Shop – California Water Library

Page

Showing
431-441 of 591

Per Page

Sort By

Rapid decline of California’s native inland fishes: a status assessment

University of California, Davis (UC Davis) | November 1st, 2010

Summary

Degradation of freshwater ecosystems is a global crisis best understood through intensive study of well-studied regional faunas. A quantitative protocol was used

View Document Download Now Email

Rapid emergence of climate change in environmental drivers of marine ecosystems

Nature Portfolio (Springer Nature) | March 7th, 2017

Summary

Climate change is expected to modify ecological responses in the ocean, with the potential for important effects on the ecosystem services provided to humankind

View Document Download Now Email

Rapid vegetation redistribution in Southern California during the early 2000s drought

American Geophysical Union (AGU) | August 31st, 2012

Summary

Climate change in semi-arid, midlatitude mountain environments is expected to shift the spatial patterns of temperature, water availability, and vegetation upslope. Veg

View Document Download Now Email

Recent declines in salmon body size impact ecosystems and fisheries

Nature Portfolio (Springer Nature) | August 19th, 2020

Summary

Declines in animal body sizes are widely reported and likely impact ecological interactions and ecosystem services. For harvested species subject to multiple stressors, l

View Document Download Now Email

Reclamation’s NEPA Handbook

U.S. Bureau of Reclamation (USBR) | January 31st, 2012

Summary

This edition of the Bureau of Reclamation’s (Reclamation) National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) Handbook has been developed in response to the Council on Environment

This edition of the Bureau of Reclamation’s (Reclamation) National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) Handbook has been developed in response to the Council on Environmental Quality’s (CEQ) and the U.S. Department of the Interior’s (Interior) implementing regulations on NEPA. These regulations state that each agency will interpret the provisions of NEPA as a supplement to its existing authority and as a mandate to view its policies and missions in the light of its national environmental objectives. This handbook has been designed as a guidance tool for use by all Reclamation staff. It should also be useful to applicants, contractors, tribal representatives, the general public, and others who may be involved in Reclamation’s NEPA process, or those who develop environmental reports for Reclamation’s use in preparing NEPA documents. This handbook describes Reclamation guidance for implementing the National Environmental Policy Act of 1969 (42 United States Code [U.S.C.] 4321, et seq.), CEQ’s Regulations for Implementing the Procedural Provisions (40 Code of Federal Regulations [CFR] Parts 1500–1508), Interior’s NEPA Regulations (43 CFR Part 46), and the Departmental Manual (DM) Chapter 516. This handbook draws these requirements together and provides guidance on how to apply them to Reclamation programs and activities. The Reclamation Manual NEPA Policy (ENV P03) refers to this handbook as the source of additional information on NEPA compliance for Reclamation. The handbook also presents and summarizes other related environmental laws and Executive orders (EO) which should be addressed during NEPA compliance. This handbook provides an overview of NEPA in chapter 2. Chapter 3 contains a general description of the requirements and procedures of NEPA. Chapter 4 provides information on integrating NEPA with other Reclamation activities. Specific information on categorical exclusion checklists (CEC), environmental assessments (EA), and environmental impact statements (EIS) can be found in chapters 5, 6, and 7, respectively. This organizational structure has been selected to allow the user to quickly locate specific, step-by-step information on the different levels of NEPA compliance. Chapter 8 addresses EIS content, and chapter 9 discusses the requirements of a record of decision (ROD). Chapters 10 and 11 present other information that can be useful in the various situations that arise in applying NEPA to Reclamation’s Federal actions. Chapter 12 concludes the handbook with information on gaining additional assistance on NEPA issues. In addition, various issues and special problems are discussed throughout the handbook. Where possible, solutions that have worked historically, or approaches that seem most reasonable, are recommended.

View Document Download Now Email

Reconciling fish and farms: Methods for managing California rice fields as salmon habitat

PLOS | February 24th, 2021

Summary

Rearing habitat for juvenile Chinook Salmon (Oncorhynchus tshawytscha) in California, the southernmost portion of their range, has drastically declined throughout the pa

Rearing habitat for juvenile Chinook Salmon (Oncorhynchus tshawytscha) in California, the southernmost portion of their range, has drastically declined throughout the past century. Recently, through cooperative agreements with diverse stakeholders, winter-flooded agricultural rice fields in California’s Central Valley have emerged as ecologically functioning floodplain rearing habitat for juvenile Chinook Salmon. From 2013 to 2016, we conducted a series of experiments examining methods to enhance habitat benefits for fall-run Chinook Salmon reared on winter-flooded rice fields in the Yolo Bypass, a modified floodplain managed for flood control, agriculture, and wildlife habitat in the Sacramento River Valley of California. Investigations included studying the effect of 1) post-harvest field substrate; 2) depth refugia; 3) duration of field drainage; and 4) duration of rearing occupancy on in-situ diet, growth and survival of juvenile salmon. Post-harvest substrate treatment had only a small effect on the lower trophic food web and an insignificant effect on growth rates or survival of rearing hatchery-origin, fall-run Chinook Salmon. Similarly, depth refugia, created by trenches dug to various depths, also had an insignificant effect on survival. Rapid field drainage yielded significantly higher survival compared to drainage methods drawn out over longer periods. A mortality of approximately one third was observed in the first week after fish were released in the floodplain. This initial mortality event was followed by high, stable survival rates for the remainder of the 6-week duration of floodplain rearing study. Across years, in-field survival ranged 7.4–61.6% and increased over the course of the experiments. Despite coinciding with the most extreme drought in California’s recorded history, which elevated water temperatures and reduced the regional extent of adjacent flooded habitats which concentrated avian predators, the adaptive research framework enabled incremental improvements in design to increase survival. Zooplankton (fish food) in the winter-flooded rice fields were 53-150x more abundant than those sampled concurrently in the adjacent Sacramento River channel. Correspondingly, observed somatic growth rates of juvenile hatchery-sourced fall-run Chinook Salmon stocked in rice fields were two to five times greater than concurrently and previously observed growth rates in the adjacent Sacramento River. The abundance of food resources and exceptionally high growth rates observed.

View Document Download Now Email

Recovery Plan for Tidal Marsh Ecosystems of Northern and Central California

U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (FWS) | September 23rd, 2013

Summary

The Recovery Plan for Tidal Marsh Ecosystems of Northern and Central California features five endangered species: two endangered animals, California clapper rail (Rallus

The Recovery Plan for Tidal Marsh Ecosystems of Northern and Central California features five endangered species: two endangered animals, California clapper rail (Rallus longirostris obsoletus) and salt marsh harvest mouse (Reithrodontomys raviventris) and three endangered plants, Cirsium hydrophilum var. hydrophilum (Suisun thistle), Chloropyron molle ssp. molle (soft bird’s-beak), and Suaeda californica (California sea-blite). The biology of these species is at the core of the recovery plan, but the goal of this effort is the comprehensive restoration and management of tidal marsh1 ecosystems. This recovery plan is an expansion and revision of The California Clapper Rail and Salt Marsh Harvest Mouse Recovery Plan (U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service 1984). The historic distribution of the California clapper rail encompasses major tidal marshes between Humboldt Bay and Morro Bay, defining the approximate geographic scope of this recovery plan. In addition to the California clapper rail and the salt marsh harvest mouse, the plan also covers three focal listed plant species that were listed as federally endangered in the 1990s and the northernmost population of an additional plant species. Two of the species, Cirsium hydrophilum var. hydrophilum and Chloropyron molle ssp. molle (this species’ former name is Cordylanthus mollis ssp. mollis which is how it appears on the List of Threatened and Endangered Species, but we use the currently accepted name here), are restricted to the northern reaches of the San Francisco Bay Estuary. The other endangered tidal marsh plant, Suaeda californica, historically occurred in both San Francisco Bay and Morro Bay but, except for three reintroductions to San Francisco Bay, is now restricted to Morro Bay. Another federally listed plant, Chloropyron maritimum ssp. maritimum (salt marsh bird’s-beak; formerly Cordylanthus maritimus ssp. maritimus), has its northern range limit in Morro Bay. Morro Bay was omitted from the Salt Marsh Bird’s-beak Recovery Plan (U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service 1985a) because the taxonomic interpretation at the time classified this population in another subspecies that is not federally listed. Current taxonomic interpretation considers the Morro Bay population as Chloropyron maritimum ssp. maritimum. It is included in this recovery plan due to its co-location with Suaeda californica in Morro Bay. Though recovery strategies and actions are provided for the Morro Bay population of C. maritimum ssp. maritimum, recovery criteria are not, therefore, the species should not be considered covered by the recovery portion of the document. In addition, this recovery plan addresses 11 species or subspecies of concern. These include the salt marsh wandering shrew (Sorex vagrans halicoetes), Suisun shrew (Sorex ornatus sinuosus), San Pablo vole (Microtus californicus sanpabloensis), California black rail (Laterallus jamaicensis coturniculus), three song sparrow subspecies of the San Francisco Bay Estuary (Alameda song sparrow [Melospiza melodia ssp. pusillula], Suisun song sparrow [M.m. maxillaris] and San Pablo song sparrow [M.m. samuelis]), saltmarsh common yellowthroat (Geothlypis trichas sinuosa), old man tiger beetle (Cicindela senilis senilis), Lathryrus jepsonii ssp. jepsonii (delta tule pea), and Spartina foliosa (Pacific cordgrass). These species occur in a variety of tidal marsh habitats where they are limited by the requirements of moisture, salinity, topography, soil types, and climatic conditions. Adjacent uplands and ecotone areas are also crucial habitats for many of these species. Primary threats to all the listed species include historical and current habitat loss and fragmentation due to urban development, agriculture, and diking related to duck hunting; altered hydrology and salinity; non-native invasive species; inadequate regulatory mechanisms; disturbance; contamination; risk of extinction due to small population size; and the most central threat, sea level rise due to climate change.

View Document Download Now Email

Reducing Methylmercury Accumulation in the Food Webs of San Francisco Bay and Its Local Watersheds

San Francisco Estuary Institute (SFEI) | April 8th, 2014

Summary

San Francisco Bay (California, USA) and its local watersheds present an interesting case study in estuarine mercury (Hg) contamination. This review focuses on the most pr

View Document Download Now Email

Reforming Watershed Restoration: Science in Need of Application and Applications in Need of Science (The H.T. Odum Synthesis Essay)

Estuaries and Coasts (Springer) | December 23rd, 2008

Summary

Coastal and inland waters are continuing to decline in many parts of the world despite major efforts made to restore them. This is due in part to the inadequate role that

Coastal and inland waters are continuing to decline in many parts of the world despite major efforts made to restore them. This is due in part to the inadequate role that ecological science has played in shaping restoration efforts. A significant amount of fundamental ecological knowledge dealing with issues such as system dynamics, state changes, context-dependency of ecological response, and diversity is both under-used by managers and practitioners and under-developed by ecologists for use in real-world applications. Some of the science that is being ‘used’ has not been adequately tested. Thus, restoration ecology as a science and ecological restoration as a practice are in need of reform. I identify five ways in which our ecological knowledge should be influencing restoration to a far greater extent than at present including a need to: shift the focus to restoration of process and identification of the limiting factors instead of structures and single species, add ecological insurance to all projects, identify a probabilistic range of possible outcomes instead of a reference condition, expand the spatial scale of efforts, and apply hierarchical approaches to prioritization. Prominent examples of restoration methods or approaches that are commonly used despite little evidence to support their efficacy are highlighted such as the use of only structural enhancements to restore biodiversity. There are also major gaps in scientific knowledge that are of immediate need to policy makers, managers, and restoration practitioners including: predictive frameworks to guide the restoration of ecological processes, identification of social-ecological feedbacks that constrain ecosystem recovery and data to support decisions of where and how to implement restoration projects to achieve the largest gains. I encourage ecologists to respond to the demand for their scientific input so that restoration can shift from an engineering-driven process to a more sustainable enterprise that fully integrates ecological processes and social science methods.

View Document Download Now Email

Regulatory steps needed to protect and conserve wetlands not subject to the Clean Water Act

California State Water Resources Control Board (SWRCB) | November 17th, 2003

Summary

This report responds to legislative direction to describe the steps and resources needed to protect California wetlands and other waters that are not covered by the feder

View Document Download Now Email

← Prev

Page : 44

Rapid decline of California’s native inland fishes: a status assessment

Rapid emergence of climate change in environmental drivers of marine ecosystems

Rapid vegetation redistribution in Southern California during the early 2000s drought

Recent declines in salmon body size impact ecosystems and fisheries

Reclamation’s NEPA Handbook

Reconciling fish and farms: Methods for managing California rice fields as salmon habitat

Recovery Plan for Tidal Marsh Ecosystems of Northern and Central California

Reducing Methylmercury Accumulation in the Food Webs of San Francisco Bay and Its Local Watersheds

Reforming Watershed Restoration: Science in Need of Application and Applications in Need of Science (The H.T. Odum Synthesis Essay)

Regulatory steps needed to protect and conserve wetlands not subject to the Clean Water Act

Filter Results

Type

Topic

Keywords

Publisher

Basin

Hydrological Region

Search for:

Search the California Water Library

Type

Topic

Keywords

Hydrological Region

Basin