State and green crimes related to water pollution and ecological disorganization: water pollution from publicly owned treatment works (POTW) facilities across US states

Palgrave Communications | August 1st, 2017

Green criminologists often refer to water pollution as an example of a green crime, but have yet to produce much research on this subject. The current article addressesÂ

Green criminologists often refer to water pollution as an example of a green crime, but have yet to produce much research on this subject. The current article addresses the need for green criminological analyses of water pollution problems, and draws attention to an overlooked issue: water pollution emissions from state owned public water treatment facilities or POTWs. Legally, POTWs may emit certain quantities and kinds of pollutants to waterways following treatment. This does not mean, however, that those emissions have no adverse ecological or public health impacts, or that those emissions cannot also be employed as examples of green crimes or green-state crimes. Indeed, from the perspective of environmental sociology and ecological Marxism, those emissions generate ecological disorganization. Moreover, POTW emissions contain numerous pollutants that generate different forms of ecological disorganization. The current study uses POTW emissions data drawn from the US EPA’s Discharge Monitoring Report system for 2014 to illustrate the extent of pollution emitted by POTWs in and across US states as one dimension of ecological disorganization. To contextualize the meaning of those data, we review US water pollution regulations, review the health and ecological impacts of chemicals emitted by POTWs, and situate those emissions within green criminological discussions of green crime and greenstate crimes.

Status of Water-Quality Conditions in the United States, 2010–20, Chapter C of U.S. Geological Survey Integrated Water Availability Assessment—2010–20

U.S. Geological Survey (USGS) | January 15th, 2025

Key findings related to groundwater and surface water quality problems that affect water availability include the following: Drinking-water use is affected by geogen

Key findings related to groundwater and surface water quality problems that affect water availability include the following: Drinking-water use is affected by geogenic and anthropogenic contaminants. Elevated concentrations of arsenic, manganese, strontium, radium, adjusted gross alpha, and nitrate are common in drinking water aquifers serving more than 30 million people in the United States. About one-third of stream miles assessed as surface-water sourced drinking-water supply are impaired with respect to drinking-water use, most commonly because of non-mercury metals and salinity. Health-based drinking-water violations at public water systems may disproportionately affect socially vulnerable communities. People with domestic wells as their drinking-water source are more prone to exposure to contaminants compared to people served by public water systems. Ecological water uses are predominantly limited by nutrients, sediment, temperature, pathogens, salinity, and pesticides. Contaminants without or historically without regulatory thresholds (for example, polyfluoroalkyl substances [PFAS]) have been underrepresented in previous assessments and also likely contribute to ecological degradation and human exposure. Water availability for human and ecological use is limited by elevated constituent concentrations in surface water and groundwater because of human activities. Human activities include sources (for example, inorganic and organic chemicals), processes (for example, dredging), or permanent landscape modifications (for example, dams, urbanization). Interactions between groundwater and surface water can influence water quality. Surface-water recharge can be a source of contaminants to aquifers, whereas groundwater discharge, with slow transport times, results in long-term, lagged delivery of pollutants to surface waters (especially nitrate, chloride, PFAS, and other constituents). Little information exists regarding human-health exposure risks from mixtures of geogenic and anthropogenic drinking-water contaminants. Co-occurrence and mixtures of multiple water-quality constituents, taken together, can cause compounding negative effects on water availability but mixtures are rarely measured in standard monitoring protocols. Alternative water resources could increase water availability by providing additional supply from non-traditional sources such as reclaimed wastewater, brackish and saline water, and produced water from oil and gas development. Companion chapters: U.S. Geological Survey Integrated Water Availability Assessment—2010–20, Chapter A Water Supply in the Conterminous United States, Alaska, Hawaii, and Puerto Rico, Water Years 2010–20, Chapter B Water Use Across the Conterminous United States, Water Years 2010–20, Chapter D  Climate Change and Future Water Availability in the United States, Chapter E  Integrated Water Availability in the Conterminous United States, 2010–20, Chapter F 

Study to Evaluate Long-Term Trends and Variations in the Average Total Dissolved Solids Concentration in Wastewater and Recycled Water

Southern California Salinity Coalition | March 30th, 2018

This report was funded by the Southern California Salinity Coalition (SCSC). SCSC and its member agencies are dedicated to managing salinity in the water supplies, waste

This report was funded by the Southern California Salinity Coalition (SCSC). SCSC and its member agencies are dedicated to managing salinity in the water supplies, wastewater, and recycled water. Member agencies include Eastern Municipal Water District (EMWD), Inland Empire Utilities Agency (IEUA), Metropolitan Water District of Southern California (MWDSC), Orange County Sanitation District (OCSD), Orange County Water District (OCWD), San Diego County Water Authority (SDCWA), Sanitation Districts of Los Angeles County (LACSD), and Santa Ana Watershed Project Authority (SAWPA). Daniel B. Stephens & Associates, Inc. (DBS&A) performed the analysis and is submitting this technical memorandum to address the research questions posed by SCSC and its member agencies. The 2011 to 2016 drought in California, in conjunction with unprecedented statewide conservation legislation, caused several member agencies to face challenges meeting regulatory water quality standards for the salinity of discharge water from wastewater treatment plants (WWTPs). In particular, total dissolved solids (TDS) concentrations have increased, while the operation of WWTPs have remained consistent with prior years. Figure ES-1 is a typical example of TDS trends for WWTPs in Southern California.

Sustainable wastewater reuse for agriculture

Nature Portfolio (Springer Nature) | June 6th, 2024

Tehachapi Reclaimed Water Project

City of Tehachapi | September 24th, 2024

As part of the proposed project, the City would change the location of application of the secondary treated effluent produced at the Tehachapi WWTP from the agricultural

As part of the proposed project, the City would change the location of application of the secondary treated effluent produced at the Tehachapi WWTP from the agricultural fields near the Tehachapi Municipal Airport to a new location south of the Borrow Pit. Overall WWTP effluent production and WWTP throughput capacity would remain unchanged as would the time of year of application (from April to October).

Temporal concentrations of Quaternary ammonium compounds in wastewater treatment effluents during the COVID-19 pandemic, 2020–2021

Elsevier | November 19th, 2024

The frontiers of water and sanitation

Nature Portfolio (Springer Nature) | January 19th, 2023

The way in which human society uses water is continuously evolving. The present challenges related to clean water availability require the development of sustainable tech

The way in which human society uses water is continuously evolving. The present challenges related to clean water availability require the development of sustainable technologies and infrastructure. Furthermore, a stronger and wider appreciation of water inequalities and injustice demand an adequate transformation of water governance at local and global scale. We have asked nine experts in various sectors of water-related research to share their views on how water and sanitation science, technology and governance must evolve to meet the requirements of a healthier relationship between water and society.

The implications of drought and water conservation on the reuse of municipal wastewater: Recognizing impacts and identifying mitigation possibilities

Water Research, Elsevier | November 1st, 2017

As water agencies continue to investigate opportunities to increase resilience and local water supply reliability in the face of drought and rising water scarcity, wa

As water agencies continue to investigate opportunities to increase resilience and local water supply reliability in the face of drought and rising water scarcity, water conservation strategies and the reuse of treated municipal wastewater are garnering significant attention and adoption. Yet a simple water balance thought experiment illustrates that drought, and the conservation strategies that are often enacted in response to it, both likely limit the role reuse may play in improving local water supply reliability. For instance, as a particular drought progresses and agencies enact water conservation measures to cope with drought, influent flows likely decrease while influent pollution concentrations increase, particularly salinity, which adversely affects wastewater treatment plant (WWTP) costs and effluent quality and flow. Consequently, downstream uses of this effluent, whether to maintain streamflow and quality, groundwater recharge, or irrigationmay be impacted. This is unfortunate since reuse is often heralded as a drought-proof mechanism to increase resilience. The objectives of this paper are two-fold. First, we illustrate—using a case study from Southern California during its most recent drought— how drought and water conservation strategies combine to reduce influent flow and quality and, subsequently, effluent flow and quality. Second, we use a recently developed regional water reuse decision support model (RWRM) to highlight cost-effective strategies that can be implemented to mitigate the impacts of drought on effluent water quality. While the solutions we identify cannot increase the flow of influent or effluent coming into or out of a treatment plant, they can improve the value of the remaining effluent in a cost-effective manner that takes into account the characteristics of its demand, whether it be for landscaping, golf courses, agricultural irrigation, or surface water augmentation.

The Pulse of the Bay 2019: Pollutant Pathways

San Francisco Estuary Institute (SFEI) | September 26th, 2019

Pollutants make their way to San Francisco Bay from near and far. Some pollutants come from the other side of the world, such as the mercury that is emitted into the atmo

Pollutants make their way to San Francisco Bay from near and far. Some pollutants come from the other side of the world, such as the mercury that is emitted into the atmosphere by coal-fired power plants in Asia, transported across the Pacific Ocean by the wind, and deposited on the surface of the Bay and in the Bay watershed. Some pollutants come from the far corners of the Bay’s watershed, which encompasses 40% of the land surface of California. Mercury used in historic gold mining regions in the Sierra Nevada is still flowing downstream into Central Valley rivers, through the Delta, and into the Bay.  Most pollutants, however, originate from activities closer to home in the small, local watersheds that surround the Bay. Rain that falls onto yards, roofs, parking lots, streets, farms, pastures, and other surfaces in the watersheds picks up pollutants and carries them to the Bay through an intricate network of thousands of miles of storm drain pipes, culverts, and creeks. Most of this stormwater flows to the Bay without any form of pollutant removal.  Another parallel and intricate network of thousands of miles of pipes carries wastewater from homes, business, and industries through sewage collection systems to municipal wastewater treatment plants. These treatment plants are highly effective at removing most pollutants from the wastewater stream, but some are not effectively treated and pass through to the Bay.  Some industrial operations, such as the Bay Area’s petroleum refineries, are large enough to warrant having their own wastewater treatment facilities that remove pollutants so the effluent can be safely discharged into the Bay, reused in plant operations, or applied to land.  Disposal of dredged material at designated sites within the Bay is another activity that introduces pollutants to specific areas in the Bay, but in this case the pollutants are simply transferred from one part of the Bay to another. Much of the pollutant mass in dredged material is also removed from the Bay via disposal in the ocean or beneficial reuse in wetlands and upland sites. This edition of the Pulse of the Bay features articles on the four major pollutant pathways that are the primary focus of Bay water quality managers: municipal wastewater, industrial wastewater, stormwater, and dredging and dredged material disposal.

The Resilience Value of Recycled Water for Los Angeles

University of California, Los Angeles (UCLA) | November 13th, 2024

In 2019, the City of Los Angeles (City) announced the development of the Operation NEXT Water Supply Program (Operation NEXT or Program) (City of Los Angeles, 2019), an a

In 2019, the City of Los Angeles (City) announced the development of the Operation NEXT Water Supply Program (Operation NEXT or Program) (City of Los Angeles, 2019), an advanced water recycling project aimed at expanding the use of purified recycled water. The current approach for Operation NEXT (now Pure Water Los Angeles) encompasses several distinct water infrastructure components. One is the construction and operation of an advanced water treatment purification facility at the Hyperion Wastewater Treatment Plant, the largest wastewater treatment facility west of the Mississippi. This project, in partnership with Los Angeles Sanitation & Environment comprises the Hyperion 2035 Program (Hyperion 2035) (LADWP, 2024; LASAN, 2024). Once constructed, potable recycled water flows from this facility will further diversify the City’s water supply portfolio, adding up to 257,636 acre-feet of supply each year once it is fully operational. A second component of Operation NEXT is a conveyance system that will transport this purified recycled water to groundwater basins or further treatment facilities, where it will be stored or blended with other water supplies. Currently, the construction and operation of Operation NEXT is still being estimated, and costs range between $6.4 billion and $24.0 billion USD as of 2020.