Summary and Evaluation of Central Valley Spring-run Chinook Salmon Evolutionarily Significant Unit 2016

National Marine Fisheries Service (NMFS) | April 13th, 2016

The ESA, under Section 4(c)(2), directs the Secretary of Commerce to review the listing classification of threatened and endangered species at least once every five years

The ESA, under Section 4(c)(2), directs the Secretary of Commerce to review the listing classification of threatened and endangered species at least once every five years. After completing this review, the Secretary must determine if any species should be: (1) removed from the list; (2) have its status changed from threatened to endangered; or (3) have its status changed from endangered to threatened. The most recent status reviews for West Coast salmon and steelhead occurred in 2010, and prior to that in 2005 and 2006. This document summarizes NMFS’s 5-year review of the ESA-listed Central Valley (CV) spring-run Chinook salmon Evolutionarily Significant Unit (ESU).

Summary of Draft Environmental Impact Report Peripheral Canal Project

California Department of Water Resources (DWR) | August 1st, 1974

Summary of Federal and State Water Project Environmental Impacts in the San Francisco Bay-Delta Estuary, California

American Association for the Advancement of Science (AAAS) | July 15th, 1996

Summary of NMFS BiOp RPA Actions for Water Year 2014

Delta Stewardship Council (Delta Council) | October 30th, 2014

Summary Report on the Transactions of the Smelt Working Group in Water Year 2014

Delta Stewardship Council (Delta Council) | August 29th, 2014

The Bay‐Delta Fish and Wildlife Office (BDFWO) has prepared this report to summarize the implementation the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service’s (Service) biological opi

The Bay‐Delta Fish and Wildlife Office (BDFWO) has prepared this report to summarize the implementation the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service’s (Service) biological opinion on the Central Valley Project (CVP) and State Water Project (SWP) Long‐term Operations (BiOp) in Water Year (WY) 2014. In addition to background information pertinent to implementation of the BiOp , this report provides a summary of the transactions of the Smelt Working Group (SWG), as well as water operations and during WY 2014. The SWG is a technical team that evaluates biological and technical issues regarding Delta Smelt (Hypomesus transpacificus) and develops recommendations for consideration by the Service during implementation of the BiOp’s Reasonable and Prudent Alternative (RPA) actions. During WY 2014 the SWG made no recommendations for more restrictive water operations and the Service issued no determinations to reduce water exports.

Summary Report on the Transactions of the Smelt Working Group in Water Year 2018

Delta Stewardship Council (Delta Council) | November 1st, 2018

Support for Sediment Bioaccumulation Evaluation: Toxicity Reference Values for San Francisco Bay

San Francisco Estuary Institute (SFEI) | December 3rd, 2018

This special study of the Regional Monitoring Program for Water Quality in San Francisco Bay was conducted to support the Dredged Material Management Office (DMMO) proces

This special study of the Regional Monitoring Program for Water Quality in San Francisco Bay was conducted to support the Dredged Material Management Office (DMMO) process of evaluating results from bioaccumulation testing performed for routine dredging projects. The goal was to use the current DMMO methodology for selecting Toxicity Reference Values (TRVs) from the US Army Corps of Engineers Environmental Residue-Effects Database (ERED), in order to develop a standard list of TRVs for San Francisco Bay. TRVs are used as a conservative screening tool to efficiently evaluate whether observed invertebrate test organism body burdens could indicate adverse ecological effects on benthic organisms in situ. Currently, there are no published standard TRVs for the Bay, and TRV selection is presently performed on a case-by-case basis during the evaluation of bioaccumulation testing results submitted by individual dredgers. A standard list would promote consistent application of the methodology and improve the efficiency of dredging project evaluations. 

Suspect Screening and Chemical Profile Analysis of Storm-Water Runoff Following 2017 Wildfires in Northern California

Society of Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry (SETAC) | May 5th, 2022

The combustion of structures and household materials as well as firefighting during wildfires lead to releases of potentially hazardous chemicals directly into the landsc

The combustion of structures and household materials as well as firefighting during wildfires lead to releases of potentially hazardous chemicals directly into the landscape. Subsequent storm-water runoff events can transport wildfire-related contaminants to downstream receiving waters, where they may pose water quality concerns. To evaluate the environmental hazards of northern California fires on the types of contaminants in storm water discharging to San Francisco Bay and the coastal marine environment, we analyzed storm water collected after the northern California wildfires (October 2017) using a nontargeted analytical (NTA) approach. Liquid chromatography quadrupole time-of-flight mass spectrometric analysis was completed on storm-water samples (n = 20) collected from Napa County (impacted by the Atlas and Nuns fires), the city of Santa Rosa, and Sonoma County (Nuns and Tubbs fires) during storm events that occurred in November 2017 and January 2018. The NTA approach enabled us to establish profiles of contaminants based on peak intensities and chemical categories found in the storm-water samples and to prioritize significant chemicals within these profiles possibly attributed to the wildfire. The results demonstrated the presence of a wide range of contaminants in the storm water, including surfactants, per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances, and chemicals from consumer and personal care products. Homologs of polyethylene glycol were found to be the major contributor to the contaminants, followed by other widely used surfactants. Nonylphenol ethoxylates, typically used as surfactants, were detected and were much higher in samples collected after Storm Event 1 relative to Storm Event 2. The present study provides a comprehensive approach for examining wildfire-impacted storm-water contamination of related contaminants, of which we found many with potential ecological risk.

Sustainable Water and Environmental Management in the California Bay-Delta

National Academy of Sciences (NAS) | March 29th, 2012

Water management in the California Bay Delta is directed toward providing a more reliable water supply for California, and protecting and rehabilitating the Delta eco

Water management in the California Bay Delta is directed toward providing a more reliable water supply for California, and protecting and rehabilitating the Delta ecosystem, including five endangered and threatened populations and species of fish that live in or migrate through the Delta. However, water management in the Bay and Delta is distributed among many agencies and organizations, a structure that hinders the development and implementation of an integrated, comprehensive plan. As a result, recent Bay Delta planning efforts have not resolved the best plan for the environment or for satisfying anticipated water needs. Challenges include the fact that water scarcity has not been adequately addressed in planning for Delta water and environmental management; the interacting effects of the many environmental stressors that impact the Delta ecosystem, and the many biological and physical effects of climate change. This report discusses the issue of scarcity, factors affecting the listed species and the Delta ecosystem in general, future water-supply and delivery options, scientific uncertainties, the degree of restoration likely to be attainable, and the need for comprehensive planning. Key Messages Planning efforts to implement the two goals of providing a more reliable water supply for California and protecting and rehabilitating the Delta ecosystem have not led to clarity on how the inevitable tradeoffs between the two goals should be managed, particularly when water is in short supply. Climate change is one of most challenging and important issues confronting the management and rehabilitation of the Delta ecosystem. Changes in climate are expected to have profound effects on the physical and ecological structure and functioning of the Delta, as well as on the availability of water in California. Many environmental stressors, including water diversions, contaminants in the water, and introduced species affect the structure and functioning of Delta ecosystems. Interactions among stressors and between stressors and ecosystem processes are widespread and complex. Furthermore, species differ in their responses to stress. This complicates the interpretation and evaluation of the effects of stressors on the ecosystem, and makes it impossible to identify which stressor is the root cause of a certain environmental problem, or even to rank the stressors with any certainty. The large number of stressors, their effects and interactions lead to the conclusion that efforts to eliminate any one stressor are unlikely to reverse declines in listed species. Opportunities exist to mitigate or reverse the effects of many stressors. Continued effects analyses, modeling, and monitoring are necessary to ensure actions taken to rehabilitate the ecosystem are cost-effective. Due to the extensive physical changes that have already taken place and are still occurring in the Delta ecosystem and its tributary watersheds, it will not be possible to restore the habitat to its pre-disturbance state. Delta restoration programs will need to balance consideration of an ecosystem approach with the Endangered Species Act's emphasis on individual species. Assessments suggest that many species will be affected by shifts changes in the pattern and type of precipitation due to climate change. Projected increases in mean sea level and extremes of precipitation have the potential to increase the frequency of levee failures and the inundation of islands, in part because the levees continue to subside due to the oxidation of peat. Sea level rise also has the potential to enhance salt water intrusion and alter water quality. Planning and evaluation of future environmental and economic scenarios will need to address uncertainties in projections, integrated analysis, and the development of risk management strategies. Future planning should also include a climate-change based risk model and analysis that incorporates data on the actual changes in Delta conditions as well as alternative future climate change scenarios and their probability. The instability of levees and the fact that the failure of one levee can affect others are likely to be major issues for achieving any measure of water-supply reliability or ecosystem rehabilitation. Continuing the status quo of improving levees will not always be the most environmentally sustainable or economically defensible response in the years ahead. Science is necessary to inform actions and proposals, but does not provide the entire, prioritized, integrated analysis needed. Societal and political considerations are also important factors in determining the most appropriate policy. Undertaking a comprehensive review of water planning and management functioning would allow California to anticipate future needs such as water scarcity, balanced consideration of all statewide water use practices, and water engineering alternatives. As a result, the Delta would be an effective partner in statewide water management plans. It is likely that the scarcity of water for all needs in the Delta will become severe. While more effective planning is developed, the state will need to use its water resources efficiently and productively. The committee has not analyzed the benefits and disadvantages of an isolated conveyance facility, because not enough specific information was available about it, and therefore there is no recommendation with respect to its adoption as a major part of water management in the Delta. However, the considerations such as the form such a facility would take, its size, location, and the diversion design and operation, including the role of current diversions, should be analyzed as part of any integrated Delta plan, and compared to alternative water management options, including current operations.

Sustainable Water Management Strategy for Specialty Crop Expansion in the Sacramento Valley

Sacramento Area Council of Governments (SACOG) | June 26th, 2018

The Sacramento Area Council of Governments (SACOG) is an association of local governments in the six-county Sacramento Region of El Dorado, Placer, Sacramento, Sutter, Yo

The Sacramento Area Council of Governments (SACOG) is an association of local governments in the six-county Sacramento Region of El Dorado, Placer, Sacramento, Sutter, Yolo, and Yuba counties (excluding the Tahoe Basin in Placer and El Dorado counties) and the 22 cities therein. SACOG provides planning and funding for the region and serves as a forum for the study and resolution of regional issues. SACOG prepares the region’s long range plan which considers both transportation and land use. Through the lens of rural planning, SACOG has actively engaged in a Rural-Urban Connections Strategy (RUCS) Program that has studied ways to enhance rural economies and natural assets. The RUCS Program includes a scenario analysis modeling tool that links a parcel-level crop map with environmental and economic factors, including a comprehensive profile of per acre operational cost and return metrics for each crop. The study described in this report looks at how new agricultural crops and markets coupled with improved irrigation techniques will support new specialty crop acreage in the SACOG area. While new and improved irrigation techniques can result in better crop yields and decreased water demands, increases in irrigation efficiency also result in reduced groundwater recharge from irrigation return flows. SACOG received grant funding from the California Department of Food and Agriculture (CDFA) to evaluate the feasibility of recharging groundwater on agricultural lands within the SACOG portion of the Sacramento Valley to benefit specialty crop production. The primary goal of the project is to bring together a broad range of different factors impacting groundwater recharge and infiltration and to identify areas across the region that are most suited for strategic flooding of specialty crop fields; in other words, areas that will most efficiently and effectively facilitate recharge, while minimizing cost to the specialty crop producer. Ultimately, this feasibility information will be incorporated into SACOG’s RUCS model to evaluate the potential benefits of recharging groundwater on agricultural land for the benefit of specialty crops.