Navigating a Flood of Information Evaluating and Integrating Climate Science into Groundwater Planning in California

Union of Concerned Scientists | November 1st, 2017

In early 2017, northern California experienced record-setting levels of precipitation. The amount of rain and snow from October 2016 through February 2017 was the greates

In early 2017, northern California experienced record-setting levels of precipitation. The amount of rain and snow from October 2016 through February 2017 was the greatest in the 122 years of California record-keeping. As the reservoir behind Oroville Dam quickly filled to capacity, a torrent of excess water was let out through the main spillway. Shortly thereafter the spillway began to collapse, leading to massive soil erosion and concerns that the erosion could undermine the dam itself. Fears of a catastrophic dam breach led to the evacuation of around 180,000 residents downstream from the dam. While we do not know how much climate change contributed to this particular event, we do know that climate change is making extreme events more common (Black et al. 2016; Mote et al. 2016; Otto 2016). While reports indicate that management failures may have played in an important role in the Oroville disaster, it is also true that this event took place in the context of extreme weather, and that climate change is increasing pressure on structures and communities. This finding is not limited to highprofile infrastructure such as the Oroville Dam. Much of our water infrastructure, management tools, institutions, and planning mechanisms are not designed for the increased magnitude and frequency of such extremes—making the state, its environment, and its water resources vulnerable to the changes we are likely to see in the coming decades. In California, groundwater contributes more than half of the state’s water supply during dry years (DWR 2009). Therefore, understanding the impacts that climate change will have on this critical resource will be of particular importance for the state’s water and food security over the long term. To that end, Governor Jerry Brown issued Executive Order B-30-15 that, along with setting ambitious greenhouse gas reduction targets, requires state agencies take climate change into account in their planning and investment decisions. In addition, California’s Sustainable Groundwater Management Act (SGMA), passed by the legislature in 2014, requires that Groundwater Sustainability Agencies (GSAs) explicitly assess the impacts of climate change and incorporate these assessments into their Groundwater Sustainability Plans (GSPs). Under the legislation, GSAs must develop and implement GSPs to achieve sustainable groundwater management in all high- and medium-priority groundwater basins in the state. Within these plans, GSAs are required to provide “[p]rojected water budget information for population, population growth, climate change, and sea level rise” (CWR 354.18(d)(3)). Additionally, projected water budgets must “identify the uncertainties of these projected water budget components,” including uncertainties in projected hydrology, water demand, and surface water supply resulting from sea level rise, land use changes, population growth, and climate change (CWR 354.18(c)(3)). To meet these regulatory requirements, plans must “rely on the best available information and best available science to quantify the water budget for the basin” (CWR 354.18(e)). Yet, it can be difficult to identify the best approach to incorporating climate change into local plans. The purpose of this white paper is to assist in that challenging task. The consequences of not incorporating climate change into water planning can be severe, leading to unforeseen costs and even threatening lives. It is therefore the intention of this white paper to: • provide water managers and other decision-makers across the state with an overview of climate models, their component parts, and key terminology • provide a framework for evaluating and comparing the various approaches currently employed by the state and federal agencies to incorporating climate change into state-level water planning documents • recommend a four-step process to incorporate future climate projections into local GSPs Recognizing the importance of climate change impacts on the state’s water supply, the California Department of Water Resources (DWR) has devoted a significant amount of time and expertise to integrating climate change into water planning. In 2012, DWR convened the Climate Change Technical Advisory Group (DWR CCTAG) to advise DWR on the scientific aspects of climate change, the impact of climate change on water resources, the use and creation of planning approaches and analytical tools, and the development of adaptation responses. The DWR CCTAG released a report in 2015, Perspectives and Guidance for Climate Change Analysis, which makes several recommendations for future work. One central theme is the need to develop guidance and support for water managers and planners. Factoring climate change into water management decisions requires future projections of how climate change will impact water-relevant factors such as temperature and precipitation—projections that are generally derived from global climate models. However, incorporating climate change into water planning for any given community or groundwater basin can be difficult, not only because of the technical expertise required to do so, but also because the effects of climate change are spatially and temporally variable. Although the scientific community has high confidence in a key set of variables for the planet as a whole, translating global estimates of climate change to specific geographical areas creates uncertainty. Fortunately, there are tools and methods to address uncertainty. As is the case for other natural phenomena that are difficult to predict with precision, such as earthquakes, uncertainty cannot be an excuse for inaction. Scientific and technical tools can substantially assist in creating plans that cope with an uncertain future. This white paper does not directly address the role of hydrologic models themselves, but rather addresses how climate change information can be incorporated into hydrologic models as water managers seek to comply with the requirements of SGMA. The process of incorporating climate change into water management decisions has several steps, starting with running global climate models to produce future climate projections, which are then used as inputs to hydrologic models (Figure 1). We recognize that GSAs are likely to engage at different levels of technical sophistication with climate data and that the majority will seek out the services of technical experts. Ultimately, it is our intent that this white paper equip water managers with sufficient knowledge about climate change projections to understand, evaluate, and direct the work of the technical experts and consultants. Using appropriate climate change information is vital to ensuring that water managers capture potential future water resource conditions. This white paper is organized into three main sections. The first section provides a general overview of climate models, including their strengths and limitations and the type of information they can provide, and describes a framework for incorporating their output into management decisions. The second section addresses how to incorporate climate change into planning involving imported water supplies. The third section turns to planning for local water supplies and proposes a process for incorporating appropriate climate change data into GSPs.

New Method for Estimating Landslide Losses from Major Winter Storms in California and Application to the ARkStorm Scenario

American Society of Civil Engineers (ASCE) | May 30th, 2014

ARkStorm is a statewide emergency planning scenario hypothesizing severe atmospheric river storms that transport huge amounts of moisture from the tropical Pacific to Cal

ARkStorm is a statewide emergency planning scenario hypothesizing severe atmospheric river storms that transport huge amounts of moisture from the tropical Pacific to California, where it falls as intense rain. The storm is projected to be similar to historic storms that have struck California in recent decades, but include extended periods of intense rainfall that approach the massive storms of 1861–1862 in total rainfall. A meteorological model for the ARkStorm has been developed from records of the 1969 and 1986 storms, both of which caused widespread landslides and severe damage in California. Estimating the numbers and impact of landslides from the ARkStorm requires models relating rainfall to the number and distribution of landslides and detailed records of the impact of landslides in past storms. Neither of these basic data sets exist. However, models that estimate the areas with the greatest susceptibility to landsliding do exist and can be combined with detailed maps of small areas showing the numbers of landslides triggered in individual storms. This study extrapolated from local landslide damage to private property in past storms by using a new statewide landslide susceptibility map. These methods may provide a framework for other landslide loss estimates, which can be greatly improved with additional data. Records of landslide losses to the state highway system are more complete than records of damage to private property; it was possible to assemble records for only the past 10 years. Even within these short records, the amount of damage to the state highway system appears to be correlated with rainfall. Projecting from these records, the amount of landslide damage to highways and other infrastructure from the ARkStorm can be estimated. Overall, it is estimated that the ARkStorm would trigger landslides that directly cause billions of dollars in damage.

Observed and projected changes in snow accumulation and snowline in California’s snowy mountains

Climate Dynamics (Springer) | May 25th, 2023

The Sierra Nevada and Southern Cascades—California’s snowy mountains—are primary freshwater sources and natural reservoirs for the states of California and Nevada.

The Sierra Nevada and Southern Cascades—California’s snowy mountains—are primary freshwater sources and natural reservoirs for the states of California and Nevada. These mountains receive precipitation overwhelmingly from wintertime storms including atmospheric rivers (ARs), much of it falling as snow at the higher elevations. Using a seven-decade record of daily observed temperature and precipitation as well as a snow reanalysis and downscaled climate projections, we documented historical and future changes in snow accumulation and snowlines. In four key subregions of California’s snowy mountains, we quantified the progressing contribution of ARs and non-AR storms to the evolving and projected snow accumulation and snowlines (elevation of the snow-to-rain transition), exploring their climatology, variability and trends. Historically, snow makes up roughly a third of the precipitation affecting California’s mountains. While ARs make up only a quarter of all precipitating days and, due to their relative warmth, produce snowlines higher than do other storms, they contribute over 40% of the total seasonal snow. Under projected unabated warming, snow accumulation would decline to less than half of historical by the late twenty-first century, with the greatest snow loss at mid elevations (from 1500 to 3300 m by the mountain sub-regions) during fall and spring. Central and Southern Sierra Nevada peaks above 3400 m might see occasionally extreme snow accumulations in January–February resulting entirely from wetter ARs. AR-related snowlines are projected to increase by more than 700 m, compared to about 500 m for other storms. We discuss likely impacts of the changing climate for water resources as well as for winter recreation.

Ocean submesoscale fronts induce diabatic heating and convective precipitation within storms

Nature Portfolio (Springer Nature) | January 30th, 2025

The intensity of atmospheric storms is influenced by ocean temperature contrasts. While mesoscale sea surface temperature anomalies ( ~ 200 km-size) are known to inte

The intensity of atmospheric storms is influenced by ocean temperature contrasts. While mesoscale sea surface temperature anomalies ( ~ 200 km-size) are known to intensify storms via latent heat release, the role of finer oceanic scales remains unknown. Using a global coupled ocean-atmosphere simulation at a km-scale resolution, we show that half of latent heat flux variability is driven by oceanic motions at the meso- ( ~ 40%) and submesoscale ( ~ 10-20 km-size,  < 10%) in the Kuroshio Extension during winter. Additionally, ocean submesoscale fronts, with temperature gradients of 5 °C per 10 km, induce a secondary circulation reaching 4 km within the troposphere, which enhances diabatic processes and convective precipitations within storms. In the warm sector of storms, ocean submesoscale fronts locally account for half the total precipitations, averaging 14 mm day−1 over five days. As such, ocean submesoscale fronts pump moisture from the ocean to the atmosphere and have the potential to affect storm intensification.

On the Connection Between Global Hydrologic Sensitivity and Regional Wet Extremes

American Geophysical Union (AGU) | October 23rd, 2018

The global water cycle is expected to intensify under climate change and can be generally characterized by greater rainfall and surface evaporation in the future. However

The global water cycle is expected to intensify under climate change and can be generally characterized by greater rainfall and surface evaporation in the future. However, the rate at which the globally averaged precipitation increases is highly variable among different climate models. In this paper, we relate the intermodel variability in global water cycle intensification to differences in model projections of heavy precipitation in tropical and some extratropical regions. We also find that models consistently experience a trade‐off between increasing heavy and decreasing light‐moderate precipitation: Models with larger future increases in heavy precipitation exhibit greater compensating declines in light‐moderate rainfall. Differences in heavy precipitation changes are also tied to model resolution. Our study helps to provide new insight on the factors shaping projections of future precipitation extremes, which have strong implications for water resources, natural hazard risks associated with flooding, and ecosystem stability.

Overview of the ARkStorm Scenario

U.S. Geological Survey (USGS) | January 13th, 2011

The U.S. Geological Survey, Multi Hazards Demonstration Project (MHDP) uses hazards science to improve resiliency of communities to natural disasters including ea

The U.S. Geological Survey, Multi Hazards Demonstration Project (MHDP) uses hazards science to improve resiliency of communities to natural disasters including earthquakes, tsunamis, wildfires, landslides, floods and coastal erosion. The project engages emergency planners, businesses, universities, government agencies, and others in preparing for major natural disasters. The project also helps to set research goals and provides decision-making information for loss reduction and improved resiliency. The first public product of the MHDP was the ShakeOut Earthquake Scenario published in May 2008. This detailed depiction of a hypothetical magnitude 7.8 earthquake on the San Andreas Fault in southern California served as the centerpiece of the largest earthquake drill in United States history, involving over 5,000 emergency responders and the participation of over 5.5 million citizens. This document summarizes the next major public project for MHDP, a winter storm scenario called ARkStorm (for Atmospheric River 1,000). Experts have designed a large, scientifically realistic meteorological event followed by an examination of the secondary hazards (for example, landslides and flooding), physical damages to the built environment, and social and economic consequences. The hypothetical storm depicted here would strike the U.S. West Coast and be similar to the intense California winter storms of 1861 and 1862 that left the central valley of California impassible. The storm is estimated to produce precipitation that in many places exceeds levels only experienced on average once every 500 to 1,000 years. Extensive flooding results. In many cases flooding overwhelms the state’s flood-protection system, which is typically designed to resist 100- to 200-year runoffs. The Central Valley experiences hypothetical flooding 300 miles long and 20 or more miles wide. Serious flooding also occurs in Orange County, Los Angeles County, San Diego, the San Francisco Bay area, and other coastal communities. Windspeeds in some places reach 125 miles per hour, hurricane- force winds. Across wider areas of the state, winds reach 60 miles per hour. Hundreds of landslides damage roads, highways, and homes. Property damage exceeds $300 billion, most from flooding. Demand surge (an increase in labor rates and other repair costs after major natural disasters) could increase property losses by 20 percent. Agricultural losses and other costs to repair lifelines, dewater (drain) flooded islands, and repair damage from landslides, brings the total direct property loss to nearly $400 billion, of which $20 to $30 billion would be recoverable through public and commercial insurance. Power, water, sewer, and other lifelines experience damage that takes weeks or months to restore. Flooding evacuation could involve 1.5 million residents in the inland region and delta counties. Business interruption costs reach $325 billion in addition to the $400 billion property repair costs, meaning that an ARkStorm could cost on the order of $725 billion, which is nearly 3 times the loss deemed to be realistic by the ShakeOut authors for a severe southern California earthquake, an event with roughly the same annual occurrence probability. The ARkStorm has several public policy implications: (1) An ARkStorm raises serious questions about the ability of existing federal, state, and local disaster planning to handle a disaster of this magnitude. (2) A core policy issue raised is whether to pay now to mitigate, or pay a lot more later for recovery. (3) Innovative financing solutions are likely to be needed to avoid fiscal crisis and adequately fund response and recovery costs from a similar, real, disaster. (4) Responders and government managers at all levels could be encouraged to conduct risk assessments, and devise the full spectrum of exercises, to exercise ability of their plans to address a similar event. (5) ARkStorm can be a reference point for application of Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) and California Emergency Management Agency guidance connecting federal, state and local natural hazards mapping and mitigation planning under the National Flood Insurance Plan and Disaster Mitigation Act of 2000. (6) Common messages to educate the public about the risk of such an extreme disaster as the ARkStorm scenario could be developed and consistently communicated to facilitate policy formulation and transformation. These impacts were estimated by a team of 117 scientists, engineers, public-policy experts, insurance experts, and employees of the affected lifelines. In many aspects the ARkStorm produced new science, such as the model of coastal inundation. The products of the ARkStorm are intended for use by emergency planners, utility operators, policymakers, and others to inform preparedness plans and to enhance resiliency.

Pluvial flood impacts and policyholder responses throughout the United States

Nature Portfolio (Springer Nature) | January 24th, 2025

Precipitation in a warming world: Assessing projected hydro-climate changes in California and other Mediterranean climate regions

Nature Portfolio (Springer Nature) | September 7th, 2017

In most Mediterranean climate (MedClim) regions around the world, global climate models (GCMs) consistently project drier futures. In California, however, proj

In most Mediterranean climate (MedClim) regions around the world, global climate models (GCMs) consistently project drier futures. In California, however, projections of changes in annual precipitation are inconsistent. Analysis of daily precipitation in 30 GCMs reveals patterns in projected hydrometeorology over each of the five MedClm regions globally and helps disentangle their causes. MedClim regions, except California, are expected to dry via decreased frequency of winter precipitation. Frequencies of extreme precipitation, however, are projected to increase over the two MedClim regions of the Northern Hemisphere where projected warming is strongest. The increase in heavy and extreme precipitation is particularly robust over California, where it is only partially offset by projected decreases in low-medium intensity precipitation. Over the Mediterranean Basin, however, losses from decreasing frequency of low-medium-intensity precipitation are projected to dominate gains from intensifying projected extreme precipitation. MedClim regions are projected to become more sub-tropical, i.e. made dryer via pole-ward expanding subtropical subsidence. California’s more nuanced hydrological future reflects a precarious balance between the expanding subtropical high from the south and the south-eastward extending Aleutian low from the north-west. These dynamical mechanisms and thermodynamic moistening of the warming atmosphere result in increased horizontal water vapor transport, bolstering extreme precipitation events.

Precipitation in a warming world: Assessing projected hydro‐climate changes in California and other Mediterranean climate regions

Nature Portfolio (Springer Nature) | September 7th, 2017

In most Mediterranean climate (MedClim) regions around the world, global climate models (GCMs) consistently project drier futures. In California, however, proj

In most Mediterranean climate (MedClim) regions around the world, global climate models (GCMs) consistently project drier futures. In California, however, projections of changes in annual precipitation are inconsistent. Analysis of daily precipitation in 30 GCMs reveals patterns in projected hydrometeorology over each of the five MedClm regions globally and helps disentangle their causes. MedClim regions, except California, are expected to dry via decreased frequency of winter precipitation. Frequencies of extreme precipitation, however, are projected to increase over the two MedClim regions of the Northern Hemisphere where projected warming is strongest. The increase in heavy and extreme precipitation is particularly robust over California, where it is only partially offset by projected decreases in low-medium intensity precipitation. Over the Mediterranean Basin, however, losses from decreasing frequency of low-medium-intensity precipitation are projected to dominate gains from intensifying projected extreme precipitation. MedClim regions are projected to become more sub-tropical, i.e. made dryer via pole-ward expanding subtropical subsidence. California’s more nuanced hydrological future reflects a precarious balance between the expanding subtropical high from the south and the south-eastward extending Aleutian low from the north-west. These dynamical mechanisms and thermodynamic moistening of the warming atmosphere result in increased horizontal water vapor transport, bolstering extreme precipitation events.

Precipitation Regime Change in Western North America: the Role of Atmospheric Rivers

Nature Portfolio (Springer Nature) | July 9th, 2019

Daily precipitation in California has been projected to become less frequent even as precipitation extremes intensify, leading to uncertainty in the overall re

Daily precipitation in California has been projected to become less frequent even as precipitation extremes intensify, leading to uncertainty in the overall response to climate warming. Precipitation extremes are historically associated with Atmospheric Rivers (ARs). Sixteen global climate modelsare evaluated for realism in modeled historical AR behavior and contribution of the resulting dailyprecipitation to annual total precipitation over Western North America. The five most realistic models display consistent changes in future AR behavior, constraining the spread of the full ensemble. They, moreover, project increasing year-to-year variability of total annual precipitation, particularly over California, where change in total annual precipitation is not projected with confidence. Focusing on three representative river basins along the West Coast, we show that, while the decrease in precipitation frequency is mostly due to non-AR events, the increase in heavy and extreme precipitation is almost entirely due to ARs. This research demonstrates that examining meteorological causes of precipitation regime change can lead to better and more nuanced understanding of climate projections. It highlights the critical role of future changes in ARs to Western water resources, especially over California.