Source area management practices as remediation tool to address groundwater nitrate pollution in drinking supply wells

Journal of Contaminant Hydrology (Elsevier) | July 19th, 2019

Nitrate in drinking water may cause serious health problems for consumers. Agricultural activities are known to be the main source of groundwater nitrate contaminating ru

Nitrate in drinking water may cause serious health problems for consumers. Agricultural activities are known to be the main source of groundwater nitrate contaminating rural domestic and urban public water supply wells in farming regions. Management practices have been proposed to reduce the amount of nitrate in groundwater, including improved nutrient management practices and “pump and fertilize” with nitrate-affected irrigation wells. Here, we evaluate the feasibility and long-term impacts of agricultural managed aquifer recharge (Ag-MAR) in the source area of public water supply wells. A numerical model of nitrate fate and transport was developed for the Modesto basin, part of California's Central Valley aquifer system. The basin is representative of semi-arid agricultural regions around the world with a diversity of crop types, overlying an unconsolidated sedimentary aquifer system. A local public supply well in an economically disadvantaged community surrounded by farmland was the focus of this study. Model scenarios implemented include business as usual, alternative low-impact crops, and Ag-MAR in the source area of the public supply well. Alternative nutrient management and recharge practices act as remediation tools in the area between farmland and the public supply well. Improved agricultural source area management practices are shown to be an effective tool to maintain or even enhance groundwater quality in the targeted supply well while remediating ambient groundwater.

Source, distribution, and management of arsenic in water from wells, Eastern San Joaquin Ground-Water Subbasin, California

U.S. Geological Survey (USGS) | October 15th, 2008

Source, movement and age of groundwater in the upper part of the Mojave River Basin, California, USA

Proceedings of the 1994 International Symposium on Application of Tracers in Arid Zone Hydrology | August 22nd, 1996

Water samples from wells were collected and analysed for oxygen-18, deuterium, tritium, carbon-14, and carbon-13 to determine the source, movement and age of groundwate

Water samples from wells were collected and analysed for oxygen-18, deuterium, tritium, carbon-14, and carbon-13 to determine the source, movement and age of groundwater in the upper part of the Mojave River basin. Water in the alluvial aquifer has a median deuterium composition of — 66% and contains tritium, and was recently recharged by water from the Mojave River. Water in the regional aquifer near the Mojave River, near Summit Valley, and underlying several small washes has deuterium compositions heavier than — 60 %. Although some water in the regional aquifer near the Mojave River contains tritium, most of this water does not contain tritium. Carbon-14 data indicate that this water was recharged less than 2400 years ago. Water in the remainder of the regional aquifer has a median deuterium composition of — 84 %, which is as much as 20 % lighter than the volume-weighted deuterium composition of present-day precipitation. These data show that this water was recharged under climatic conditions different from average conditions today. Carbon-14 data indicate that some water in the regional aquifer was recharged more than 20,000 years ago.

Sources of high-chloride water and managed aquifer recharge in an alluvial aquifer in California, USA

Hydrogeology Journal (Springer) | July 3rd, 2015

Sources, Pathways and Loadings: Multi-Year Synthesis with a Focus on PCBs and Hg

San Francisco Estuary Institute (SFEI) | December 15th, 2015

This report provides a synthesis of information gathered since 2000 on sources, pathways, and loadings of pollutants of concern in the San Francisco Bay Area with a focus

This report provides a synthesis of information gathered since 2000 on sources, pathways, and loadings of pollutants of concern in the San Francisco Bay Area with a focus on polychlorinated biphenyls (PCBs) and total mercury (Hg). Concentration and load estimates for other pollutants of concern (POC) are provided in the Appendix tables but not supported by any synthesis or discussion in the main body of the report. The PCB and Hg TMDLs for San Francisco Bay call for implementation of control measures to reduce stormwater PCB loads from 20 kg to 2 kg by 2030 and to reduce stormwater Hg loads from 160 kg to 80 kg by 2028 with an interim milestone of 120 kg by 2018. These are very challenging objectives given that the 2 kg PCB load allocation translates to a mean annual yield of 0.31 g/km2 for the free flowing areas downstream from reservoirs (6,650 km2), a mean annual concentration of 1.33 ng/L (assuming an annual average flow from small tributaries of 1.5 km3), and mean annual particle ratio of 1.4 ng/g of suspended sediment load (assuming an average annual suspended sediment load of 1.4 million metric t). Similarly for Hg, the 80 kg load allocation translates to a mean annual yield of 12 g/km2, a mean annual concentration of 53 ng/L, and mean annual particle ratio of 58 ng/g of suspended sediment load. Concentrations of these low magnitudes have been observed commonly in the Bay Area for Hg and yields of this low magnitude have been observed for PCBs and Hg. However, concentrations of PCBs at these magnitudes have only been observed in Marsh Creek (a more rural watershed) and particle ratios of PCBs and Hg as low as these have never been observed in the region.

South San Francisco Bay Salt Pond Restoration Project— A Synthesis of Phase-1 Mercury Studies

U.S. Geological Survey (USGS) | March 7th, 2023

The South Bay Salt Pond Restoration Project (SBSPRP) encompasses over 6,000 hectares of former salt production ponds along the south edge of the San Francisco Bay and rep

The South Bay Salt Pond Restoration Project (SBSPRP) encompasses over 6,000 hectares of former salt production ponds along the south edge of the San Francisco Bay and represents the largest wetland restoration effort on the west coast of North America. A series of studies associated with Phase 1 (2010–2018) restoration activities that are focused on a historically mercury contaminated slough and series of ponds within the restoration area have recently been completed. This report brings together the key findings of these loosely coordinated studies and integrates the results into a more comprehensive and holistic product that informs future restoration activities associated with the SBSPRP and elsewhere.

Spatial analysis of residential location at birth, PFAS in public water, and childhood cancers in Southern California (2000–2019)

Nature Portfolio (Springer Nature) | March 5th, 2026

Locations with significant increased risk of all cancers, leukemias, lymphomas, and other solid tumors were collocated with PFOS/PFOA contaminated water supplies. Referen

Locations with significant increased risk of all cancers, leukemias, lymphomas, and other solid tumors were collocated with PFOS/PFOA contaminated water supplies. Referent ORs for location were attenuated after adjusting for PFOS detection and in stratified analyses for children of US-born mothers but not for Mexico-born mothers. PFOS detection was associated with higher odds of neuroblastoma (OR = 1.51, 95% CI: 1.07, 2.13) and retinoblastoma (OR = 1.83, 95% CI: 1.19, 2.79), whereas all cancers (OR = 1.07; 95% CI: 0.97, 1.18), brain tumors (OR = 1.15, 95% CI: 0.96, 1.37), and other solid tumors (OR = 1.12, 95% CI: 0.98, 1.29) had non-significant associations. PFOA detection was associated with elevated risk of retinoblastoma (OR = 1.85, 95% CI: 1.14, 3.01).

Spectral characterization of dissolved organic matter in groundwater to assess mixing with oil-field water near selected oil fields, southern California

Science of The Total Environment (Elsevier) | September 16th, 2023

SSALTS Final Phase 3 Report: Evaluate Potential Salt Disposal Alternatives to Identify Acceptable Alternatives for Implementation

Central Valley Salinity Alternatives for Long-Term Sustainability (CV-SALTS) | October 31st, 2016

The purpose of the Strategic Salt Accumulation Land and Transportation Study (SSALTS) is to identify the range of viable Central Valley alternatives for salt disposal to

The purpose of the Strategic Salt Accumulation Land and Transportation Study (SSALTS) is to identify the range of viable Central Valley alternatives for salt disposal to provide input for consideration during development of the Salt and Nitrate Management Plan (SNMP) for the region under the jurisdiction of the Central Valley Regional Water Quality Control Board (Central Valley Water Board). The findings have been used to guide discussions regarding establishment of regional salt management policies and the need for changes to the existing Central Valley Water Board Water Quality Control Plans (Basin Plans) to facilitate salt disposal in a manner that is most beneficial to the region and consistent with the State Water Resources Control Board’s (State Water Board) Recycled Water Policy. This work is being conducted under the direction of the Central Valley Salinity Alternatives for Long-Term Sustainability (CV-SALTS) initiative, which is developing the SNMP for the Central Valley. The SSALTS project has been conducted in three phases (Figure 1-1): Phase 1: Identify and Characterize Existing Salt Accumulation Study Areas – The selection of representative study areas served as archetype situational examples to facilitate discussions regarding salt accumulation and disposal in the Central Valley. Each of these study areas was characterized to establish baseline information that was subsequently used to support development of salt disposal alternatives in Phases 2 and 3. Phase 2: Develop Potential Salt Management Strategies – Phase 2 of SSALTS developed potential long-term salt disposal alternatives in three parts: (1) in-valley alternatives; (2) out-of-valley alternatives; and (3) hybrid alternatives that combined in-valley and out-of valley salt disposal options. Phase 3: Evaluate Potential Salt Disposal Alternatives to Identify Acceptable Alternatives for Implementation – Alternatives developed under Phase 2 were evaluated in this report using selected feasibility criteria (e.g., regulatory, institutional, economic, technological, etc.). The outcome of this evaluation was the identification and prioritization of acceptable salt disposal alternatives for potential incorporation into Central Valley SNMP as salt management implementation measures. The Phase 1 and Phase 2 SSALTS final reports were submitted to the CV-SALTS Executive Committee in December 2013 and September 2014, respectively (CDM Smith 2013; CDM Smith 2014). The Phase 3 SSALTS draft report was submitted to the CV-SALTS Executive Committee in March 2015. Comments were received and incorporated into the Phase 3 SSALTS draft report. The Executive Committee recommended postponing the finalization of the Phase 3 SSALTS report until a draft of the Nitrate Implementation Measures Study (NIMS) report was completed, so that salt and nitrate implementation measures and mitigation strategies could be coordinated. While based on the March 2015 Phase 3 SSALTS draft report – and thus including the changes based on the March 2015 Phase 3 SSALTS draft report – and thus including the changes based on the original comments, the September 2016 Phase 3 SSALTS draft report had major changes in terms of content and structure. The September 2016 Phase 3 SSALTS draft report was sent to the Project Committee on September 20, 2016 and comments were received on October 5, 2016. The second set of comments were addressed and incorporated into this October 2016 Phase 3 SSALTS final report. Appendix E. provides the comments and responses on the September 2016 Phase 3 SSALTS draft report. The Phase 3 SSALTS report provides a path forward, based on the foundation of Phases 1 and 2 and CV-SALTS Executive Committee discussions.

State and green crimes related to water pollution and ecological disorganization: water pollution from publicly owned treatment works (POTW) facilities across US states

Palgrave Communications | August 1st, 2017

Green criminologists often refer to water pollution as an example of a green crime, but have yet to produce much research on this subject. The current article addresses�

Green criminologists often refer to water pollution as an example of a green crime, but have yet to produce much research on this subject. The current article addresses the need for green criminological analyses of water pollution problems, and draws attention to an overlooked issue: water pollution emissions from state owned public water treatment facilities or POTWs. Legally, POTWs may emit certain quantities and kinds of pollutants to waterways following treatment. This does not mean, however, that those emissions have no adverse ecological or public health impacts, or that those emissions cannot also be employed as examples of green crimes or green-state crimes. Indeed, from the perspective of environmental sociology and ecological Marxism, those emissions generate ecological disorganization. Moreover, POTW emissions contain numerous pollutants that generate different forms of ecological disorganization. The current study uses POTW emissions data drawn from the US EPA’s Discharge Monitoring Report system for 2014 to illustrate the extent of pollution emitted by POTWs in and across US states as one dimension of ecological disorganization. To contextualize the meaning of those data, we review US water pollution regulations, review the health and ecological impacts of chemicals emitted by POTWs, and situate those emissions within green criminological discussions of green crime and greenstate crimes.