Oases of the future? Springs as potential hydrologic refugia in drying climates

Ecological Society of America (Wiley) | June 1st, 2020

Natural springs in water‐limited landscapes are biodiversity hotspots and keystone ecosystems that have a disproportionate influence on surrounding landscapes despite t

Natural springs in water‐limited landscapes are biodiversity hotspots and keystone ecosystems that have a disproportionate influence on surrounding landscapes despite their usually small size. Some springs served as evolutionary refugia during previous climate drying, supporting relict species in isolated habitats. Understanding whether springs will provide hydrologic refugia from future climate change is important to biodiversity conservation but is complicated by hydrologic variability among springs, data limitations, and multiple non‐climate threats to groundwater‐dependent ecosystems. We present a conceptual framework for categorizing springs as potentially stable, relative, or transient hydrologic refugia in a drying climate. Clues about the refugial capacity of springs can be assembled from various approaches, including citizen‐science‐powered ecohydrologic monitoring, remote sensing, landowner interviews, and environmental tracer analysis. Managers can integrate multiple lines of evidence to predict which springs may become future refugia for species of concern, strengthening the long‐term effectiveness of their conservation and restoration, and informing climate adaptation for terrestrial and freshwater species.

Ojai Basin Groundwater Management Agency Groundwater Management Plan – 2018 Update

Ojai Basin Groundwater Management Agency | August 30th, 2018

In September, 2014, Governor Jerry Brown signed into law a package of three bills (AB 1739, SB 1168, and SB 1319) known as the Sustainable Groundwater Management Act (“

In September, 2014, Governor Jerry Brown signed into law a package of three bills (AB 1739, SB 1168, and SB 1319) known as the Sustainable Groundwater Management Act (“SGMA”). SGMA provides a framework for sustainable management of groundwater supplies by local authorities, with a limited role for state intervention only if necessary to protect the resource.  The Act requires the formation of local groundwater sustainability agencies that must assess conditions in their local water basins and adopt locally-based management plans. SGMA provides local agencies with the tools and authority to require registration of groundwater wells, measure and manage extractions, require reports and assess fees, and request revisions of basin boundaries, including establishing new subbasins.  High- and medium-priority basins, as defined by the State of California Department of Water Resources (“DWR”), must adopt groundwater sustainability plans within five to seven years, depending on whether the basin is in critical overdraft. Statewide groundwater basins are prioritized based on eight criteria: (1) overlying population, (2) projected growth of overlying population, (3) public supply wells, (4) total water wells, (5) overlying irrigated acreage, (6) reliance on groundwater as the primary source of water (7) impacts on the groundwater, including overdraft, subsidence, saline intrusion, and other water quality degradation, and (8) any other information determined to be relevant by the DWR.  Consistent with its Enabling Legislation, the Ojai Basin Groundwater Management Agency (“OBGMA” or “Agency”) has worked to preserve the quantity and quality of groundwater in the Ojai Valley Groundwater Basin (“Ojai Basin”) for sustainable long-term use since the agency’s establishment in 1991. (The Agency’s Enabling Legislation, SB 534, approved by the Governor October 8, 1991, is also referred to herein as the “OBGMA Act.”) These management efforts have resulted in the protection and maintenance of the long-term water supply for the common benefit of all water users in the Basin. As a result, the Ojai Basin has operated within its “sustainable yield” for the past several decades with no evidence of “undesirable results.”  Per OBGMA Resolution No. 2014-4, adopted by its Board of Directors on December 4, 2014 (copy included as Appendix A), OBGMA is designated as the Groundwater Sustainability Agency (“GSA”) for the Ojai Groundwater Basin. In addition, SGMA identifies OBGMA as an “exclusive local agency” within its statutory boundaries for purposes of implementing the requirements of the Act. (Water Code § 10723(c)(1).) Since OBGMA, in compliance with its Enabling Legislation, already performs many of the planning and management tasks required by SGMA, and sustainable conditions have persisted in the Basin for more than a 10-year period. OBGMA determined it would comply with SGMA by making the Alternative Demonstration of groundwater sustainability authorized by Water Code § 10733.6(b)(3).  To comply with SGMA, OBGMA issued its December 23, 2016 “Report Supporting Alternative Demonstration Made Pursuant to Water Code 10733.6(b)(3). The report contained a physical description of the Basin, including groundwater levels, groundwater quality, information on groundwater-surface water interaction, data on historical and projected water demands and supplies, monitoring and management provisions. The report demonstrated how the Ojai Basin has operated within its “sustainable yield” for the past several decades with no evidence of “undesirable results.”  In sum, OBGMA’s management of the Basin pursuant to its Enabling Legislation has allowed the Agency to make the Alternative Demonstration authorized by SGMA. This 2018 Update to the Agency’s Groundwater Management Plan, undertaken in compliance with its Enabling Legislation, is part of the Agency’s ongoing efforts to preserve the long-term quantity and quality of groundwater in the Ojai Basin for the common benefit all users in the Basin. 

One Water LA 2040 Plan

City of Los Angeles | April 30th, 2018

The purpose of the One Water LA 2040 Plan (Plan) is to increase sustainable water management for the City of Los Angeles (City). The City launched One Water LA with two p

The purpose of the One Water LA 2040 Plan (Plan) is to increase sustainable water management for the City of Los Angeles (City). The City launched One Water LA with two primary goals: 1. Develop a vision and implementation strategy to more sustainably and cost-effectively manage water. 2. Identify ways for City departments and regional agencies to integrate their water management strategies. Los Angeles Sanitation (LASAN) and the Los Angeles Department of Water and Power (LADWP) led the Plan's development, partnering with other City departments, regional agencies, academia, the business community, and other stakeholders. The Plan provides a comprehensive strategy for managing water in a more integrated, collaborative, and sustainable way through new project, program, and policy opportunities. The Implementation Strategy provides a roadmap to make the One Water LA Vision a reality. Additional water projects, programs, or policies that are the sole responsibility of one agency, including LADWP's aqueduct or groundwater remediation project, are contained in each agency's appropriate plans. This plan is divided into an Executive Summary and ten sections. Executive Summary Volume One: Summary Report Volume Two: Wastewater Facilities Plan Volume Three: Stormwater and Urban Runoff Facilities Plan Volume Four: Los Angeles River Flow Study Volume Five: Integration Opportunities Analysis Volume Six: Climate Risk and Resilience Assessment for Wastewater and Stormwater Infrastructure Volume Seven: Implementation Strategy Supporting Documents Volume Eight: Technical Support Materials Volume Nine: Stakeholder Engagement Materials, Part 1, Part 2, Part 3 Volume Ten: Programmatic Environmental Impact Report (in progress)

Open data and stormwater systems in Los Angeles: applications for equitable green infrastructure

Local Environment (Taylor & Francis) | February 6th, 2018

Urban stormwater systems traditionally used “grey” infrastructure to manage runoff. Contemporary designs now incorporate “green” infrastructure, which offers addi

Urban stormwater systems traditionally used “grey” infrastructure to manage runoff. Contemporary designs now incorporate “green” infrastructure, which offers additional potential benefits such as urban amenities and health. Understanding how green and grey infrastructure investments are distributed across urban areas is important for new goals of promoting environmental justice in planning. In California, for instance, public investments increasingly require a percentage of funds to be spent in disadvantaged communities. Recent advancements in the availability of high-detail geographic data in cities can support prioritising investments to fulfil these multiple benefits. This paper analyses the distribution of stormwater infrastructure in Los Angeles (LA) County in relation to design criteria, urban structure and sociodemographic information. It demonstrates an approach for identifying projects that simultaneously address engineering needs and promote equity. Statistical analysis of high-detail sewer locations reveals geographic correlations with key local design parameters, urban characteristics and sociodemographic indicators. Watershed areas in LA County were identified that support multi-benefit projects, meeting dual criteria for infrastructure improvements and disadvantaged community status. As stormwater systems are increasingly designed for multi-benefit outcomes, new design frameworks can emphasise both performance and social equity.

Optimizing the dammed: Water supply losses and fish habitat gains from dam removal in California

Journal of Environmental Management (Elsevier) | April 1st, 2014

Dams provide water supply, flood protection, and hydropower generation benefits, but also harm native species by altering the natural flow regime and degrading aquatic an

Dams provide water supply, flood protection, and hydropower generation benefits, but also harm native species by altering the natural flow regime and degrading aquatic and riparian habitat. Restoring some rivers reaches to free-flowing conditions may restore substantial environmental benefits, but at some economic cost. This study uses a systems analysis approach to preliminarily evaluate removing rim dams in California's Central Valley to highlight promising habitat and unpromising economic use tradeoffs for water supply and hydropower. CALVIN, an economic-engineering optimization model, is used to evaluate water storage and scarcity from removing dams. A warm and dry climate model for a 30-year period centered at 2085, and a population growth scenario for year 2050 water demands represent future conditions. Tradeoffs between hydropower generation and water scarcity to urban, agricultural, and instream flow requirements were compared with additional river kilometers of habitat accessible to anadromous fish species following dam removal. Results show that existing infrastructure is most beneficial if operated as a system (ignoring many current institutional constraints). Removing all rim dams is not beneficial for California, but a subset of existing dams are potentially promising candidates for removal from an optimized water supply and free-flowing river perspective. Removing individual dams decreases statewide delivered water by 0–2282 million cubic meters and provides access to 0 to 3200 km of salmonid habitat upstream of dams. The method described here can help prioritize dam removal, although more detailed, project-specific studies also are needed. Similarly, improving environmental protection can come at substantially lower economic cost, when evaluated and operated as a system.

Origins of Extreme Climate States during the 1982–83 ENSO Winter

American Meteorological Society (AMS) | November 1st, 1997

Our Built and Natural Environments: A Technical Review of the Interactions Among Land Use, Transportation, and Environmental Quality

U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) | June 13th, 2013

Decisions about how and where we build our communities have significant impacts on the natural environment and on human health. Cities, regions, sta

Decisions about how and where we build our communities have significant impacts on the natural environment and on human health. Cities, regions, states, and the private sector need information about the environmental effects of their land use and transportation decisions to mitigate growth‐ related environmental impacts and to improve community quality of life and human health.

Our Changing Planet: The U.S. Global Change Research Program for Fiscal Year 2024

U.S. Global Change Research Program (USGCRP) | April 19th, 2024

The U.S. Global Change Research Program (USGCRP) advances global change science and informs our national response to the climate crisis—from President Biden’s climate

The U.S. Global Change Research Program (USGCRP) advances global change science and informs our national response to the climate crisis—from President Biden’s climate, environmental justice, and nature priorities to decisions at all levels of government and society. Our Changing Planet: The U.S. Global Change Research Program for Fiscal Year 2024 presents highlights of USGCRP’s recent accomplishments, outlines federal investments in global change research, and sets future priorities for federal global change research as USGCRP implements its 2022-2031 Strategic Plan.

Overcoming Organizational Barriers to Implementing Local Government Adaptation Strategies

California Natural Resources Agency (CNRA) | August 27th, 2018

Local governments across California have taken immense strides to combat climate change. However, many local governments still face organizational barriers to comprehensi

Local governments across California have taken immense strides to combat climate change. However, many local governments still face organizational barriers to comprehensively implement climate change adaptation measures. Organizational barriers can delay and even prevent local governments from moving from adaptation planning to implementation due to the wide-reaching scope of climate change impacts. This study aims to further the understanding of the diversity of organizational barriers that California local governments experience and to develop a resource to assist local governments in their efforts to overcome these barriers to more effectively implement climate change adaptation strategies.  The research team conducted a broad literature review, an online survey, multiple regional stakeholder workshops, and focus groups to deepen the understanding of organizational barriers to adaptation in California local governments. These research inputs produced findings on organizational barriers experienced by California local government adaptation practitioners, and enabled the development and testing of the Adaptation Capability Advancement Toolkit. The Toolkit aims to help local governments rapidly assess their current capabilities to overcome organizational barriers and identify key actions and resources for increasing their organizational capability for undertaking climate change adaptation. The Toolkit is based on the Capability Maturity Model process improvement framework, and focuses on developing capabilities within four key process areas which were identified as common sources of organizational barriers: leadership and organizational culture, staffing and technical capacity, stakeholder engagement and partnerships, and operations and institutional processes. The Toolkit was tested by California local government adaptation practitioners in order to ground-truth recommendations and assess the utility of suggested actions and resources. Participants indicated that they view the resource as valuable, particularly if continuously supported. 

Overview on Central Valley Project Financing, Cost Allocation, and Repayment Issues

Delta Vision Blue Ribbon Task Force (Delta Vision) | September 18th, 2008

As part of its strategic plan, the Delta Vision Task Force is considering in detail the entire California water infrastructure. This report summarizes and expands upon

As part of its strategic plan, the Delta Vision Task Force is considering in detail the entire California water infrastructure. This report summarizes and expands upon four individual reports prepared for the Task Force on the financial characteristics and status of the Central Valley Project (CVP). It begins with an overview of CVP history, organization, costs, and repayment. It then focuses on the overall repayment responsibilities of irrigation and municipal and industrial (M&I) contractors as well as those responsibilities specifically for Sacramento Valley and San Joaquin Valley water users. Next is a review of the summary financial statements of the 10 largest San Joaquin Valley contractors based on reports filed with the California State Controller. Following is a discussion of CVP power generation revenues, expenditures, and repayment. The report is then summarized and conclusions presented, with subsequent appendices showing detailed financial statements and repayment responsibilities by individual contractors; and information on power sales over time to various users.