U.S. Geological Survey (USGS) | June 25th, 1992
Summary
A geohydrologic data base was compiled to evaluate the changes in ground-water conditions in the upper Coachella Valley, California, since 1978, when the results of a pre
A geohydrologic data base was compiled to evaluate the changes in ground-water conditions in the upper Coachella Valley, California, since 1978, when the results of a previous ground-water-model study were published. The compiled data were analyzed to improve understanding of the ground-water flow system and the effects on water quality of an existing artificial-recharge program. Analysis of well logs indicates that several zones of differing permeability can be correlated throughout the valley. Analysis of the water-quality data suggests that the artificial recharge of Colorado River water has caused increases in dissolved solids in some wells. Sparse data indicate that the recharged water moves much more rapidly through the uppermost part of the ground-water system than through deeper parts. An evaluation of the existing ground-water simulation model of the upper Coachella Valley that was developed in the 1978 study yielded several conclusions. First, the 300- to 400-foot rise in water levels in the artificialrecharge area in 1985-86 significantly affected the groundwater flow system. Transmissivities in the model had to be increased to reflect the increase in saturated thickness. Storage-coefficient values in the model had to be increased from 0.02 (used in the previous study) to 0.10-0.15 to simulate the unconfined water-level response during this period. Second, stream-recharge and underflow rates from San Gorgonio Pass during 1979-86 seem to have been higher than the values estimated for previous studies. Conditions generally were wetter in 1979-86 than during the period in which the earlier estimates were made. Third, the flow system could be simulated more accurately if the model were extended to its true southeastern boundary, the Salton Sea. Finally, there are important vertical differences in transport of the artificially recharged water that the two-dimensional areal transport model cannot simulate.
The study results indicate several additional data collection and modeling needs. The drilling of several sets of monitor wells perforated at different depths could help better define the three-dimensional flow system and waterquality differences. Additional data also are needed on underflow and stream recharge, evaporation rates and infiltration rates at the artificial-recharge facilities, and net pumpage. Three-dimensional flow and transport models are needed to evaluate the effects of ground-water development on water levels and water quality.