San Francisco Estuary Institute (SFEI) | July 1st, 2020
Summary
The Regional Monitoring Program for Water Quality in San Francisco Bay (RMP) screened Bay waters for neonicotinoid pesticides, comparing levels to toxicity thresholds to
The Regional Monitoring Program for Water Quality in San Francisco Bay (RMP) screened Bay waters for neonicotinoid pesticides, comparing levels to toxicity thresholds to inform placement of this class of emerging contaminants within the tiered risk-based framework. Neonicotinoids are one of the most widely used classes of insecticides in the world. Given their widespread use in agricultural and urban environments, and ubiquitous detections in surface waters, there is growing concern about consequences for non-target species such as aquatic invertebrates, insects, birds, and fish.
In the summer of 2017, open Bay water samples were collected during the RMP Status and Trends Water Cruise. Samples were analyzed for 19 neonicotinoids and metabolites. The only neonicotinoid detected was imidacloprid, an active ingredient used in both urban and agricultural applications. Imidacloprid was detected at a single site above the method detection limits (2.2-2.6 ng/L) in Lower South Bay at a level of 4.2 ng/L. This value is within the range of concentrations found in a separate RMP study in water samples collected from the South and Lower South Bay margins in 2017. Imidacloprid was detected at 3 of 12 of the margin sites at levels between 3.9 and 11 ng/L; no other neonicotinoids were detected. Of note, these RMP studies appear to represent the first evaluation of ambient neonicotinoid concentrations in an estuarine environment in the nation.
Two significant pathways of imidacloprid contamination to the Bay are treated wastewater and runoff from the surrounding, primarily urban landscape. Previous RMP monitoring of wastewater influent and effluent, consisting of 24-hour composite samples collected from eight wastewater treatment facilities in the Bay Area in September 2015, detected imidacloprid in 100% of samples at levels up to 310 ng/L. Independent surveys in both northern and southern California urban areas confirm that imidacloprid is a commonly detected insecticide in urban runoff. For example, a San Francisco Bay Area study in Fairfield and Suisun City detected imidacloprid at up to 1,462 ng/L in urban creek waters. However, these concentrations diminished to below detection limits in downstream samples as creek waters mixed with brackish waters from the Bay. While Bay Area agricultural runoff has not been well-characterized with respect to imidacloprid, this pathway may also be of potential interest.
A hydrodynamic dilution spreadsheet model was applied as an additional screening tool to explore predicted spatial patterns and temporal trends in imidacloprid concentrations in Bay subembayments. Model inputs were based on available data on concentrations in wastewater effluent and runoff. The model predicted that Lower South Bay levels of imidacloprid would be higher than in other subembayments. The Lower South Bay was also the only subembayment where imidacloprid concentrations were consistently predicted to be higher than method detection limits. The model indicated that wastewater was a dominant pathway for imidacloprid.
However, stormwater discharges during the wet season could potentially lead to higher levels in the Bay, suggesting that dry season monitoring may not fully capture maximum concentrations. The results of this simplified dilution model are based on limited input data and do not include all relevant processes and removal mechanisms; they should be interpreted with caution and best viewed as a first step toward quantifiable prediction of open Bay concentrations. Open Bay and margins monitoring of imidacloprid revealed that detected concentrations in Lower South Bay were comparable to or greater than protective US and European Union thresholds that range from 4.8 to 10 ng/L. These observations, in combination with widespread and increasing use of this pesticide in urban settings, indicate that this contaminant should be classified as a Moderate Concern in the RMP tiered risk-based framework for contaminants of emerging concern. Other neonicotinoid pesticides and degradates should be classified as Possible Concern, given their more limited availability in urban use pesticide products, as well as additional uncertainties, particularly the lack of chronic toxicity data and potential for cumulative impacts to wildlife.
Additional monitoring is not recommended at this time, due to existing monitoring in urban streams conducted primarily by the California Department of Pesticide Regulation (CDPR). In the future, it may be appropriate for the RMP to explore opportunities for wet season monitoring in Bay water, or in urban runoff. Considering the low toxicity thresholds of these compounds (i.e., in the low ng/L range), analytical methods employed should be improved to provide method detection limits well below toxicity thresholds.