observed change was 22 and 27 feet, respectively. The flow model was tested for the period of 1976-77 drought with good results. The simulations indicated that vertical leakance greatly increased from the predevelopment values as a result of water flowing through some of the more than 100,000 irrigation well casings that are open to different aquifer layers.