Drawdown ‘‘Triggers’’: A Misguided Strategy for Protecting Groundwater-Fed Streams and Springs

National Groundwater Association (NGWA) | October 31st, 2016

There is increasing recognition of the importanceof groundwater to the survival and function of terrestrial ecosystems (e.g., Ribeiro et al. 2013), which has grown from

There is increasing recognition of the importanceof groundwater to the survival and function of terrestrial ecosystems (e.g., Ribeiro et al. 2013), which has grown from understanding of the intimate connections between groundwater and surface water (Winter et al.1998). In this context, management strategies that can protect groundwater-dependent ecosystems (GDEs) such as springs and groundwater-fed streams are of critical importance. One strategy being adopted in some casesis the use of “drawdown triggers.” This involves specifying an amount of acceptable drawdown relative to baseline at a particular monitoring point, which if exceeded, triggers a management response. This technical commentary examines this strategy, highlighting potential pit-falls. There are important aspects of the response of groundwater and connected springs and streams which may be overlooked if drawdown triggers are adopted as the primary strategy for GDE protection. A case study of a recently approved mining project is discussed and some additional and/or alternative approaches proposed.

Drinking Water Notification Levels and Response Levels: An Overview

California State Water Resources Control Board (SWRCB) | February 6th, 2020

The Division of Drinking Water’s precursor, the Drinking Water Program of the California Department of Public Health (CDPH), and earlier, the California Department of H

The Division of Drinking Water’s precursor, the Drinking Water Program of the California Department of Public Health (CDPH), and earlier, the California Department of Health Services, CDHS, established health-based advisory levels, called “notification levels” (referred to as “action levels" through 2004), as needed since the early 1980s. These have been used to provide information to public water systems and others about certain non-regulated chemicals in drinking water that lack maximum contaminant levels (MCLs).  When chemicals are found at concentrations greater than these levels, certain requirement and recommendations apply.  Generally, notification levels have been established in response to actual contamination of drinking water supplies, e.g., perchlorate, which now has an MCL. However, notification levels for a number of chemicals were established in anticipation of possible contamination, such as from a hazardous waste site containing many pesticides (in the 1980s), or from a Superfund site (in the 2000s).  Chemicals for which notification levels are established may eventually be regulated by MCLs (through a formal regulatory process), depending on the extent of contamination, the levels observed, and the risk to human health. Most, however, have not proceeded to MCLs. Once established, a notification level generally stays in place, unless it is replaced by an MCL.On occasion, though, we have revised the numeric value of an individualnotification level to reflect new risk assessment information on the particularchemical. For some of the chemicals that had advisory levels established early on, if noMCL was adopted and the need for the notification level had passed, the advisory levelwas archived. Archived advisory levels may nevertheless be updated to reflect any newrisk information that may become available, and may be used as notification levels ifneeded. To date, of the 93 chemicals for which notification levels have been established; 40 now have MCLs. Of the remaining 53 chemicals, 29 are chemicals with current notification levels. 24 are chemicals with archived advisory levels (AALs). Note that following adoption of an MCL, the notification level is no longer used. For more about AALs and notification levels, go to: http://www.waterboards.ca.gov/drinking_water/certlic/drinkingwater/NotificationLevels.shtml. 

Drought impact on cropland use monitored with AVIRIS imagery in Central Valley, California

Science of the Total Environment (Elsevier) | November 19th, 2022

During 2012–2016 California experienced the longest and most severe drought in the last centuries. This water scarcity led to an increase in non-cultivated croplands du

During 2012–2016 California experienced the longest and most severe drought in the last centuries. This water scarcity led to an increase in non-cultivated croplands during this period. The objective of this study was to quantify agricultural trends in the Central Valley (California) at peak growth from 2013 to 2016 during the drought and in 2017–2018 post-drought. For this purpose, we analysed yearly official harvested area reported at county level for the main crops and compared them to visible-shortwave infrared (VSWIR) spectra acquired by the Airborne Visible/Infrared Imaging-Spectrometer (AVIRIS-classic) over 2334 km2 of the Central Valley each year. Multiple Endmember Spectral Mixture Analysis (MESMA) was applied to AVIRIS data to estimate green vegetation (GV), non-photosynthetic vegetation (NPV) and soil fractions in crop fields each year. MESMA and crop reports (R2 = 0.9) showed that soil (i.e.; non-cultivated areas) increased during the summers of the drought; with the smallest GV area in 2015, the second year classified with exceptional drought in this period. According to MESMA, 34 % of the cropland was covered by GV in 2015, and 69.5·104 ha according to the crop reports. MESMA also registered the highest value of soil area in 2015 (48 %). The year with most cultivated area was 2017, the wettest year in the studied period, with 54 % of the croplands covered by GV and 75.2·104 ha. This study verified that the non-cultivated areas increased in the Central Valley during the exceptional drought period and validated the use of AVIRIS imagery to monitor broad-scale cropland use changes in future climatic extreme events.

Drought water right curtailment analysis for California’s Eel river

American Society of Civil Engineers (ASCE) | February 1st, 2018

Water users in California’s hybrid water rights system have different legal priorities to available surface water in times of water scarcity. A set of two linear progra

Water users in California’s hybrid water rights system have different legal priorities to available surface water in times of water scarcity. A set of two linear programming models was developed to determine curtailments of water use under drought conditions according to riparian and appropriative water right doctrines with spatially varying water availability and water rights within a basin. The models were implemented in spreadsheets and extended to estimate water right reliability and factors of safety in water rights administration. Alternate methods for calculating water use curtailments are discussed. Curtailments from the models are compared with actual water shortage notices issued by the state for the Eel River, California for June 30, 2014. Analyzing water use curtailments with an algorithm in spreadsheet software offers a mechanistic, transparent, accessible, and precise approach derived from legal doctrines to support water rights administration during drought.

Ecological Condition Assessments of California’s Perennial Wadeable Streams (2000 through 2006)

California State Water Resources Control Board (SWRCB) | October 15th, 2007

The struggle to adequately monitor the condition of waterbodies with limited financial resources is a challenge faced by water resource agencies worldwide. For a resource

The struggle to adequately monitor the condition of waterbodies with limited financial resources is a challenge faced by water resource agencies worldwide. For a resource agency to adequately meet its obligations to monitor and assess the condition of its waterbodies it must provide information at both the site-specific scale and the scale of the entire resource. This dual obligation requires different monitoring strategies. Traditional targeted monitoring (in which site locations are selected to meet specific monitoring goals) is essential for answering many key water quality monitoring questions (e.g., what is the condition of specific sites, how do site conditions vary seasonally and annually, where are the best and worst sites, what are the primary water quality problems at specific sites, what are the effects of specific watershed activities and/or BMPs). Although this approach can generate much valuable water quality data, it is unable to provide information about the overall condition of large populations of resources (e.g., all streams, lakes or wetlands in a state) unless the monitoring entity is prepared to perform a complete census of the targeted resource. Site specific monitoring approaches are also unable to provide an objective context for interpreting the data they generate.  However, the perspective provided from this context is a necessary logical foundation for a sound monitoring program. In the US, the need for a broader context for interpreting the results of targeted monitoring data has driven the development of alternate sampling designs at both the state and federal level. To meet this need, the U.S. EPA established its Environmental Monitoring and Assessment Program (EMAP), a long term research program designed to develop the tools and techniques needed for cost-effectively answering the fundamental status and trends questions in the Clean Water Act. The EMAP studies are based on a probabilistic survey design in which each sampling location represents a known proportion of the total resource of interest (e.g., percent of total stream length) with known statistical confidence. This design permits the inference of resource conditions for large geographic regions with a relatively small investment in sampling (Ringold et al. 1996, Olsen et al. 1999, Stevens and Olsen 2004). After completing assessments of the condition of Eastern lakes and the condition of wadeable streams in the Middle-Atlantic states, the EPA initiated a similar assessment of streams in the western states (WEMAP), which included a high density of sites in California. For the first time in 2006, the state of California used data from a probability survey to derive the condition assessments of its perennial streams in its 305(b) report to the US EPA (Ode and Rehn 2005, California State Water Resources Control Board 2006). These reports were developed to meet California’s obligation to monitor its compliance with the goal of biotic integrity stipulated under Clean Water Act §305(b). Prior to these report, the ABL has presented results of the Southern Coastal California intensification area (Rehn and Ode 2004), Northern Coastal California intensification area (Rehn et al. 2005) as demonstration projects. As the EPA’s Western EMAP sampling effort ended in 2003, the EPA strongly encouraged western states to continue the EMAP monitoring approach in their own state monitoring programs. Two monitoring programs in the California State Water Resources Control Board, the recently established Surface Water Ambient Monitoring Program (SWAMP) and the Non-Point Source Program (NPS) expressed interest in probabilistic sampling. In concert with (and with funding from) their counterparts in the EPA Region 9 Non-point Source Programs and Office of Water, NPS and SWAMP developed the California Monitoring and Assessment Program (CMAP) to provide an additional four years of statewide probabilistic sampling to support continued ecological condition assessments. The study designs used for these condition assessments were developed by the EPA’s Office of Research and Development. Since the state and federal NPS programs brought a strong interest in the relationship between non-point source pollution sources and aquatic life use, the sampling design was adapted to include an explicit stratification by landuse/ landcover.

Effects of imported recharge on fluoride trends in groundwater used for public supply in California

Science of the Total Environment (Elsevier) | March 31st, 2022

Fluoride is a naturally occurring element in groundwater that supports bone and dental health at low concentrations but can cause health problems at elevated concentrati

Fluoride is a naturally occurring element in groundwater that supports bone and dental health at low concentrations but can cause health problems at elevated concentrations in drinking water. This study investigates spatial and temporal trends for fluoride concentrations in untreated groundwater from over 20,000 public supply wells in California. The presence of a significant temporal trend in fluoride concentrations in a well was assessed using the Mann-Kendall test and a spatial-weighting approach was used to identify the areal extent of the groundwater resources with significant trends. Less than 2% of the groundwater resources used for public supply in the state have concentrations above the California maximum contaminant level of 2 mg/L. Approximately 14% of the groundwater resource used for public supply show a significant recent trend (2000–2019), with decreasing trends occurring in 10%of the resource. Potential drivers for trends were evaluated in two of the areas in southern California with the greatest prevalence of trends but distinct climate and hydrogeological characteristics. Aquifers in the Mojave and Whitewater River watersheds, located in the desert region, and the Los Angeles Basin, located on the coast, have been replenished with imported and treated water over the last half century to maintain sustainable groundwater levels. The recharge of imported water with different chemistries has altered the geochemical conditions in the aquifers, driving changes in fluoride concentrations.

Effects of montane watershed development on vulnerability of domestic groundwater supply during drought

Journal of Hydrology (Elsevier) | April 1st, 2020

Climate change is expected to reduce recharge to montane aquifers in the western United States, but it is unclear how this will impact groundwater resources in waters

Climate change is expected to reduce recharge to montane aquifers in the western United States, but it is unclear how this will impact groundwater resources in watersheds where intensive surface-water development has disrupted the natural hydrologic regime. To better understand sources of recharge and associated vulnerabilities of groundwater supply in this setting, we made a detailed geochemical survey of domestic wells finished in fractured bedrock throughout the Yuba and Bear River watersheds (Sierra Nevada foothills, northern California) during historic drought (2015–2016). Stable isotopes of water and noble gas recharge temperatures closely tracked atmospheric lapse rates across a broad elevation gradient (100–2000 m), indicating groundwater inputs are dominated by local precipitation that rapidly recharges fractured bedrock during the winter wet-season. However, nearly one-quarter of wells had water isotopes that were fractionated by evaporation and warm recharge temperatures, indicative of mixing with dry-season recharge by surface water. Monte Carlo mixing models suggest evaporation-impacted groundwater samples are mixtures of local rain with an average of 28% ± 13% from diverted surface water that can recharge bedrock aquifers during the dry-season by either irrigation return flow or seepage from extensive distribution infrastructure. Wells that received recharge subsidies from diverted surface water had elevated levels of nitrate and coliform bacteria compared to those replenished exclusively by local precipitation, which are more vulnerable to supply shortage during drought. It is important to consider the impacts of increased surface-water development on the quantity and quality of groundwater recharge in rapidly developing montane watersheds.

Estimating perchlorate exposure from food and tap water based on U.S. biomonitoring and occurrence data

Journal of Exposure Science & Environmental Epidemiology (Springer) | June 23rd, 2010

Human biomonitoring data show that exposure to perchlorate is widespread in the United States. The predominant source of intake is food, whereas drinking water is

Human biomonitoring data show that exposure to perchlorate is widespread in the United States. The predominant source of intake is food, whereas drinking water is a less frequent and far smaller contributor. We used spot urine samples for over 2700 subjects and estimated 24 h intake using new creatinine adjustment equations. Merging data from surveys of national health (NHANES) with drinking water monitoring (UCMR), we categorized survey participants according to their potential exposure through drinking water or food. By subtracting daily food doses of perchlorate from the oral reference dose (RfD), we derive an allowances for perchlorate in tap water for several populations. The calculated mean food perchlorate dose in the United States was 0.081 μg/kg/day compared to 0.101 μg/kg/day for those who also had a potential drinking water component. The calculated 95th percentile doses, typically falling between 0.2 and 0.4 μg/kg/day, were well below the RfD (0.7 μg/kg/day) in all populations analyzed. Children aged 6–11 years had the highest mean perchlorate doses in food (0.147 μg/kg/day), with an additional water contribution of only 0.003 μg/kg/day representing just 2% of exposure. Pregnant women had a mean food dose of 0.093 vs 0.071 μg/kg/day for all women of reproductive age. At the 95th percentile intake for both the total population and women of child-bearing age (15–44), the perchlorate contribution from food was 86% and from drinking water 14% (respectively, 30% and 5% of the RfD). At the mean for the same groups, the food to water contribution ratio is approximately 80:20. We calculate that an average 66 kg pregnant woman consuming a 90th percentile food dose (0.198 μg/kg/day) could also drink the 90th percentile of community water for pregnant women (0.033 l/kg/day) containing 15 μg/l perchlorate without exceeding the 0.7 μg/kg/day reference dose.

Estrogen Receptor In Vitro Assay Linkage Studies

San Francisco Estuary Institute (SFEI) | July 30th, 2018

Our Phase 1 study indicated that it would be possible to link in vitro ER assays to in vivo endpoints (Mehinto et al. 2018). These conclusions were based on several expe

Our Phase 1 study indicated that it would be possible to link in vitro ER assays to in vivo endpoints (Mehinto et al. 2018). These conclusions were based on several experiments that were performed at the University of Florida and SCCWRP. Our conclusion was that in order to see higher order effects in Menidia, the dose of estrogens in the in vivo assay needed to be above the EC50 point for the in vitro assays. However, the dose response curve for the in vivo endpoints was broad starting at 20 ng E2/L and progressing to 20, 200 and 500 ng/L. Our Phase 1 experiments did not include the resolution to reduce uncertainty in estimated quantitative in vitro to in vivo linkage factors. While the data allowed us to extrapolate those values, it was decided that the experiment should be repeated another time with more intervening estradiol concentrations, to get a better determination. A second goal of the study was to measure estrogen equivalencies at 6 locations in San Francisco Bay, testing both the water and sediments, to determine the usefulness of the approach. Results from this study will begin to enable managers to determine whether or not additional cleanup is necessary for treated effluents that are disposed into sensitive estuarine environments.

Estuary News, February 1995

San Francisco Estuary Partnership (SFEP) | February 15th, 1995