Pure Water Southern California

Metropolitan Water District of Southern California (MWD) | March 29th, 2024

Recycled Water Research Needs in California: Monitoring and Treatment Performance for Constituents of Emerging Concern

California State Water Resources Control Board (SWRCB) | April 4th, 2017

The California State Water Resources Control Board (State Water Board) held a workshop on October 27-28, 2015 in Costa Mesa focused on the state of the science, monitorin

The California State Water Resources Control Board (State Water Board) held a workshop on October 27-28, 2015 in Costa Mesa focused on the state of the science, monitoring techniques, and water treatment reliability for constituents of emerging concern (CECs) in recycled water. The goal of the workshop was to help the State Water Board identify knowledge gaps to identify and prioritize CEC monitoring and treatment activities that will ensure water supplies from recycled water, including potable reuse, are protective of public health and the environment. The workshop included presentations from experts regarding monitoring and treatment performance for CECs, as well as breakout sessions intended to review and discuss the most important CEC research needs. At the conclusion of each day, a summary of recommendations based on the breakout discussions was developed by the participants. Below are general takeaway messages developed during the workshop. These messages reflect discussions at the workshop and are not intended to represent the views of all participants.

Reimagining Water Infrastructure in a Changing California

American Water Resources Association (AWRA) | April 15th, 2023

For much of the 20th century, California’s water supply strategy has relied on building large reservoirs and conveyance systems to store and divert surface water and dr

For much of the 20th century, California’s water supply strategy has relied on building large reservoirs and conveyance systems to store and divert surface water and drilling ever deeper wells to tap declining aquifers. This approach has brought many benefits but has also come at great social, economic, and environmental costs. Moreover, these traditional water supplies are tapped out. Even in wet years, the state’s major rivers are overallocated and major aquifers severely overdrafted. Dry years intensify these issues. Persistent water challenges, the severe drought, and the intensifying effects of climate change highlight the vulnerability of California’s water systems and the need for new approaches.

Salt and Nutrient Management Plan Santa Clara River Valley East Subbasin

California State Water Resources Control Board (SWRCB) | October 25th, 2016

In accordance with the State Water Resources Control Board’s (SWRCB’s) Recycled Water Policy, the Upper Santa Clara River Integrated Regional Water Management Group

In accordance with the State Water Resources Control Board’s (SWRCB’s) Recycled Water Policy, the Upper Santa Clara River Integrated Regional Water Management Group (IRWMG), which is comprised of Castaic Lake Water Agency (CLWA), City of Santa Clarita, CLWA Santa Clarita Water Division (SCWD), Los Angeles County Flood Control District (LACFCD), Newhall County Water District (NCWD), San Gabriel & Lower Los Angeles Rivers and Mountains Conservancy, Santa Clarita Valley Sanitation District (SCVSD) and Valencia Water Company (VWC), have entered into a Memorandum of Understanding (MOU) to prepare a Salt and Nutrient Management Plan (SNMP) for the Santa Clara River Valley East Groundwater Subbasin (East Subbasin). This group of agencies, collectively known as the SNMP Task Force (Task Force) and facilitated by the CLWA, have directed the preparation of this SNMP, which was prepared using guidance set forth by the Los Angeles Regional Water Quality Control Board (LARWQCB). The purpose of this SNMP is to determine the current (ambient) water quality conditions in the East Subbasin and to ensure that all water management practices, including the use of recycled water, are consistent with water quality objectives. This SNMP is intended to provide the framework for water management practices to ensure protection of beneficial uses, and allow for the sustainability of groundwater resources consistent with the Water Quality Control Plan Los Angeles Region (Basin Plan). Additionally, compliance with the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) and approval by LARWQCB staff is required. As part of the SNMP, a monitoring plan has been developed for the East Subbasin which identifies key monitoring locations within each subunit for both surface water and groundwater.

San Gabriel Valley Groundwater Basin Salt And Nutrient Management Plan

Publisher not available | May 31st, 2016

Study to Evaluate Long-Term Trends and Variations in the Average Total Dissolved Solids Concentration in Wastewater and Recycled Water

Southern California Salinity Coalition | March 30th, 2018

This report was funded by the Southern California Salinity Coalition (SCSC). SCSC and its member agencies are dedicated to managing salinity in the water supplies, waste

This report was funded by the Southern California Salinity Coalition (SCSC). SCSC and its member agencies are dedicated to managing salinity in the water supplies, wastewater, and recycled water. Member agencies include Eastern Municipal Water District (EMWD), Inland Empire Utilities Agency (IEUA), Metropolitan Water District of Southern California (MWDSC), Orange County Sanitation District (OCSD), Orange County Water District (OCWD), San Diego County Water Authority (SDCWA), Sanitation Districts of Los Angeles County (LACSD), and Santa Ana Watershed Project Authority (SAWPA). Daniel B. Stephens & Associates, Inc. (DBS&A) performed the analysis and is submitting this technical memorandum to address the research questions posed by SCSC and its member agencies. The 2011 to 2016 drought in California, in conjunction with unprecedented statewide conservation legislation, caused several member agencies to face challenges meeting regulatory water quality standards for the salinity of discharge water from wastewater treatment plants (WWTPs). In particular, total dissolved solids (TDS) concentrations have increased, while the operation of WWTPs have remained consistent with prior years. Figure ES-1 is a typical example of TDS trends for WWTPs in Southern California.

Sustainable wastewater reuse for agriculture

Nature Portfolio (Springer Nature) | June 6th, 2024

The cost of alternative urban water supply and efficiency options in California

Environmental Research Communications (IOP) | May 28th, 2019

Urban communities, farms, businesses, and natural ecosystems depend upon adequate, reliable, and affordable supplies of clean water. As populations and economies

Urban communities, farms, businesses, and natural ecosystems depend upon adequate, reliable, and affordable supplies of clean water. As populations and economies grow and as climatic changes alter both water supply and demand, traditional options for meeting freshwater needs are becoming less available, reliable, and effective. As we approach peak water constraints on traditional water supplies, more efforts needed to reduce water demands through a wide range of conservation and efficiency technologies and policies, and to develop alternative, non-traditional water sources. A key factor in the adoption of these strategies is their economic feasibility; yet, only limited and often confusing data are available on their relative costs. To fill this gap, this analysis evaluates the costs of four groups of alternatives for urban supply and demand based on data and analysis in the California context: stormwater capture; water recycling and reuse; brackish and seawater desalination; and a range of water conservation and efficiency measures. We also describe some important co-benefits or avoided costs, such as reducing water withdrawals from surface water bodies or polluted runoff in coastal waterways. While difficult to quantify, such benefits are economically relevant, and we highlight areas where further research and analysis are needed to improve estimates presented here. All of the water- use efficiency options are far less costly than traditional or alternative supply systems with the exception of some of the most expensive landscape water reduction options. The water treatment and reuse systems and the urban stormwater capture projects are more costly per unit of water produced but still less expensive than seawater desalination—the most expensive option evaluated.

The frontiers of water and sanitation

Nature Portfolio (Springer Nature) | January 19th, 2023

The way in which human society uses water is continuously evolving. The present challenges related to clean water availability require the development of sustainable tech

The way in which human society uses water is continuously evolving. The present challenges related to clean water availability require the development of sustainable technologies and infrastructure. Furthermore, a stronger and wider appreciation of water inequalities and injustice demand an adequate transformation of water governance at local and global scale. We have asked nine experts in various sectors of water-related research to share their views on how water and sanitation science, technology and governance must evolve to meet the requirements of a healthier relationship between water and society.

The implications of drought and water conservation on the reuse of municipal wastewater: Recognizing impacts and identifying mitigation possibilities

Water Research, Elsevier | November 1st, 2017

As water agencies continue to investigate opportunities to increase resilience and local water supply reliability in the face of drought and rising water scarcity, wa

As water agencies continue to investigate opportunities to increase resilience and local water supply reliability in the face of drought and rising water scarcity, water conservation strategies and the reuse of treated municipal wastewater are garnering significant attention and adoption. Yet a simple water balance thought experiment illustrates that drought, and the conservation strategies that are often enacted in response to it, both likely limit the role reuse may play in improving local water supply reliability. For instance, as a particular drought progresses and agencies enact water conservation measures to cope with drought, influent flows likely decrease while influent pollution concentrations increase, particularly salinity, which adversely affects wastewater treatment plant (WWTP) costs and effluent quality and flow. Consequently, downstream uses of this effluent, whether to maintain streamflow and quality, groundwater recharge, or irrigationmay be impacted. This is unfortunate since reuse is often heralded as a drought-proof mechanism to increase resilience. The objectives of this paper are two-fold. First, we illustrate—using a case study from Southern California during its most recent drought— how drought and water conservation strategies combine to reduce influent flow and quality and, subsequently, effluent flow and quality. Second, we use a recently developed regional water reuse decision support model (RWRM) to highlight cost-effective strategies that can be implemented to mitigate the impacts of drought on effluent water quality. While the solutions we identify cannot increase the flow of influent or effluent coming into or out of a treatment plant, they can improve the value of the remaining effluent in a cost-effective manner that takes into account the characteristics of its demand, whether it be for landscaping, golf courses, agricultural irrigation, or surface water augmentation.