Minimizing the Impact of Cannabis Cultivation on California Lands and Waterways

California State Water Resources Control Board (SWRCB) | February 17th, 2017

Following recent changes in state law and voter-approved initiatives, California’s commercial cultivation of cannabis for recreational and medical use is expected to gr

Following recent changes in state law and voter-approved initiatives, California’s commercial cultivation of cannabis for recreational and medical use is expected to grow significantly. The State Water Resources Control Board has adopted a state cannabis policy to set up strict environmental standards, and a permitting system to protect local surface water from dewatering, protect water habitat and prevent pollution in the state’s rivers and streams. Left unregulated, cannabis cultivation can pose serious threats to water quality and the environment. Cannabis cultivation impacts include the release of fertilizers, pesticides and other supplements that degrade water quality and threaten wildlife. Excessive water diversions can injure fish or even dewater smaller streams. The physical alteration of the land can harm stream habitat and wildlife by the sediment and debris that is deposited in waterways by unregulated cultivation. Overview: The State Water Board’s “Cannabis Cultivation Policy, Principles and Guidelines for Cannabis Cultivation” (Policy) will be implemented through a water quality permit and a water right. The water quality permit is referred to as a Statewide General Order for Cannabis Cultivation Activities (Cannabis General Order). The water right is referred to as a Cannabis Small Irrigation Use Registration. Tiered Approach: The Cannabis General Order consists of a tiered permit structure based on threat to water quality. Tier 1 Cannabis Cultivators have a disturbed area greater than 2,000 square feet and less than 1 acre (43,560 square feet). Tier 2 Cannabis Cultivators have a disturbed area equal to or greater than 1 acre.

Modeling Barriers and Levee-Break Effects on Delta-Wide Salinity

Delta Stewardship Council (Delta Council) | February 18th, 2016

Modeling Cost, Energy, and Total Organic Carbon Trade-Offs for Stormwater Spreading Basin Systems Receiving Recycled Water Produced Using Membrane-Based, Ozone-Based, and Hybrid Advanced Treatment Trains

American Chemical Society (ACS) | January 31st, 2019

To address water scarcity, cities are pursuing options for augmenting groundwater recharge with recycled water. Ozone-based treatment trains comprising ozone and biologic

To address water scarcity, cities are pursuing options for augmenting groundwater recharge with recycled water. Ozone-based treatment trains comprising ozone and biologically activated carbon potentially offer cost-effective alternatives to membrane-based treatment, the standard process for potable reuse in numerous countries. However, regulations in multiple states effectively limit the extent to which ozone-based treatment alone can produce recycled water for groundwater recharge. To investigate the trade-offs between treatment costs and regulatory constraints, this study presents methods for modeling and optimizing designs for (1) producing recycled water using membrane-based treatment, ozone-based treatment, and hybrid treatment trains comprising ozone-based treatment with a membrane sidestream, and (2) delivering that water to stormwater spreading basins. We present a case study of Los Angeles, CA, to demonstrate the model’s application under realistic conditions, including regulations that limit spreading recycled water based on its concentration of total organic carbon and the extent of dilution. While the membrane-based treatment train exhibits economies of scale, we demonstrate how regulatory constraints create a diseconomies of scale effect for hybrid treatment systems because larger scales necessitate a higher proportion of recycled water undergo membrane treatment. Nevertheless, relative to membrane-based treatment, we identify opportunities for ozone-based or hybrid treatment trains to reduce treatment costs and energy use by up to 62% and 59%, respectively, for systems with up to 1 m3/s (23 million gallons per day) mean water recycling rate, potentially lowering the barrier for decentralized water recycling systems. This modeling approach could inform planning and policy regarding recycled water projects for groundwater recharge through spreading basins and, with additional modification, other potable reuse applications.

Modeling Land Subsidence Using InSAR and Airborne Electromagnetic Data

American Geophysical Union (AGU) | March 13th, 2019

Land subsidence as a result of groundwater overpumping in the San Joaquin Valley, California, is associated with the loss of groundwater storage and aquifer contaminatio

Land subsidence as a result of groundwater overpumping in the San Joaquin Valley, California, is associated with the loss of groundwater storage and aquifer contamination. Although the physical processes governing land subsidence are well understood, building predictive models of subsidence is challenging because so much subsurface information is required to do so accurately. For the first time, we integrate airborne electromagnetic data, representing the subsurface, with subsidence data, mapped by interferometric synthetic aperture radar (InSAR), to model deformation. By combining both data sets, we are able to solve for hydrologic and geophysical properties of the subsurface to effectively model the complex spatiotemporal process of deformation. The resulting model reveals that roughly 3 m of subsidence has occurred at one location of our study area from 1990 to 2018. This model also allows us to predict subsidence more accurately under future hydrologic scenarios, which is needed to develop plans for sustainable groundwater use.

Modern groundwater reaches deeper depths in heavily pumped aquifer systems

Nature Portfolio (Springer Nature) | September 7th, 2022

Deep groundwater is an important source of drinking water, and can be preferable to shallower groundwaters where they are polluted by surface-borne contaminants. Surface-

Deep groundwater is an important source of drinking water, and can be preferable to shallower groundwaters where they are polluted by surface-borne contaminants. Surface-borne contaminants are disproportionately common in ‘modern’ groundwaters that are made up of precipitation that fell since the ~1950s. Some local-scale studies have suggested that groundwater pumping can draw modern groundwater downward and potentially pollute deep aquifers, but the prevalence of such pumping-induced downwelling at continental scale is not known. Here we analyse thousands of US groundwater tritium measurements to show that modern groundwater tends to reach deeper depths in heavily pumped aquifer systems. These findings imply that groundwater pumping can draw mobile surface-borne pollutants to deeper depths than they would reach in the absence of pumping. We conclude that intensive groundwater pumping can draw recently recharged groundwater deeper into aquifer systems, potentially endangering deep groundwater quality.

Mojave Region Functionally Equivalent Storm Water Resources Plan

Mojave Water Agency (MWA) | October 4th, 2017

The State of California now recognizes the importance of incorporating storm water as a potential resource in a region’s water portfolio. Historically, storm water was

The State of California now recognizes the importance of incorporating storm water as a potential resource in a region’s water portfolio. Historically, storm water was thought of as a public risk (e.g., flooding) and a source of water quality impairment. Traditional approaches for storm water focused on diverting storm water into the storm drain system which ultimately and efficiently moved said water away from populated areas; the State is now supporting watershed-based approaches where storm water and dry weather runoff can yield benefits beyond flood control, such as water supply, water quality improvement, and habitat enhancement. To incentivize use of storm water, the State of California has linked storm water resources planning to state funding. Storm water and dry weather runoff capture projects seeking funding from any California bond act approved by voters after January 1, 2014 must be included in a Storm Water Resources Plan, which meets California Water Code. Regional water planning has a long history in the Mojave region. In 2005, agencies in the Mojave service area, that share a common concern for the area’s water resources, met and agreed to develop an Integrated Regional Water Management Plan (IRWMP). The Region’s first IRWMP identified, defined, and established strategies to capitalize on all water management opportunities that were present at that time or would become possible in the Mojave Region in the future. Since that time the IRWMP has acted as a forum for regular collaboration. The IRWMP is a living document and the regional objectives as well as strategies to improvement water management are regularly updated. The IRWMP was last updated in 2014. This Mojave Region Storm Water Resource Plan (SWRP) is an extension of the IRWMP process and is meant to bring an integrated and watershed-based approach to managing and creating benefits from storm water. This SWRP is regional and multi-agency. This SWRP includes all components required by the Water Code and will be submitted to the IRWM group. This SWRP will help entities in the Mojave Region identify, prioritize, and implement storm water projects.

Monitoring for Acidification Threats in West Coast Estuaries: A San Francisco Bay Case Study

San Francisco Estuary Institute (SFEI) | June 6th, 2017

The estuaries of the U.S. Pacific Coast are diverse and productive ecosystems of high ecological, cultural, and economic value. They have many stakeholders, are managed t

The estuaries of the U.S. Pacific Coast are diverse and productive ecosystems of high ecological, cultural, and economic value. They have many stakeholders, are managed to meet many different, often competing, objectives, and contend with environmental stressors from a variety of sources. Ocean acidification (OA) is one stressor expected to have widespread impacts on the Pacific coastal ecosystems. Recently, the West Coast Ocean Acidification & Hypoxia Science Panel recommended improved monitoring to assess biological impacts in the coastal ocean and estuaries. However, the current status and impacts of ocean acidification on West Coast estuaries are largely unknown. A workshop in October 2016 brought together scientists from throughout the West Coast of the United States, leading researchers on San Francisco Bay, the region’s largest estuary, and representatives from a variety of management agencies. The main objectives of the Workshop were to assess whether acidification is of concern in the Bay and to identify its potential impacts to beneficial uses, cost-effective monitoring strategies, and potential management actions. Although the Bay was the case study, the aim was to develop general guidance that could be applied to West Coast estuaries.

Monitoring Special Study (MSS) Salinity Point Source and Ion Sampling CY 2022–2023

California Department of Water Resources (DWR) | August 15th, 2022

The interior southern Delta region of the San Francisco Estuary (SFE) has relatively higher seasonal-based salinity compared to other interior freshwater regions. Some of

The interior southern Delta region of the San Francisco Estuary (SFE) has relatively higher seasonal-based salinity compared to other interior freshwater regions. Some of this degradation in water quality in the interior southern Delta likely originates in upstream salt loading from agriculture drainage in the San Joaquin River prior to reaching the channels of Old River and Grant Line Canal. However, there is also measurable increases in salt loading within the channel networks of Old River at Head (OH1) east to lower Old River near Mountain House Creek (ORM) and the interconnected sloughs of Paradise and Sugar Cut in the region of Doughty Cut (Figure 1) (in-Delta agriculture drainage), as well as other naturally occurring (i.e., groundwater) sources and other non-point and point sources. The California Department of Water Resources (DWR) and U.S. Bureau of Reclamation (Reclamation), under the State Water Resources Control Board’s (State Water Board) Water Right Decision 1641 (D-1641), are assigned partial responsibility for meeting interior southern Delta water quality objectives each year at multiple compliance stations that measure specific conductance (EC) data continuously at 15-minute intervals.

Monitoring Strategies for Chemicals of Emerging Concern (CECs) in California’s Aquatic Ecosystems

California State Water Resources Control Board (SWRCB) | April 26th, 2012

Although thousands of substances can now be detected in the environment, a small percentage of known chemicals – approximately 200 -- are currently regulated and/or rou

Although thousands of substances can now be detected in the environment, a small percentage of known chemicals – approximately 200 -- are currently regulated and/or routinely monitored in California receiving waters.  The much larger group of chemicals that remain largely unregulated and/or unmonitored in the aquatic environment, known as chemicals of emerging concern (CECs), may originate from a wide range of point and non-point sources. Upon discharge to receiving waters, CECs that are readily soluble in water will remain in the dissolved (aqueous) phase and provide a route of exposure to aquatic life. A smaller subset of CECs that are hydrophobic will associate with particles, where they may remain suspended in the water column or accumulate in sediments and ultimately in tissues of aquatic and terrestrial biota. The larger concern is that exposure to aqueous, sediment and tissue CECs may affect wildlife and humans. In response, the California Water Resources Control Board (State Water Board) in conjunction with the David and Lucile Packard Foundation and a group of stakeholder advisors tasked a group of leading scientists to address the issues associated with CECs in the State’s aquatic systems that receive discharge of treated municipal wastewater effluent and stormwater. The group was charged to identify potential sources and evaluate the fate and effects of CECs, and ultimately to provide guidance for developing monitoring programs that assess those chemicals with the highest potential to cause effects in the State’s receiving waters. Seven experts in chemistry, biochemistry, toxicology, chemical and risk assessment, engineering and coastal and marine environmental health science were convened as the CEC Ecosystems Panel (“Panel”) in October 2009. The Panel held six in?person meetings to formulate their approach and recommendations, while soliciting input from stakeholders and the public. This report provides the results from the Panel’s deliberations, including four products intended to assist the State in developing a monitoring process for CECs based on sound, up-to-date scientific principles.

Monitoring Well Destruction, Replacement, and New Installations at Various Locations Soquel, Capitola, and Aptos, CA

Soquel Creek Water District | June 14th, 2012

A total of six new monitoring wells and seven replacement monitoring wells were drilled and constructed, and 13 monitoring well destroyed between February 7 and April 26,

A total of six new monitoring wells and seven replacement monitoring wells were drilled and constructed, and 13 monitoring well destroyed between February 7 and April 26, 2012 for the Soquel Creek Water District (District). This work took place at six different locations in the Soquel-Aptos area. The work was accomplished in order to meet the basin management objectives of the Soquel-Aptos Groundwater Management Plan (Soquel Creek Water District and Central Water District, 2007) and recommendations made in the Water Year 2010 Annual Report and Review (HydroMetrics WRI, 2011). A summary of the work performed and monitoring well construction details at each of the six locations are provided below.