Tule Subbasin Coordination Agreement

University of Massachusetts | January 16th, 2020

Pursuant to 23 Cal. Code Regs. §357.4(a), the GSAs hereby enter into this Coordination Agreement. The Tule Subbasin identified by DWR as No. 5-22-13 of the Tulare Lake H

Pursuant to 23 Cal. Code Regs. §357.4(a), the GSAs hereby enter into this Coordination Agreement. The Tule Subbasin identified by DWR as No. 5-22-13 of the Tulare Lake Hydrologic Region, Figure 1-1, is currently composed of seven GSAs. Each GSA within the Tule Subbasin has previously submitted notice to the Department of its intent to implement and develop its own GSP pursuant to 23 CCR §353.6. As a result, a Coordination Agreement is necessary as multiple GSAs within the Tule Subbasin are developing and implementing independent GSPs. The purpose of this Coordination Agreement is to fulfill all statutory and regulatory requirements related to Intra-basin coordination agreements pursuant to the Sustainable Groundwater Management Act (“SGMA”).

Tule Subbasin Probationary Hearing Draft Staff Report

California State Water Resources Control Board (SWRCB) | March 1st, 2024

The State Water Board recognizes that local public agencies in the Tule Subbasin significant efforts since the passage of SGMA to form groundwater sustainability agencies

The State Water Board recognizes that local public agencies in the Tule Subbasin significant efforts since the passage of SGMA to form groundwater sustainability agencies (GSAs) and then develop detailed technical and other information supporting the adoption and implementation of six groundwater sustainability plans (GSPs) for the subbasin. Despite those efforts, in January of 2022, DWR reviewed GSPs to determine if the GSPs met SGMA’s requirements and found it to be incomplete. Following revisions made by the GSAs in the subbasin, DWR reevaluated the GSPs in March of 2023, determined the GSPs to be inadequate, and referred the subbasin to the State Water Board, as required by SGMA. Consistent with SGMA, the State Water Board may now consider whether to designate the Tule Subbasin as a “probationary basin,” a term that is used in SGMA to describe a basin in the first stage of state intervention.

Tule Subbasin Probationary Hearing Final Staff Report

California State Water Resources Control Board (SWRCB) | August 30th, 2024

Board staff identified specific deficiencies in the Tule Subbasin 2022 GSPs and outlined potential corrective actions to address those specific deficiencies. • Chron

Board staff identified specific deficiencies in the Tule Subbasin 2022 GSPs and outlined potential corrective actions to address those specific deficiencies. • Chronic lowering of groundwater levels with insufficient management criteria. • Continued land subsidence (sinking). • Further degradation of groundwater quality. • Depletions of interconnected surface water.

Turlock Subbasin Groundwater Sustainability Plan

West and East Turlock Subbasin Groundwater Sustainability Agencies | January 6th, 2022

The Turlock Subbasin Groundwater Sustainability Plan (GSP) was adopted January 6, 2022, and covers the Turlock Subbasin (5-22.03), which has been designated a high-priori

The Turlock Subbasin Groundwater Sustainability Plan (GSP) was adopted January 6, 2022, and covers the Turlock Subbasin (5-22.03), which has been designated a high-priority basin by the Department of Water Resources (DWR). The Turlock Subbasin covers about 348,160 acres (about 544 square miles) in the northern portion of the San Joaquin Valley Groundwater Basin. Subbasin boundaries are defined by the Tuolumne River on the north, the Merced River on the south, and the San Joaquin River on the west. The eastern boundary approximates the contact between Subbasin sediments and the crystalline basement rocks of the Sierra Nevada foothills. Two groundwater sustainability agencies (GSAs) have been formed in the Subbasin. The West Turlock Subbasin Groundwater Sustainability Agency (WTSGSA) is located in the western Subbasin and covers about 60 percent of the area. The East Turlock Subbasin Groundwater Sustainability Agency (ETSGSA) covers the remaining 40 percent of the Subbasin in the east. The two Subbasin GSAs have cooperatively developed one GSP, which covers the entire Turlock Subbasin as the Plan Area. The "Get Document" link will take you to the Department of Water Resources GSP page for Turlock Subbasin, where the 1,323-page GSP submitted by Turlock Groundwater may be downloaded. Or the file may be accessed in parts by clicking the links below. Click here for further links from Turlock Groundwater. Part 1, Part 2, Part 3, Part 4, Part 5, Part 6, Part 7, Part 8

Turlock Subbasin Groundwater Sustainability Plan (Revised)

West and East Turlock Subbasin Groundwater Sustainability Agencies | July 12th, 2024

The Turlock GSAs submitted the first version of the Turlock GSP to the Department of Water Resources (DWR) in January 2022. DWR determined the GSP to be incomplete in J

The Turlock GSAs submitted the first version of the Turlock GSP to the Department of Water Resources (DWR) in January 2022. DWR determined the GSP to be incomplete in January of 2024 (DWR, 2024) and identified two deficiencies. The first of these involves provision of sufficient information (namely, analysis of potential impacts on wells) to support the selection of sustainable management criteria for chronic lowering of groundwater levels. The second involves the provision of sufficient details on the projects and management actions to mitigate overdraft in the Subbasin and to provide a feasible path to achieve sustainability. Corrective actions are incorporated into this revised July 16, 2024 GSP for resubmittal to DWR. This does not represent a GSP update, which is slated for 2027. The revised GSP was adopted by the GSAs on July 11, 2024 pursuant to 23 CCR § 355.2(e)(2)(A).

Understanding the Contributions of Paleo-Informed Natural Variability and Climate Changes to Hydroclimate Extremes in the San Joaquin Valley of California

American Geophysical Union (AGU) | November 13th, 2023

Updating the CALVIN Hydro-Economic Optimization Model of California: Central Valley Groundwater

University of California, Davis (UC Davis) | July 11th, 2012

Updates are being made to Central Valley groundwater in CALVIN, a hydro-economic model of California’s intertied water supply and delivery system. These updates reflect

Updates are being made to Central Valley groundwater in CALVIN, a hydro-economic model of California’s intertied water supply and delivery system. These updates reflect better estimates of water demands, groundwater availability, and local water management opportunities. This poster focuses on updating CALVIN groundwater parameters based on California Department of Water Resources’ (DWR) California Central Valley Groundwater-Surface Water Simulation Model (C2VSIM) and the United States Geological Survey (USGS) Central Valley Hydrologic Model (CVHM) model inputs and results. Two CALVIN update projects, using the DWR and USGS groundwater models, are underway to improve groundwater representation including basin inflows, reuse, return flows, capacities, and pumping costs. These sub-projects will result in a CALVIN model with updated groundwater representation based on C2VSIM and CVHM. This poster shows a preliminary comparison of these sub-projects and a summary comparison between the DWR and USGS models.

Uplift and seismicity driven by groundwater depletion in central California

Nature Portfolio (Springer Nature) | May 14th, 2014

Groundwater use in California’s San Joaquin Valley exceeds replenishment of the aquifer, leading to substantial diminution of this resource and rapid subsidence of the

Groundwater use in California’s San Joaquin Valley exceeds replenishment of the aquifer, leading to substantial diminution of this resource and rapid subsidence of the valley floor. The volume of groundwater lost over the past century and a half also represents a substantial reduction in mass and a large-scale unburdening of the lithosphere, with significant but unexplored potential impacts on crustal deformation and seismicity. Here we use vertical global positioning system measurements to show that a broad zone of rock uplift of up to 1–3 mm per year surrounds the southern San Joaquin Valley. The observed uplift matches well with predicted flexure from a simple elastic model of current rates of water-storage loss, most of which is caused by groundwater depletion. The height of the adjacent central Coast Ranges and the Sierra Nevada is strongly seasonal and peaks during the dry late summer and autumn, out of phase with uplift of the valley floor during wetter months. Our results suggest that long-term and late-summer flexural uplift of the Coast Ranges reduce the effective normal stress resolved on the San Andreas Fault. This process brings the fault closer to failure, thereby providing a viable mechanism for observed seasonality in microseismicity at Parkfield and potentially affecting long-term seismicity rates for fault systems adjacent to the valley. We also infer that the observed contemporary uplift of the southern Sierra Nevada previously attributed to tectonic or mantle-derived forces is partly a consequence of human-caused groundwater depletion.

User Manual for the California Central Valley Groundwater-Surface Water Simulation Model

California Department of Water Resources (DWR) | June 13th, 2013

This report describes the input and output files for the California Central Valley Groundwater-Surface Water Simulation Model (C2VSim). C2VSim is an integrated numeri

This report describes the input and output files for the California Central Valley Groundwater-Surface Water Simulation Model (C2VSim). C2VSim is an integrated numerical model simulating land surface processes and groundwater and surface water flows in the main alluvial aquifer system of California’s Central Valley (figure 1). C2VSim was developed using the Integrated Water Flow Model (IWFM) application, which couples a three-dimensional finite element groundwater simulation process with one-dimensional land surface, stream flow, lake, unsaturated zone and smallstream watershed simulation processes. The C2VSim version described in this report runs under IWFM version 3.02 and utilizes a coarse grid, and is thus referred to as version 3.02-CG. In addition, the input files for the C2VSim model are regularly updated to correct errors, incorporate improved input data or extend the simulation time period. These updates are referred to as revisions; this report describes the data in revision R374, released in June 2013. The C2VSim model inputs include monthly historical precipitation, stream inflows, surface water diversions, land use and crop acreages for the simulation period, October 1921 through September 2009. C2VSim dynamically calculates crop water demands, allocates contributions from precipitation, soil moisture and surface water diversions, and calculates the groundwater pumpage required to meet the remaining demand. The coarse grid version of the C2VSim model incorporates a finite element grid with 1392 elements, grouped into 21 water budget subregions (figure 1), which are further grouped by drainage basin into five hydrologic regions. The model subregions are based on Depletion Study Areas (DSAs), originally created by the DWR Division of Planning for estimating regional water supplies and demands. Hydrologic parameters (including hydraulic conductivities, storage parameters and recession coefficients) were calibrated to match observed values including groundwater heads, groundwater head differences between well pairs, surface water flows, and stream-groundwater flows for the period between September 1975 and October 2003. The model simulates the historical response of the Central Valley’s groundwater flow system to historical stresses, and can also be used to simulate the response to projected future stresses. Agricultural groundwater pumping is not monitored in the Central Valley, and the C2VSim model provides pumpage estimates that are considered robust because they are constrained spatially and temporally by the estimated demand and surface water supplies. The calibrated model is also being used as the basis for the groundwater flow component of CalSim 3, a water resources planning model for simulating operation of the California State Water Project (SWP) and Federal Central Valley Project (CVP).

Using Landsat and MODIS satellite collections to examine extent, timing, and potential impacts of surface water inundation in California croplands

Remote Sensing Applications: Society and Environment (RSASE) | October 1st, 2022

The state of California, United States of America produces many crop products that are both utilized domestically and exported throughout the world. With nearly 39,000 km

The state of California, United States of America produces many crop products that are both utilized domestically and exported throughout the world. With nearly 39,000 km2 of croplands, monitoring unintentional and intentional surface water inundation is important for water resource management and flood hazard readiness. We examine inundation dynamics in California croplands from 2003 to 2020 by intersecting monthly surface water maps (n = 216 months) derived using two satellite remote sensing platforms (Landsat and Moderate Resolution Imaging Spectroradiometer [MODIS]) with a high-quality cropland map generated by the California Department of Water Resources. Surface water maps were produced using the Dynamic Surface Water Extent model, in which satellite image pixels are classified into different levels of detection confidence. Our analysis focused on calculating monthly and annual occurrence of “high confidence” water for each satellite collection across eight cropland types and 58 counties. Results indicate that 49.9% (MODIS) to 56.4% (Landsat) of croplands were inundated at least once during the 18-year timespan. Rice crops, due to their unique need of consistent surface water and dominance as a crop type in CA, had the highest proportion of and mean annual inundation area, while citrus crops had the lowest. Mean monthly inundation patterns in most croplands followed California's precipitation patterns with high inundation during the winter and spring rainy season. At the county level, croplands in the southern Central Valley typically had high occurrences of inundation in conjunction with large crop areas. Exposure and sensitivity of inundation for three crop types (citrus, deciduous, and vineyards) that are typically less associated with intentional inundation were geographically variable, but overall were generally highest in counties in the southern Central Valley, California's primary agricultural region. Flood and precipitation related crop insurance claims indicated that rice had the highest mean indemnity payout for any month with damages typically occurring in March and April. Insurance claims were also high in deciduous fruit and nut crops, which had peak damages in February. A comparison between inundation results and insurance claims suggests that the inundation mapped by our process coincides with claim activity. These data elucidate water inundation patterns across the state that can serve to inform farmers, insurers, decision makers, resource managers, and flood mitigation professionals.