The Cost of Regulating Active Landfills for Water Quality

California State Water Resources Control Board (SWRCB) | January 3rd, 2016

This report to the legislature was prepared pursuant to Chapter 718, Statutes of 2010 (SB 855, Committee on Budget and Fiscal Review), which requires the State Water Reso

This report to the legislature was prepared pursuant to Chapter 718, Statutes of 2010 (SB 855, Committee on Budget and Fiscal Review), which requires the State Water Resources Control Board (State Water Board) to submit to the budget committees in each house of the legislature a report on the costs of regulating water quality at active landfills. The State Water Board and Regional Water Quality Control Boards (Regional Boards, collectively, the Water Boards) analyzed the cost of resources required to implement State and Federal statutes, regulations, and policies at these facilities. This report provides an overview of the Water Boards’ Land Disposal Program, followed by a cost analysis. The Water Boards’ Land Disposal Program provides regulatory oversight to 439 active landfills and 235 other waste management facilities in the State. Active landfills are all landfills that still pose a threat to the environment, even if they have stopped accepting waste. Active landfills are classified as operating or non-operating, with non-operating landfills including proposed, closing, and closed landfills. There are an estimated 1600 legacy landfills that were not included in the cost analysis for this report. Legacy landfills are waste management units that were closed, abandoned, or inactive prior to the adoption of revised State Water Board regulations in November 1984. In response to the legislative requirements, the results of this analysis show the cost of regulating the 439 active landfills to be approximately $18.1 million. The Land Disposal Program also regulates other waste management facilities as an integral part of the program, and tracks these facilities along with active landfills. Based on this analysis, the cost of regulating the 235 other waste management facilities is approximately $7.6 million. In total, implementation of the Land Disposal Program would cost approximately $25.7 million (not including legacy landfills). In Fiscal Year 2011-2012, the total expenditures incurred by the Land Disposal Program were approximately $10.6 million. As this presents an approximately $15.2 million shortfall in funding, the program prioritizes work based on threat to water quality, complexity, and level of activity at the facility. Working within existing resource constraints, the Land Disposal Program is currently implementing a series of efficiency measures to improve program effectiveness. A discussion of these efforts concludes this report.

Tracing enhanced oil recovery signatures in casing gases from the Lost Hills oil field using noble gases

Earth and Planetary Science Letters (Elsevier) | August 15th, 2018

Enhanced oil recovery (EOR) and hydraulic fracturing practices are commonly used methods to improve hydrocarbon extraction efficiency; however, the environmental effects

Enhanced oil recovery (EOR) and hydraulic fracturing practices are commonly used methods to improve hydrocarbon extraction efficiency; however, the environmental effects of such practices remain poorly understood. EOR is particularly prevalent in oil fields throughout California where water resources are in high demand and the disposal of large volumes of produced water may affect groundwater quality. Consequently, it is essential to better understand the fate of injected (EOR) fluids in California, and other subsurface petroleum systems, as well as any potential effect on nearby aquifer systems. Noble gases can be used as tracers to understand hydrocarbon generation, migration, and storage conditions, as well as the relative proportions of oil and water present in the subsurface. In addition, a noble gas signature diagnostic of injected (EOR) fluids can be readily identified. We report noble gas isotope and concentration data in casing gases from oil production wells in the Lost Hills oil field, northwest of Bakersfield, California, and injectate gas data from the Fruitvale oil field, located within the city of Bakersfield. Casing and injectate gas data are used to: 1) establish pristine hydrocarbon noble-gas signatures and the processes controlling noble gas distributions, 2) characterize the noble gas signature of injectate fluids, 3) trace injectate fluids in the subsurface, and 4) construct a model to estimate EOR efficiency. Noble gas results range from pristine to significantly modified by EOR, and can be best explained using a solubility exchange model between oil and connate/formation fluids, followed by gas exsolution upon production. This model is sensitive to oil–water interaction during hydrocarbon expulsion, migration, and storage at reservoir conditions, as well as any subsequent modification by EOR.

Two-dimensional, steady-state model of ground-water flow, Nevada Test Site and vicinity, Nevada- California: U.S. Geological Survey Water-Resources Investigations Report 82-4085

U.S. Geological Survey (USGS) | July 1st, 1962

Variations on a method for evaluating decadal-scale changes in the groundwater quality of two GAMA coastal study units 2004–14, California GAMA Priority Basin Project

U.S. Geological Survey (USGS) | August 8th, 2018

Decadal changes in groundwater quality in two study units on the north-central California coast were evaluated by the Priority Basin Project (PBP) of the Groundwater Ambi

Decadal changes in groundwater quality in two study units on the north-central California coast were evaluated by the Priority Basin Project (PBP) of the Groundwater Ambient Monitoring and Assessment (GAMA) Program. Groundwater samples collected from wells during 2004–05 were compared on a pair-wise basis to samples collected from the same wells during 2014. The data set consisted of paired-samples from 50 public supply wells in 2 GAMA-PBP study units (25 wells each in the North San Francisco Bay and the Monterey Bay and Salinas Valley Basins), with analytical results for 160 water-quality constituents. Statistical analysis was done on grouped results for the 59 constituents that were detected in at least 10 percent of the samples during either sampling period to evaluate decadal-scale change by a step-trend analysis. The data for both of the sampling periods were processed three different ways, resulting in three variations of the paired results to be submitted for statistical analyses. The first evaluation method variation processed data only to facilitate comparison of data when one or both of the results was a non-detection. The second and third variations applied the additional requirement that differences between initial and decadal-sample results exceed a defined threshold to prevent small differences from supporting the conclusion of a step trend. One method for setting the difference threshold between initial-sampling and resampling results is based on criteria used by the GAMA-PBP to determine whether or not replicate results are acceptable. The other difference-threshold-setting method uses a calculated confidence interval around each result based on demonstrated analytical variability for the constituents during each sampling period. Finally, constituents for which decadal-scale changes were statistically significant were identified using the Wilcoxon-Pratt signed-rank test on each of the three evaluation method variations. Step trends were identified by at least 1 of the 3 method variations for 33 constituents. After considering other factors, however, such as water-quality context and the results of quality-control samples, it was concluded that decadal changes were meaningful for 14 constituents in at least 1 of the 2 study units. Constituents for which step trends indicated meaningful increases were dissolved oxygen, total nitrogen, nitrate, orthophosphate, calcium, chloride, sulfate, iron, and lithium. Constituents for which step trends indicated meaningful decreases were temperature, arsenic, lead, the isotopic ratio of carbon-13, and tritium.

Volatile Organic Compounds in the Nation’s Ground Water and Drinking Water Supply Wells

U.S. Geological Survey (USGS) | August 29th, 2014

This national assessment of 55 volatile organic compounds (VOCs) in ground water gives emphasis to the occurrence of VOCs in aquifers that are used as an important supply

This national assessment of 55 volatile organic compounds (VOCs) in ground water gives emphasis to the occurrence of VOCs in aquifers that are used as an important supply of drinking water. In contrast to the monitoring of VOC contamination of ground water at point-source release sites, such as landfills and leaking underground storage tanks (LUSTs), our investigations of aquifers are designed as large-scale resource assessments that provide a general characterization of water-quality conditions. Nearly all of the aquifers included in this assessment have been identified as regionally extensive aquifers or aquifer systems.(2)  The assessment of ground water (Chapter 3) included analyses of about 3,500 water samples collected during 1985–2001 from various types of wells, representing almost 100 different aquifer studies. This is the first national assessment of the occurrence of a large number of VOCs with different uses, and the assessment addresses key questions about VOCs in aquifers. The assessment also provides a foundation for subsequent decadal assessments of the U.S. Geological Survey (USGS) National Water-Quality Assessment (NAWQA) Program to ascertain long-term trends of VOC occurrence in these aquifers.