San Joaquin River

Salinity Changes the Dynamics of Pyrethroid Toxicity in Terms of Behavioral Effects on Newly Hatched Delta Smelt Larvae

Toxics (MDPI) | February 20th, 2021

Salinity can interact with organic compounds and modulate their toxicity. Studies have shown that the fraction of pyrethroid insecticides in the aqueous phase increases w

Salinity can interact with organic compounds and modulate their toxicity. Studies have shown that the fraction of pyrethroid insecticides in the aqueous phase increases with increasing salinity, potentially increasing the risk of exposure for aquatic organisms at higher salinities. In the San Francisco Bay Delta (SFBD) estuary, pyrethroid concentrations increase during the rainy season, coinciding with the spawning season of Delta Smelt (Hypomesus transpacificus), an endangered, endemic fish. Furthermore, salinity intrusion in the SFBD is exacerbated by global climate change, which may change the dynamics of pyrethroid toxicity on aquatic animals. Therefore, examining the effect of salinity on the sublethal toxicity of pyrethroids is essential for risk assessments, especially during the early life stages of estuarine fishes. To address this, we investigated behavioral effects of permethrin and bifenthrin at three environmentally relevant concentrations across a salinity gradient (0.5, 2 and 6 PSU) on Delta Smelt yolk-sac larvae. Our results suggest that environmentally relevant concentrations of pyrethroids can perturb Delta Smelt larvae behavior even at the lowest concentrations (<1 ng/L) and that salinity can change the dynamic of pyrethroid toxicity in terms of behavioral effects, especially for bifenthrin, where salinity was positively correlated with anti-thigmotaxis at each concentration.

Salinity Effects on Agricultural Irrigation‐related Uses

Central Valley Salinity Alternatives for Long-Term Sustainability (CV-SALTS) | December 1st, 2016

Purpose: Summarize current state of knowledge regarding the effects of elevated EC (TDS) concentrations on crop yields with specific attention to seasonal tolerance

Purpose: Summarize current state of knowledge regarding the effects of elevated EC (TDS) concentrations on crop yields with specific attention to seasonal tolerances. Additional information provided regarding federal, state, international regulations and guidelines and effects of elevated EC on turfgrass, landscape plants and wetland plants.

Salinity in the Central Valley: An Overview

California State Water Resources Control Board (SWRCB) | May 3rd, 2006

The Central Valley is one of the most rapidly growing areas in the nation. Population in the Valley is anticipated to increase 39% by the year 2020. Industry and urbaniza

The Central Valley is one of the most rapidly growing areas in the nation. Population in the Valley is anticipated to increase 39% by the year 2020. Industry and urbanization are taking place at an increasing pace, although agriculture is still a dominant economic force here, accounting for 57% of the $6.5 billion in sales of all agricultural products in California in 2002. The Central Valley is also home to wildlife and includes the largest contiguous wetlands area remaining in California. The warm, dry, Mediterranean climate and fertile soils have drawn agricultural users for over a century. The presence of transportation corridors and ready access to workers has enticed industry to move in, and the relatively cheap price of land has encouraged urban development. The open areas and wetlands provide vital habitat for many species, particularly migratory birds along the Pacific Flyway. But the very features that make the Central Valley desirable for wildlife, farmers, developers, industry and the general population also contribute to salinity problems. When water is used, salts are left behind. Every time a farmer irrigates a field, every time a managed wetland is flooded, every time an industrial facility conducts some water-requiring process, and every time you or I take a shower, we contribute to the salinity problem because the water we use and release has a higher salinity concentration than what we started with. Sometimes this is because we add salt intentionally (home water softeners, plant fertilizers), but even when no salts are added to the system, evaporation and consumptive use act to concentrate unused salts. Additionally, salts move with water so salts originating in one basin will turn up in another. This is a significant problem when the receiving basin has no reliable way of disposing salt, as is the case in the Tulare Lake Basin; or has only limited capacity to discharge salt, which is the case in the San Joaquin River Basin. We know today that salinity impacts are being felt in the Central Valley and that these impacts are increasing. A very preliminary analysis of salt flux in the Delta, estimated that 700 thousand tons of salt flow into the Delta from the Bay annually and are imported into the State, federal, and other water supply projects. The Tulare Lake and San Joaquin River Basins collectively receive over two million tons of salt annually through water taken in and distributed by state and federal water projects. Because the Tulare Lake Basin is a closed basin with no reliable outlet for the discharge of salts, and there is no other viable option at this time, the majority of the salt imported into the basin from the state and federal water projects (over one million tons per year) is collecting in the basin and is migrating to the basin’s groundwater. For this reason, the Central Valley Regional Water Quality Control Board’s Tulare Lake Basin Plan assumes degradation by salt is occurring in the basin and contains a controlled degradation policy for groundwater. A preliminary evaluation of salt migration to groundwater in the San Joaquin Valley estimated that over 400 thousand tons of salt per year were being added to the confined aquifer in the San Joaquin Basin. In a current study, preliminary findings of a USGS investigation have shown chloride levels in the semi-confined aquifer near Stockton are increasing and have been found to be as high as 2,200 mg/l and EC as high as 5,930 ?S/cm A simple analysis of groundwater data from 14 drinking water wells on the south side of Fresno has shown an average increase of 30 ?S/cm in the past 15 years. Although this is not a radical increase, it does indicate that salt imported into the area may be impacting the drinking water aquifer. The mean annual EC levels in the San Joaquin River near Vernalis have nearly doubled since the mid-1940s. Because the San Joaquin River is limited in its capacity to assimilate salts safely, a Total Maximum Daily Load (TMDL) has been adopted for salt and boron. The Basin Plan for the San Joaquin and Sacramento Basins has been amended to include the TMDL. The recently completed Draft Soil Survey of Fresno County, California, Western Part states that approximately 400 thousand acres of saline-sodic soils currently exist in the survey area. This acreage constitutes approximately 48 percent of the irrigated land within the boundaries of the survey area, up from approximately 33 percent of the irrigated saline-sodic land identified in 1985, an increase of approximately 120 thousand acres in 18 years. There are currently 4470 acres of active evaporation basins in the Tulare Lake Basin, and this number may be increasing due to recent legislation allowing Integrated Farm Drainage Management Systems for individual farms in salt impaired areas. The Board has stated that evaporation basins are, at best, interim salt management tools, not a final disposal option. Approximately 113 thousand acres on the west side of the San Joaquin Valley have been retired (permanently removed from irrigation) due to regional drainage problems (high salinity, shallow groundwater). More land retirement is anticipated. Salinity problems are often complicated by the presence of other materials. Soils on the west side of the San Joaquin Valley are high in selenium, so any salt management program in the area must also address selenium management. Approximately $40 million in both public and private funds has been spent (as of 2005) to manage salt and selenium problems in the Grassland Drainage Area alone. Water providers are experiencing salinity impacts and costs are being incurred and are being passed on to customers to protect their systems from corrosion and provide the quality of water needed by their customers. Agricultural, industrial, and municipal dischargers in the Region are spending increasingly greater resources on monitoring for, treating, controlling, and managing salt. Over the years, the Central Valley Regional Water Quality Control Board has been aware of the growing problem of increasing salinity in the Central Valley, but many of the key decisions that must be made in order to control Valley salinity are outside of this Board’s jurisdiction. This report is a first step in opening a dialogue between the stakeholders and decision makers that will need to be involved in a comprehensive, sustainable, salinity management program for the Central Valley and for the State of California.

Salinity Incursion and Water Resources, Appendix to Bulletin No. 76, Delta Water Facilities

California Department of Water Resources (DWR) | April 16th, 1962

Data and analyses contained in this appendix were utilized to determine the present and future quantity and quality of water supplies within the Delta and to determine

Data and analyses contained in this appendix were utilized to determine the present and future quantity and quality of water supplies within the Delta and to determine the conditions under which the State Water Facilities must operate within the Delta with the various facilities proposed in Bulletin No. 76 constructed therein. In general, the conditions imposed result from conservative assumptions of available water supply and Delta channel hydraulics.

Salinity Management Strategy Report

Central Valley Regional Water Quality Control Board (CVRWQCB) | July 29th, 2008

The mission of the Central Valley Salinity Policy Group is to work closely, in a collaborative manner to create a comprehensive Central Valley Salinity Management Plan. T

The mission of the Central Valley Salinity Policy Group is to work closely, in a collaborative manner to create a comprehensive Central Valley Salinity Management Plan. This mission is presented at all meetings and forms the basis for the efforts of the group. This report and its plans and strategies are intended to further the initial efforts of the group in fulfilling its mission. The purpose of this report is to document the strategies discussed and proposed to provide an overall roadmap developing efforts that lead to solving salinity issues in the Central Valley Region. While these efforts are just beginning and will take a long time to come to fruition many of them need to be started now to be successful. The document collects materials and information prepared with the committees and group participants as they worked during most of 2007 and early 2008. The report attempts to capture this progress and provide summary information that would be useful to current and future participants, the Regional Board and Salinity Policy Group members. Within this document no specific regulatory or policy decisions related to salinity have been made by the Salinity Policy Group or Waterboards. Changes to the outline of this document were made to include efforts that were undertaken to assist the groups in planning and working on issues important to the group over the contract term. Additionally, some technical information and integration of existing technical studies is omitted from this report as several of these studies are ongoing and will not be completed in time to report their findings in this report.

Salt Water Problem: San Francisco Bay and Delta of Sacramento and San Joaquin Rivers

Association of Industrial Water Users of Contra Costa and Solano Counties | April 12th, 1928

PENETRATION OF SALT WATER IN UPPER BAY AND LOWER RIVER REGiON Under natural conditions, Carquinez Straits marked, approximately, the boundary between salt and fresh

PENETRATION OF SALT WATER IN UPPER BAY AND LOWER RIVER REGiON Under natural conditions, Carquinez Straits marked, approximately, the boundary between salt and fresh water in the upper San Francisco Bay and delta region of the two tributary rivers-the Sacramento and San Joaquin. Ordinarily salt water was present below the straits and fresh water was present above. Native vegetation in the tide marshes was predominantly of salt water types around San Pablo Bay and of fresh water types around Suisun Bay. In tidal waters, into which run fresh water streams of variable flow, there is an ebb and flow of salt water and the zone of mixing will move up and down stream as the fresh water flow increases and decreases. For short intervals in late summer of years of minimum flow, salt water penetrated the lower river and delta region, and in wet seasons the upper bay was fresh, part of the time, to the Golden Gate. This variation in quality of water was not, however, of sufficient duration to affect the characteristic vegetation growth of the regions on each side of the straits, nor to change the designation of Suisun Bay as ordinarily a fresh water body and San Francisco Bay as salt water. The works of man have changed conditions in many ways. The most important changes have been brought about gradualJy,-so slowly as to be hardly noticeable. The dry season of 1918,-when large summer diversions for irrigation in the Sacramento Valley resulted in the sudden penetration of salt water farther upstream than ever known before, at such an early period in summer first brought the salt water problem to public notice. The slow effects of increasing diversions in previous years had escaped notice, but were brought prominently to the attention of the inhabitants of the upper bay and delta regions in this year. Since 1918, the dry years of 1920, 1924- and 1926 have more convincingly demonstrated the importance of the salt water problem. An accurate picture of natural conditions is not possible, because no records have been collected on which such a picture can be based, but very close approximations can be made. The log of the distance traveled by the water barge of the California Hawaiian Sugar Company in going upstream to obtain fresh water has been kept since 1908. These figures give the means of determining approximately the conditions during that period. In 1908 irrigation had been extensively developed in both valleys and conditions then were not natural. For an estimate of earlier conditions we must go to the stream flow records of the tributary streams before important diversions are taken out. It is the practice of the Sugar Company to send the barge upstream until water of approximately 50 to 70 parts per million chlorine is reached. The crew of the barge are equipped with apparatus by which water is analyzed until this degree of purity is reached. Since trips are made nearly every day during the summer months, the record is a very good indication of the point reached by salt water. A summary of the complete records shows the fluctuation of the line between fresh and salt water. Records of the Sugar Company arc attached. (Table 1.) The Sugar Company requires water of great purity. For irrigation, domestic or ordinary industrial uses, water of a lesser degree of purity may be used. A comparison of the point where the Sugar Company's barge is filled with the point where the remaining uses could be satisfied, indicates that from five to ten miles downstream from the place where the barge turns, water could be obtained satisfactory for domestic supply. Making an allowance of 7 1/2 miles in the average records, we find that an average flow of 5,000 second feet in both streams will maintain fresh water at Collinsville; 7,000 second feet will maintain fresh water at the San Francisco-Sacramento ferry. If we sum up the flow of the important tributaries of the Sacramento and San Joaquin rivers at the points where these streams leave the mountains and assume that this flow under natural conditions would have reached the head of the Suisun Bay we will find that at no time in the past ten years would the average monthly flow have been Jess than 5,100 second feet. It is probable, should all streams be running in a natural way, that salt water would have penetrated no farther in this extremely dry period than Antioch, and then only for a few days at a time. It is not possible to make a more detailed study of this condition without making a number of assumptions as to speed of flow from the gaging stations to the head of the bay, and there is little accurate information on which the assumptions may be made. The definite statement that salt water under natural conditions did not penetrate higher upstream than the mouth of the river, except in the driest years and then only for a few days at a time, is warranted. (See Table 2 for monthly flow of tributary streams.) At present salt water reaches Antioch every year, in two-thirds of the years running further upstream. It is to be expected that it will continue to do so in future, even in years of greatest runoff. In other words, the penetration of salt water has become a permanent phenomenon in the lower river region.

Sampling for Per- and Polyfluoroalkyl Substances (PFAS) by the Groundwater Ambient Monitoring and Assessment Priority Basin Project

Publisher not available | May 25th, 2021

San Andreas Fault Stress Change Due To Groundwater Withdrawal in California's Central Valley, 1860-2010

American Geophysical Union (AGU) | December 28th, 2021

We investigate the spatial and temporal effects of groundwater removal in California's Central Valley on ground surface deformation and on stress changes on the nearby ce

We investigate the spatial and temporal effects of groundwater removal in California's Central Valley on ground surface deformation and on stress changes on the nearby central San Andreas fault (CSAF). In particular, we focus on two outstanding questions: (a) What are the spatial distributions of Coulomb failure stress (ΔCFS) on the CSAF? (b) What are the effects of viscoelasticity on uplift and ΔCSF over time? We focus on the well studied 2006–2010 drought, estimating the change in groundwater storage and the resulting uplift and stress change through a numerical model for the Earth. Viscoelastic effects are examined through an estimate of historical groundwater change from 1860-1961 and a hydrological model from 1961-2003 added to the 2006–2010 drought estimates. Here we find that lower crust or upper mantle viscosity variations enhance uplift and stress changes and that CSAF stress changes may accumulate with time, especially with droughts and groundwater consumption.

San Francisco Bay California Toxics Rule Priority Pollutant Ambient Water Monitoring Report

San Francisco Estuary Institute (SFEI) | February 1st, 2017

In 2000, the USEPA published Water Quality Standards; Establishment of Numeric Objectives for Priority Toxic Pollutants for the State of California, commonly known as t

In 2000, the USEPA published Water Quality Standards; Establishment of Numeric Objectives for Priority Toxic Pollutants for the State of California, commonly known as the California Toxics Rule (CTR), which established numeric water quality standards for 126 priority pollutants. Under the Policy for Implementation of Toxics Standards for Inland Surface Waters, Enclosed Bays, and Estuaries of California (also known as the State Implementation Policy, SIP) the San Francisco Bay Regional Water Quality Control Board (SFBRWQCB) is required to establish water quality-based effluent limitations in order to achieve priority pollutant standards. For the purposes of this document “water quality criteria” (WQCs) will be used to refer both to the CTR established numeric criteria for 126 priority pollutants as well as to numeric objectives for 12 of these priority pollutants and tributyltin previously established in the San Francisco Bay Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) and/or the National Toxics Rule. A number of these pollutants previously were or continue to be regularly monitored as part of the Regional Monitoring Program Status and Trends (RMP S&T). The priority pollutants not routinely included in RMP S&T were previously monitored in wet and dry season ambient water sampling in 2002 and 2003. Results of that effort are detailed in a previously issued : Most of the priority pollutants were not detected in that study, or detected at concentrations below their WQC. Among the pollutants that were detected, a number of them were also found at similar concentrations in lab blanks, suggesting they might not have been present (or at least were at lower concentrations) in the ambient environment. Since over a decade had passed since that previous monitoring effort, the RMP embarked on an effort to repeat measurement of these seldom analyzed (non- S&T) contaminants, to ensure conditions have not changed appreciably to present greater risk for any of them.

San Francisco Bay: A Freshwater Starved Estuary

Bay Institute | September 1st, 2016

How Reducing Flows Harms the Ecosystems of San Francisco Bay and Coastal Waters The Bay Institute’s major new study, San Francisco Bay: The Freshwater – Starved Estu

How Reducing Flows Harms the Ecosystems of San Francisco Bay and Coastal Waters The Bay Institute’s major new study, San Francisco Bay: The Freshwater – Starved Estuary, documents how the ecological health of San Francisco Bay and the nearby ocean is at high risk because large-scale water diversion in the Bay’s watershed severely limits the amount of fresh water that reaches the Bay and alters the timing of that flow. Inflow to the Bay from its Central Valley watershed now averages less than half of what it would be without diversions; in some years just one-third of the runoff makes it to the Bay. The result is a nearly permanent drought for the Bay’s fish, wildlife, and their habitats. This radical alteration creates severe consequences for the Bay and marine ecosystems – and Bay Area residents pay the price. The study shows how unsustainable diversion of the Bay’s freshwater inflow: Dramatically cuts production of fish and shrimp that are the food source for marine mammals, like Orca Whales, and birds; Allows pollutants to accumulate to dangerous levels and encourages blooms of toxic algae; Reduces sediment supply to Bay Area wetlands and beaches; Makes it easier for undesirable non-native species to successfully invade the Bay Estuary. The San Francisco Bay Estuary is created by the mixing of fresh water from the Central Valley’s rivers with salt water from the Pacific Ocean. Dramatically reducing the inflow of fresh water generates cascading effects in the Bay’s watershed, the Bay itself, and coastal ocean waters. The report’s major findings include: On average, since 1975 more than half (53%) of runoff from the Central Valley watershed has been diverted, stored, or exported before it can reach the Bay – and in many years two-thirds or more of the Bay’s inflow is captured; As a result of intensive water diversions, the Bay experiences catastrophically dry years almost half the time (only one “supercritically dry” year occurred naturally between 1975-2014, but the Bay experienced nineteen supercritical years during that period); Numerous unrelated fish species – from sharks to salmon, from sturgeon to smelt – show strong positive correlations with Bay Inflow; many of these species are now endangered, and even commercially viable fisheries are in decline; Predators that feed on flow-dependent fish and shrimp are feeling the pinch – for example, dwindling supplies of Central Valley Chinook salmon may restrict the recovery of the local Orca whale population; Blooms of toxic “algae” (cyanobacteria) are becoming more frequent, and other pollutants are becoming more concentrated, as a result of reductions in freshwater flows from the Bay’s watershed; Bay Area beaches and tidal wetlands are deprived of sediment that was once transported by high river flows. The study reports that local businesses are likely to suffer from the Bay’s continued decline, including those related to commercial fishing and tourism. As our Bay, beaches, wetlands, and fish and wildlife populations deteriorate, the quality of life for many Bay Area residents will also be severely – and perhaps permanently – damaged. The study identifies four important approaches to improving Bay inflows: Update the State’s 21 year old water quality standards for the Bay Estuary to ensure adequate inflow Require all those who divert water destined for the Bay, not just a subset, to contribute their fair share of fresh water to support benefits enjoyed by all Californians Invest in local water supplies around the state including conservation, and recycling, that can generate millions of acre-feet of water and reduce reliance on water diverted from the Estuary and its watershed Coordinate management of flows with wetland and beach restoration to more effectively protect shorelines The study was prepared for the San Francisco Estuary Partnership, a coalition of resource agencies, non-profits, citizens, and scientists working to protect, restore, and enhance water quality and fish and wildlife habitat in and around the San Francisco Bay Delta Estuary, which also provided the majority of funding for the project.