Tulare Lake Subbasin Groundwater Sustainability Plan

Kings County Farm Bureau | January 29th, 2020

Tulare Lake Subbasin Groundwater Sustainability Plan -- Amended

Mid-Kings River Groundwater Sustainability Agency | July 26th, 2022

The Tulare Lake Subbasin submitted a single GSP in January 2020 to the Department of Water Resources (DWR). DWR was required to determine whether the GSP conformed to the

The Tulare Lake Subbasin submitted a single GSP in January 2020 to the Department of Water Resources (DWR). DWR was required to determine whether the GSP conformed to the specific requirements of SGMA. In a letter dated January 28, 2022, DWR determined that that the GSP is incomplete. DWR stated that the GSP was considered incomplete as it “does not define undesirable results or set sustainable management criteria for groundwater levels, subsidence, and water quality in the manner consistent with SGMA and the GSP regulations.” Upon receiving the incomplete determination, the Subbasin had 180 days to address the identified deficiencies and submit a revised GSP by July 27, 2022. The GSAs are submitting this 2022 Amended GSP to address the three deficiencies outlined in the determination letter. The 2022 Amended GSP consists of clean and redline strike out versions of the 2020 GSP and the attached 2022 GSP Addendum. The 2022 GSP Addendum was prepared to specifically address the incomplete determination letter from DWR. Sections of this document have been edited since the original submittal in 2020 and direct the reader to the Addendum for further details. Due to size, this file has been divided. Part 1, Part 2, Part 3, Part 4, Part 5, Part 6

Tulare Lake Subbasin Probationary Hearing Final Staff Report

California State Water Resources Control Board (SWRCB)nia | March 29th, 2024

State Water Board staff have identified specific deficiencies in the Tulare Lake Subbasin 2022 GSP and have outlined potential corrective actions to address those specifi

State Water Board staff have identified specific deficiencies in the Tulare Lake Subbasin 2022 GSP and have outlined potential corrective actions to address those specific deficiencies. The Final Staff Report also incorporates deficiencies identified by DWR’s determination. Deficiencies that have been identified within the GSP relate to: * Chronic lowering of groundwater levels with insufficient management criteria. * Continued land subsidence (sinking). * Further degradation of groundwater quality.

Tule Lake Subbasin Groundwater Sustainability Plan

Tule Lake Subbasin Groundwater Sustainability Agency | December 14th, 2021

On September 16, 2014, Governor Jerry Brown signed into law a three-bill legislative package, composed of Assembly Bill (AB) 1739 (Dickinson), Senate Bill (SB) 1168 (Pav

On September 16, 2014, Governor Jerry Brown signed into law a three-bill legislative package, composed of Assembly Bill (AB) 1739 (Dickinson), Senate Bill (SB) 1168 (Pavley), and SB 1319 (Pavley), collectively known as the Sustainable Groundwater Management Act (SGMA), which is codified in Section 10720 et seq. of the California Water Code. The purpose of this Groundwater Sustainability Plan (GSP or Plan) is to bring the Klamath River Valley – Tule Lake Subbasin (Tule Lake Subbasin or Subbasin), a medium priority basin, into sustainable groundwater management by 2042, which would meet the requirements of SGMA.

Tule Lake* Subbasin Groundwater Sustainability Plan

Tulelake Subbasin Groundwater Sustainability Agency | June 14th, 2024

*Spelled various as one and two words, Tule Lake and Tulelake, across the GSP submissions. From the GSP: "This ... covers the entire Tule Lake Subbasin, which comprises

*Spelled various as one and two words, Tule Lake and Tulelake, across the GSP submissions. From the GSP: "This ... covers the entire Tule Lake Subbasin, which comprises approximately 64,000 acres of irrigated land near the California-Oregon border. The Subbasin is part of the larger Upper Klamath Basin, which extends into Oregon, and is located within the North Coast Hydrologic Region. The Subbasin is within Modoc County and Siskiyou County, which have been respectively identified as "severely disadvantaged” and “disadvantaged” communities. The majority of land in the Subbasin is also in TID [Tulelake Irrigation District], which covers approximately 84% of the Subbasin. As the most prominent public agency within the Subbasin, TID has been the primary GSA responsible for recent planning activities." Due to length, this document has been divided. Part 1, Part 2

Tule Subbasin Coordination Agreement

University of Massachusetts | January 16th, 2020

Pursuant to 23 Cal. Code Regs. §357.4(a), the GSAs hereby enter into this Coordination Agreement. The Tule Subbasin identified by DWR as No. 5-22-13 of the Tulare Lake H

Pursuant to 23 Cal. Code Regs. §357.4(a), the GSAs hereby enter into this Coordination Agreement. The Tule Subbasin identified by DWR as No. 5-22-13 of the Tulare Lake Hydrologic Region, Figure 1-1, is currently composed of seven GSAs. Each GSA within the Tule Subbasin has previously submitted notice to the Department of its intent to implement and develop its own GSP pursuant to 23 CCR §353.6. As a result, a Coordination Agreement is necessary as multiple GSAs within the Tule Subbasin are developing and implementing independent GSPs. The purpose of this Coordination Agreement is to fulfill all statutory and regulatory requirements related to Intra-basin coordination agreements pursuant to the Sustainable Groundwater Management Act (“SGMA”).

Tule Subbasin Probationary Hearing Final Staff Report

California State Water Resources Control Board (SWRCB) | August 30th, 2024

Board staff identified specific deficiencies in the Tule Subbasin 2022 GSPs and outlined potential corrective actions to address those specific deficiencies. • Chron

Board staff identified specific deficiencies in the Tule Subbasin 2022 GSPs and outlined potential corrective actions to address those specific deficiencies. • Chronic lowering of groundwater levels with insufficient management criteria. • Continued land subsidence (sinking). • Further degradation of groundwater quality. • Depletions of interconnected surface water.

Turlock Subbasin Groundwater Sustainability Plan

West and East Turlock Subbasin Groundwater Sustainability Agencies | January 6th, 2022

The Turlock Subbasin Groundwater Sustainability Plan (GSP) was adopted January 6, 2022, and covers the Turlock Subbasin (5-22.03), which has been designated a high-priori

The Turlock Subbasin Groundwater Sustainability Plan (GSP) was adopted January 6, 2022, and covers the Turlock Subbasin (5-22.03), which has been designated a high-priority basin by the Department of Water Resources (DWR). The Turlock Subbasin covers about 348,160 acres (about 544 square miles) in the northern portion of the San Joaquin Valley Groundwater Basin. Subbasin boundaries are defined by the Tuolumne River on the north, the Merced River on the south, and the San Joaquin River on the west. The eastern boundary approximates the contact between Subbasin sediments and the crystalline basement rocks of the Sierra Nevada foothills. Two groundwater sustainability agencies (GSAs) have been formed in the Subbasin. The West Turlock Subbasin Groundwater Sustainability Agency (WTSGSA) is located in the western Subbasin and covers about 60 percent of the area. The East Turlock Subbasin Groundwater Sustainability Agency (ETSGSA) covers the remaining 40 percent of the Subbasin in the east. The two Subbasin GSAs have cooperatively developed one GSP, which covers the entire Turlock Subbasin as the Plan Area. The "Get Document" link will take you to the Department of Water Resources GSP page for Turlock Subbasin, where the 1,323-page GSP submitted by Turlock Groundwater may be downloaded. Or the file may be accessed in parts by clicking the links below. Click here for further links from Turlock Groundwater. Part 1, Part 2, Part 3, Part 4, Part 5, Part 6, Part 7, Part 8

Turlock Subbasin Groundwater Sustainability Plan (Revised)

West and East Turlock Subbasin Groundwater Sustainability Agencies | July 12th, 2024

The Turlock GSAs submitted the first version of the Turlock GSP to the Department of Water Resources (DWR) in January 2022. DWR determined the GSP to be incomplete in J

The Turlock GSAs submitted the first version of the Turlock GSP to the Department of Water Resources (DWR) in January 2022. DWR determined the GSP to be incomplete in January of 2024 (DWR, 2024) and identified two deficiencies. The first of these involves provision of sufficient information (namely, analysis of potential impacts on wells) to support the selection of sustainable management criteria for chronic lowering of groundwater levels. The second involves the provision of sufficient details on the projects and management actions to mitigate overdraft in the Subbasin and to provide a feasible path to achieve sustainability. Corrective actions are incorporated into this revised July 16, 2024 GSP for resubmittal to DWR. This does not represent a GSP update, which is slated for 2027. The revised GSP was adopted by the GSAs on July 11, 2024 pursuant to 23 CCR § 355.2(e)(2)(A).

UC groundwater research: A survey

California Agriculture (UCANR) | March 13th, 2018

As California implements the Sustainable Groundwater Management Act (SGMA), UC research is building knowledge and supporting innovation in groundwater recharge, groundwat

As California implements the Sustainable Groundwater Management Act (SGMA), UC research is building knowledge and supporting innovation in groundwater recharge, groundwater accounting, groundwater quality, groundwater governance and more. Here's a sample of work from across the UC system: whole watershed accounting; water availability for recharge; precision data on snowmelt; spatial data on well vulnerability; large scale groundwater recharge and agricultural systems; groundwater-surface water interactions; groundwater quality and salinity; water supply, land use and rural communities; data on water use and water rights; managed aquifer recharge on farmland; soil suitability for recharge; distributed stormwater collection; net metering for groundwater; geophysical imaging; groundwater governance; lessons on groundwater permitting from around the West; supporting Groundwater Sustainability Plan development; the economics of sustainable groundwater management; and considerations for groundwater markets.