Tahoe: State of the Lake Report 2025

University of California, Davis (UC Davis) | July 18th, 2025

UC Davis has conducted research at Lake Tahoe since 1950, and scientists from UC Davis Tahoe Environmental Research Center have been monitoring conditions at the lake con

UC Davis has conducted research at Lake Tahoe since 1950, and scientists from UC Davis Tahoe Environmental Research Center have been monitoring conditions at the lake continuously since 1968. This has created a unique document of change for one of the world’s most iconic and vulnerable lakes.

Tap Water Affordability in Arizona

Arizona State University (ASU) | February 20th, 2025

In this report, the Kyl Center for Water Policy presents a comprehensive set of tap water affordability data for community water systems (CWS) in Arizona. Communities can

In this report, the Kyl Center for Water Policy presents a comprehensive set of tap water affordability data for community water systems (CWS) in Arizona. Communities can use this study to better assess how their current and future charges for water impact low- and median-income households. Water access can be improved when water charges are designed with affordability in mind so that fewer families face the risk of disconnection due to non-payment. On the other hand, most water providers rely on fees to pay for replacing aging infrastructure and water system improvements to ensure reliability.

Technical Guidance for Incorporating Climate Change Information into Water Resources Planning Studies

U.S. Bureau of Reclamation (USBR) | ?

The impacts of climate change are being felt across the Western United States. Warming is affecting water supplies by changing the overall annual volume of precipitation

The impacts of climate change are being felt across the Western United States. Warming is affecting water supplies by changing the overall annual volume of precipitation and altering the balance of rain versus snowfall. Communities are facing increasing problems with water availability and drought, flooding, and increased risk of forest fires. The requirements established by Secretarial Order 3289, Departmental Manual 523 DM 1, Executive Order 13653, and Reclamation’s Directives and Standards CMP 09-02 for feasibility studies reinforces the need for Reclamation's on-going programs to be more resilient to the impacts of climate change and for continued efforts to incorporate climate change information into aspects of our mission where it has not been fully considered in the past such as in decisions regarding ecosystem restoration, reservoir operations, infrastructure investments and planning capacity. This document is an important step to reinforcing Reclamation’s planning capacity by providing guidance to help study teams navigate the range of planning and technical methods available to account for climate change impacts in feasibility studies. The effects of climate change have altered and will continue to alter the basic assumptions underlying Reclamation’s water resources planning. Effective water management and planning rely on an understanding of climate change impacts on water supply, demand, and criteria that govern or guide water management. The guidance in this document may also be applied to environmental compliance studies since they are typically conducted concurrently with feasibility studies. The guidance is organized around the planning and technical framework for conducting a feasibility study as detailed in CMP 09-02, and which occurs in two phases: the scoping phase and the alternative formulation and evaluation phase.

Temescal Basin Groundwater Sustainability Plan

Temescal Basin Groundwater Sustainability Agency | January 27th, 2022

Wishing to provide a framework for cooperative groundwater management and SGMA compliance, the City of Corona (Corona), City of Norco (Norco), and the Home Gardens Coun

Wishing to provide a framework for cooperative groundwater management and SGMA compliance, the City of Corona (Corona), City of Norco (Norco), and the Home Gardens County Water District (HGCWD) executed a Memorandum of Understanding (MOU) in March 2017 establishing the Temescal Basin Groundwater Sustainability Agency (Temescal GSA). In August 2017, the Temescal GSA became the GSA for the Basin by submitting a formation notice to DWR. While Corona is leading this effort, the GSP will be developed jointly among the three agencies, with coordinated implementation toward sustainable management. Due to size, the file has been divided into four parts. Part 1, Part 2, Part 3, Part 4

Temporary Restraining Order in Kings County Farm Bureau et al v. California State Water Resources Control Board

Superior Court of California, County of Kings | July 11th, 2024

Tentative Ruling, Friant Water Authority vs. Eastern Tule Groundwater Sustainability Agency

Superior Court of California, County of Tulare | June 25th, 2024

The 1991 Drought Water Bank

California Department of Water Resources (DWR) | January 1st, 1991

This report, produced by the Department of Water Resources, provides a retrospective of the operations of the 1991 Drought Water Bank.

This report, produced by the Department of Water Resources, provides a retrospective of the operations of the 1991 Drought Water Bank.

The 2025-26 Budget: Proposition 4 Spending Plan

Legislative Analyst's Office (LAO) | February 12th, 2025

The Ahwahnee Water Principles

Local Government Commission | July 1st, 2006

In 2004,the Local Government Commission set out to identify effective,least-cost economically and politically viable options for sustainable water resources management at

In 2004,the Local Government Commission set out to identify effective,least-cost economically and politically viable options for sustainable water resources management at the local level. The LGC invited respected water resource policy, management and planning professionals – with experience at the federal,state and local levels – to craft a set of land use principles which would provide guidance to local officials and communities concerned about sustaining future water supplies. The process of developing the Ahwahnee Water Principles mirrored the LGC’s earlier Ahwahnee Principles for Resource-Efficient Communities, which were released in 1991. The Ahwahnee Principles presented a blueprint for elected officials to create compact, mixed-use,walkable,transit-oriented developments in their local communities,and have since paved the way for growing acceptance and inclusion of “smart growth”and the “New Urbanism”in local and regional land-use policies and practices.

The Application of Ground-Water Flow Models as Predictive Tools—A Review of Two Ground-Water Models of Eastern Honey Lake Valley, California-Nevada

Geological Society of America (GSA) | January 9th, 1992

In the late 1980's Washoe County, Nevada, entered into an agreement with a private water development company to develop and export groundwater from the Nevada portion of

In the late 1980's Washoe County, Nevada, entered into an agreement with a private water development company to develop and export groundwater from the Nevada portion of the arid Honey Lake Valley to the rapidly growing Reno-Sparks area. The proposed project is known as the Truckee Meadows Project (TMP). Honey Lake Valley is 35 mi north of Reno, Nevada; but is located predominantly in California. Computer groundwater models of the valley were prepared by the USGS and the TMP proponents and presented to the Nevada State Engineer to evaluate the impacts of the proposed exportation of 15,000 ac-ft annually from eastern Honey Lake Valley. By using assumptions, numbers, and data which are not justified by the scientific data, both models place unreasonable and, in some instances, artificial constraints on the geology and hydrogeology of the groundwater system rather than allowing the geology and hydrogeology to constrain the models. Neither model is useful as a predictive tool. However, the major problems with the two models fall into two fundamentally different classes. The USGS model exceeded the technical limitations of the model code and made large, inappropriate adjustments to the water budget to compensate for these undetected errors. The TMP model used a water budget that was not technically justified or explained and placed the spatial distribution of ground-water recharge and discharge beyond the realm of hydrogeologic reality.