Variations on a method for evaluating decadal-scale changes in the groundwater quality of two GAMA coastal study units 2004–14, California GAMA Priority Basin Project

U.S. Geological Survey (USGS) | August 8th, 2018

Decadal changes in groundwater quality in two study units on the north-central California coast were evaluated by the Priority Basin Project (PBP) of the Groundwater Ambi

Decadal changes in groundwater quality in two study units on the north-central California coast were evaluated by the Priority Basin Project (PBP) of the Groundwater Ambient Monitoring and Assessment (GAMA) Program. Groundwater samples collected from wells during 2004–05 were compared on a pair-wise basis to samples collected from the same wells during 2014. The data set consisted of paired-samples from 50 public supply wells in 2 GAMA-PBP study units (25 wells each in the North San Francisco Bay and the Monterey Bay and Salinas Valley Basins), with analytical results for 160 water-quality constituents. Statistical analysis was done on grouped results for the 59 constituents that were detected in at least 10 percent of the samples during either sampling period to evaluate decadal-scale change by a step-trend analysis. The data for both of the sampling periods were processed three different ways, resulting in three variations of the paired results to be submitted for statistical analyses. The first evaluation method variation processed data only to facilitate comparison of data when one or both of the results was a non-detection. The second and third variations applied the additional requirement that differences between initial and decadal-sample results exceed a defined threshold to prevent small differences from supporting the conclusion of a step trend. One method for setting the difference threshold between initial-sampling and resampling results is based on criteria used by the GAMA-PBP to determine whether or not replicate results are acceptable. The other difference-threshold-setting method uses a calculated confidence interval around each result based on demonstrated analytical variability for the constituents during each sampling period. Finally, constituents for which decadal-scale changes were statistically significant were identified using the Wilcoxon-Pratt signed-rank test on each of the three evaluation method variations. Step trends were identified by at least 1 of the 3 method variations for 33 constituents. After considering other factors, however, such as water-quality context and the results of quality-control samples, it was concluded that decadal changes were meaningful for 14 constituents in at least 1 of the 2 study units. Constituents for which step trends indicated meaningful increases were dissolved oxygen, total nitrogen, nitrate, orthophosphate, calcium, chloride, sulfate, iron, and lithium. Constituents for which step trends indicated meaningful decreases were temperature, arsenic, lead, the isotopic ratio of carbon-13, and tritium.

Water Quality Science in the Sacramento-San Joaquin Delta: Chemical Contaminants and Nutrients

Delta Stewardship Council (Delta Council) | July 26th, 2018

This review focuses on contaminants and nutrients in the Sacramento-San Joaquin Delta (the Delta), and on how findings about them have been sometimes used and sometimes n

This review focuses on contaminants and nutrients in the Sacramento-San Joaquin Delta (the Delta), and on how findings about them have been sometimes used and sometimes neglected in decisions related to ecosystem health in the Delta. The review considers water quality measurements made both in support of basic research and as part of routine monitoring studies in the Delta. However, the topic of monitoring per se is not comprehensively covered in this review because the Delta ISB is in the initial stages of reviewing the extensive monitoring enterprise in the Delta. This review of water quality is based on responses to a questionnaire sent to government agencies and science programs, interviews with water quality specialists and users of water quality data, relevant scientific publications, presentations observed in workshops and conferences, and public comments received on draft versions of the review. While we sought input from a broad range of stakeholders, we do not assume that we received a complete range of perceptions about this important issue. Additionally, water quality research and monitoring efforts are constantly evolving in the Delta, and several new programs and improvements were made as this review was being researched and prepared. This review should be considered to be part of an ongoing process by the Delta ISB.

Watershed-scale Evaluation of Agricultural BMP Effectiveness in Protecting Critical Coastal Habitats: Final Report on the Status of Three Central California Estuaries

Central Coast Regional Water Quality Control Board (CCRWQCB) | April 30th, 2010

Along California's Central Coast, the Pajaro, Salinas, and Santa Maria Rivers drain to coastal estuaries that provide essential habitat for early life stages of commercia

Along California's Central Coast, the Pajaro, Salinas, and Santa Maria Rivers drain to coastal estuaries that provide essential habitat for early life stages of commercially and recreationally important marine fish species, threatened anadromous fish species, migratory birds, and other wildlife. These are the largest watersheds on the central coast and each contains year-round, intensively cultivated agricultural land that supports a $3.5 billion/year industry producing most of the nation's lettuce, artichokes, and crucifer crops. Runoff from irrigated agriculture constitutes a significant portion of river flow during most of the year, and a number of studies have documented pesticide occurrence and biological impacts in these watersheds. Evidence of pesticide impacts has encouraged diverse stakeholders to begin implementing farm management practices (MPs) to reduce pesticide concentrations and toxicity in agricultural runoff. This project is designed to complement ongoing evaluations of individual MPs with measurements of pesticide concentrations throughout the estuarine environments, including the water column, sediments, and in resident biota. Biological effects were measured at the organism and community levels. Chemical analyses emphasized pesticide impacts because previous research in these watersheds has indicated these are the primary chemicals of concern impacting beneficial uses. A broad suite of pesticides were measured, including legacy organochlorines, widely-used organophosphates, increasingly-used pyrethroids, herbicides and fungicides. Sampling in the three estuaries was conducted from January 2008 until October 2009. A total of fifteen sampling events were conducted in each estuary, and these were divided between eleven irrigation season events and four storm events. Storm and irrigation monitoring included water toxicity and chemistry analyses for pesticides. Samples were collected at multiple stations in the estuaries and in key tributaries flowing to the estuaries. In addition, sediment toxicity was assessed at eight estuary stations and the tributary stations during three irrigation season sampling events. Benthic community characterizations were also conducted in May and October 2008. All sediment samples were analyzed for pesticides, as well as grain size and total organic carbon. Pesticide analyses in resident fish and sand crab tissues were conducted once in each estuary. The goal of this project was to establish a baseline of estuary conditions with respect to pesticide impacts as MPs are beginning to be implemented.