Groundwater Quality in the Shallow Aquifers of the Madera– Chowchilla and Kings Subbasins, San Joaquin Valley, California

U.S. Geological Survey (USGS) | January 8th, 2018

Groundwater Quality in the Shallow Aquifers of the Tulare, Kaweah, and Tule Groundwater Basins and Adjacent Highlands areas, Southern San Joaquin Valley, California

U.S. Geological Survey (USGS) | January 11th, 2017

The Tulare Shallow Aquifer study unit covers approximately 2,320 square miles and consists of the Tulare, Kaweah, and Tule groundwater basins of the southern San Joaquin

The Tulare Shallow Aquifer study unit covers approximately 2,320 square miles and consists of the Tulare, Kaweah, and Tule groundwater basins of the southern San Joaquin Valley and adjacent highlands of the Sierra Nevada (California Department of Water Resources, 2003; Bennett and others, 2017). The freshwater aquifer system in the groundwater basins is composed of Quaternary-age alluvial and fluvial sediments primarily derived from the Sierra Nevada to the east and is divided into upper and lower zones by a clay-rich lacustrine unit, the Corcoran Clay (Faunt, 2009). The highlands have fractured rock aquifers composed primarily of Mesozoic-age granitic rocks. The hydrology of the southern San Joaquin Valley has been extensively altered by human activity, especially by agricultural development (Faunt, 2009). This study examined the quality of groundwater resources used for domestic drinking-water supply. Domestic wells in the study unit typically are drilled to depths of 150 to 500 feet (Bennett and others, 2017), which is shallower than the depths of public-supply wells in the same area (typically 300 to 1,400 feet deep; Burton and others, 2012). Water quality varies with depth in the groundwater system. This study was designed to provide a statistically representative assessment of groundwater resources used for domestic drinking water (Bennett and others, 2017). A total of 96 wells, distributed across the study unit, were sampled between November 2014 and April 2015. Previous groundwater studies in this area have found that nitrate, fumigants, microbial indicators, and several trace elements are present at elevated concentrations in some domestic wells (Burow and others, 1998; Jurgens and others, 2010; Harter and Lund, 2012; California State Water Resources Control Board, 2016).

Groundwater Quality in the Sierra Nevada, California

U.S. Geological Survey (USGS) | December 23rd, 2014

Groundwater provides more than 40 percent of California’s drinking water. To protect this vital resource, the State of California created the Groundwater Ambient Monito

Groundwater provides more than 40 percent of California’s drinking water. To protect this vital resource, the State of California created the Groundwater Ambient Monitoring and Assessment (GAMA) Program. The Priority Basin Project (PBP) of the GAMA Program provides a comprehensive assessment of the State’s groundwater quality and increases public access to groundwater-quality information. The Sierra Nevada Regional study unit constitutes one of the study units being evaluated. The Sierra Nevada Regional (SNR) study unit covers approximately 25,000 square miles and includes the Sierra Nevada mountain and foothill regions. The study unit was divided into four study areas corresponding to the four major rock types present in the region: granitic rocks, metamorphic rocks, sedimentary deposits, and volcanic rocks (Shelton and others, 2010). In contrast to most other study units evaluated by the GAMA PBP, the SNR study unit consists primarily of fractured-bedrock aquifers. Most of the Sierra Nevada consists of granitic and metamorphic rocks. Groundwater is in fractures in the rocks. The fracture systems may be interconnected or isolated, resulting in variability in water levels, well yields, and water quality on local and regional scales (California Department of Water Resources, 2003). Sedimentary basins contain glacial, alluvial fan, fluvial, and lake sediments. Aquifers composed of different materials commonly contain groundwater with different chemical compositions.

Groundwater Quality in the South Coast Interior Basins, California

U.S. Geological Survey (USGS) | May 14th, 2014

The South Coast Interior Basins (SCI) study unit covers approximately 653 square miles and consists of the Livermore, Gilroy-Hollister, Cuyama Valley, Castac Lake Valley,

The South Coast Interior Basins (SCI) study unit covers approximately 653 square miles and consists of the Livermore, Gilroy-Hollister, Cuyama Valley, Castac Lake Valley, Cuddy Canyon Valley, Cuddy Ranch Area, Cuddy Valley, and Mil Potrero groundwater basins (California Department of Water Resources, 2003). These basins were grouped into three study areas based on geography: Livermore (LIV), Gilroy (GIL), and Cuyama (CUY) (Mathany and others, 2009). Average annual precipitation across the study unit varies among the three study areas—from more than 20 inches (in.) along the northwest margin of the LIV study area to less than 8 in. in the northern parts of the CUY study area. The study areas are drained by the Arroyo de la Laguna canal in LIV, the Pájaro River and the San Benito River in GIL, and the Cuyama River in CUY. The primary aquifer system consists of Plio-Pleistocene sedimentary formations, Tertiary to Holocene-age alluvial sedimentary sequences, and unconfined Holocene- age and Pleistoceneage alluvium. The primary aquifer system is defined as those parts of the aquifers corresponding to the perforated intervals of the public-supply wells listed in the California Department of Public Health (CDPH) database. Public-supply wells in the study unit are typically drilled to depths between 200 and 600 feet, consist of solid casing from the land surface to a depth of about 50 to 350 feet, and are perforated below the solid casing. Water quality in the primary aquifer system may differ from that in the shallower and deeper parts of the aquifer system. Land use within 500-meter buffer areas around the wells in the study unit is approximately 44 percent (%) agricultural, 29% urban, and 27% natural. Agricultural lands are mostly orchards, row crops, vineyards, or pastures. The largest urban areas are the cities of Livermore and Gilroy. Recharge to groundwater basins occurs as infiltration of spring and streamflow, direct infiltration of precipitation and irrigation, subsurface inflow, and engineered recharge (percolation ponds and river regulation). The primary sources of groundwater discharge are water pumped for irrigation and municipal supply, discharge to rivers and streams, and evaporation.

Groundwater Quality in the Western San Joaquin Valley Study Unit, 2010: California GAMA Priority Basin Project

U.S. Geological Survey (USGS) | June 9th, 2017

Water quality in groundwater resources used for public drinking-water supply in the Western San Joaquin Valley (WSJV) was investigated by the USGS in cooperation with the

Water quality in groundwater resources used for public drinking-water supply in the Western San Joaquin Valley (WSJV) was investigated by the USGS in cooperation with the California State Water Resources Control Board (SWRCB) as part of its Groundwater Ambient Monitoring and Assessment (GAMA) Program Priority Basin Project. The WSJV includes two study areas: the Delta–Mendota and Westside subbasins of the San Joaquin Valley groundwater basin. Study objectives for the WSJV study unit included two assessment types: (1) a status assessment yielding quantitative estimates of the current (2010) status of groundwater quality in the groundwater resources used for public drinking water, and (2) an evaluation of natural and anthropogenic factors that could be affecting the groundwater quality. The assessments characterized the quality of untreated groundwater, not the quality of treated drinking water delivered to consumers by water distributors. The status assessment was based on data collected from 43 wells sampled by the U.S. Geological Survey for the GAMA Priority Basin Project (USGS-GAMA) in 2010 and data compiled in the SWRCB Division of Drinking Water (SWRCB-DDW) database for 74 additional public-supply wells sampled for regulatory compliance purposes between 2007 and 2010. To provide context, concentrations of constituents measured in groundwater were compared to U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) and SWRCB-DDW regulatory and non-regulatory benchmarks for drinking-water quality. The status assessment used a spatially weighted, grid-based method to estimate the proportion of the groundwater resources used for public drinking water that has concentrations for particular constituents or class of constituents approaching or above benchmark concentrations. This method provides statistically unbiased results at the study-area scale within the WSJV study unit, and permits comparison of the two study areas to other areas assessed by the GAMA Priority Basin Project statewide. Groundwater resources used for public drinking water in the WSJV study unit are among the most saline and most affected by high concentrations of inorganic constituents of all groundwater resources used for public drinking water that have been assessed by the GAMA Priority Basin Project statewide. Among the 82 GAMA Priority Basin Project study areas statewide, the Delta–Mendota study area ranked above the 90th percentile for aquifer-scale proportions of groundwater resources having concentrations of total dissolved solids (TDS), sulfate, chloride, manganese, boron, chromium(VI), selenium, and strontium above benchmarks, and the Westside study area ranked above the 90th percentile for TDS, sulfate, manganese, and boron.

Groundwater Quality in the Western San Joaquin Valley, California

U.S. Geological Survey (USGS) | June 9th, 2017

Groundwater provides more than 40 percent of California’s drinking water. To protect this vital resource, the State of California created the Groundwater Ambient Monito

Groundwater provides more than 40 percent of California’s drinking water. To protect this vital resource, the State of California created the Groundwater Ambient Monitoring and Assessment (GAMA) Program. The Priority Basin Project of the GAMA Program provides a comprehensive assessment of the State’s groundwater quality and increases public access to groundwater-quality information. The Western San Joaquin Valley is one of the study units being evaluated.

Groundwater Quality in the Yuba River and Bear River Watersheds, Sierra Nevada, California

U.S. Geological Survey (USGS) | September 27th, 2017

The Yuba River and Bear River Watersheds study unit (Yuba-Bear Watersheds) covers approximately 4,400 square kilometers on the western slope of the Sierra Nevada. Groundw

The Yuba River and Bear River Watersheds study unit (Yuba-Bear Watersheds) covers approximately 4,400 square kilometers on the western slope of the Sierra Nevada. Groundwater composes about 10 percent of overall water use in the region, but is the sole supply for many individual homes beyond the limits of public water supply infrastructure (Cosumnes, American, Bear, Yuba Integrated Regional Water Management Group, 2014). Recent drought conditions highlighted the vulnerability of private wells to diminished groundwater supplies in the study area and many wells required deepening (California Department of Water Resources, 2014).

Groundwater Quality near the Montebello Oil Field, Los Angeles County, California

U.S. Geological Survey (USGS) | February 6th, 2023

Groundwater quality and potential sources and migration pathways of chemical constituents associated with hydrocarbon-bearing formations were assessed by the U.S. Geologi

Groundwater quality and potential sources and migration pathways of chemical constituents associated with hydrocarbon-bearing formations were assessed by the U.S. Geological Survey for the California State Water Resources Control Board Oil and Gas Regional Monitoring Program (RMP). Groundwater samples were collected as part of the RMP from 21 preexisting wells used for public supply, monitoring, or irrigation in and near the Montebello Oil Field and analyzed for constituents associated with hydrocarbon-bearing formations and constituents used to identify recently recharged groundwater and older groundwater. The newly collected RMP data were supplemented with historical sample data from 849 groundwater wells and analyzed with respect to explanatory factors that have the potential to influence water quality. Potential sources and migration pathways of fluids (water, gas, or oil) from hydrocarbon-bearing formations that could affect groundwater quality in the Montebello Oil Field include large volumes of recycled produced water (water withdrawn from an oil well and brought to the surface that may include oil, water, and gas from the geologic formation and water or gas injected for enhanced recovery) that have been reinjected since the 1960s to enhance oil production, oil and gas wells with well-integrity issues, and oil and gas wells with an uncemented annulus that intersects groundwater resource zones. Trace amounts of dissolved petroleum hydrocarbons, thermogenic gas (propane through pentane range), or both, were detected in seven groundwater samples collected in 2014 and 2018 as part of the RMP. Five of those samples also contained manufactured volatile organic compounds and at least some modern-age groundwater (recharged during or after 1953), indicating that the hydrocarbons could have originated from surficial, or shallow, sources unrelated to oil and gas development. Two samples contained low concentrations of petroleum hydrocarbons (less than 0.1 microgram per liter) and did not contain detections of manufactured volatile organic compounds in pre-modern groundwater. These samples were collected from relatively deep wells (greater than 140 meters below land surface) with perforations completed in marine sediments that may contain water with similar compositions to produced water. The RMP sample results and available historical data in and near the Montebello Oil Field did not provide conclusive evidence that oil and gas development has adversely affected groundwater resources. All samples with detectable petroleum hydrocarbons, thermogenic gases, or both, were collected from sites that also are within 500 meters of anthropogenic hydrocarbon sources not associated with oil and gas development or sources. In addition, naturally occurring sources of hydrocarbons that exist at intervals shallower than, or are in areas outside of, economically productive oil- and gas-producing zones could affect groundwater quality. A definitive analysis of relations of groundwater quality to potential anthropogenic and natural explanatory factors was not possible because of the low density of new and historical sampling data, particularly in parts of the Montebello Oil Field where the largest relative risks to groundwater from hydrocarbon-bearing formations exist. Areas to consider for more detailed monitoring and analysis in the future that may present the largest relative potential risks to groundwater quality include (1) areas downgradient from historical surface ponds and sumps and (2) areas with co-located high net injection (oil reservoir injection exceeds production), old oil and gas wells that may be more likely to develop well-integrity issues than newer wells, and oil and gas wells with uncemented boreholes intersecting groundwater zones. To help fill gaps resulting from sparse groundwater wells, temperature and resistivity borehole log data could be analyzed to locate anomalies that identify potential areas where relatively warm or saline water from deeper hydrocarbon-bearing formations is present in groundwater.

Groundwater quality near the Placerita Oil Field, California, 2018

U.S. Geological Survey (USGS) | September 26th, 2024

Groundwater-quality data and potential fluid-migration pathways near the Placerita Oil Field in Los Angeles County, California, were examined by the U.S. Geological Surve

Groundwater-quality data and potential fluid-migration pathways near the Placerita Oil Field in Los Angeles County, California, were examined by the U.S. Geological Survey to determine if oil-field fluids (water and gas from oil-producing and non-producing zones) have mixed with groundwater resources. Six of the 13 new groundwater samples collected for this study contained petroleum hydrocarbons, thermogenic gas, inorganic chemical signatures, and (or) isotopic values consistent with potential mixing with fluids from hydrocarbon-bearing formations.

Groundwater Quality of the Lucerne Valley Groundwater Basin, California

U.S. Geological Survey (USGS) | July 7th, 2022

Anthropogenic activities, including groundwater withdrawals, return flow from irrigated agriculture, and treated wastewater-effluent disposal have the potential to affect

Anthropogenic activities, including groundwater withdrawals, return flow from irrigated agriculture, and treated wastewater-effluent disposal have the potential to affect groundwater quality in the Lucerne Valley groundwater basin, located in the southwest Mojave Desert. Questions regarding the current state and potential future of groundwater quality in this basin were addressed by (1) considering groundwater data from and findings of historical water-quality studies, (2) evaluating recent (1990–2021) U.S. Geological Survey water-quality and geochemical-tracer data, and (3) assessing groundwater-quality results from samples collected in 2021 to better understand the transport of applied treated wastewater effluent in the subsurface and associated effects of this practice on water quality. As observed by previous studies, differences in groundwater quality existed among the upper, middle, and lower aquifers of the Lucerne Valley groundwater basin, with the lower aquifer characterized by high dissolved-solid content relative to the middle and upper aquifers. Stable and radioisotope tracers indicate that most of the groundwater sampled in the basin was recharged during cooler, wetter climate conditions than those of the present day (2022). Analyses of the 2021 samples collected to examine the subsurface transport of applied treated wastewater effluent were not conclusive but indicate that water from applied treated wastewater effluent is currently (2022) limited to the upper aquifer and likely to remain so given the extensive confining unit below the upper aquifer.