Monitoring for Acidification Threats in West Coast Estuaries: A San Francisco Bay Case Study

San Francisco Estuary Institute (SFEI) | June 6th, 2017

The estuaries of the U.S. Pacific Coast are diverse and productive ecosystems of high ecological, cultural, and economic value. They have many stakeholders, are managed t

The estuaries of the U.S. Pacific Coast are diverse and productive ecosystems of high ecological, cultural, and economic value. They have many stakeholders, are managed to meet many different, often competing, objectives, and contend with environmental stressors from a variety of sources. Ocean acidification (OA) is one stressor expected to have widespread impacts on the Pacific coastal ecosystems. Recently, the West Coast Ocean Acidification & Hypoxia Science Panel recommended improved monitoring to assess biological impacts in the coastal ocean and estuaries. However, the current status and impacts of ocean acidification on West Coast estuaries are largely unknown. A workshop in October 2016 brought together scientists from throughout the West Coast of the United States, leading researchers on San Francisco Bay, the region’s largest estuary, and representatives from a variety of management agencies. The main objectives of the Workshop were to assess whether acidification is of concern in the Bay and to identify its potential impacts to beneficial uses, cost-effective monitoring strategies, and potential management actions. Although the Bay was the case study, the aim was to develop general guidance that could be applied to West Coast estuaries.

Monitoring Special Study (MSS) Salinity Point Source and Ion Sampling CY 2022–2023

California Department of Water Resources (DWR) | August 15th, 2022

The interior southern Delta region of the San Francisco Estuary (SFE) has relatively higher seasonal-based salinity compared to other interior freshwater regions. Some of

The interior southern Delta region of the San Francisco Estuary (SFE) has relatively higher seasonal-based salinity compared to other interior freshwater regions. Some of this degradation in water quality in the interior southern Delta likely originates in upstream salt loading from agriculture drainage in the San Joaquin River prior to reaching the channels of Old River and Grant Line Canal. However, there is also measurable increases in salt loading within the channel networks of Old River at Head (OH1) east to lower Old River near Mountain House Creek (ORM) and the interconnected sloughs of Paradise and Sugar Cut in the region of Doughty Cut (Figure 1) (in-Delta agriculture drainage), as well as other naturally occurring (i.e., groundwater) sources and other non-point and point sources. The California Department of Water Resources (DWR) and U.S. Bureau of Reclamation (Reclamation), under the State Water Resources Control Board’s (State Water Board) Water Right Decision 1641 (D-1641), are assigned partial responsibility for meeting interior southern Delta water quality objectives each year at multiple compliance stations that measure specific conductance (EC) data continuously at 15-minute intervals.

Monitoring Strategies for Chemicals of Emerging Concern (CECs) in California’s Aquatic Ecosystems

California State Water Resources Control Board (SWRCB) | April 26th, 2012

Although thousands of substances can now be detected in the environment, a small percentage of known chemicals – approximately 200 -- are currently regulated and/or rou

Although thousands of substances can now be detected in the environment, a small percentage of known chemicals – approximately 200 -- are currently regulated and/or routinely monitored in California receiving waters.  The much larger group of chemicals that remain largely unregulated and/or unmonitored in the aquatic environment, known as chemicals of emerging concern (CECs), may originate from a wide range of point and non-point sources. Upon discharge to receiving waters, CECs that are readily soluble in water will remain in the dissolved (aqueous) phase and provide a route of exposure to aquatic life. A smaller subset of CECs that are hydrophobic will associate with particles, where they may remain suspended in the water column or accumulate in sediments and ultimately in tissues of aquatic and terrestrial biota. The larger concern is that exposure to aqueous, sediment and tissue CECs may affect wildlife and humans. In response, the California Water Resources Control Board (State Water Board) in conjunction with the David and Lucile Packard Foundation and a group of stakeholder advisors tasked a group of leading scientists to address the issues associated with CECs in the State’s aquatic systems that receive discharge of treated municipal wastewater effluent and stormwater. The group was charged to identify potential sources and evaluate the fate and effects of CECs, and ultimately to provide guidance for developing monitoring programs that assess those chemicals with the highest potential to cause effects in the State’s receiving waters. Seven experts in chemistry, biochemistry, toxicology, chemical and risk assessment, engineering and coastal and marine environmental health science were convened as the CEC Ecosystems Panel (“Panel”) in October 2009. The Panel held six in?person meetings to formulate their approach and recommendations, while soliciting input from stakeholders and the public. This report provides the results from the Panel’s deliberations, including four products intended to assist the State in developing a monitoring process for CECs based on sound, up-to-date scientific principles.

Monitoring Well Destruction, Replacement, and New Installations at Various Locations Soquel, Capitola, and Aptos, CA

Soquel Creek Water District | June 14th, 2012

A total of six new monitoring wells and seven replacement monitoring wells were drilled and constructed, and 13 monitoring well destroyed between February 7 and April 26,

A total of six new monitoring wells and seven replacement monitoring wells were drilled and constructed, and 13 monitoring well destroyed between February 7 and April 26, 2012 for the Soquel Creek Water District (District). This work took place at six different locations in the Soquel-Aptos area. The work was accomplished in order to meet the basin management objectives of the Soquel-Aptos Groundwater Management Plan (Soquel Creek Water District and Central Water District, 2007) and recommendations made in the Water Year 2010 Annual Report and Review (HydroMetrics WRI, 2011). A summary of the work performed and monitoring well construction details at each of the six locations are provided below. 

Monterey County Groundwater Management Plan

Monterey County Water Resources Agency (MCWRA) | May 17th, 2006

In 1992, California State Legislature adopted the Groundwater Management Act (California Water Code Part 2.7, §10753), originally enacted as Assembly Bill (AB) 3030 and

In 1992, California State Legislature adopted the Groundwater Management Act (California Water Code Part 2.7, §10753), originally enacted as Assembly Bill (AB) 3030 and amended by Senate Bill (SB) 1938 in 2002. The Groundwater Management Act provided the authority to prepare groundwater management plans and encouraged local agencies to work cooperatively to manage groundwater resources within their jurisdictions and groundwater basins. Monterey County Water Resources Agency (MCWRA), recognizing that management of its natural water resources is critical to ensuring a long-term sustainable and reliable good quality water supply, has prepared this Groundwater Management Plan (GWMP). The purpose of the GWMP is to provide a comprehensive overview of the Salinas Valley Groundwater Basin and to recommend various management strategies for the basin. Specifically, this document provides the framework for the management of groundwater resources in the Salinas Valley Groundwater Basin (exclusive of the Seaside and Paso Robles subareas) and acts as a guidance document for future groundwater projects. While this edition of the GWMP focuses on the Salinas Valley Groundwater Basin, MCWRA is responsible for the management of the water resources for all of Monterey County. Future GWMP versions will incorporate the additional groundwater basins in the County. This document has been prepared in accordance with existing regulations as outlined in the California Water Code (as referenced above) and was prepared in coordination with local agencies and interested residents through public outreach activities.

MSS Salinity Point Source and Ion Sampling to the Monitoring Special Study Plan CY 2022–2023 Work Plan Monitoring Plan

California Department of Water Resources (DWR) | August 16th, 2023

The interior southern Delta region of the San Francisco Estuary (SFE) has relatively higher seasonal-based salinity compared to other interior freshwater regions. Some of

The interior southern Delta region of the San Francisco Estuary (SFE) has relatively higher seasonal-based salinity compared to other interior freshwater regions. Some of this degradation in water quality in the interior southern Delta likely originates in upstream salt loading from agriculture drainage in the San Joaquin River prior to reaching the channels of Old River and Grant Line Canal. However, there is also measurable increases in salt loading within the channel networks of Old River at Head (OH1) east to lower Old River near Mountain House Creek (ORM) and the interconnected sloughs of Paradise and Sugar Cut in the region of Doughty Cut (in-Delta agriculture drainage), as well as other naturally occurring (i.e., groundwater) sources and other non-point and point sources. The California Department of Water Resources (DWR) and U.S. Bureau of Reclamation (Reclamation), under the State Water Resources Control Board’s (State Water Board) Water Right Decision 1641 (D-1641), are assigned partial responsibility for meeting interior southern Delta water quality objectives each year at multiple compliance stations that measure specific conductance (EC) data continuously at 15-minute intervals.

Multi-box mass balance model of PFOA and PFOS in different regions of San Francisco Bay

Chemosphere (Elsevier) | August 3rd, 2020

We present a model to predict the long-term distribution and concentrations of perfluorooctanoic acid (PFOA) and perfluorooctanesulfonic acid (PFOS) in estuaries comprisi

We present a model to predict the long-term distribution and concentrations of perfluorooctanoic acid (PFOA) and perfluorooctanesulfonic acid (PFOS) in estuaries comprising multiple intercommunicated sub-embayments. To that end, a mass balance model including rate constants and time-varying water inputs was designed to calculate levels of these compounds in water and sediment for every sub-embayment. Subsequently, outflows and tidal water exchanges were used to interconnect the different regions of the estuary. To calculate plausible risks to population, outputs of the model were used as inputs in a previously designed model to simulate concentrations of PFOA and PFOS in a sport fish species (Cymatogaster aggregata). The performance of the model was evaluated by applying it to the specific case of San Francisco Bay, (California, USA), using 2009 sediment and water sampled concentrations of PFOA and PFOS in North, Central and South regions. Concentrations of these compounds in the Bay displayed exponential decreasing trends, but with different shapes depending on region, compound, and compartment assessed. Nearly stable PFOA concentrations were reached after 50 years, while PFOS needed close to 500 years to stabilize in sediment and fish. Afterwards, concentrations stabilize between 4 and 23 pg/g in sediment, between 0.02 and 44 pg/L in water, and between 7 and 104 pg/g wet weight in fish, depending on compound and region. South Bay had the greatest final concentrations of pollutants, regardless of compartment. Fish consumption is safe for most scenarios, but due to model uncertainty, limitations in monthly intake could be established for North and South Bay catches.

Multi-region assessment of chemical mixture exposures and predicted cumulative effects in USA wadeable urban/agriculture-gradient streams

Science of the Total Environment (Elsevier) | February 4th, 2021

Chemical-contaminant mixtures are widely reported in large stream reaches in urban/agriculture-developed watersheds, but mixture compositions and aggregate biolog

Chemical-contaminant mixtures are widely reported in large stream reaches in urban/agriculture-developed watersheds, but mixture compositions and aggregate biological effects are less well understood in corresponding smaller headwaters, which comprise most of stream length, riparian connectivity, and spatial biodiversity. During 2014–2017, the U.S. Geological Survey (USGS) measured 389 unique organic analytes (pharmaceutical, pesticide, organic wastewater indicators) in 305 headwater streams within four contiguous United States (US) regions. Potential aquatic biological effects were evaluated for estimated maximum and median exposure conditions using multiple lines of evidence, including occurrence/concentrations of designed-bioactive pesticides and pharmaceuticals and cumulative risk screening based on vertebrate-centric ToxCast™ exposure-response data and on invertebrate and nonvascular plant aquatic life benchmarks. Mixed-contaminant exposures were ubiquitous and varied, with 78% (304) of analytes detected at least once and cumulative maximum concentrations up to more than 156,000 ng/L. Designed bioactives represented 83% of detected analytes. Contaminant summary metrics correlated strong-positive (rho (ρ): 0.569–0.719) to multiple watershed-development metrics, only weak-positive to point-source discharges (ρ: 0.225–353), and moderate- to strong-negative with multiple instream invertebrate metrics (ρ: −0.373 to −0.652). Risk screening indicated common exposures with high probability of vertebrate-centric molecular effects and of acute toxicity to invertebrates, respectively. The results confirm exposures to broad and diverse contaminant mixtures and provide convincing multiple lines of evidence that chemical contaminants contribute substantially to adverse multi-stressor effects in headwater-stream communities.

Multiple lines of evidence point to pesticides as stressors affecting invertebrate communities in small streams in five United States regions

Science of the Total Environment (Elsevier) | January 24th, 2024

Multiple lines of evidence point to pesticides as stressors affecting invertebrate communities in small streams in five United States regions

Science of the Total Environment (Elsevier) | February 2nd, 2024