Microplastic pollution is widely detected in US municipal wastewater treatment plant effluent

Environmental Pollution (Elsevier) | August 27th, 2016

Municipal wastewater effluent has been proposed as one pathway for microplastics to enter the aquatic environment. Here we present a broad study of municipal wastewater t

Municipal wastewater effluent has been proposed as one pathway for microplastics to enter the aquatic environment. Here we present a broad study of municipal wastewater treatment plant effluent as a pathway for microplastic pollution to enter receiving waters. A total of 90 samples were analyzed from 17 different facilities across the United States. Averaging all facilities and sampling dates, 0.05 ± 0.024 microparticles were found per liter of effluent. Though a small value on a per liter basis, even minor municipal wastewater treatment facilities process millions of liters of wastewater each day, yielding daily discharges that ranged from ∼50,000 up to nearly 15 million particles. Averaging across the 17 facilities tested, our results indicate that wastewater treatment facilities are releasing over 4 million microparticles per facility per day. Fibers and fragments were found to be the most common type of particle within the effluent; however, some fibers may be derived from non-plastic sources. Considerable inter- and intra-facility variation in discharge concentrations, as well as the relative proportions of particle types, was observed. Statistical analysis suggested facilities serving larger populations discharged more particles. Results did not suggest tertiary filtration treatments were an effective means of reducing discharge. Assuming that fragments and pellets found in the effluent arise from the ‘microbeads’ found in many cosmetics and personal care products, it is estimated that between 3 and 23 billion (with an average of 13 billion) of these microplastic particles are being released into US waterways every day via municipal wastewater. This estimate can be used to evaluate the contribution of microbeads to microplastic pollution relative to other sources (e.g., plastic litter and debris) and pathways (e.g., stormwater) of discharge.

Microplastic Strategy Update on behalf of the Regional Monitoring Program (RMP) for Water Quality in San Francisco Bay

San Francisco Estuary Institute (SFEI) | December 2nd, 2019

Based on the detection of microplastics in San Francisco Bay surface water and Bay Area wastewater effluent in 2015, the Regional Monitoring Program for Water Quality in

Based on the detection of microplastics in San Francisco Bay surface water and Bay Area wastewater effluent in 2015, the Regional Monitoring Program for Water Quality in San Francisco Bay (RMP) convened a Microplastic Workgroup (MPWG) in 2016 to discuss the issue, identify management information needs and management questions (MQs), and prioritize studies to provide information to answer these management questions. The MPWG meets annually to review on-going microplastic projects and to conduct strategic long-term planning in response to new information in this rapidly evolving field.

Microplastics from Tire Particles in San Francisco Bay

San Francisco Estuary Institute (SFEI) | March 14th, 2022

Microplastics in Lake Mead National Recreation Area

U.S. Geological Survey (USGS) | October 9th, 2019

  This dataset describes the quantity and morphology of microplastics in water, surficial sediment, sediment core, fish, and shellfish samples from Lake Mead Nation

  This dataset describes the quantity and morphology of microplastics in water, surficial sediment, sediment core, fish, and shellfish samples from Lake Mead National Recreation Area (Nevada/Arizona). Water and surficial sediment samples were collected once at 9 locations. A sediment core (33 cm long) was extracted from Las Vegas Bay to assess changes in microplastic deposition over time. Striped bass (Morone saxatilis), common carp (Cyprinus carpio), quagga mussels (Dreissena bugensis), and Asian clams (Corbicula fluminea) were sampled at a subset of locations to assess biological uptake of microplastics. Sampling and analysis methods are described in the Processing Steps section of the metadata. All samples were collected in March 2017 except the sediment core, which was collected in March 2018.  

Microplastics in Lake Mead National Recreation Area, USA: Occurrence and biological uptake

PLOS | May 4th, 2020

Microplastics are an environmental contaminant of growing concern, but there is a lack of information about microplastic distribution, persistence, availability, and bio

Microplastics are an environmental contaminant of growing concern, but there is a lack of information about microplastic distribution, persistence, availability, and biological uptake in freshwater systems. This is especially true for large river systems like the Colorado River that spans multiple states through mostly rural and agricultural land use. This study characterized the quantity and morphology of microplastics in different environmental compartments in two large reservoirs along the Colorado River: Lakes Mead and Mohave, within Lake Mead National Recreation Area. To assess microplastic occurrence, surface water and surficial sediment were sampled at a total of nine locations. Sampling locations targeted different sub-basins with varying levels of anthropogenic impact. Las Vegas Wash, a tributary which delivers treated wastewater to Lake Mead, was also sampled. A sediment core (33 cm long, representing approximately 19 years) was extracted from Las Vegas Bay to assess changes in microplastic deposition over time. Striped bass (Morone saxatilis), common carp (Cyprinus carpio), quagga mussels (Dreissena bugensis), and Asian clams (Corbicula fluminea) were sampled at a subset of locations to assess biological uptake of microplastics. Microplastic concentrations were 0.44–9.7 particles/cubic meter at the water surface and 87.5–1,010 particles/kilogram dry weight (kg dw) at the sediment surface. Sediment core concentrations were 220–2,040 particles/kg dw, with no clear increasing or decreasing trend over time. Shellfish microplastic concentrations ranged from 2.7–105 particles/organism, and fish concentrations ranged from 0–19 particles/organism. Fibers were the most abundant particle type found in all sample types. Although sample numbers are small, microplastic concentrations appear to be higher in areas of greater anthropogenic impact. Results from this study improve our understanding of the occurrence and biological uptake of microplastics in Lake Mead National Recreation Area, and help fill existing knowledge gaps on microplastics in freshwater environments in the southwestern U.S.

Mid-Kaweah Groundwater Sustainability Agency Groundwater Sustainability Plan

Mid-Kaweah Groundwater Sustainability Agency (MKGSA) | December 18th, 2019

Middle Santa Ana River Watershed TMDL Task Force

Santa Ana Watershed Project Authority (SAWPA) | July 5th, 2018

The Task Force is an 18-agency collaborative effort organized by the Santa Ana Watershed Project Authority. It was formed in January 2006 to coordinate water quality impr

The Task Force is an 18-agency collaborative effort organized by the Santa Ana Watershed Project Authority. It was formed in January 2006 to coordinate water quality improvement activities related to bacteria in the Middle Santa Ana River Watershed. The activities were designed to manage or eliminate sources of bacterial indicators in local waterbodies. The Task Force supports on-going source investigation efforts to identify major sources of bacterial indicators and to understand how to best address them. Task Force resources are allocated on a risk-reduction priority basis in order to achieve compliance where it will provide the greatest improvement in public health.

Minerals of California Bulletin No. 113

State of California | February 15th, 1938

Minimizing the Impact of Cannabis Cultivation on California Lands and Waterways

California State Water Resources Control Board (SWRCB) | February 17th, 2017

Following recent changes in state law and voter-approved initiatives, California’s commercial cultivation of cannabis for recreational and medical use is expected to gr

Following recent changes in state law and voter-approved initiatives, California’s commercial cultivation of cannabis for recreational and medical use is expected to grow significantly. The State Water Resources Control Board has adopted a state cannabis policy to set up strict environmental standards, and a permitting system to protect local surface water from dewatering, protect water habitat and prevent pollution in the state’s rivers and streams. Left unregulated, cannabis cultivation can pose serious threats to water quality and the environment. Cannabis cultivation impacts include the release of fertilizers, pesticides and other supplements that degrade water quality and threaten wildlife. Excessive water diversions can injure fish or even dewater smaller streams. The physical alteration of the land can harm stream habitat and wildlife by the sediment and debris that is deposited in waterways by unregulated cultivation. Overview: The State Water Board’s “Cannabis Cultivation Policy, Principles and Guidelines for Cannabis Cultivation” (Policy) will be implemented through a water quality permit and a water right. The water quality permit is referred to as a Statewide General Order for Cannabis Cultivation Activities (Cannabis General Order). The water right is referred to as a Cannabis Small Irrigation Use Registration. Tiered Approach: The Cannabis General Order consists of a tiered permit structure based on threat to water quality. Tier 1 Cannabis Cultivators have a disturbed area greater than 2,000 square feet and less than 1 acre (43,560 square feet). Tier 2 Cannabis Cultivators have a disturbed area equal to or greater than 1 acre.

Modeling Barriers and Levee-Break Effects on Delta-Wide Salinity

Delta Stewardship Council (Delta Council) | February 18th, 2016