Microplastic Monitoring and Science Strategy for the San Francisco Bay

San Francisco Estuary Institute (SFEI) | February 7th, 2017

Microplastic is commonly defined as plastic particles smaller than 5 mm. In 2015, the Regional Monitoring Program for Water Quality in San Francisco Bay (RMP) conducte

Microplastic is commonly defined as plastic particles smaller than 5 mm. In 2015, the Regional Monitoring Program for Water Quality in San Francisco Bay (RMP) conducted a special study to measure microplastic in treated wastewater effluent and Bay surface water. Bay surface water appeared to have higher microplastic levels than other urban water bodies sampled in North America, such as the Great Lakes and Chesapeake Bay. Microbeads derived from personal care products and tiny fibers, a portion of which were likely derived from synthetic clothing, were recovered from all nine Bay sites. Tiny particles, primarily fibers, were also detected in treated effluent from Bay Area facilities; not all of these particles are known to be plastic. These findings received considerable media attention and catalyzed state and federal policy shifts. In 2016, the RMP authorized a special study to develop a strategy for continued study of microplastic in San Francisco Bay. To form this strategy, the RMP convened stakeholders to articulate management questions specific to microplastic pollution, and then conducted a one-day workshop that brought together stakeholders and microplastic experts to develop an understanding of the state of the science on this emerging contaminant, and determine consensus priorities for future work. The resulting strategy document provides: • an overview of microplastic science relevant to San Francisco Bay, • the management questions that will guide future work, • a summary of available sampling and analysis methods, and • a multi-year plan for studies that would provide answers to the management questions. The monitoring and management of both macro- and microplastic are issues that extend beyond the scope of the RMP. In this document, we seek to identify data gaps, next steps, and strategic partners who can help provide information and resources to inform management decisions. This Microplastic Strategy will be refined and adjusted in years to come based on advances in understanding and changes in the sources and management of plastic pollution.

Microplastic Strategy Update on behalf of the Regional Monitoring Program (RMP) for Water Quality in San Francisco Bay

San Francisco Estuary Institute (SFEI) | December 2nd, 2019

Based on the detection of microplastics in San Francisco Bay surface water and Bay Area wastewater effluent in 2015, the Regional Monitoring Program for Water Quality in

Based on the detection of microplastics in San Francisco Bay surface water and Bay Area wastewater effluent in 2015, the Regional Monitoring Program for Water Quality in San Francisco Bay (RMP) convened a Microplastic Workgroup (MPWG) in 2016 to discuss the issue, identify management information needs and management questions (MQs), and prioritize studies to provide information to answer these management questions. The MPWG meets annually to review on-going microplastic projects and to conduct strategic long-term planning in response to new information in this rapidly evolving field.

Microplastics from Tire Particles in San Francisco Bay

San Francisco Estuary Institute (SFEI) | March 14th, 2022

Middle Santa Ana River Watershed TMDL Task Force

Santa Ana Watershed Project Authority (SAWPA) | July 5th, 2018

The Task Force is an 18-agency collaborative effort organized by the Santa Ana Watershed Project Authority. It was formed in January 2006 to coordinate water quality impr

The Task Force is an 18-agency collaborative effort organized by the Santa Ana Watershed Project Authority. It was formed in January 2006 to coordinate water quality improvement activities related to bacteria in the Middle Santa Ana River Watershed. The activities were designed to manage or eliminate sources of bacterial indicators in local waterbodies. The Task Force supports on-going source investigation efforts to identify major sources of bacterial indicators and to understand how to best address them. Task Force resources are allocated on a risk-reduction priority basis in order to achieve compliance where it will provide the greatest improvement in public health.

Modern groundwater reaches deeper depths in heavily pumped aquifer systems

Nature Portfolio (Springer Nature) | September 7th, 2022

Deep groundwater is an important source of drinking water, and can be preferable to shallower groundwaters where they are polluted by surface-borne contaminants. Surface-

Deep groundwater is an important source of drinking water, and can be preferable to shallower groundwaters where they are polluted by surface-borne contaminants. Surface-borne contaminants are disproportionately common in ‘modern’ groundwaters that are made up of precipitation that fell since the ~1950s. Some local-scale studies have suggested that groundwater pumping can draw modern groundwater downward and potentially pollute deep aquifers, but the prevalence of such pumping-induced downwelling at continental scale is not known. Here we analyse thousands of US groundwater tritium measurements to show that modern groundwater tends to reach deeper depths in heavily pumped aquifer systems. These findings imply that groundwater pumping can draw mobile surface-borne pollutants to deeper depths than they would reach in the absence of pumping. We conclude that intensive groundwater pumping can draw recently recharged groundwater deeper into aquifer systems, potentially endangering deep groundwater quality.

Monitoring Strategies for Chemicals of Emerging Concern (CECs) in California’s Aquatic Ecosystems

California State Water Resources Control Board (SWRCB) | April 26th, 2012

Although thousands of substances can now be detected in the environment, a small percentage of known chemicals – approximately 200 -- are currently regulated and/or rou

Although thousands of substances can now be detected in the environment, a small percentage of known chemicals – approximately 200 -- are currently regulated and/or routinely monitored in California receiving waters.  The much larger group of chemicals that remain largely unregulated and/or unmonitored in the aquatic environment, known as chemicals of emerging concern (CECs), may originate from a wide range of point and non-point sources. Upon discharge to receiving waters, CECs that are readily soluble in water will remain in the dissolved (aqueous) phase and provide a route of exposure to aquatic life. A smaller subset of CECs that are hydrophobic will associate with particles, where they may remain suspended in the water column or accumulate in sediments and ultimately in tissues of aquatic and terrestrial biota. The larger concern is that exposure to aqueous, sediment and tissue CECs may affect wildlife and humans. In response, the California Water Resources Control Board (State Water Board) in conjunction with the David and Lucile Packard Foundation and a group of stakeholder advisors tasked a group of leading scientists to address the issues associated with CECs in the State’s aquatic systems that receive discharge of treated municipal wastewater effluent and stormwater. The group was charged to identify potential sources and evaluate the fate and effects of CECs, and ultimately to provide guidance for developing monitoring programs that assess those chemicals with the highest potential to cause effects in the State’s receiving waters. Seven experts in chemistry, biochemistry, toxicology, chemical and risk assessment, engineering and coastal and marine environmental health science were convened as the CEC Ecosystems Panel (“Panel”) in October 2009. The Panel held six in?person meetings to formulate their approach and recommendations, while soliciting input from stakeholders and the public. This report provides the results from the Panel’s deliberations, including four products intended to assist the State in developing a monitoring process for CECs based on sound, up-to-date scientific principles.

Multi-box mass balance model of PFOA and PFOS in different regions of San Francisco Bay

Chemosphere (Elsevier) | August 3rd, 2020

We present a model to predict the long-term distribution and concentrations of perfluorooctanoic acid (PFOA) and perfluorooctanesulfonic acid (PFOS) in estuaries comprisi

We present a model to predict the long-term distribution and concentrations of perfluorooctanoic acid (PFOA) and perfluorooctanesulfonic acid (PFOS) in estuaries comprising multiple intercommunicated sub-embayments. To that end, a mass balance model including rate constants and time-varying water inputs was designed to calculate levels of these compounds in water and sediment for every sub-embayment. Subsequently, outflows and tidal water exchanges were used to interconnect the different regions of the estuary. To calculate plausible risks to population, outputs of the model were used as inputs in a previously designed model to simulate concentrations of PFOA and PFOS in a sport fish species (Cymatogaster aggregata). The performance of the model was evaluated by applying it to the specific case of San Francisco Bay, (California, USA), using 2009 sediment and water sampled concentrations of PFOA and PFOS in North, Central and South regions. Concentrations of these compounds in the Bay displayed exponential decreasing trends, but with different shapes depending on region, compound, and compartment assessed. Nearly stable PFOA concentrations were reached after 50 years, while PFOS needed close to 500 years to stabilize in sediment and fish. Afterwards, concentrations stabilize between 4 and 23 pg/g in sediment, between 0.02 and 44 pg/L in water, and between 7 and 104 pg/g wet weight in fish, depending on compound and region. South Bay had the greatest final concentrations of pollutants, regardless of compartment. Fish consumption is safe for most scenarios, but due to model uncertainty, limitations in monthly intake could be established for North and South Bay catches.

Multi-region assessment of chemical mixture exposures and predicted cumulative effects in USA wadeable urban/agriculture-gradient streams

Science of the Total Environment (Elsevier) | February 4th, 2021

Chemical-contaminant mixtures are widely reported in large stream reaches in urban/agriculture-developed watersheds, but mixture compositions and aggregate biolog

Chemical-contaminant mixtures are widely reported in large stream reaches in urban/agriculture-developed watersheds, but mixture compositions and aggregate biological effects are less well understood in corresponding smaller headwaters, which comprise most of stream length, riparian connectivity, and spatial biodiversity. During 2014–2017, the U.S. Geological Survey (USGS) measured 389 unique organic analytes (pharmaceutical, pesticide, organic wastewater indicators) in 305 headwater streams within four contiguous United States (US) regions. Potential aquatic biological effects were evaluated for estimated maximum and median exposure conditions using multiple lines of evidence, including occurrence/concentrations of designed-bioactive pesticides and pharmaceuticals and cumulative risk screening based on vertebrate-centric ToxCast™ exposure-response data and on invertebrate and nonvascular plant aquatic life benchmarks. Mixed-contaminant exposures were ubiquitous and varied, with 78% (304) of analytes detected at least once and cumulative maximum concentrations up to more than 156,000 ng/L. Designed bioactives represented 83% of detected analytes. Contaminant summary metrics correlated strong-positive (rho (ρ): 0.569–0.719) to multiple watershed-development metrics, only weak-positive to point-source discharges (ρ: 0.225–353), and moderate- to strong-negative with multiple instream invertebrate metrics (ρ: −0.373 to −0.652). Risk screening indicated common exposures with high probability of vertebrate-centric molecular effects and of acute toxicity to invertebrates, respectively. The results confirm exposures to broad and diverse contaminant mixtures and provide convincing multiple lines of evidence that chemical contaminants contribute substantially to adverse multi-stressor effects in headwater-stream communities.

Nationwide geospatial analysis of county racial and ethnic composition and public drinking water arsenic and uranium

Nature Portfolio (Springer Nature) | December 3rd, 2022

There is no safe level of exposure to inorganic arsenic or uranium, yet recent studies identified sociodemographic and regional inequalities in concentrations of these fr

There is no safe level of exposure to inorganic arsenic or uranium, yet recent studies identified sociodemographic and regional inequalities in concentrations of these frequently detected contaminants in public water systems across the US. We analyze the county-level association between racial/ethnic composition and public water arsenic and uranium concentrations from 2000–2011 using geospatial models. We find that higher proportions of Hispanic/Latino and American Indian/Alaskan Native residents are associated with significantly higher arsenic and uranium concentrations. These associations differ in magnitude and direction across regions; higher proportions of non-Hispanic Black residents are associated with higher arsenic and uranium in regions where concentrations of these contaminants are high. The findings from this nationwide geospatial analysis identifying racial/ethnic inequalities in arsenic and uranium concentrations in public drinking water across the US can advance environmental justice initiatives by informing regulatory action and financial and technical support to protect communities of color.

Natural and Anthropogenic Hexavalent Chromium, Cr(VI), in Groundwater near a Mapped Plume, Hinkley, California

U.S. Geological Survey (USGS) | May 25th, 2023

Related documents in this series: Chapter A: Introduction to Study Area Hydrogeology, Chromium Sources, Site History, and Purpose of Study Chapter B: Survey of Chro

Related documents in this series: Chapter A: Introduction to Study Area Hydrogeology, Chromium Sources, Site History, and Purpose of Study Chapter B: Survey of Chromium and Selected Element Concentrations in Rock, Alluvium, and Core Material Chapter C: Chromium in Minerals and Selected Aquifer Materials Chapter D: Analyses of Regulatory Water-Quality Data Chapter E: Groundwater Chemistry and Hexavalent Chromium Chapter F: Environmental Tracers of Groundwater Source, Age, and Geochemical Evolution Chapter G: Evaluation of Natural and Anthropogenic (Human-Made) Hexavalent Chromium Chapter H: Predevelopment Water Levels, Groundwater Recharge, and Selected Hydrologic Properties of Aquifer Materials, Hinkley and Water Valleys, California Chapter I: Sequestration and Reoxidation of Chromium in Experimental Microcosms Chapter J: Summary and Conclusions