Shop – California Water Library

Page

Showing
21-31 of 33

Per Page

Sort By

Nutrient Management Strategy Science Plan Report

San Francisco Estuary Institute (SFEI) | September 9th, 2016

Summary

The San Francisco Bay (SFB) estuary receives large inputs of the nutrients nitrogen and phosphorous from anthropogenic sources, and has the potential to suffer negative

The San Francisco Bay (SFB) estuary receives large inputs of the nutrients nitrogen and phosphorous from anthropogenic sources, and has the potential to suffer negative impacts from nutrient overenrichment. Nutrient concentrations in SFB exceed those in other estuarine ecosystems where degradation is strongly expressed. To date, SFB has shown resistance to some of the classic symptoms of nutrient over-enrichment, such as excessive phytoplankton biomass as chlorophyll-a (chl-a) and low dissolved oxygen (DO). Recent observations, however, suggest that SFB’s resistance to nutrient enrichment is weakening, and have generated concern that SFB may be trending toward, or may already be experiencing, adverse impacts due to its high nutrient loads. In response to these concerns, the San Francisco Bay Regional Water Quality Control Board (SFBRWQCB) worked collaboratively with stakeholders to develop the San Francisco Bay Nutrient Management Strategy (NMS).1 The NMS lays out an overall approach for developing the underlying science to support nutrient management decisions. This report presents a Draft Science Plan for implementing the SFB NMS. The report’s main goals include: Lay out a multi-year Science Plan representing a logical sequence of studies to inform major management decisions, assuming a time-line of 10+ years. Develop an approach and rationale for sequencing and prioritizing among studies, and identify specific high-priority studies, in particular those that should proceed in FY2016- 2018. Provide realistic estimates of the time-frame and funding needed to support a Science Plan that will successfully inform management decisions. The Draft Science Plan was developed in 2014-15 with input from science advisors (Table 1.1), the NMS Steering Committee, and the NMS Nutrient Technical Work Group (Fig. 1.1). Projects are described in more detail in the first 1-3 years, and in increasingly less detail over time, recognizing that the Science Plan will be iteratively refined based on new insights gained as work progresses.

View Document Download Now Email

Nutrient Management Strategy Science Program

San Francisco Estuary Institute (SFEI) | September 1st, 2017

Summary

San Francisco Bay (SFB) receives large inputs of the nutrients nitrogen (N) and phosphorous (P) from anthropogenic sources. N and P are essential components of a healthy

San Francisco Bay (SFB) receives large inputs of the nutrients nitrogen (N) and phosphorous (P) from anthropogenic sources. N and P are essential components of a healthy estuary, supporting primary production at the base of the food web. However, ambient N and P concentrations in SFB exceed those in many other estuarine ecosystems, including those considered eutrophic1 and that experience nutrient-related impairment, such as excessive phytoplankton blooms and prolonged periods of low dissolved oxygen (DO). Unlike those other nutrient-enriched estuaries, though, SFB has exhibited resistance to classic eutrophication symptoms. Recent observations, however, suggest that SFB’s resistance to nutrient enrichment is weakening (e.g., Cloern et al., 2007; Cloern et al., 2010; SFEI 2014a). These San Francisco Bay Nutrient Management Strategy (NMS) Science Program was launched in 2014 to develop the scientific foundation to support nutrient management decisions. The NMS Steering Committee, representing 13 stakeholder groups (regulators, dischargers, water purveyors, NGOs, resource agencies) oversees the NMS’ implementation, including financial oversight and alignment of NMS science activities with high priority management questions. The San Francisco Estuary Institute (SFEI) serves as the technical lead on implementing the NMS Science Program. SFEI staff work with regional collaborators to carry out NMS projects, including field investigations, monitoring, and data interpretation.

View Document Download Now Email

Nutrients in the Nation’s Streams and Groundwater, 1992–2004

U.S. Geological Survey (USGS) | June 6th, 2011

Summary

This report is one of a series of publications, The Quality of Our Nation’s Waters, which describes major findings of the NAWQA Program on water-quality issues of regio

This report is one of a series of publications, The Quality of Our Nation’s Waters, which describes major findings of the NAWQA Program on water-quality issues of regional and national concern. This report presents an assessment of the occurrence and distribution of nutrients in the Nation’s streams and groundwater based on water-quality data from about 500 streams and over 5,000 wells collected from 1992 through 2001. Other topics addressed include the relation of nutrient conditions to aquatic life in streams, changes in nutrient conditions from 1988 through 2004, and implications for future changes. The information in this series is intended primarily for those interested or involved in resource management and protection, conservation, regulation, and policy-making at regional and national levels. In addition, the information is relevant to those at a local level who wish to know more about the general quality of streams and groundwater in areas near where they live and how that quality compares with other areas across the Nation.

View Document Download Now Email

Pilot Study Examining Spatial Differences in Water Quality Between Shoal and Channel Habitats

San Francisco Estuary Institute (SFEI) | August 1st, 2019

Summary

Under the umbrella of the Nutrient Management Strategy (NMS; www.sfbaynutrients.sfei.org), we are investigating relationships between the SFB’s elevated nutrient levels

Under the umbrella of the Nutrient Management Strategy (NMS; www.sfbaynutrients.sfei.org), we are investigating relationships between the SFB’s elevated nutrient levels and phytoplankton production, with the goal of identifying protective nutrient loads and effective nutrient management options. To address these goals, NMS work includes continued ship-based monitoring (in collaboration with USGS); augmenting that monitoring with high-frequency sensor data and intensive field studies; and developing coupled hydrodynamic-biogeochemical models -- calibrated using field observations -- to simulate water quality under a range of forcings.

View Document Download Now Email

Pollutants of concern (POC) loads monitoring progress report, water years (WYs) 2012, 2013, and 2014

San Francisco Estuary Institute (SFEI) | July 1st, 2016

Summary

The San Francisco Regional Water Quality Control Board (Water Board) has determined that San Francisco Bay is impaired by mercury and PCBs due to threats to wildlife and

The San Francisco Regional Water Quality Control Board (Water Board) has determined that San Francisco Bay is impaired by mercury and PCBs due to threats to wildlife and human consumers of fish from the Bay. These contaminants persist in the environment and accumulate in aquatic food webs (SFRWRCB 2006; SFRWRCB, 2008). The Water Board has identified urban runoff from local watersheds as a pathway for pollutants of concern into the Bay, including mercury and PCBs. The Municipal Regional Stormwater Permit (MRP; SFRWRCB, 2009) contains several provisions requiring studies to measure local watershed loads of suspended sediment (SS), total organic carbon (TOC), polychlorinated biphenyl (PCB), total mercury (HgT), total methylmercury (MeHgT), nitrate-N (NO3), phosphate-P (PO4), and total phosphorus (TP) (provision C.8.e), as well as other pollutants covered under provision C.14. (e.g. legacy pesticides, PBDEs, and selenium).

View Document Download Now Email

Pulse of the Delta 2011

San Francisco Estuary Institute (SFEI) | March 16th, 2011

Summary

Welcome to the first issue of the Pulse of the Delta: Monitoring and Managing Water Quality in the Sacramento – San Joaquin Delta, the new publication of the emerging D

Welcome to the first issue of the Pulse of the Delta: Monitoring and Managing Water Quality in the Sacramento – San Joaquin Delta, the new publication of the emerging Delta Regional Monitoring Program (RMP). This report is a direct response to Delta RMP stakeholders’ desire for an accessible water quality summary for the Delta that addresses important regional questions. Table of Contents: Did Contaminants Play a Role in the Pelagic Organism Decline? The Delta RMP: Re-thinking Water Quality Monitoring in the Delta Ammonia in the Delta: The science, implications for management How Delta Studies Have Reshaped Our Understanding Pyrethroid Insecticides Contaminants of Emerging Concern: Adapting to a Moving Target New Pesticides

View Document Download Now Email

Pulse of the Delta 2012

San Francisco Estuary Institute (SFEI) | August 2nd, 2013

Summary

This second edition of the Pulse of the Delta includes the following sections: The KEY TOPIC article introduces this year’s theme, LINKING SCIENCE AND MANAGEMENT THR

This second edition of the Pulse of the Delta includes the following sections: The KEY TOPIC article introduces this year’s theme, LINKING SCIENCE AND MANAGEMENT THROUGH REGIONAL MONITORING (PAGE 6). The MANAGEMENT UPDATE section provides updates on Delta RMP development (PAGE 12) and the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA)’s Delta Clean Water Act evaluation (PAGE 18). It further provides an update on the development of Nutrient Numeric Endpoints for San Francisco Bay, due to the relevance of this topic to Delta stakeholders (PAGE 28). And as a new feature, the Management Update section now also provides a regulatory status update for pollutants of concern. This edition of the Pulse of the Delta introduces a NEW STATUS AND TRENDS section with updates on important monitoring results (PAGE 44) and leading indicators (PAGE 50) for the Delta. The STATUS AND TRENDS section was made possible thanks to significant contributions by the Interagency Ecological Program, U.S. Geological Survey, the Central Valley Regional Water Board, California Department of Fish and Game, California Department of Water Resources, and scientists at the UC Berkeley and San Francisco State University Romberg Tiburon Center. Two FEATURE ARTICLES provide an overview of recent research findings that could help wetland managers reduce the methylmercury problem and a glimpse into the future of the Interagency Ecological Program (IEP). One of the main challenges as ecosystem restoration efforts are moving forward will be the mercury problem. Large-scale restoration of wetland areas will be required to provide a sufficient amount of aquatic habitat for restoring the Delta ecosystem. At the same time, water quality managers will need to identify actions to protect people and wildlife from exposure to methylmercury that may originate from restored wetlands, due to a legacy of mercury contamination in Delta soils. Recently completed and ongoing studies in the Yolo Bypass provide new information on management options for controlling methylmercury production in wetlands and offsite transport (PAGE 66). IEP scientists have been monitoring and researching the San Francisco Estuary since 1970. Now the IEP has arrived at an important crossroads, and its future is being decided at the same time as environmental managers are determining what a desirable future ecosystem would look like, how it would function, and how it can be established (PAGE 76).

View Document Download Now Email

San Francisco Bay Interim Model Validation Report

San Francisco Estuary Institute (SFEI) | December 1st, 2017

Summary

As part of the Nutrient Management Strategy, a coupled hydrodynamic-biogeochemical model of San Francisco Bay is being developed. The process-based, numerical model will

As part of the Nutrient Management Strategy, a coupled hydrodynamic-biogeochemical model of San Francisco Bay is being developed. The process-based, numerical model will be used to inform nutrient management decisions, by: • improving quantitative understanding of processes that shape current conditions, • forecasting ecosystem response under future scenarios, and • evaluating potential effectiveness of management actions. This report describes the model in its present configuration and the status of its validation. Model development is necessarily an iterative process, with early stages focused on refining the model’s representation of hydrodynamics and transport, and later stages of the effort including increasingly complex representations of biogeochemistry. Present validation efforts focus on assessing model skill with respect to hydrodynamics, salinity and transport. The final report will additionally consider model validation of water quality and biogeochemical processes.

View Document Download Now Email

San Francisco Bay Nutrient Management Strategy Observation Program

San Francisco Estuary Institute (SFEI) | July 1st, 2020

Summary

This document presents a planning-level description of the draft Nutrient Management Strategy Observation Program (NMSOP), including estimated budget and approach for ph

This document presents a planning-level description of the draft Nutrient Management Strategy Observation Program (NMSOP), including estimated budget and approach for phased growth. The NMSOP represents the design that is needed to address NMS†data needs¨ not an existing program. The proposed design represents a balance between two key goals: ● Target high priority NMS data collection needs ● Where feasible, align field work and data collection efforts with other programs’ established infrastructure, to enhance cost-effectiveness and sustainability. While an inter-program collaborative approach is important for securing NMSOP’s long-term sustainability, building a reliable consortium will require up-front effort to establish inter-program science, management, and financial agreements. This document focuses on the NMSOP scientific program design and growth, with institutional program development described in a companion work plan (SFEI 2016b).

View Document Download Now Email

Synthesis of Data from High-Frequency Nutrient and Associated Biogeochemical Monitoring for the Sacramento– San Joaquin Delta, Northern California

U.S. Geological Survey (USGS) | July 11th, 2017

Summary

This report is the second in a series of three reports that provide information about high-frequency (HF) nutrient and biogeochemical monitoring in the Sacramento–San J

This report is the second in a series of three reports that provide information about high-frequency (HF) nutrient and biogeochemical monitoring in the Sacramento–San Joaquin Delta of northern California (Delta). The purpose of this report is to synthesize the data available from a nutrient and water-quality HF (about every 15 minutes) monitoring network operated by the U.S. Geological Survey in the northern Delta. In this report, we describe the network and focus on the purpose of each station. We then present and discuss the available data, at various timescales—first at the monthly, seasonal, and inter-annual timescales, and second, for comparison, at the tidal and event timescales. As expected, we determined that there is substantial variability in nitrate-N concentrations at short timescales within hours, but also significant variability at longer timescales such as months or years. Resolving this variability is made possible by the HF data, with the largest variability caused by storms, tides, and diel biological processes. Given this large temporal variability, calculations of cumulative nutrient fluxes (for example, daily, monthly, or annual loads) is difficult without HF data. For example, in the Cache Slough, calculation of the annual load without the tidal variability resulted in a 30 percent underestimation of the true annual load value. We conclude that HF measurements are important for accurate determination of fluxes and loads in tidal environments, but, more importantly, provide important insights into processes and rates of nutrient cycling. This report, along with the other two reports of this series (Bergamaschi and others, 2017; Kraus, Bergamaschi, and others, 2017), was drafted in cooperation with the Delta Regional Monitoring Program to help scientists, managers, and planners understand how HF data improve our understanding of nutrient sources and sinks, drivers, and effects in the Delta.

View Document Download Now Email

← Prev

Page : 3

Type

Journal Article (4)
magazine (3)
Memo (1)
Model (6)
Plan (1)
Report (15)
Research Article (1)
Strategy (4)
Technical Report (2)
White Paper (1)

Topic

Adaptive Management (1)
Agriculture (2)
Drought & Hydrology (1)
Ecosystem & Species Management (10)
Ecosystem Restoration (1)
Estuary News (3)
Federal Water Quality (4)
Fisheries (4)
Geochemistry (1)
Groundwater (1)
History (1)
Modeling (8)
Non Point Pollution Sources (6)
Planning & Management (4)
Point Pollution Sources (1)
Pollutants (7)
Sacramento-San Joaquin Delta (23)
Sanitation (1)
Science Management (4)
State Water Quality (3)
Stormwater (1)
Water Quality (28)
Water Quality Monitoring (18)

Keywords

agricultural drainage (1)
agriculture (1)
benthic macroinvertebrates (1)
bioassessment (1)
ecosystem management (3)
environmental justice (1)
Estuary News (3)
fisheries (3)
floodplain restoration (1)
groundwater (1)
groundwater contamination (1)
Groundwater Exchange (1)
habitat restoration (1)
history (1)
invasive species (1)
mercury (2)
modeling (5)
monitoring (16)
native fish (1)
nitrates (1)
nutrients (33)
outreach and engagement (1)
pesticides (1)
planning and management (2)
pollutants (5)
Sacramento–San Joaquin Delta (22)
science management (5)
sediment (1)
stormwater (2)
streams (2)
Surface Water Ambient Monitoring Program (SWAMP) (1)
wastewater (1)
water and energy (1)
water quality (26)
wetlands (1)

Publisher

California State Water Resources Control Board (SWRCB) (3)
Harmful Algae (Elsevier) (1)
Journal of Environmental Management (Elsevier) (1)
Nature Portfolio (Springer Nature) (1)
San Francisco Bay Regional Water Quality Control Board (SFBRWQCB) (1)
San Francisco Estuary Institute (SFEI) (15)
San Francisco Estuary Partnership (SFEP) (3)
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) (2)
U.S. Geological Survey (USGS) (4)
University of California, Davis (UC Davis) (2)

Basin

Santa Clara Valley - East Bay Plain 2-009.04 (1)

Hydrological Region

National (2)
Sacramento River (17)
San Francisco Bay (25)
San Joaquin River (17)

Reset

Search for:

CONTACT