Shop – California Water Library

Page

Showing
61-71 of 122

Per Page

Sort By

Innovation in Monitoring: The U.S. Geological Survey Sacramento–San Joaquin River Delta, California, Flow-Station Network

U.S. Geological Survey (USGS) | January 1st, 2016

Summary

The U.S. Geological Survey (USGS) installed the first gage to measure the flow of water into California’s Sacramento–San Joaquin River Delta from the Sacramento River

The U.S. Geological Survey (USGS) installed the first gage to measure the flow of water into California’s Sacramento–San Joaquin River Delta from the Sacramento River in the late 1800s. Today, a network of 35 hydro-acoustic meters measure flow throughout the delta. This region is a critical part of California’s freshwater supply and conveyance system. With the data provided by this flow-station network—sampled every 15 minutes and updated to the web every hour—state and federal water managers make daily decisions about how much freshwater can be pumped for human use, at which locations, and when. Fish and wildlife scientists, working with water managers, also use this information to protect fish species affected by pumping and loss of habitat. The data are also used to help determine the success or failure of efforts to restore ecosystem processes in what has been called the “most managed and highly altered” watershed in the country.

View Document Download Now Email

Instream flow evaluation: Temperature and passage assessment for salmonids in Mill Creek, Tehama County

California Department of Fish and Wildlife (CDFW) | May 8th, 2017

Summary

Mill Creek is among the essential streams for recovery and perpetuation of wild stocks of Central Valley spring-run Chinook salmon (Oncorhynchus tshawytscha), and support

Mill Creek is among the essential streams for recovery and perpetuation of wild stocks of Central Valley spring-run Chinook salmon (Oncorhynchus tshawytscha), and supports Central Valley steelhead trout (Oncorhynchus mykiss; Armentrout et al. 1998). In addition, Mill Creek is utilized by fall-run Chinook salmon, late fall-run Chinook salmon, and Pacific Lamprey (Entosphenus tridentatus). The Recovery Plan for Central Valley Chinook Salmon and Steelhead (NMFS 2014) classified Mill Creek as a high priority Core 1 watershed because of its potential to support independent viable populations. Mill Creek is also identified as a priority stream in the State Water Resources Control Board (SWRCB) Instream Flow Studies for the Protection of the Public Trust Resources: A Prioritized Schedule and Estimate of Cost (SWRCB 2010), and the US Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS) Final Restoration Plan for the Anadromous Fish Restoration Program: A Plan to Increase Natural Production of Anadromous Fish in the Central Valley of California (USFWS 2001). The California Department of Fish and Wildlife (Department) has interest in ensuring that water flows within streams are maintained at levels which are adequate for long-term protection, maintenance, and proper stewardship of fish and wildlife resources. The Department’s Instream Flow Program develops scientific information to determine what flows are needed to maintain healthy conditions for fish and wildlife. For each species of interest, life stage, and stream, relationships between flow and habitat are developed. The Department recommends using the federal Instream Flow Incremental Methodology (IFIM) to evaluate and develop instream flow criteria for projects which may affect California’s aquatic resources. The IFIM process, and instream flow evaluations, in general, should include broad consideration of the structure and function of riverine systems while also providing examination of five core components (i.e., hydrology, biology, geomorphology, water quality, and connectivity) of the riverine system. The Public Resources Code (PRC) §10000-10005 outlines the Department’s responsibilities for developing and transmitting flow criteria to the SWRCB for consideration as set forth in 1257.5 of the Water Code. The results from this study are intended to be used, along with other supporting information and data, to identify stream flow requirements necessary for upstream passage of adult Chinook salmon and steelhead into the upper Mill Creek watershed pursuant to the Department’s PRC mandate. Flow criteria for lower Mill Creek will be developed by the Department in a future document.

View Document Download Now Email

Instream Flow Regime Recommendations, Big Sur River, Monterey County

California Department of Fish and Wildlife (CDFW) | September 23rd, 2016

Summary

The Department of Fish and Wildlife (Department) has interest in assuring that water flows within streams are maintained at levels which are adequate for long-term protec

The Department of Fish and Wildlife (Department) has interest in assuring that water flows within streams are maintained at levels which are adequate for long-term protection, maintenance and proper stewardship of fish and wildlife resources. The Department has developed recommended instream flow regimes for the Big Sur River, Monterey County for transmittal to the State Water Resources Control Board (Water Board) and consideration as set forth in 1257.5 of the Water Code. Submission of these flow recommendations to the Water Board complies with Public Resources Code (PRC) §10001-10002. The Department is recommending instream flow regimes for the lower Big Sur River from Pfeiffer Big Sur State Park at U.S. Geological Survey (USGS) Gage 11143000 downstream through Molera State Park. The recommendations are separated into six monthly hydrological condition types (i.e., critically dry, dry, below median, above median, wet, and extremely wet) and are presented in the form of an annual schedule for each of three mainstem river reaches (i.e., Lower Molera, Molera, and Campground). The recommended instream flow regimes are summarized in the current document, along with justification for the recommendations and reference to the data sources. The Department files the enclosed set of instream flow regime recommendations for the Big Sur River that we believe to be comprehensive and substantially complete. The recommendations were based upon information developed through recent PRC instream flow evaluations by the Department, and earlier information. The Department may revise its recommended instream flow regimes for the Big Sur River at a later date based upon any new scientific information that may become available.

View Document Download Now Email

Interim instream flow criteria for the protection of fishery resources in the Scott River watershed, Siskiyou County

California Department of Fish and Wildlife (CDFW) | February 6th, 2017

Summary

This document describes the methods and results of an analysis using historical flow data and regional regression relationships to develop interim instream flow criteria

This document describes the methods and results of an analysis using historical flow data and regional regression relationships to develop interim instream flow criteria suitable for anadromous fish in the Scott River watershed in Siskiyou County. The Scott River watershed provides aquatic habitat for four species of anadromous fish; Chinook Salmon (Oncorhynchus tshawytscha), Coho Salmon (O. kisutch), steelhead trout (O. mykiss), and Pacific Lamprey (Lampetra tridentata). Specifically, the Scott River is one of the most important Coho Salmon spawning and rearing tributaries in the Klamath River watershed. Instream flow requirements can be generated from flow standard setting techniques or from the results of site specific studies. The interim instream flow criteria presented for the Scott River were developed using flow standard setting techniques. Stream flow standards derived from standard setting techniques are designed to identify the environmental resource in need of flow protection, identify biologically significant criterion that can be used to measure potential flow related impacts, and specify the amount of flow required to protect the resource. Most individual standards evaluate only one or more, but not all the criterion needed to fully evaluate the flow needs of an aquatic species. This limitation can lead to prescribing a single minimum threshold or “flat-line” affect (Poff et al. 1997). The seasonal and inter-annual variability in the hydrograph must be maintained to protect stream ecology and provide an ecosystem based standard (Annear 2004). To account for the seasonal and the inter-annual hydrologic variability of the Scott River, the Department applied a detailed hydrologic analysis along with application of three standard setting methods to evaluate the life history flow needs of salmonids in the Scott River near Fort Jones. Adult fish passage was estimated using the equation developed by R2 Resources (R2 2008) for the State Water Resources Control Board’s (SWRCB) North Coast Instream Flow Policy (SWRCB 2014), spawning and juvenile rearing were evaluated using the Hatfield and Bruce regional equations (Hatfield and Bruce 2000), and the results were adjusted monthly based on estimates of unimpaired hydrology using Tessmann’s adaptation (Tessmann 1980) of the Tennant or Montana Method (Tennant 1975).

View Document Download Now Email

Investigating Runoff Efficiency in Upper Colorado River Streamflow Over Past Centuries

American Geophysical Union (AGU) | January 5th, 2018

Summary

With increasing concerns about the impact of warming temperatures on water resources, more attention is being paid to the relationship between runoff and precipitat

With increasing concerns about the impact of warming temperatures on water resources, more attention is being paid to the relationship between runoff and precipitation, or runoff efficiency. Temperature is a key influence on Colorado River runoff efficiency, and warming temperatures are projected to reduce runoff efficiency. Here, we investigate the nature of runoff efficiency in the upper Colorado River (UCRB) basin over the past 400 years, with a specific focus on major droughts and pluvials, and to contextualize the instrumental period. We first verify the feasibility of reconstructing runoff efficiency from tree‐ring data. The reconstruction is then used to evaluate variability in runoff efficiency over periods of high and low flow, and its correspondence to a reconstruction of late runoff season UCRB temperature variability. Results indicate that runoff efficiency has played a consistent role in modulating the relationship between precipitation and streamflow over past centuries, and that temperature has likely been the key control. While negative runoff efficiency is most common during dry periods, and positive runoff efficiency during wet years, there are some instances of positive runoff efficiency moderating the impact of precipitation deficits on streamflow. Compared to past centuries, the 20th century has experienced twice as many high flow years with negative runoff efficiency, likely due to warm temperatures. These results suggest warming temperatures will continue to reduce runoff efficiency in wet or dry years, and that future flows will be less than anticipated from precipitation due to warming temperatures.

View Document Download Now Email

Investigating the Role of Snow Water Equivalent on Streamflow Predictability during Drought

American Meteorological Society (AMS) | October 20th, 2022

Summary

Snowpack provides the majority of predictive information for water supply forecasts (WSFs) in snow-dominated basins across the western United States. Drought conditions t

Snowpack provides the majority of predictive information for water supply forecasts (WSFs) in snow-dominated basins across the western United States. Drought conditions typically accompany decreased snowpack and lowered runoff efficiency, negatively impacting WSFs. Here, we investigate the relationship between snow water equivalent (SWE) and April–July streamflow volume (AMJJ-V) during drought in small headwater catchments, using observations from 31 USGS streamflow gauges and 54 SNOTEL stations. A linear regression approach is used to evaluate forecast skill under different historical climatologies used for model fitting, as well as with different forecast dates. Experiments are constructed in which extreme hydrological drought years are withheld from model training, that is, years with AMJJ-V below the 15th percentile. Subsets of the remaining years are used for model fitting to understand how the climatology of different training subsets impacts forecasts of extreme drought years. We generally report overprediction in drought years. However, training the forecast model on drier years, that is, below-median years (P15, P57.5], minimizes residuals by an average of 10%in drought year forecasts, relative to a baseline case, with the highest median skill obtained in mid- to late April for colder regions. We report similar findings using a modified National Resources Conservation Service (NRCS) procedure in nine large Upper Colorado River basin (UCRB) basins, highlighting the importance of the snowpack–streamflow relationship in streamflow predictability. We propose an “adaptive sampling” approach of dynamically selecting training years based on antecedent SWE conditions, showing error reductions of up to 20% in historical drought years relative to the period of record. These alternate training protocols provide opportunities for addressing the challenges of future drought risk to water supply planning.

View Document Download Now Email

Legal Aspects of Instream Water Uses in California: Background and Issues

California State Water Resources Control Board (SWRCB) | January 1st, 1978

Summary

This paper is part of a series of background and issue papers prepared by the staff of the Governor's Commission to Review California Water Rights Law. TABLE OF CONTEN

This paper is part of a series of background and issue papers prepared by the staff of the Governor's Commission to Review California Water Rights Law. TABLE OF CONTENTS I. Introduction II. The Nature of Property Rights III. State Water Resources Control Board Authority Related to Instream Uses IV. Other Authority for the Protection and Enhancement of Instream Uses V. Methods of Protecting Instream Uses in Western States other than California VI. Issues

View Document Download Now Email

Letter to State Water Board re: Flow Criteria that use Percent of Unimpaired Flow

Delta Stewardship Council (Delta Council) | May 22nd, 2012

Summary

The proposed use of percent of unimpaired flow is a step toward improving the outlook for fish and other wildlife utilizing the San Joaquin River and its tributaries. Fal

The proposed use of percent of unimpaired flow is a step toward improving the outlook for fish and other wildlife utilizing the San Joaquin River and its tributaries. Fall-run Chinook salmon are likely to benefit from February-through-June flows that are more natural in timing and variability than current flows. Compared with the existing maze of flow standards for the San Joaquin River and its tributaries, unimpaired flow comes closer to approximating natural flow, and it does so more transparently. Caveats include: (1) flow is but one of many stressors affecting fish and wildlife; (2) the choice of flow criteria and metrics needs to serve the broader needs of ecosystems as well as individual species; (3) a chosen percentage of unimpaired flow may fall short of the minimum needed by fish and wildlife in some years; and (4) such critical years are likely to become more common as Sierra Nevada snowpacks diminish as a consequence of climate change. This qualified endorsement is based on our reading of the “Technical Report on the Scientific Basis for Alternative San Joaquin River Flow and Southern Delta Salinity Objectives” (State Water Resources Control Board, February 2012).

View Document Download Now Email

Linking river management to species conservation using dynamic landscape-scale models

River Research and Applications (Wiley) | March 23rd, 2012

Summary

Efforts to conserve stream and river biota could benefit from tools that allow managers to evaluate landscape-scale changes in species distributions in response to water

Efforts to conserve stream and river biota could benefit from tools that allow managers to evaluate landscape-scale changes in species distributions in response to water management decisions. We present a framework and methods for integrating hydrology, geographic context and metapopulation processes to simulate effects of changes in streamflow on fish occupancy dynamics across a landscape of interconnected stream segments. We illustrate this approach using a 482 km2 catchment in the southeastern US supporting 50 or more stream fish species. A spatially distributed, deterministic and physically based hydrologic model is used to simulate daily streamflow for sub-basins composing the catchment. We use geographic data to characterize stream segments with respect to channel size, confinement, position and connectedness within the stream network. Simulated streamflow dynamics are then applied to model fish metapopulation dynamics in stream segments, using hypothesized effects of streamflow magnitude and variability on population processes, conditioned by channel characteristics. The resulting time series simulate spatially explicit, annual changes in species occurrences or assemblage metrics (e.g. species richness) across the catchment as outcomes of management scenarios. Sensitivity analyses using alternative, plausible links between streamflow components and metapopulation processes, or allowing for alternative modes of fish dispersal, demonstrate large effects of ecological uncertainty on model outcomes and highlight needed research and monitoring. Nonetheless, with uncertainties explicitly acknowledged, dynamic, landscape-scale simulations may prove useful for quantitatively comparing river management alternatives with respect to species conservation.

View Document Download Now Email

Lower Mill Creek Watershed Conjunctive Use Project: Tehama County, California

California Department of Water Resources (DWR) | November 18th, 2008

Summary

In 1920, the Tehama County Superior Court of the State of California adjudicated entitlements to all Mill Creek flow below 203 cubic feet per second (cfs). As such, water

In 1920, the Tehama County Superior Court of the State of California adjudicated entitlements to all Mill Creek flow below 203 cubic feet per second (cfs). As such, water right holders on Mill Creek legally divert a significant portion of the surface water flow for agricultural beneficial use. During certain times of the year, especially during dry or critically dry years, the agricultural demand for surface water can reduce Mill Creek flow and expose in-stream barriers to fish migration. Fishery experts recognize Mill Creek as a high priority stream for the protection and enhancement of Chinook salmon spawning habitat. Mill Creek surface water diverters currently participate in a long-term cooperative management plan to help provide sufficient flow for fish migration while also maintaining irrigation supplies and the recognition of surface water rights. As part of these efforts, Mill Creek water users participate in water lease and groundwater exchange programs designed to increase in-stream flow during critical spring and fall fish migration periods. Along with other entities, the Department of Water Resources (DWR) plans to establish methods of monitoring and studying fish passage, assessing agricultural water use efficiency, and examining the potential for additional use of groundwater as opposed to use of surface water diversions in the Lower Mill Creek watershed. This report provides a background of the geology and hydrogeology in the Lower Mill Creek watershed area, a detailed discussion of the groundwater resources, and an overview of the potential for conjunctive use of surface water and groundwater resources. It also provides recommendations for additional groundwater monitoring and potentially favorable locations for production well installation associated with possible future conjunctive use programs.

View Document Download Now Email

← Prev

Page : 7

Type

Book/Textbook (3)
Bulletin (1)
California Water Plan (1)
Case study (8)
Conference proceedings (3)
Environmental Documents (5)
Essay (1)
Fact sheet (2)
Guidance Document (3)
Handbook/Guide (3)
Issue Paper (1)
Journal Article (29)
Legal document (4)
Letter (4)
magazine (1)
Memo (2)
Model (12)
NGO Position Paper (2)
Plan (1)
Policy (1)
Report (43)
Research Article (6)
Science Panel Report (10)
Technical Report (8)
Water Right Decision (1)
White Paper (2)

Topic

Adaptive Management (10)
Agriculture (5)
Basic Information (1)
California Water Fix/BDCP/Delta Conveyance (1)
Climate Change (13)
Drought & Hydrology (14)
Ecosystem & Species Management (72)
Ecosystem Restoration (7)
Environmental Justice (2)
Estuary News (1)
Federal Water Quality (3)
Fisheries (47)
Flood Management (3)
Geochemistry (2)
Geochemistry (1)
Geohydrology (5)
Geohydrology (2)
Groundwater (12)
History (3)
Invasive Species (1)
Levees (1)
Modeling (19)
People & Water (1)
Planning & Management (30)
Policy (1)
Pollutants (3)
Recycled Water (1)
Sacramento-San Joaquin Delta (42)
Salinity (13)
Science Management (5)
State Water Quality (4)
Storage (2)
Stormwater (2)
Transfers & Markets (2)
Tribal Water Issues (4)
Upper Watershed Management (12)
Water & Energy (3)
Water Project Operations (35)
Water Quality (45)
Water Quality Monitoring (6)
Water Rights, Water Law (8)
Water Supply (12)
Water Use & Efficiency (4)

Keywords

adaptive management (7)
agriculture (2)
agriculture wa (1)
agriculture water use and efficiency (3)
anadromous fish (16)
atmospheric rivers (1)
basin characterization (1)
benthic macroinvertebrates (1)
bioassessment (2)
Central Valley (10)
Central Valley Project (CVP) (8)
climate change (9)
Colorado River (2)
conjunctive use (1)
drought (7)
economic analysis (2)
ecosystem management (50)
ecosystem restoration (3)
endangered species (20)
Estuary News (1)
fisheries (46)
flood management (3)
flows (122)
forest management (1)
groundwater dependent ecosystems (4)
Groundwater Exchange (8)
groundwater pumping impacts (1)
groundwater recharge (4)
groundwater-surface water interaction (9)
history (3)
invasive species (1)
irrigation (1)
levees (1)
modeling (19)
monitoring (8)
native fish (20)
outreach and engagement (1)
planning and management (14)
pollutants (3)
public trust doctrine (5)
recycled water (1)
risk assessment (1)
Sacramento–San Joaquin Delta (41)
salinity (13)
science management (1)
sediment (5)
snowpack (4)
State Water Project (SWP) (5)
stora (1)
storage (2)
stormwater (1)
streams (8)
Sustainable Groundwater Management Act (SGMA) (2)
transboundary aquifers (1)
tribal water issues (4)
upper watershed management (6)
urban water conservation (1)
wastewater (2)
water and energy (2)
water budget (3)
water markets (2)
water project operations (25)
water quality (30)
water rights (10)
water supply (5)
water supply forecasting (4)
wetlands (2)

Publisher

American Chemical Society (ACS) (1)
American Geophysical Union (AGU) (5)
American Meteorological Society (AMS) (3)
American Rivers (1)
American Society of Civil Engineers (ASCE) (1)
Bay Institute (2)
CALFED (1)
California Agriculture (UCANR) (1)
California Department of Fish and Wildlife (CDFW) (5)
California Department of Water Resources (DWR) (9)
California Energy Commission (CEC) (1)
California State Water Resources Control Board (SWRCB) (10)
California Urban Water Agencies (CUWA) (1)
Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences (Canadian Science Publishing) (1)
Center for Biological Diversity (CBD) (1)
Delta Stewardship Council (Delta Council) (6)
Duke Environmental Law & Policy Forum (1)
Ecological Society of America (Wiley) (1)
Environmental Biology of Fishes (Springer) (2)
Environmental Defense Fund (EDF) (1)
Freshwater Biology (Wiley) (2)
Frontiers in Environmental Science (1)
Frontiers in Environmental Science (Frontiers) (1)
Hydrobiologia (Springer) (1)
Klamath Riverkeeper (1)
Klamath Tribal Water Quality Consortium (1)
Legislative Analyst's Office (LAO) (1)
Limnology and Oceanography (Wiley) (1)
Mount Shasta Bioregional Ecology Center (1)
National Academy of Sciences (NAS) (2)
Nature Conservancy (4)
Nature Portfolio (Springer Nature) (2)
Oxford University Press (OUP) (3)
Pacific Institute (2)
Public Policy Institute of California (PPIC) (7)
River Research and Applications (Wiley) (3)
Sacramento-San Joaquin Delta Conservancy (1)
San Francisco Baykeeper (1)
San Francisco Estuary Partnership (SFEP) (1)
Scott River Water Trust (1)
Siskiyou Farm Bureau (1)
Southern California Coastal Water Research Project (1)
Superior Court of California, County of Kern (2)
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (USACE) (1)
U.S. Bureau of Reclamation (USBR) (2)
U.S. Department of the Interior (DOI) (1)
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) (2)
U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (FWS) (1)
U.S. Geological Survey (USGS) (11)
University of California, Berkeley (UC Berkeley) (1)
University of California, Davis (UC Davis) (6)
University of Southern California (USC) (1)
Western Resource Advocates (1)

Basin

Coachella Valley - Desert Hot Springs 7-021.03 (1)
Coachella Valley - Mission Creek 7-021.02 (1)
Coachella Valley - San Gorgonio Pass 7-021.04 (1)
Klamath River Valley - Lower Klamath 1-002.02 (1)
Klamath River Valley - Tulelake 1-002.01 (1)
Las Posas Valley 4-008 (1)
Middle Amargosa Valley - 6-020 (1)
Mono Valley 6-009 (1)
Pleasant Valley 4-006 (1)
San Joaquin Valley - Kern 5-022.14 (2)
Santa Clara River Valley - Oxnard 4-004.02 (1)

Hydrological Region

Central Coast (6)
Colorado River (8)
Lower Basin States and Mexico - Colorado River (7)
National (12)
North Coast (23)
North Lahontan (8)
Sacramento River (48)
San Francisco Bay (42)
San Joaquin River (49)
South Coast (13)
South Lahontan (8)
Tulare Lake (13)
Upper Basin States - Colorado River (8)

Reset

Search for:

CONTACT