Suspect Screening and Chemical Profile Analysis of Storm-Water Runoff Following 2017 Wildfires in Northern California

Society of Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry (SETAC) | May 5th, 2022

The combustion of structures and household materials as well as firefighting during wildfires lead to releases of potentially hazardous chemicals directly into the landsc

The combustion of structures and household materials as well as firefighting during wildfires lead to releases of potentially hazardous chemicals directly into the landscape. Subsequent storm-water runoff events can transport wildfire-related contaminants to downstream receiving waters, where they may pose water quality concerns. To evaluate the environmental hazards of northern California fires on the types of contaminants in storm water discharging to San Francisco Bay and the coastal marine environment, we analyzed storm water collected after the northern California wildfires (October 2017) using a nontargeted analytical (NTA) approach. Liquid chromatography quadrupole time-of-flight mass spectrometric analysis was completed on storm-water samples (n = 20) collected from Napa County (impacted by the Atlas and Nuns fires), the city of Santa Rosa, and Sonoma County (Nuns and Tubbs fires) during storm events that occurred in November 2017 and January 2018. The NTA approach enabled us to establish profiles of contaminants based on peak intensities and chemical categories found in the storm-water samples and to prioritize significant chemicals within these profiles possibly attributed to the wildfire. The results demonstrated the presence of a wide range of contaminants in the storm water, including surfactants, per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances, and chemicals from consumer and personal care products. Homologs of polyethylene glycol were found to be the major contributor to the contaminants, followed by other widely used surfactants. Nonylphenol ethoxylates, typically used as surfactants, were detected and were much higher in samples collected after Storm Event 1 relative to Storm Event 2. The present study provides a comprehensive approach for examining wildfire-impacted storm-water contamination of related contaminants, of which we found many with potential ecological risk.

Sustainability Outlook Indicator Descriptions and Methodology

California Department of Water Resources (DWR) | December 13th, 2018

The Sustainability Outlook describes how, through the lens of four societal values — public health and safety, healthy economy, ecosystem vitality, and opportunities fo

The Sustainability Outlook describes how, through the lens of four societal values — public health and safety, healthy economy, ecosystem vitality, and opportunities for enriching experiences — it will help identify desired water management outcomes and indicators. Those outcomes and indicators can be used to gauge the status of, and progress toward, sustainability. Because sustainability is not something achieved once and forever, the Sustainability Outlook and the representative indicators are intended to be adaptive and help water resource managers address changing circumstances and incorporate lessons learned.  This document details the process to date for developing the sustainability indicators and includes descriptions of the initial indicators. Indicators are presented according to societal value, corresponding intended outcome, and classification (“Basic” with potential statewide application or “Watershed” level application, “Advanced” for future development, or “Archived” with no additional development identified at this time). Each intended outcome has several indicators, and in some cases, indicators may apply to multiple outcomes.  This version of the document (December 2018) is being released concurrently with the public review draft of Update 2018. It is considered an in-progress review draft because indicator assessments are ongoing, and the contents are subject to change as indicators are more fully developed, combined, or otherwise modified. As part of Update 2018, future versions of this paper will reflect the status of indicator development and stakeholder input. 

Sustainable Groundwater Management Act 2019 Basin Prioritization Process and Results

California Department of Water Resources (DWR) | April 1st, 2019

Synthesis of Data from High-Frequency Nutrient and Associated Biogeochemical Monitoring for the Sacramento– San Joaquin Delta, Northern California

U.S. Geological Survey (USGS) | July 11th, 2017

This report is the second in a series of three reports that provide information about high-frequency (HF) nutrient and biogeochemical monitoring in the Sacramento–San J

This report is the second in a series of three reports that provide information about high-frequency (HF) nutrient and biogeochemical monitoring in the Sacramento–San Joaquin Delta of northern California (Delta). The purpose of this report is to synthesize the data available from a nutrient and water-quality HF (about every 15 minutes) monitoring network operated by the U.S. Geological Survey in the northern Delta. In this report, we describe the network and focus on the purpose of each station. We then present and discuss the available data, at various timescales—first at the monthly, seasonal, and inter-annual timescales, and second, for comparison, at the tidal and event timescales. As expected, we determined that there is substantial variability in nitrate-N concentrations at short timescales within hours, but also significant variability at longer timescales such as months or years. Resolving this variability is made possible by the HF data, with the largest variability caused by storms, tides, and diel biological processes. Given this large temporal variability, calculations of cumulative nutrient fluxes (for example, daily, monthly, or annual loads) is difficult without HF data. For example, in the Cache Slough, calculation of the annual load without the tidal variability resulted in a 30 percent underestimation of the true annual load value. We conclude that HF measurements are important for accurate determination of fluxes and loads in tidal environments, but, more importantly, provide important insights into processes and rates of nutrient cycling. This report, along with the other two reports of this series (Bergamaschi and others, 2017; Kraus, Bergamaschi, and others, 2017), was drafted in cooperation with the Delta Regional Monitoring Program to help scientists, managers, and planners understand how HF data improve our understanding of nutrient sources and sinks, drivers, and effects in the Delta.

Synthesis Report: Integrating probability and targeted survey designs in regional stream condition assessments with examples from southern coastal California

California State Water Resources Control Board (SWRCB) | June 30th, 2010

Ambient water quality monitoring programs have traditionally relied on the use of targeted monitoring designs (in which sampling locations are assigned non-randomly) to a

Ambient water quality monitoring programs have traditionally relied on the use of targeted monitoring designs (in which sampling locations are assigned non-randomly) to assess the condition of aquatic resources. As probability-based surveys (in which site locations are assigned randomly) have become more widely adopted, there has been a growing desire to combine data from targeted sites with data from probability sites when making overall assessments of resource condition. We evaluated the potential for combining datasets and present an approach to combining data from the two types of surveys. We compiled biological, chemical and habitat data from 63 probability sites and 133 targeted monitoring sites in southern coastal California and compared the distribution of analyte values collected under the two designs. This analysis clearly demonstrates that both targeted and probabilistic sampling designs are necessary for effective non-point source water quality monitoring programs. Probability designs are the only survey type capable of giving an objective overview of the range of conditions present in the resource of interest. By contrast, targeted designs often are needed to fill in critical data gaps and answer site-specific questions. We conclude that the most effective way to ‘integrate’ probability and targeted surveys is to use probability surveys to produce an unbiased regional framework for interpreting targeted results and to supplement this framework as needed with sites targeted to fill data gaps.

Technical Approach to Develop Nutrient Numeric Endpoints for California

California State Water Resources Control Board (SWRCB) | July 31st, 2006

This report provides an approach for the development of nutrient (nitrogen and phosphorus) numeric endpoints for use in the water quality programs of the California’s S

This report provides an approach for the development of nutrient (nitrogen and phosphorus) numeric endpoints for use in the water quality programs of the California’s State Water Resources Control Board (State Water Board) and Regional Water Quality Control Boards (Regional Water Boards). The approach provides a methodology to support several water quality program components including: setting numeric limits for National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) permits; development of Total Maximum Daily Load (TMDL) nutrient numeric endpoints; and for those Regional Water Boards that choose to, the development of numeric nutrient criteria. Guidance for this technical report comes from participants at workshop (Nutrient Numeric Endpoints Training Workshop held on May 18 & 19 2005 in Sacramento, CA) that is a part of a longer running process that has been sponsored by EPA Region IX and the State Water Board.   The workshop summary (Summary of May 18-19, 2005 Nutrient Workshop) of this workshop can be downloaded from the project website: http://rd.tetratech.com/epa/. The CA Nutrient Numeric Endpoints process includes a Regional Technical Advisory Group (RTAG); and a collaborative forum of Regional Water Boards, Tribes, and other state and federal agencies in the State Regional Technical Advisory Group (STRTAG). The result of the RTAG / STRTAG process is an approach that has achieved a high level of consensus among participants. The purpose of this document is to describe the approach that has been reviewed and approved by the STRTAG. The intention of the proposed approach is to select nutrient response indicators that can be used to evaluate risk of use impairment, rather than using pre-defined nutrient limits that may or may not result in eutrophication for a particular water body. The report provides a description of the proposed approach that includes innovative elements such as: A water body classification framework that uses three Beneficial Use risk classification categories; Risk-based secondary indicators that are more closely linked to Beneficial Use condition than water column nutrient concentrations; and Modeling tools that provide the necessary linkage analysis between secondary indicators and water column nutrient concentrations. The modeling tools also account for site-specific cofactors such as flow, light availability, and others. This report provides the starting point for a process that will lead to refinements in the classification framework, secondary indicators, and linkage analysis modeling tools through the development of site-specific endpoints. The report has been reviewed by workshop participants; other State, Federal, and Tribal staff; and the Technical Evaluation Committee identified in Appendix 1. This report includes changes made in response to comments received. As an adaptive management process technical updates will be made and new dated editions of this document will be made available. A potential outcome of this process is the adoption of the framework and endpoints by various Regional Water Quality Control Boards for use as nutrient numeric criteria.

Technical Report for the Interagency Ecological Program (IEP) Pelagic Organism Decline (POD) Workgroup: Assessment of Aquatic Herbicide Use in the Delta

San Francisco Estuary Institute (SFEI) | May 15th, 2006

Since 2001, the California Department of Boating and Waterways (DBW) has conducted an extensive water quality monitoring program in conjunction with its aquatic herbicide

Since 2001, the California Department of Boating and Waterways (DBW) has conducted an extensive water quality monitoring program in conjunction with its aquatic herbicide applications. In this report, the risk quotient calculation method utilized by the Aquatic Pesticide Monitoring Program (a USEPA Tier 1 risk assessment) was used to determine if there are patterns of Level of Concern exceedances that indicate the possibility of adverse impacts on the Delta aquatic ecosystem due to DBW aquatic herbicide applications. Level of Concern exceedances are indicative only of the need for further investigation of an application scenario and do not, in and of themselves, indicate adverse impacts. This type of risk analysis cannot quantify the potential additive or synergistic effects of all pelagic organism stressors (one of which would be aquatic herbicides) within the Delta. This risk assessment indicates that, with the exception of diquat dibromide applications, DBW herbicide applications are unlikely to have the potential to cause Delta ecosystem water quality impacts. While there were a number of Level of Concern exceedances for diquat, DBW and all regulatory agencies involved were aware of this potential prior to application. NOAA Fisheries requested that, when possible, diquat used adjacent to salmon migratory routes should be reduced or avoided when that species is likely to be present. USFWS determined that diquat impact to aquatic invertebrates is minimal, temporary, and not likely to jeopardize Delta smelt but has required avoidance in areas where and when the smelt are known to be present. For 2006, NOAA has allowed DBW to treat sites in April and May with fluridone, which has allowed the use of diquat to be discontinued.

The California Stream Condition Index

California State Water Resources Control Board (SWRCB) | December 1st, 2015

The California Stream Conditon Index (CSCI) is a biological scoring tool that helps aquatc resource managers translate complex data about benthic macroinver

The California Stream Conditon Index (CSCI) is a biological scoring tool that helps aquatc resource managers translate complex data about benthic macroinvertebrates found living in a stream into an overall measure of stream health. The CSCI score indicates whether, and to what degree, the ecology of a stream is altered from a healthy state. Direct measures of ecosystem health like the CSCI are preferable to those based on chemical or physical measurements for many management questons. Living organisms integrate the efects of multple stressors, such as sedimentaton, nutrient enrichment and riparian disturbance, over both space and tme.

The California Stream Condition Index (CSCI): A New Statewide Biological Scoring Tool for Assessing the Health of Freshwater Streams

California State Water Resources Control Board (SWRCB) | September 1st, 2015

California’s dramatic environmental diversity supports a broad array of natural stream types throughout the state. Bioassessment of freshwater stream and rivers is esp

California’s dramatic environmental diversity supports a broad array of natural stream types throughout the state. Bioassessment of freshwater stream and rivers is especially challenging in such a region because the reference condition, or the benchmark of biological condition expected when human disturbance in the environment is absent or minimal, varies greatly among natural stream types. Previous indices used by monitoring programs were developed on a regional basis to help partition the state’s environmental diversity, but statewide assessments were confounded by different criteria used in different regions. The CSCI, which translates complex data about individual benthic macroinvertebrates (BMIs) found living in a stream into an overall measure of stream health, was developed specifically to address some of the shortcomings of earlier indices. First, the CSCI was developed with a much larger, more representative data set that makes it applicable statewide and that covers the broad range of environmental variability among natural stream types. Second, the CSCI sets biological benchmarks for a site based on its site-specific environmental setting. Finally, the CSC combines two separate types of indices, each of which provides unique information about the biological condition of a stream: a multi-metric index (MMI) that measures ecological structure and function, and an observed-to-expected (O/E) index that measures taxonomic completeness. Together they provide multiple lines of evidence about the condition of a stream, providing greater confidence in results than a single index.

The California Stream Condition Index (CSCI): A New Statewide Biological Scoring Tool for Assessing the Health of Freshwater Streams

California State Water Resources Control Board (SWRCB) | October 19th, 2015

California’s dramatic environmental diversity supports a broad array of natural stream types throughout the state. Bioassessment of freshwater stream and rivers is espe

California’s dramatic environmental diversity supports a broad array of natural stream types throughout the state. Bioassessment of freshwater stream and rivers is especially challenging in such a region because the reference condition, or the benchmark of biological condition expected when human disturbance in the environment is absent or minimal, varies greatly among natural stream types. Previous indices used by monitoring programs were developed on a regional basis to help partition the state’s environmental diversity, but statewide assessments were confounded by different criteria used in different regions. The CSCI, which translates complex data about individual benthic macroinvertebrates (BMIs) found living in a stream into an overall measure of stream health, was developed specifically to address some of the shortcomings of earlier indices. First, the CSCI was developed with a much larger, more representative data set that makes it applicable statewide and that covers the broad range of environmental variability among natural stream types. Second, the CSCI sets biological benchmarks for a site based on its site-specific environmental setting. Finally, the CSCI combines two separate types of indices, each of which provides unique information about the biological condition of a stream: a multi-metric index (MMI) that measures ecological structure and function, and an observed-to-expected (O/E) index that measures taxonomic completeness.  Together they provide multiple lines of evidence about the condition of a stream, providing greater confidence in results than a single index.