The Water Rights Process

California State Water Resources Control Board (SWRCB) | June 1st, 2002

A water right is a legal entitlement authorizing water to be diverted from a specified source and put to beneficial, nonwasteful use. Water rights are property rights, bu

A water right is a legal entitlement authorizing water to be diverted from a specified source and put to beneficial, nonwasteful use. Water rights are property rights, but their holders do not own the water itself – they possess the right to use it. Some water rights require a permit or license from the State Water Resources Control Board, whose objective is to ensure that the state’s waters are put to the best possible use and that the public interest is served. In making decisions, the Board must keep three goals in mind: • Developing water resources in an orderly manner. • Preventing waste and unreasonable use of water. • Protecting the environment. The State Board’s duties are not limited to permits and licenses. It may be called upon to adjudicate water for entire systems or to act as a “referee” or fact-finder in court cases involving water rights.

Time Limits for Western Water Rights

Natural Resources and Environment (SSRN) | November 1st, 2022

Tribal Water Study: An Overview

Water and Tribes Initiative | October 28th, 2019

The purpose of this policy brief is to provide an overview of the Colorado River Basin Ten Tribes Partnership Tribal Water Study (Study), a unique review of the water rig

The purpose of this policy brief is to provide an overview of the Colorado River Basin Ten Tribes Partnership Tribal Water Study (Study), a unique review of the water rights, water uses, and future plans of the member tribes of the Colorado River Basin Tribes Partnership (Ten Tribes Partnership). The information in this policy brief is taken directly from the Study. In the foreword to the Study, Bureau of Reclamation (Reclamation) Commissioner Brenda Burman states that Reclamation and the Ten Tribes Partnership collaborated to document current water use and potential future water development to better facilitate planning and decision-making throughout the Colorado River Basin (Basin). The Study strengthens a Department of the Interior commitment to address water issues facing tribes and recognizes that the Colorado River is an essential foundation for the physical, economic, and cultural sustenance of tribes in the Basin. The Study also explores ways to provide a wide range of benefits to both Partnership Tribes and other water users. The mutual trust and understanding forged during the Study will prove to be critical as the Basin collaboratively addresses the significant challenges ahead. The Ten Tribes Partnership, in its foreword, stated that in addition to producing technical information, the Tribes had other goals. First, they wanted to better understand how, at present, the Study’s water use scenarios fit into the overall scheme of Colorado River Basin management. Second, they wanted to know how future development of tribal water resources will affect other water users who are now using water to which a tribe may hold legal title, but which the title-holding tribe has not yet developed for its own use. Finally, they wanted to assess--to the extent present information allows -- the role future development of tribal water rights will have on Basin operations. The Ten Tribes Partnership hopes the Study resolves some uncertainty about how tribes perceive the future for their water uses, and establishes a baseline of information for discussions and development of relationships among tribes, states, federal government, water managers, and water users throughout the Basin.

Truckee River Operating Agreement

U.S. Bureau of Reclamation (USBR) | September 6th, 2008

Click here for USBR home page for the agreement and related documents.

Click here for USBR home page for the agreement and related documents.

United States v. State Water Resources Control Board (1986)

Court of Appeals of California, First Appellate District | May 28th, 1986

This appeal raises a number of novel and complex questions concerning the interrelationship of the law of water quality and the law of water rights. The coordinated cases

This appeal raises a number of novel and complex questions concerning the interrelationship of the law of water quality and the law of water rights. The coordinated cases arise out of efforts by the State Water Resources Control Board (the Board) to set new water quality standards for the Sacramento-San Joaquin Delta (Delta) in order to take account of the combined effects upon the Delta of the state's two massive water projects: the Central Valley Project (CVP) and the State Water Project (SWP), operated by the U.S. Bureau of Reclamation (U.S. Bureau or Bureau) and the California Department of Water Resources (DWR), respectively.

Updating California Water Laws to Address Drought and Climate Change

California Planning & Conservation League Foundation | February 3rd, 2022

Upper Colorado River Basin Compact, 1948

U.S. Bureau of Reclamation (USBR) | October 11th, 1948

Upper Division States Alternative for Post-2026 Operations of Lake Powell and Lake Mead

Colorado Department of Natural Resources (DNR) | March 5th, 2024

Upper San Gabriel Valley Municipal Water District v. City of Alhambra et al

Superior Court of California, County of Los Angeles | June 21st, 2012

Background note from An Evaluation of California’s Adjudicated Groundwater Basins by Langridge et al, (UC Davis) 2016 The Main San Gabriel Basin is one of the larges

Background note from An Evaluation of California’s Adjudicated Groundwater Basins by Langridge et al, (UC Davis) 2016 The Main San Gabriel Basin is one of the largest groundwater basins in southern California, providing residents of the greater San Gabriel Valley with about 240,000 AF per year. It is geographically situated in the south-easterly portion of Los Angeles County and bounded on the north by the San Gabriel Mountains, on the northwest by Raymond Basin, on the southeast by Puente Basin, and on the south by the Central Basin. The adjudication of the basin was deemed necessary by water producers to streamline administration, reduce overdraft, and adhere to the Long Beach Judgment and Puente Narrows Agreements, and the adjudication was relatively amenable. One of the most significant concerns in the basin is water quality, with four areas of the valley containing Superfund sites. The 1973 Judgment included water quality as one of the Watermaster’s responsibilities, and since the mid-1980s the Watermaster has coordinated with regulatory agencies to have groundwater remediation facilities constructed, permitted and operated to protect and enhance the groundwater supplies. The 1992 Judgment amendment explicitly required coordination with EPA for a federal cleanup of the Superfund sites.

Utilization of Waters of the Colorado and Tijuana Rivers and of the Rio Grande: Treaty Between the United States of America and Mexico

U.S. Government Publishing Office (GPO) | November 14th, 1945