The Importance of Interflow to Groundwater Recharge in a Snowmelt-Dominated Headwater Basin

American Geophysical Union (AGU) | May 23rd, 2019

Understanding the sensitivity of groundwater generation to climate in a mountain system is complicated by the tight coupling of snow dynamics to vegetation and topogr

Understanding the sensitivity of groundwater generation to climate in a mountain system is complicated by the tight coupling of snow dynamics to vegetation and topography. To address these feedbacks, we combine LiDAR-derived snow observations with an integrated hydrologic model to quantify spatially and temporally distributed water fluxes across varying climate conditions in a Colorado River headwater basin. Results indicate annual groundwater flow is an important and stable source of stream water. However, interflow decreases during drought as a function increased plant water use and the relative fraction of groundwater to streams increases. Seasonal snowmelt and vegetation water use regulate small recharge rates in the lower portions of the basin, but snowmelt transported via interflow from high mountain ridges toward convergent topographic zones define preferential recharge in the upper subalpine. Recharge in this zone appears decoupled from annual climate variability and resilient to drought. 

Three-Dimensional Hydrogeologic Framework Model of the Russian River Watershed, California

U.S. Geological Survey (USGS) | December 19th, 2024

The U.S. Geological Survey (USGS) was invited by the California State Water Resources Control Board and Sonoma County Water Agency to cooperate on a scientific investigat

The U.S. Geological Survey (USGS) was invited by the California State Water Resources Control Board and Sonoma County Water Agency to cooperate on a scientific investigation to evaluate the groundwater resources of the Russian River watershed and to develop tools to better understand and manage the groundwater system. The purpose of this report is to describe the development of a digital 3D HFM of the Russian River watershed. Such a model will help fully conceptualize the 3D subsurface configuration of aquifers and also may be used as the primary geologic input to numerical simulations of the hydrologic system. The 3D HFM, and data used to construct the 3D HFM, can be found in the following data release (Fenton and others, 2022).

Tools for Assessing Groundwater-Surface Water Connectivity Under the Sustainable Groundwater Management Act

Stanford University | February 14th, 2019

In 2014, California enacted the Sustainable Groundwater Management Act (SGMA), which requires local agencies to develop and implement groundwater sustainability plans (G

In 2014, California enacted the Sustainable Groundwater Management Act (SGMA), which requires local agencies to develop and implement groundwater sustainability plans (GSPs) in all groundwater basins designated by the California Department of Water Resources (DWR) as high or medium priority by 2020 or 2022, depending on basin condition. For the first time in California’s history, agencies managing groundwater under SGMA must assess the impacts of groundwater pumping on water supply and surface water flows and avoid “significant and unreasonable adverse impacts on beneficial uses of the surface water.” SGMA’s legal and regulatory requirements pertaining to interconnected surface water – defined in SGMA as, “surface water that is hydraulically connected at any point by a continuous zone to the underlying aquifer and the overlying surface water is not completely depleted.” – represent a significant step forward in recognizing the interconnected nature of surface water and groundwater and for managing this resource accordingly. However, because groundwater-surface water connectivity was not a common management consideration prior to the enactment of SGMA, many basins lack data or models or technical capacity to adequately characterize interconnected surface water (ISW) and evaluate the impacts of groundwater pumping on these systems. Thus, meeting legal and regulatory requirements related to ISW may be hindered by a lack of information about both the location and timing of such waters, as well as the many beneficial uses and users that they support. In March 2018, Water in the West, The University of Victoria, Foundry Spatial, The Nature Conservancy (TNC) and Environmental Defense Fund co-hosted a workshop on tools to assess ISW under SGMA. The workshop, which included a small, select group of hydrologists, water managers, water lawyers, nongovernmental organizations (NGOs) and academia, focused on four main areas: 1) Accounting for beneficial uses and users in GSP development and implementation; 2) Identifying physical or analytical approaches for characterizing, quantifying and monitoring ISW; 3) Using hydrological modeling to assess the effects of groundwater pumping on ISW and streamflow depletions; and 4) Understanding the functionality and use of decision support tools from other jurisdictions This report summarizes key findings from the one-day workshop and a short questionnaire completed by workshop participants during the day. A list of workshop attendees, the workshop agenda and workshop questionnaire can be found in Appendices A-C, respectively.

Two-dimensional and three-dimensional digital flow models of the Salinas Valley ground-water basin, California

U.S. Geological Survey (USGS) | November 16th, 1978

The Salinas Valley is a topographic and ground-water basin in central coastal California. The ground-water basin extends from Monterey Bay south­eastward along the Salin

The Salinas Valley is a topographic and ground-water basin in central coastal California. The ground-water basin extends from Monterey Bay south­eastward along the Salinas River to San Arda, a distance of 70 miles, and has a maximum thickness of 2,000 feet. Annual recharge to the ground-water basin, which is derived mostly from the Salinas River, is about 290,000 acre­feet. Annual discharge, which is mostly from pumpage but also includes the consumptive use of ground water by riparian vegetation along the Salinas River, is about 507,000 acre-feet. About 45 percent of the pumpage, or 217,000 acre-feet of water annually, returns to the ground-water system. A group of interacting hydrologic models was developed for the Salinas Valley. These models include the small-stream model, river model, two­dimensional ground-water model, and three-dimensional ground-water model. The small-stream model simulates ground-water recharge from small streams that are tributary to the Salinas River. The river model simulates ground­water recharge from and surface-water discharge in the Salinas River. The two-dimensional and three-dimensional ground-water models simulate hydraulic head in the ground-water basin. The ground-water models were calibrated by comparing water level com­puted by the models to the corresponding measured water level for both steady-state and transient-state simulations. For the steady-state simulation, which was used to calibrate transmissivity for the two-dimensional model and hydraulic conductivity for the three-dimensional model, the median deviation of the model-generated water level from measured water level was 6 and 5 feet for the two-dimensional and three-dimensional models, respectively. For the transient-state simulation, which was used to calibrate storage coefficient for the two-dimensional model and specific storage for the three-dimensional model, the median deviation of the model-generated water level (at the end of a 3-year calibration period) from measured water level was 6 feet for both models.

UC groundwater research: A survey

California Agriculture (UCANR) | March 13th, 2018

As California implements the Sustainable Groundwater Management Act (SGMA), UC research is building knowledge and supporting innovation in groundwater recharge, groundwat

As California implements the Sustainable Groundwater Management Act (SGMA), UC research is building knowledge and supporting innovation in groundwater recharge, groundwater accounting, groundwater quality, groundwater governance and more. Here's a sample of work from across the UC system: whole watershed accounting; water availability for recharge; precision data on snowmelt; spatial data on well vulnerability; large scale groundwater recharge and agricultural systems; groundwater-surface water interactions; groundwater quality and salinity; water supply, land use and rural communities; data on water use and water rights; managed aquifer recharge on farmland; soil suitability for recharge; distributed stormwater collection; net metering for groundwater; geophysical imaging; groundwater governance; lessons on groundwater permitting from around the West; supporting Groundwater Sustainability Plan development; the economics of sustainable groundwater management; and considerations for groundwater markets.

Use of a Three-Dimensional Model for the Analysis of the Ground-Water Flow System in Parker Valley, Arizona and California

U.S. Geological Survey (USGS) | December 1st, 1982

User Manual for the California Central Valley Groundwater-Surface Water Simulation Model

California Department of Water Resources (DWR) | June 13th, 2013

This report describes the input and output files for the California Central Valley Groundwater-Surface Water Simulation Model (C2VSim). C2VSim is an integrated numeri

This report describes the input and output files for the California Central Valley Groundwater-Surface Water Simulation Model (C2VSim). C2VSim is an integrated numerical model simulating land surface processes and groundwater and surface water flows in the main alluvial aquifer system of California’s Central Valley (figure 1). C2VSim was developed using the Integrated Water Flow Model (IWFM) application, which couples a three-dimensional finite element groundwater simulation process with one-dimensional land surface, stream flow, lake, unsaturated zone and smallstream watershed simulation processes. The C2VSim version described in this report runs under IWFM version 3.02 and utilizes a coarse grid, and is thus referred to as version 3.02-CG. In addition, the input files for the C2VSim model are regularly updated to correct errors, incorporate improved input data or extend the simulation time period. These updates are referred to as revisions; this report describes the data in revision R374, released in June 2013. The C2VSim model inputs include monthly historical precipitation, stream inflows, surface water diversions, land use and crop acreages for the simulation period, October 1921 through September 2009. C2VSim dynamically calculates crop water demands, allocates contributions from precipitation, soil moisture and surface water diversions, and calculates the groundwater pumpage required to meet the remaining demand. The coarse grid version of the C2VSim model incorporates a finite element grid with 1392 elements, grouped into 21 water budget subregions (figure 1), which are further grouped by drainage basin into five hydrologic regions. The model subregions are based on Depletion Study Areas (DSAs), originally created by the DWR Division of Planning for estimating regional water supplies and demands. Hydrologic parameters (including hydraulic conductivities, storage parameters and recession coefficients) were calibrated to match observed values including groundwater heads, groundwater head differences between well pairs, surface water flows, and stream-groundwater flows for the period between September 1975 and October 2003. The model simulates the historical response of the Central Valley’s groundwater flow system to historical stresses, and can also be used to simulate the response to projected future stresses. Agricultural groundwater pumping is not monitored in the Central Valley, and the C2VSim model provides pumpage estimates that are considered robust because they are constrained spatially and temporally by the estimated demand and surface water supplies. The calibrated model is also being used as the basis for the groundwater flow component of CalSim 3, a water resources planning model for simulating operation of the California State Water Project (SWP) and Federal Central Valley Project (CVP).

Widespread potential loss of streamflow into underlying aquifers across the USA

Nature Portfolio (Springer Nature) | March 17th, 2021

Most rivers exchange water with surrounding aquifers. Where groundwater levels lie below nearby streams, streamwater can infiltrate through the streambed, reducing stream

Most rivers exchange water with surrounding aquifers. Where groundwater levels lie below nearby streams, streamwater can infiltrate through the streambed, reducing streamflow and recharging the aquifer. These ‘losing’ streams have important implications for water availability, riparian ecosystems and environmental flows, but the prevalence of losing streams remains poorly constrained by continent-wide in situ observations. Here we analyse water levels in 4.2 million wells across the contiguous USA and show that nearly two-thirds (64 per cent) of them lie below nearby stream surfaces, implying that these streamwaters will seep into the subsurface if it is sufficiently permeable. A lack of adequate permeability data prevents us from quantifying the magnitudes of these subsurface flows, but our analysis nonetheless demonstrates widespread potential for streamwater losses into underlying aquifers. These potentially losing rivers are more common in drier climates, flatter landscapes and regions with extensive groundwater pumping. Our results thus imply that climatic factors, geological conditions and historic groundwater pumping jointly contribute to the widespread risk of streams losing flow into surrounding aquifers instead of gaining flow from them. Recent modelling studies have suggested that losing streams could become common in future decades, but our direct observations show that many rivers across the USA are already potentially losing flow, highlighting the importance of coordinating groundwater and surface water policy.