Groundwater Sustainability Plan for the Delano-Earlimart Irrigation District

Delano-Earlimart Irrigation District Groundwater Sustainability Agency (DEID GSA) | July 21st, 2022

This updated GSP addresses the items identified in the SGMA regulations specific to DEID GSA, including descriptions of the physical characteristics, the water budget (hi

This updated GSP addresses the items identified in the SGMA regulations specific to DEID GSA, including descriptions of the physical characteristics, the water budget (historical and future), specific monitoring features and locations, quantifiable targets and minimum thresholds for depth to groundwater, groundwater storage, groundwater quality, and land subsidence between 2020 and 2040, and those projects and management actions proposed to implement during the 20-year planning horizon to achieve the sustainability goal. This updated GSP is also intended to address the deficiencies noted in the DWR Corrective Notice, to the extent applicable to DEID’s GSP. Due to size, the file has been divided. Part 1, Part 2, Part 3, Part 4, Part 5, Part 6, Part 7, Part 8, Part 9

Groundwater Sustainability Plan for the Delta-Mendota Subbasin

Delta-Mendota Subbasin Coordination Committee | July 31st, 2024

1. Table of Contents 2. Executive Summary 3. Introduction 4. Plan Area 5. Basin Setting 6. Groundwater Conditions 7. Water Budget 8. Sustainability Criteria 9

1. Table of Contents 2. Executive Summary 3. Introduction 4. Plan Area 5. Basin Setting 6. Groundwater Conditions 7. Water Budget 8. Sustainability Criteria 9. Monitoring 10. Projects and Management 11. Plan Implementation 12. References 13. Appendices For a full history of basin GSPs, go to the Department of Water Resources Sustainable Groundwater Management Act portal.

Groundwater Sustainability Plan for the Northern and Central Delta-Mendota Regions

San Luis & Delta-Mendota Water Authority (SLDMWA) | November 30th, 2019

Table of Contents Executive Summary Introduction Plan Area Governance and Administration Outreach and Communication Basin Setting Sustainable M

Table of Contents Executive Summary Introduction Plan Area Governance and Administration Outreach and Communication Basin Setting Sustainable Management Criteria Sustainability Implementation Plan Implementation Technical Studies Appendices A. Coordination Agreements B. Common Chapter C. Outreach Documentation D. Water Budget Model Documentation E. Hydrographs for Sustainable Management Criteria F. Quality Assurance Program G. Noticing and Adoption Implementation H. Elements Guide

Groundwater Sustainability Plan for the San Joaquin River Exchange Contractors Groundwater Sustainability Plan (GSP) Group in the Delta-Mendota Subbasin

San Joaquin River Exchange Contractors GSA (SJREC GSA) | December 13th, 2019

Groundwater Sustainability Plan for the San Joaquin River Exchange Contractors GSP Group in the Delta-Mendota Subbasin (5-022.07)

San Joaquin River Exchange Contractors Water Authority (SJRECWA) | June 30th, 2022

The GSP was adopted by the SJREC GSA on December 13, 2019. The GSP has been amended in response to the January 21, 2022 DWR Determination letter to Delta-Mendota Subbasin

The GSP was adopted by the SJREC GSA on December 13, 2019. The GSP has been amended in response to the January 21, 2022 DWR Determination letter to Delta-Mendota Subbasin’s Point of Contact that included evaluation of the San Joaquin River GSA’s Groundwater Sustainability Plan (GSP). The amended plan was adopted by the SJRECGSA Board on July 5, 2022. On March 2nd, 2023, the Department of Water Resources announced decisions for Groundwater Sustainability Plans (GSPs), finding that numerous subbasins were found to be inadequate. One of these subbasins—the Delta-Mendota Subbasin in San Joaquin, Stanislaus, Merced, Fresno, Madera, and San Benito counties—includes a region for which the Exchange Contractors are responsible for developing the GSP. Due to size, this file has been divided. Part 1, Part 2, Part 3, Part 4, Part 5, Part 6, Part 7, Part 8

Groundwater Sustainability Plan for the White Wolf Basin

White Wolf Groundwater Sustainability Agency | December 15th, 2021

Groundwater Sustainability Plan Greater Kaweah Groundwater Sustainability Agency

Greater Kaweah Groundwater Sustainability Agency (GKGSA) | January 22nd, 2020

Groundwater Sustainability Plan, County of Fresno Groundwater Sustainability Agency, Management Area A and Management Area B, Delta-Mendota Subbasin

County of Fresno | January 23rd, 2020

Groundwater Sustainability Plan, Olcese Groundwater Sustainability Agency, Kern County Subbasin

Olcese Groundwater Sustainability Agency | January 30th, 2020

Harnessing the Power of Geophysical Imaging to Recharge California's Groundwater

American Geophysical Union (AGU) | April 17th, 2025

Motivated by the availability of 20,000 line-km of airborne electromagnetic (AEM) data covering the Central Valley of California, we developed a workflow that uses resist

Motivated by the availability of 20,000 line-km of airborne electromagnetic (AEM) data covering the Central Valley of California, we developed a workflow that uses resistivity profiles from electromagnetic (EM) data to assess the suitability of areas for groundwater recharge. We defined a suitable area as one where “fastpaths” of coarse-grained material could efficiently move water from the ground surface to the water table. We defined recharge metrics and generated the corresponding maps by integrating resistivity profiles from AEM data, sediment type (from driller's logs), water level measurements, and water quality measurements. The workflow is publicly available through a web-based application, fastpath. We produced maps displaying recharge metrics on a 400 m × 400 m grid covering the Central Valley, with 80% of the cells sufficiently close to an AEM resistivity profile (within ∼3 km) to be assessed for recharge. Various decisions are made in the workflow that result in a range of values for determined metrics at any given location. The maps summarizing all metrics show that between 19% (2,000,000 acres) and 56% (7,000,000 acres) of the total area in the valley is land suitable for recharge. The landcover with the largest total area of land classified as suitable is cultivated crops. We estimated the total space available for recharge water to be ∼170 km3 which is two orders of magnitude greater than an estimate of the total volume of water likely to be available for recharge.