Guadalupe River mercury concentrations and loads during the large rare January 2017 storm

San Francisco Estuary Institute (SFEI) | February 9th, 2018

The Guadalupe River watershed has a long history of urbanization and is the location of a historic mining district that produced 40 million kg of mercury (Hg) during ope

The Guadalupe River watershed has a long history of urbanization and is the location of a historic mining district that produced 40 million kg of mercury (Hg) during operation. The river system is listed as impaired and is a large pathway of Hg to San Francisco Bay. The TMDL calls for stakeholders to reduce load to an average of 9.4 kg per year over 20 years by removing H-laden wastes in the mining and urban areas and implementing other treatment practices. To demonstrate success, the stakeholders are documenting management efforts and have been conducting water sampling to show that average loads are decreasing or that Hg concentrations on suspended particles are trending towards the TMDL target of 0.2 mg/kg (dry wt., annual median). The Guadalupe River is capable of flows >10,000 cfs, and a flood flow of >6,000 cfs has a return interval of approximately 1:5 years yet most sampling has occurred at flows <4,000 cfs. Since most Hg is transported in the system during large storm events when Hg can be mobilized from the historic mining district, it is essential to measure the Hg load during these rare events. The main objective of this study was to sample and estimate loads during such a rare events.

Guideline levels for PFOA and PFOS in drinking water: the role of scientific uncertainty, risk assessment decisions, and social factors

Journal of Exposure Science & Environmental Epidemiology (Springer) | January 8th, 2019

Communities across the U.S. are discovering drinking water contaminated by perfluoroalkyl and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS) and determining appropriate actions. Ther

Communities across the U.S. are discovering drinking water contaminated by perfluoroalkyl and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS) and determining appropriate actions. There are currently no federal PFAS drinking water standards despite widespread drinking water contamination, ubiquitous population-level exposure, and toxicological and epidemiological evidence of adverse health effects. Absent federal PFAS standards, multiple U.S. states have developed their own healthbased water guideline levels to guide decisions about contaminated site cleanup and drinking water surveillance and treatment. We examined perfluorooctanoic acid (PFOA) and perfluorooctane sulfonate (PFOS) water guideline levels developed by the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) and state agencies to protect people drinking the water, and summarized how and why these levels differ. We referenced documents and tables released in June 2018 by the Interstate Technology and Regulatory Council (ITRC) to identify states that have drinking water and groundwater guideline levels for PFOA and/or PFOS that differ from EPA’s health advisories (HAs). We also gathered assessment documents from state websites and contacted state environmental and health agencies to identify and confirm current guidelines. Seven states have developed their own water guideline levels for PFOA and/or PFOS ranging from 13 to 1000 ng/L, compared to EPA’s HA of 70 ng/L for both compounds individually or combined. We find that the development of PFAS guideline levels via exposure and hazard assessment decisions is influenced by multiple scientific, technical, and social factors, including managing scientific uncertainty, technical decisions and capacity, and social, political, and economic influences from involved stakeholders. Assessments by multiple states and academic scientists suggest that EPA’s HA is not sufficiently protective. The ability of states to develop their own guideline levels and standards provides diverse risk assessment approaches as models for other state and federal regulators, while a sufficiently protective, scientifically sound, and enforceable federal standard would provide more consistent protection.

Gut Contents Analysis of Four Fish Species Collected in the San Leandro Bay RMP PCB Study in August 2016

San Francisco Estuary Institute (SFEI) | November 7th, 2018

In support of PCB modeling for San Leandro Bay, a Priority Margin Unit (PMU) for PCB load reduction in the estuary, fish samples of four species (topsmelt, shiner perch,

In support of PCB modeling for San Leandro Bay, a Priority Margin Unit (PMU) for PCB load reduction in the estuary, fish samples of four species (topsmelt, shiner perch, white croaker, and northern anchovy ) were obtained in August 2016 for both tissue analysis and examination of gut contents. The bay was sampled at eight locations, with a repeated sampling at one location (Airport Lagoon) for one species (topsmelt). Fish were measured, weighed, and dissected, and their gut contents examined microscopically. Topsmelt (9 samples, 188 specimens) had the greatest variety of food items, with gammarid amphipods and chain diatoms predominating. Some topsmelt, especially larger individuals, consumed macroalgae as a major dietary component. Two samples at two sites for shiner perch (20 fish each) had contents composed of close to 50% gammarids at both sites, but differed in proportions of bivalves and polychaetes among the important food items. The one sample of white croaker had consumed mostly gammarids, with fish and polychaetes ranking next in importance. A single sample of northern anchovy (20 fish analyzed) differed radically from the other species in consuming mainly a diatom that appears to have been filtered from the water column. Trace amounts of plastic fiber were seen in all species except shiner perch. All exposure to sediment appeared to have occurred in the top 2 cm of the sediment column, or as contact with flocculent material on plants or hard substrates, or even in the water column, as some fine sand grains were seen in all fish, even anchovy. There was no conclusive evidence of site-specific foraging (site fidelity). The best spatial coverage was for topsmelt, and these fish appear to have fed opportunistically, with some evidence for having fed outside San Leandro Bay.

Hexavalent Chromium Maximum Contaminant Level (MCL) Standardized Regulatory Impact Assessment (SRIA)

California State Water Resources Control Board (SWRCB) | May 4th, 2023

The Division of Drinking Water (DDW) of the State Water Resources Control Board (State Water Board) is responsible for adopting drinking water standards. Primary drinking

The Division of Drinking Water (DDW) of the State Water Resources Control Board (State Water Board) is responsible for adopting drinking water standards. Primary drinking water standards, as defined in section 116275 of the California Safe Drinking Water Act (Health & Safety Code (HSC), div. 104, pt. 12, ch. 4, section 116270 et seq.), must be set in accordance with the requirements of HSC 116365. The purpose of the proposed regulation addressed in this Standardized Regulatory Impact Assessment (SRIA) is to adopt a primary drinking water standard for hexavalent chromium in drinking water consisting of a maximum contaminant level (MCL) and pertinent monitoring and reporting requirements. Consistent with title 1 of the California Code of Regulations (CCR), section 2003(a), the economic impact method used for the assessment was the Regional Input-Output Modeling System (RIMS II) developed by the U.S. Bureau of Economic Analysis (BEA).

Historical Seawater Intrusion Map Pressure 180-Foot Aquifer - 500 mg/L or Greater Chloride Areas

Monterey County Water Resources Agency (MCWRA) | April 11th, 2018

History and Sources of Co-Occurring Pesticides in an Abstraction Well Unraveled by Age Distributions of Depth-Specific Groundwater Samples

American Chemical Society (ACS) | November 24th, 2019

When groundwater-based drinking water supply becomes contaminated, the timing and source of contamination are obvious questions. However, contaminants often have diffuse

When groundwater-based drinking water supply becomes contaminated, the timing and source of contamination are obvious questions. However, contaminants often have diffuse sources and different contaminants may have different sources even in a single groundwater well, making these questions complicated to answer. Age dating of groundwater has been used to reconstruct contaminant travel times to wells; however, critics have highlighted that groundwater flow is often complex with mixing of groundwater of different ages. In drinking water wells, where water is typically abstracted from a large depth interval, such mixing is even more problematic. We present a way to overcome some of the obstacles in identifying the source and age of contaminants in drinking water wells by combining depth-specific sampling with age tracer modeling, particle tracking simulations, geological characterization, and contaminant properties. This multitool approach was applied to a drinking water well, where bentazon and dichlorprop contamination was found to have different pollutant sources and release histories, even though both pesticides can be associated with the same land use. Bentazon was derived from recent application to a golf course, while dichlorprop was derived from agricultural use more than 30 years ago. The advantages, limitations, and pitfalls of the proposed course of action are then further discussed.

How are Western water districts managing groundwater basins?

California Agriculture (UCANR) | March 13th, 2018

Making the transition from open-access groundwater rights to sustainable groundwater management is a formidable task for newly formed groundwater sustainability age

Making the transition from open-access groundwater rights to sustainable groundwater management is a formidable task for newly formed groundwater sustainability agencies in California. As agencies begin to decide how to make equitable water allocations, how to monitor groundwater use and what mix of supply- and demand-side mechanisms to adopt to satisfy sustainability criteria, the groundwater management strategies in place across other basins in the western United States are worth studying. We surveyed 18 groundwater districts in California and other Western states to identify the management approaches and practices they have instituted. The conclusions we draw suggest a correlative rights framework of water allocation with phase-ins for heavy users; metered pumping; flexible arrangements for trading and carrying over allocations for multiple years; and incentivizing groundwater recharge, including recharge from deep percolation from crops. Rigid formulas for significantly reducing groundwater use in medium- and high-priority basins are likely to have significant negative effects on the regional economy.

Human viral nucleic acids concentrations in wastewater solids from Central and Coastal California USA

Nature Portfolio (Springer Nature) | June 22nd, 2023

Hydraulic, Geochemical, and Thermal Monitoring of an Aquifer System in the Vicinity of Mammoth Lakes, Mono County, California, 2015–17

U.S. Geological Survey (USGS) | June 27th, 2019

Since 2014, the U.S. Geological Survey has been working in cooperation with the Bureau of Land Management, Mono County, Ormat Technologies, Inc., and the Mammoth Communit

Since 2014, the U.S. Geological Survey has been working in cooperation with the Bureau of Land Management, Mono County, Ormat Technologies, Inc., and the Mammoth Community Water District to design and implement a groundwater-monitoring program for the proposed Casa Diablo IV Geothermal Power Project in Long Valley Caldera, California, to characterize baseline groundwater-level, water-temperature, and water-chemistry conditions at dedicated monitoring wells and municipal supply wells. The publicly available data and the analyses provided here represent quality-assured and peer-reviewed information to help with the management of the thermal and non-thermal water resources beneath and in the vicinity of the town of Mammoth Lakes, California. The methods of data collection for continuous water levels and quarterly water-temperature profiles for two 600-foot-deep monitoring wells during 2016 through 2017 are discussed. Also discussed are the methods of water-sample collection and characterizations of the water chemistry in numerous wells in the multilayered aquifer system beneath Mammoth Lakes. Additionally, the methodology used to develop digital (mathematical) filters to remove or reduce the effects of barometric pressure and solid Earth tides on the continuous water-level records is discussed. Digitally filtered water levels for a 2017 flow test of a deep geothermal production well are described, and various aquifer responses observed during the flow test are discussed. These are further considered in a companion evaluation of potential physical and chemical influences on the water-level data collected during the flow test. The digitally filtered water-level data indicated that some hydraulic communication exists between the deep geothermal aquifer and shallow groundwater aquifer at the location of the flow test, northeast of Mammoth Lakes. Groundwater-chemistry data from three wells indicated that shallow groundwater naturally mixes with a small component of geothermal water along the northern periphery of the shallow aquifer system at Mammoth Lakes.

Hydrologic Modeling of the Santa Clara River Watershed with the U.S. EPA Hydrologic Simulation Program - FORTRAN (HSPF)

Ventura County Watershed Protection District | January 24th, 2009

The purpose of the Santa Clara River (SCR) Watershed Feasibility Study as described in the PMP (October, 2003) is to determine the impact of the upstream urbanization, s

The purpose of the Santa Clara River (SCR) Watershed Feasibility Study as described in the PMP (October, 2003) is to determine the impact of the upstream urbanization, specifically in Los Angeles County, to the present natural state of the river in Ventura County and communities adjacent to the River that expect to develop close to the river banks. It is the goal of the watershed study to develop the necessary baseline data and analytical tools. In order to evaluate these impacts the feasibility study will include: • A comprehensive update of hydrologic, hydraulic, and sediment (yield and transport) models for a range of flow rates for existing conditions and future conditions within the Santa Clara River. The hydrologic model provides the flow data needed as input to the hydraulic and sediment transport models. • The hydrologic model will also be used to evaluate baseline and changes to water quality and pollutant loadings as a result of development or any proposed regional solutions to flooding or water quality problems. • Generate computer models that can simulate the impacts of land use changes under existing, natural and future conditions, and provide data to forecast the resulting changes to streamflow in the Santa Clara River. • Existing conditions include recently installed flood control and water supply/storage facilities. For future conditions, the modeling will include proposed land use changes, any additional flood control or sediment control facilities, and the effects of changes in sediment flow to the downstream areas as a result of proposed alternatives to mitigate flooding or water quality problems. The Natural Condition will be modeled by assuming the watershed has not been developed or subjected to extensive ranching or agricultural activities (pre-European). This document is the Final Report for the watershed hydrology model of the Santa Clara River Watershed using the U.S. EPA Hydrologic Simulation Program FORTRAN (HSPF). This effort was funded directly and wholly by contract with the Ventura County Watershed Protection District (VCWPD). This report identifies and describes the watershed characteristics and types of data required/available for the model, the segmentation of the watershed for modeling purposes, model calibration and validation efforts, and the results for the Baseline and Natural Conditions Scenario model runs. This effort has been designed to produce a comprehensive watershed model that meets the needs of the hydrologic model component of the SCR Watershed Feasibility Study as described above. This model was designed to: a. Represent hydrologic conditions throughout the SCR watershed for a wide range of flow conditions continuously for both high flows, low flows and individual storm events b. Provide continuous flow boundary conditions for the hydraulic and sediment transport models, at the appropriate spatial scales and boundary locations identified by the Feasibility Study participants c. Provide a modeling framework for subsequent sediment yield and water quality modeling requirements of the Feasibility Study d. Include a long-term database of 40 or more years of model input (e.g. precipitation, evaporation, diversions, POTWs) to allow long-term model simulations needed to develop the required flood (and low flow) frequency information at selected points throughout the SCR Watershed e. Provide long-term model simulations for both Baseline (current) and Natural Condition alternatives as a basis for assessing and comparing with planned Future Condition alternatives.