Shop – California Water Library

Page

Showing
71-81 of 122

Per Page

Sort By

Making the Most of Water for the Environment: A Functional Flows Approach for California’s Rivers

Public Policy Institute of California (PPIC) | August 25th, 2020

Summary

In California, water and land management activities have substantially altered river flows and degraded river channels and their floodplains. The result has been a precip

In California, water and land management activities have substantially altered river flows and degraded river channels and their floodplains. The result has been a precipitous decline in native fish populations, including the collapse of valued salmon fisheries, and widespread imperilment of freshwater biodiversity. Environmental flows—flows in rivers and streams necessary to sustain ecosystem health—are essential to reversing these trends. Yet many rivers in California lack environmental flows. And for those rivers with such protections, environmental flows are typically established at static minimum levels, which fail to preserve the natural seasonal and interannual variability of flow that sustains healthy ecosystems. A new approach to managing environmental water is needed.

View Document Download Now Email

Managing California’s Freshwater Ecosystems: Lessons from the 2012-16 Drought

Public Policy Institute of California (PPIC) | November 16th, 2017

Summary

The 2012–16 drought caused unprecedented stress to California’s ecosystems and pushed many native species to the brink of extinction. It also tested the laws, policie

The 2012–16 drought caused unprecedented stress to California’s ecosystems and pushed many native species to the brink of extinction. It also tested the laws, policies, and institutions charged with protecting the environment. Eight case studies on environmental water management during the drought reveal both strengths and weaknesses in federal, state, and local response that can inform how California addresses future droughts. Three areas of reform hold promise for improving ecosystem conditions and reducing conflict: * Improve water accounting. Drought management requires accurate and timely information about water use and availability and about likely environmental response to changes in water supply. But California’s current tracking systems are neither timely nor transparent. To address these gaps, environmental water accounting and ecosystem monitoring systems need an overhaul. * Prepare for drought. With a few significant exceptions, environmental water managers were unprepared for the environmental consequences of an extended drought, and were forced to make ad hoc decisions during a crisis. Developing watershed-level plans that set ecosystem priorities and identify trade-offs would help managers anticipate drought and drive implementation of habitat investments and water allocation. Annual watering plans that guide management under different types of water years would better engage and inform water users. * Develop ecosystem water budgets. Current methods of allocating water to support ecosystem health rely on minimum flow standards that are unevenly enforced and often insufficient during drought. Ecosystem water budgets, which allocate a portion of water to the ecosystem within watersheds, could enable more flexible and effective water management during dry times. Although state and federal agencies have important

View Document Download Now Email

Managing California’s Freshwater Ecosystems: Lessons from the 2012–16 Drought

Public Policy Institute of California (PPIC) | November 9th, 2017

Summary

The 2012–16 drought caused unprecedented stress to California’s ecosystems and pushed many native species to the brink of extinction. It also tested the laws, policie

View Document Download Now Email

Managing California’s Water: From Conflict to Reconciliation

Public Policy Institute of California (PPIC) | April 5th, 2011

Summary

In this book, we explore solutions for the modern era, when water management must become more balanced and flexible to support both economic prosperity and environmental

In this book, we explore solutions for the modern era, when water management must become more balanced and flexible to support both economic prosperity and environmental sustainability. We start by reviewing the history of how California has adapted to changes and conflicts in water management in the past—slowly, controversially, and imperfectly—but with remarkable success. We then lay out a variety of promising principles and directions for improving water management in California for contemporary and anticipated future conditions.

View Document Download Now Email

Managing diversions in unregulated streams using a modified percent-of-flow approach

Freshwater Biology (Wiley) | August 22nd, 2017

Summary

In Mediterranean-type river systems stream flows are naturally low in summer and autumn. This pattern is often exacerbated by over-exploitation of water resources during

In Mediterranean-type river systems stream flows are naturally low in summer and autumn. This pattern is often exacerbated by over-exploitation of water resources during the dry season, which has implications for managing flows for both environmental and human needs. Mediterranean systems are characterised by strong inter- and intra-annual variability with almost all precipitation occurring in winter months followed by summer droughts with little or no rainfall, and extreme year-to-year variation ranging from intense winter storms to year-round drought (Gasith & Resh, 1999; Power, Kupferberg, Cooper, & Deas, 2015; Power, Parker, & Dietrich, 2008). The seasonal pattern of precipitation in Mediterranean climatic regions results in water availability and demand being out-of-phase; precipitation and runoff occur (almost exclusively) in winter when human demands are lowest, and precipitation is virtually non-existent in summer months when human demand is greatest (Kondolf & Batalla, 2005; Merenlender & Matella, 2013). As a result, rivers in Mediterranean climates tend to have a high degree of alteration with streamsdiverted and dammed to provide scarce water for human use (Kondolf, Podolak, & Grantham, 2013; Marr et al., 2009; Moyle, 2013). While the biophysical responses to alterations of land use, vegetation and hydrology are similar in Mediterranean and other climatic regions, the magnitude of responses tends to be intensified in Mediterranean systems. For example prolonged dry season flows may result in lower dissolved oxygen, higher temperatures and concentration of contaminants among other impacts (Cooper, Lake, Sabater, Melack, & Sabo, 2013). Climate change and increasing frequency and severity of drought promise to increase the conflict between human needs and ecological needs over time (Arthington, 2012).

View Document Download Now Email

Managing Water for the Environment During Drought: Lessons from Victoria, Australia

Public Policy Institute of California (PPIC) | June 16th, 2016

Summary

Over the past 30 years the Australian state of Victoria developed innovative approaches to planning and setting priorities for environmental water, along with new tools t

Over the past 30 years the Australian state of Victoria developed innovative approaches to planning and setting priorities for environmental water, along with new tools to manage it. These sweeping reforms were in part a response to the Millennium Drought, a decade-long record dry spell that severely affected all water use in Victoria. California—currently in its fifth year of drought—has many similarities with Victoria, including significant challenges in managing the health of rivers and wetlands during times of extreme water scarcity. In this report, we examine the reforms enacted by Victoria and compare them to current environmental water management policies in California. This comparison highlights some key lessons learned by Victoria that may help guide how California adapts environmental water management to address future droughts. The environmental policy reforms enacted by Victoria were difficult and at times highly controversial. While it will take years to fully understand whether these reforms had their intended effect, there is no doubt that the state’s new approach to managing environmental water avoided some serious biological losses during the drought. Additionally, it is clear that the state is much better prepared for the next drought.

View Document Download Now Email

Measuring Cost-Effectiveness of Environmental Water Transactions

Klamath Riverkeeper | August 4th, 2016

Summary

The diversion, storage and consumptive use of water in the western United States (US) has drastically altered streamflow, water quality and a raft of ecological, social a

The diversion, storage and consumptive use of water in the western United States (US) has drastically altered streamflow, water quality and a raft of ecological, social and economic goods and services. Over the last fifty years, western states have begun to address this problem through a range of approaches. Water quality regulations, endangered species protections, application of the public trust doctrine to water allocations and other regulatory approaches reflect an effort to prevent further degradation of streamflow and associated values. For example, in Oregon, minimum streamflow requirements created in the 1950s were converted into full-fledged instream water rights in the 1980s and 1990s to limit further appropriations of water for out-of-stream use. Unfortunately, as junior (or low) priority rights, these rights do not serve to restore flow to already dewatered streams. In other cases, both large and small, regulatory enforcement has led to real improvements in water for the environment. In California, the protections afforded to Mono Lake water levels and the re-dedication of contract water to environmental uses under the Central Valley Project Improvement Act, are but two examples. However, the controversy, costs and lengthy time span of dedicating water to the environment through litigation and regulatory approaches are unappealing to some conservation groups, particularly those that prefer to collaborate and purchase water rather than litigate to achieve streamflow restoration. An alternative approach to meet streamflow restoration needs is to proactively negotiate in the “water market” for the acquisition of existing out-of-stream rights or for changes in water use and management in order to benefit the environment. These transactions result in “environmental flows,” including the dedication or protection of water instream or the provision of water to Roughly 80% of California’s developed water supply is used for agricultural irrigation.*

View Document Download Now Email

Methodology for Flow and Salinity Estimates in the Sacramento-San Joaquin Delta and Suisun Marsh

California Department of Water Resources (DWR) | June 1st, 2017

Summary

This is the 38th annual progress report of the California Department of Water Resources’ San Francisco Bay-Delta Evaluation Program, which is carried out by t

This is the 38th annual progress report of the California Department of Water Resources’ San Francisco Bay-Delta Evaluation Program, which is carried out by the Delta Modeling Section. This report is submitted annually by the section to the State Water Resources Control Board pursuant to its Water Right Decision D-1485, Term 9, which is still active pursuant to its Water Right Decision D-1641, Term 8. This report documents progress in the development and enhancement of computer models for the Delta Modeling Section of the Bay-Delta Office. It also reports the latest findings of studies conducted as part of the program. This report was compiled under the direction of Tara Smith, Program Manager for the Bay-Delta Evaluation Program.

View Document Download Now Email

Methodology for Flow and Salinity Estimates in the Sacramento-San Joaquin Delta and Suisun Marsh

California Department of Water Resources (DWR) | December 1st, 2019

Summary

Various water resource management actions have been planned to protect and restore salmon populations for a healthy Sacramento-San Joaquin Delta (Delta) ecosystem. Curren

Various water resource management actions have been planned to protect and restore salmon populations for a healthy Sacramento-San Joaquin Delta (Delta) ecosystem. Currently, evaluating the effectiveness of these actions relies on field studies and/or expert opinion. Field studies can be costly and may not provide a comprehensive assessment for a range of applications because of limited study areas, durations, and river conditions. Expert opinion, although valuable, may under- or over-emphasize the importance of certain project components. To supplement field studies and provide a quantitative assessment tool, the California Department of Water Resources (DWR), in collaboration with the United States Geological Survey (USGS), developed an ecological modeling tool, ECO-PTM. ECO-PTM is an individual-based juvenile salmon migration model that is based on a random-walk particle-tracking method with fish-like behaviors attached to the particles. The behavioral parameters are estimated from acoustic telemetry tag data of juvenile late-fall Chinook salmon (Tag Data) from various field studies (Perry et al. 2018). A stochastic optimization tool, Particle Swarm Optimization, is used to calibrate the swimming behavior parameters. ECO-PTM can simulate juvenile salmonid migration timing, routing, and survival. This chapter describes ECO-PTM and its behavioral modules, and the model performance and applications to assist water resource management planning, assessment, and decision-making related to juvenile salmonid survival outcomes.

View Document Download Now Email

Missing Water: The Uses and Flows of Water in the Colorado River Delta Region

Pacific Institute | September 1st, 2001

Summary

The Pacific Institute for Studies in Development, Environment, and Security is pleased to announce the release of Missing Water: The Uses and Flows of Water in the Color

The Pacific Institute for Studies in Development, Environment, and Security is pleased to announce the release of Missing Water: The Uses and Flows of Water in the Colorado River Delta Region. This new study describes the fate of the millions of acre-feet of water diverted from the Colorado River at and below Imperial Dam, and the total inflows to and outflows from the Colorado River delta region more generally. This study uses the classic hydrologic boundaries of the delta region described by Godfrey Sykes in 1937, encompassing some 3,325 square miles (8,611 square kilometers) in the states of Arizona, Baja California, California, and Sonora, including the Imperial, Mexicali, and San Luis valleys, Yuma Project lands, and the lower Coachella Valley. The study period examines the flows and uses of water in the years 1991-1998, divided into Flood and Non-Flood years to reflect the tremendous variability of mainstem Colorado River flows. Missing Water compiles flow data along the mainstem and along diversions within the delta region, the first time such data has been compiled for the region as a whole. The study also report consumptive uses of water in the agricultural and urban sectors, and estimates such use by the environment. Agricultural use is also reported for the major crops in the region, both by acreage and by water use.

View Document Download Now Email

← Prev

Page : 8

Type

Book/Textbook (3)
Bulletin (1)
California Water Plan (1)
Case study (8)
Conference proceedings (3)
Environmental Documents (5)
Essay (1)
Fact sheet (2)
Guidance Document (3)
Handbook/Guide (3)
Issue Paper (1)
Journal Article (29)
Legal document (4)
Letter (4)
magazine (1)
Memo (2)
Model (12)
NGO Position Paper (2)
Plan (1)
Policy (1)
Report (43)
Research Article (6)
Science Panel Report (10)
Technical Report (8)
Water Right Decision (1)
White Paper (2)

Topic

Adaptive Management (10)
Agriculture (5)
Basic Information (1)
California Water Fix/BDCP/Delta Conveyance (1)
Climate Change (13)
Drought & Hydrology (14)
Ecosystem & Species Management (72)
Ecosystem Restoration (7)
Environmental Justice (2)
Estuary News (1)
Federal Water Quality (3)
Fisheries (47)
Flood Management (3)
Geochemistry (1)
Geochemistry (2)
Geohydrology (2)
Geohydrology (5)
Groundwater (12)
History (3)
Invasive Species (1)
Levees (1)
Modeling (19)
People & Water (1)
Planning & Management (30)
Policy (1)
Pollutants (3)
Recycled Water (1)
Sacramento-San Joaquin Delta (42)
Salinity (13)
Science Management (5)
State Water Quality (4)
Storage (2)
Stormwater (2)
Transfers & Markets (2)
Tribal Water Issues (4)
Upper Watershed Management (12)
Water & Energy (3)
Water Project Operations (35)
Water Quality (45)
Water Quality Monitoring (6)
Water Rights, Water Law (8)
Water Supply (12)
Water Use & Efficiency (4)

Keywords

adaptive management (7)
agriculture (2)
agriculture wa (1)
agriculture water use and efficiency (3)
anadromous fish (16)
atmospheric rivers (1)
basin characterization (1)
benthic macroinvertebrates (1)
bioassessment (2)
Central Valley (10)
Central Valley Project (CVP) (8)
climate change (9)
Colorado River (2)
conjunctive use (1)
drought (7)
economic analysis (2)
ecosystem management (50)
ecosystem restoration (3)
endangered species (20)
Estuary News (1)
fisheries (46)
flood management (3)
flows (122)
forest management (1)
groundwater dependent ecosystems (4)
Groundwater Exchange (8)
groundwater pumping impacts (1)
groundwater recharge (4)
groundwater-surface water interaction (9)
history (3)
invasive species (1)
irrigation (1)
levees (1)
modeling (19)
monitoring (8)
native fish (20)
outreach and engagement (1)
planning and management (14)
pollutants (3)
public trust doctrine (5)
recycled water (1)
risk assessment (1)
Sacramento–San Joaquin Delta (41)
salinity (13)
science management (1)
sediment (5)
snowpack (4)
State Water Project (SWP) (5)
stora (1)
storage (2)
stormwater (1)
streams (8)
Sustainable Groundwater Management Act (SGMA) (2)
transboundary aquifers (1)
tribal water issues (4)
upper watershed management (6)
urban water conservation (1)
wastewater (2)
water and energy (2)
water budget (3)
water markets (2)
water project operations (25)
water quality (30)
water rights (10)
water supply (5)
water supply forecasting (4)
wetlands (2)

Publisher

American Chemical Society (ACS) (1)
American Geophysical Union (AGU) (5)
American Meteorological Society (AMS) (3)
American Rivers (1)
American Society of Civil Engineers (ASCE) (1)
Bay Institute (2)
CALFED (1)
California Agriculture (UCANR) (1)
California Department of Fish and Wildlife (CDFW) (5)
California Department of Water Resources (DWR) (9)
California Energy Commission (CEC) (1)
California State Water Resources Control Board (SWRCB) (10)
California Urban Water Agencies (CUWA) (1)
Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences (Canadian Science Publishing) (1)
Center for Biological Diversity (CBD) (1)
Delta Stewardship Council (Delta Council) (6)
Duke Environmental Law & Policy Forum (1)
Ecological Society of America (Wiley) (1)
Environmental Biology of Fishes (Springer) (2)
Environmental Defense Fund (EDF) (1)
Freshwater Biology (Wiley) (2)
Frontiers in Environmental Science (1)
Frontiers in Environmental Science (Frontiers) (1)
Hydrobiologia (Springer) (1)
Klamath Riverkeeper (1)
Klamath Tribal Water Quality Consortium (1)
Legislative Analyst's Office (LAO) (1)
Limnology and Oceanography (Wiley) (1)
Mount Shasta Bioregional Ecology Center (1)
National Academy of Sciences (NAS) (2)
Nature Conservancy (4)
Nature Portfolio (Springer Nature) (2)
Oxford University Press (OUP) (3)
Pacific Institute (2)
Public Policy Institute of California (PPIC) (7)
River Research and Applications (Wiley) (3)
Sacramento-San Joaquin Delta Conservancy (1)
San Francisco Baykeeper (1)
San Francisco Estuary Partnership (SFEP) (1)
Scott River Water Trust (1)
Siskiyou Farm Bureau (1)
Southern California Coastal Water Research Project (1)
Superior Court of California, County of Kern (2)
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (USACE) (1)
U.S. Bureau of Reclamation (USBR) (2)
U.S. Department of the Interior (DOI) (1)
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) (2)
U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (FWS) (1)
U.S. Geological Survey (USGS) (11)
University of California, Berkeley (UC Berkeley) (1)
University of California, Davis (UC Davis) (6)
University of Southern California (USC) (1)
Western Resource Advocates (1)

Basin

Coachella Valley - Desert Hot Springs 7-021.03 (1)
Coachella Valley - Mission Creek 7-021.02 (1)
Coachella Valley - San Gorgonio Pass 7-021.04 (1)
Klamath River Valley - Lower Klamath 1-002.02 (1)
Klamath River Valley - Tulelake 1-002.01 (1)
Las Posas Valley 4-008 (1)
Middle Amargosa Valley - 6-020 (1)
Mono Valley 6-009 (1)
Pleasant Valley 4-006 (1)
San Joaquin Valley - Kern 5-022.14 (2)
Santa Clara River Valley - Oxnard 4-004.02 (1)

Hydrological Region

Central Coast (6)
Colorado River (8)
Lower Basin States and Mexico - Colorado River (7)
National (12)
North Coast (23)
North Lahontan (8)
Sacramento River (48)
San Francisco Bay (42)
San Joaquin River (49)
South Coast (13)
South Lahontan (8)
Tulare Lake (13)
Upper Basin States - Colorado River (8)

Reset

Search for:

CONTACT