Seasonality of Retreat Rate of a Wave-Exposed Marsh Edge

American Geophysical Union (AGU) | July 10th, 2024

Waves can cause destruction of marshlands when they collide with the boundary of the marsh area. We studied how the speed of marsh loss from waves can change between seas

Waves can cause destruction of marshlands when they collide with the boundary of the marsh area. We studied how the speed of marsh loss from waves can change between seasons with different climates. To do this we made five 3D models of a marsh in South San Francisco Bay over a single year and looked at their differences between summer/fall/winter/spring. We found fast marsh loss in the seasons where daily winds are common (spring/summer), and minor changes in seasons with storms but without daily winds (fall/winter). Across our entire marsh, we saw lots of variety in how much it was changing, including some addition (i.e., positive change) to the mudflats near the marsh in the fall/winter. When we compared the marsh loss over one year to what was lost between 2004 and 2019, the speeds were similar, so we believe our study period was similar to long‐term marsh dynamics. This work encourages incorporating different seasonal climates into expectations of how marshes evolve, and supports that we need to think about marshes and mudflats as connected in how they change over time.

Seawater Intrusion in a Coastal California Aquifer

U.S. Geological Survey (USGS) | July 18th, 1996

Seawater intrusion in aquifers underlying the Oxnard Plain, Ventura County, California, was first observed in the early 1930's and became a serious problem in the mid-195

Seawater intrusion in aquifers underlying the Oxnard Plain, Ventura County, California, was first observed in the early 1930's and became a serious problem in the mid-1950's (California Department of Water Resources, 1965) (fig. 1). Historically, local agencies responsible for the management of ground water used a criterion of 100 milligrams per liter (mg/L) chloride to define the leading edge of the seawater front. It was assumed that all high-chloride water from wells behind the front originated from seawater that entered aquifers through outcrop areas in submarine canyons. Recent work (Izbicki, 1991; Stamos and others, 1992) showed that other sources of high-chloride water to wells are present and that the areal extent of seawater intrusion in the upper aquifer system is smaller than previously believed.

Seawater intrusion processes, investigation and management: Recent advances and future challenges

Advances in Water Resources (Elsevier) | January 17th, 2013

Seawater intrusion (SI) is a global issue, exacerbated by increasing demands for freshwater in coastal zones and predisposed to the influences of rising sea levels and ch

Seawater intrusion (SI) is a global issue, exacerbated by increasing demands for freshwater in coastal zones and predisposed to the influences of rising sea levels and changing climates. This review presents the state of knowledge in SI research, compares classes of methods for assessing and managing SI, and suggests areas for future research. We subdivide SI research into categories relating to processes, measurement, prediction and management. Considerable research effort spanning more than 50 years has provided an extensive array of field, laboratory and computer-based techniques for SI investigation. Despite this, knowledge gaps exist in SI process understanding, in particular associated with transient SI processes and timeframes, and the characterization and prediction of freshwater–saltwater interfaces over regional scales and in highly heterogeneous and dynamic settings. Multidisciplinary research is warranted to evaluate interactions between SI and submarine groundwater discharge, ecosystem health and unsaturated zone processes. Recent advances in numerical simulation, calibration and optimization techniques require rigorous field-scale application to contemporary issues of climate change, sea-level rise, and socioeconomic and ecological factors that are inseparable elements of SI management. The number of well-characterized examples of SI is small, and this has impeded understanding of field-scale processes, such as those controlling mixing zones, saltwater upconing, heterogeneity effects and other factors. Current SI process understanding is based mainly on numerical simulation and laboratory sand-tank experimentation to unravel the combined effects of tides, surface water–groundwater interaction, heterogeneity, pumping and density contrasts. The research effort would benefit from intensive measurement campaigns to delineate accurately interfaces and their movement in response to real-world coastal aquifer stresses, encompassing a range of geological and hydrological settings.

Second Amended Delano-Earlimart Irrigation District Groundwater Sustainability Plan 2024

Delano-Earlimart Irrigation District Groundwater Sustainability Agency (DEID GSA) | July 1st, 2024

In January of 2020, the DEID GSA submitted its Groundwater Sustainability Plan (GSP) to the California Department of Water Resources (DWR). The GSP provided technical doc

In January of 2020, the DEID GSA submitted its Groundwater Sustainability Plan (GSP) to the California Department of Water Resources (DWR). The GSP provided technical documentation of the DEID Management Area’s existing sustainability, along with addressing the needs of the Earlimart Public Utility District and Richgrove Community Services District. The GSP outlined specific management actions that will be taken in accordance with the Sustainable Groundwater Management Act. DWR’s review of the Tule Subbasin, as a whole, resulted in an incomplete determination, to which the GSAs in the Tule Subbasin had 180 days to respond. The GSA’s in the Tule Subbasin provided revised GSPs on July 27, 2022, which DWR also determined were inadequate, causing the Tule Subbasin to transition to the oversight of the State Water Resources Control Board (SWRCB). The draft GSP found below includes updates to specifically address comments received from the SWRCB and their staff in anticipation of the Tule Subbasin probationary hearing on September 17, 2024. Comments on the 2nd amended GSP can be submitted to info@deid.org and will be accepted through August 18, 2024. Due to size, this file has been divided. Part 1, Part 2, Part 3, Part 4, Part 5, Part 6

Second Report of Recharge Parties Pursuant to RWQCB Resolution No. R8-2008-0019 Cooperative Agreement to Protect Water Quality and Encourage the Conjunctive Uses of Imported Water in the Santa Ana River Basin, Yucaipa and San Timoteo Management Zones

San Bernardino Valley Municipal Water District | July 18th, 2012

The importation of water (i.e., State Water Project (SWP) water, Colorado River water, and imported groundwater) to groundwater basins within the Santa Ana River Region

The importation of water (i.e., State Water Project (SWP) water, Colorado River water, and imported groundwater) to groundwater basins within the Santa Ana River Region is necessary to meet increasing demand. However, long-term conjunctive use of water within the Region could affect groundwater quality. As such, the California Regional Water Quality Control Board Santa Ana Region (RWQCB) is requiring that groundwater quality be managed to meet the water quality objectives for total dissolved solids (TDS) and nitrogen (i.e., Salinity Objectives) regulated in the 1995 Water Quality Control Plan for the Santa Ana River Basin (Basin Plan). On January 22, 2004, the RWQCB adopted Resolution No. R8-2004-0001, incorporating an updated TDS and nitrogen management plan that includes revised groundwater subbasin boundaries; revised TDS and nitrate-nitrogen water quality objectives for groundwater; revised TDS and nitrogen waste load allocations; and revised reach designations, TDS and nitrogen objectives and beneficial uses for specific surface waters. On May 19, 2006, the RWQCB considered a resolution and order that would have adopted general waste discharge requirements for the recharge of imported water to the Santa Ana River Basin. Based on input from stakeholders, it was decided by the RWQCB that the feasibility of a cooperative program should be investigated that would achieve the objectives of and obviate the adoption of the draft resolution and order under consideration. On January 18, 2008, the RWQCB adopted Resolution No. R8-2008-0019 authorizing a “Cooperative Agreement to Protect Water Quality and Encourage the Conjunctive Use of Imported Water in the Santa Ana River Basin.” The purpose of the cooperative agreement is to allow the participating parties to “…monitor and improve water quality objectives within the Santa Ana River Region in a manner that is consistent with the needs of the inhabitants of the Region for a reliable supply of water.” (Cooperative Agreement, 2008). The following Parties have entered into this cooperative agreement: California Regional Water Quality Control Board, Santa Ana Region, City of Corona, City of Riverside, City of San Bernardino Municipal Water Department, Eastern Municipal Water District, Elsinore Valley Municipal Water District, Orange County Water District, San Bernardino Valley Municipal Water District (Valley District), San Gorgonio Pass Water Agency, and Western Municipal Water District of Riverside County (Western).  

Second Supplement to State Water Resources Board Bulletin No. 11, San Joaquin County Investigation, Basic Data, Calaveras Unit, 1955-56

California Department of Water Resources (DWR) | April 20th, 1957

Secretarial Order #3206: American Indian Tribal Rights, Federal-Tribal Trust Responsibilities, and the Endangered Species Act

U.S. Department of the Interior (DOI) | January 24th, 2006

This Order is issued by the Secretary of the Interior and the Secretary of Commerce (Secretaries) pursuant to the Endangered Species Act of 1973, 16 U.S.C. 1531, as amend

This Order is issued by the Secretary of the Interior and the Secretary of Commerce (Secretaries) pursuant to the Endangered Species Act of 1973, 16 U.S.C. 1531, as amended (the Act), the federal-tribal trust relationship, and other federal law. Specifically, this Order clarifies the responsibilities of the component agencies, bureaus and offices of the Department of the Interior and the Department of Commerce (Departments), when actions taken under authority of the Act and associated implementing regulations affect, or may affect, Indian lands, tribal trust resources, or the exercise of American Indian tribal rights, as defined in this Order. This Order further acknowledges the trust responsibility and treaty obligations of the United States toward Indian tribes and tribal members and its government-to-government relationship in dealing with tribes. Accordingly, the Departments will carry out their responsibilities under the Act in a manner that harmonizes the Federal trust responsibility to tribes, tribal sovereignty, and statutory missions of the Departments, and that strives to ensure that Indian tribes do not bear a disproportionate burden for the conservation of listed species, so as to avoid or minimize the potential for conflict and confrontation.

Securing Color River Supplies - An Urban-Agriculture Partnership in the Palo Verde Valley

Metropolitan Water District of Southern California (MWD) | March 16th, 2022

SediMatch Factsheet

San Francisco Estuary Institute (SFEI) | June 1st, 2018

 SediMatch is a collaborative program of the San Francisco Bay Joint Venture (SFBJV), the San Francisco Bay Conservation and Development Commission (BCDC), the San Franc

 SediMatch is a collaborative program of the San Francisco Bay Joint Venture (SFBJV), the San Francisco Bay Conservation and Development Commission (BCDC), the San Francisco Estuary Institute (SFEI), the San Francisco Estuary Partnership (SFEP), and others to bring together the wetland habitat restoration, flood control, and dredging communities to discuss challenges and find mutually beneficial strategies to increase reuse of dredged sediment at habitat restoration sites. 

Sediment Lithology and Borehole Erosion Testing, American and Sacramento Rivers, California

U.S. Geological Survey (USGS) | July 9th, 2020

A field investigation intended to measure the potential for erosion of sediments beside the American and Sacramento Rivers near Sacramento, California, is described. The

A field investigation intended to measure the potential for erosion of sediments beside the American and Sacramento Rivers near Sacramento, California, is described. The study featured two primary components: (1) drilling and soil sampling to reveal lithology, down to depths matching the local river thalweg, where possible, and (2) borehole erosion tests (BETs) as described by Briaud and others (2017) at many of the same locations. The latter test involved drilling a vertical hole, measuring its diameter profile, inserting a hollow drilling rod to almost the bottom of the hole, and pumping fluid through the drilling rod at a known discharge for a chosen time interval. The hole was then resurveyed to establish an erosion rate (change in borehole radius divided by duration of flow event) as a function of depth, and the test was repeated. This test was performed with water as the erosive fluid at 12 locations, with 1 test repeated with drilling mud. Lithology holes were drilled at these same locations and an additional five locations. Drilling operations took place on river left and river right on the American River and river left (left bank, when looking downstream) on the Sacramento River.