Meta-analysis reveals negative yet variable effects of ocean acidification on marine organisms: Biological responses to ocean acidification

Ecology Letters (Wiley) | August 16th, 2010

Ocean acidification is a pervasive stressor that could affect many marine organisms and cause profound ecological shifts. A variety of biological responses to ocean acid

Ocean acidification is a pervasive stressor that could affect many marine organisms and cause profound ecological shifts. A variety of biological responses to ocean acidification have been measured across a range of taxa, but this information exists as case studies and has not been synthesized into meaningful comparisons amongst response variables and functional groups. We used meta-analytic techniques to explore the biological responses to ocean acidification, and found negative effects on survival, calcification, growth and reproduction. However, there was significant variation in the sensitivity of marine organisms. Calcifying organisms generally exhibited larger negative responses than non-calcifying organisms across numerous response variables, with the exception ofcrustaceans, which calcify but were not negatively affected. Calcification responses varied significantly amongst organisms using different mineral forms of calcium carbonate.Organisms using one of the more soluble forms of calcium carbonate (high-magnesium calcite) can be more resilient to ocean acidification than less soluble forms (calcite and aragonite). Additionally, there was variation in the sensitivities of different developmental stages, but this variation was dependent on the taxonomic group. Our analyses suggest that the biological effects of ocean acidification are generally large and negative, but the variation in sensitivity amongst organisms has important implications for ecosystem responses.

Metals in Wildfire Suppressants

American Chemical Society (ACS) | October 30th, 2024

Methodology for Flow and Salinity Estimates in the Sacramento-San Joaquin Delta and Suisun Marsh

California Department of Water Resources (DWR) | June 15th, 2022

This is the 43rd annual progress report of the California Department of Water Resources’ San Francisco Bay-Delta Evaluation Program, which is carried out by the Delta M

This is the 43rd annual progress report of the California Department of Water Resources’ San Francisco Bay-Delta Evaluation Program, which is carried out by the Delta Modeling Section. This report is submitted annually to the State Water Resources Control Board pursuant to its Water Right Decision D-1485, Term 9, which is still active pursuant to its Water Right Decision D-1641, Term 8. This report documents progress in the development and enhancement of computer models for the Delta Modeling Section of the Bay-Delta Office. It also reports the latest findings of studies conducted as part of the program. This report was compiled under the direction of Nicky Sandhu, Program Manager for the Bay-Delta Evaluation Program.

Methodology for Flow and Salinity Estimates in the Sacramento-San Joaquin Delta and Suisun Marsh

California Department of Water Resources (DWR) | December 1st, 2019

Various water resource management actions have been planned to protect and restore salmon populations for a healthy Sacramento-San Joaquin Delta (Delta) ecosystem. Curren

Various water resource management actions have been planned to protect and restore salmon populations for a healthy Sacramento-San Joaquin Delta (Delta) ecosystem. Currently, evaluating the effectiveness of these actions relies on field studies and/or expert opinion. Field studies can be costly and may not provide a comprehensive assessment for a range of applications because of limited study areas, durations, and river conditions. Expert opinion, although valuable, may under- or over-emphasize the importance of certain project components.  To supplement field studies and provide a quantitative assessment tool, the California Department of Water Resources (DWR), in collaboration with the United States Geological Survey (USGS), developed an ecological modeling tool, ECO-PTM. ECO-PTM is an individual-based juvenile salmon migration model that is based on a random-walk particle-tracking method with fish-like behaviors attached to the particles. The behavioral parameters are estimated from acoustic telemetry tag data of juvenile late-fall Chinook salmon (Tag Data) from various field studies (Perry et al. 2018). A stochastic optimization tool, Particle Swarm Optimization, is used to calibrate the swimming behavior parameters. ECO-PTM can simulate juvenile salmonid migration timing, routing, and survival.  This chapter describes ECO-PTM and its behavioral modules, and the model performance and applications to assist water resource management planning, assessment, and decision-making related to juvenile salmonid survival outcomes. 

Methods of Analysis—Determination of Pesticides in Filtered Water and Suspended Sediment using Liquid Chromatography- and Gas Chromatography-Tandem Mass Spectrometry

U.S. Geological Survey (USGS) | January 31st, 2024

The widespread application of pesticides in agricultural and urban areas leads to their presence in surface waters. Presence of these biologically active chemicals in en

The widespread application of pesticides in agricultural and urban areas leads to their presence in surface waters. Presence of these biologically active chemicals in environmental waters potentially has adverse effects on nontarget organisms. To better understand the environmental fate of these contaminants, a robust method to capture chemicals with wide-ranging physicochemical properties has been developed. The method was developed by the U.S. Geological Survey’s Organic Chemistry Research Laboratory to monitor pesticides, pesticide degradates, and other agrochemicals in environmental surface waters throughout the country. The analysis involves a multiresidue method to determine 183 pesticides and pesticide degradates in filtered water samples and 178 pesticides and pesticide degradates in paired suspended sediment samples. After the filtration of whole water, contaminants are individually measured in the filtered water and the collected suspended sediment. Filtered water is extracted via solid-phase extraction, whereas suspended sediment is extracted using an ultrasonication, solid-liquid extraction. Samples are analyzed by liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry using an electrospray ionization source in positive and negative modes and analyzed by gas chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry using an advanced electron ionization source in positive mode. Instrument parameters were optimized for the highest sensitivity, and at least two transitions (quantifier and qualifier) were monitored for each analyte. Recoveries in test filtered water (n=9; 183 analytes) from the American River, California, and suspended sediment (n=9; 178 analytes) samples fortified at 15 nanograms per liter (ng/L) ranged from 70.1 to 121.0 and 71.1 to 117.0 percent in water and suspended sediment filter samples, respectively.

Microbial Water Quality at Minimally Human-Impacted Reference Beaches in Northern California

San Francisco Estuary Institute (SFEI) | September 3rd, 2018

All of the coastal reference beaches that have been used by the State of California for quantifying “natural loads” of fecal indicator bacteria have been in Southern

All of the coastal reference beaches that have been used by the State of California for quantifying “natural loads” of fecal indicator bacteria have been in Southern California. None has been in the northern and central coastal regions of the State. To fill this information gap, this study assessed bacteria concentrations at coastal reference beaches in Northern California, investigated possible factors influencing the bacteria concentrations, and evaluated how these concentrations compare to results from the Southern California reference beaches. Reference beaches were defined as open beaches with breaking waves that receive runoff from undeveloped watersheds. The study beaches were selected to represent a variety of geographical conditions and watershed sizes in Northern California. Five reference beaches were sampled between January 2016 and September 2017 for a total of 25‐30 sampling events, including 10 wet weather events, 10 winter dry events, and 10 summer dry events. The number of samples collected was admittedly small for characterizing variable bacteria concentrations but was deemed sufficient for providing initial information relevant to management questions. At each beach, samples were collected from an ocean site in the surf zone and from a freshwater site in the watershed draining to the beach. Samples were analyzed for total coliform, fecal coliform, Escherichia coli (E. coli), enterococci (ocean sites only), as well as a human‐specific genetic marker (human Bacteroides HF183).

Microparticles, Microplastics, and PAHs in Bivalves in San Francisco Bay

San Francisco Estuary Institute (SFEI) | November 15th, 2019

Microplastic Contamination in San Francisco Bay - Fact Sheet

San Francisco Estuary Institute (SFEI) | November 2nd, 2015

Microplastic contamination in the San Francisco Bay, California, USA

Marine Pollution Bulletin (Elsevier) | August 15th, 2015

Despite widespread detection of microplastic pollution in marine environments, data describing microplastic abundance in urban estuaries and microplastic discharge via tr

Despite widespread detection of microplastic pollution in marine environments, data describing microplastic abundance in urban estuaries and microplastic discharge via treated municipal wastewater are limited. This study presents information on abundance, distribution, and composition of microplastic at nine sites in San Francisco Bay, California, USA. Also presented are characterizations of microplastic in final effluent from eight wastewater treatment plants, employing varying treatment technologies, that discharge to the Bay. With an average microplastic abundance of 700,000 particles/km2, Bay surface water appears to have higher microplastic levels than other urban waterbodies sampled in North America. Moreover, treated wastewater from facilities that discharge into the Bay contains considerable microplastic contamination. Facilities employing tertiary filtration did not show lower levels of contamination than those using secondary treatment. As textile-derived fibers were more abundant in wastewater, higher levels of fragments in surface water suggest additional pathways of microplastic pollution, such as stormwaterrunoff.

Microplastic Monitoring and Science Strategy for San Francisco Bay

San Francisco Estuary Institute (SFEI) | February 1st, 2017

Microplastic is commonly defined as plastic particles smaller than 5 mm. In 2015, the Regional Monitoring Program for Water Quality in San Francisco Bay (RMP) conducted a

Microplastic is commonly defined as plastic particles smaller than 5 mm. In 2015, the Regional Monitoring Program for Water Quality in San Francisco Bay (RMP) conducted a special study to measure microplastic in treated wastewater effluent and Bay surface water. Bay surface water appeared to have higher microplastic levels than other urban water bodies sampled in North America, such as the Great Lakes and Chesapeake Bay. Microbeads derived from personal care products and tiny fibers, a portion of which were likely derived from synthetic clothing, were recovered from all nine Bay sites. Tiny particles, primarily fibers, were also detected in treated effluent from Bay Area facilities; not all of these particles are known to be plastic. These findings received considerable media attention and catalyzed state and federal policy shifts.