The human impact on North American erosion, sediment transfer, and storage in a geologic context

Nature Portfolio (Springer Nature) | November 26th, 2020

The Inundation of the Salton Basin by the Colorado River and How It Was Caused

Scientific American | April 14th, 1906

If the Colorado River continues to flow through the channel which it has been occupying during the last six months, the geography of the Southwest must be radically ch

If the Colorado River continues to flow through the channel which it has been occupying during the last six months, the geography of the Southwest must be radically changed, for at the present time but little water from the river reaches the Gulf of California, which until recently has formed its main estuary. Except when the river is in flood, the bulk of the water flows into what is known as the Salton Sink in southern California-a distance of fully 160 miles from the gulf.  The new channel of the Colorado takes a northwesterly course, while the channeI it formerly occupied is nearly south. It is perhaps needless to say that this watercourse is not only one of the most important in the Southwest, but is notable for the immense volume of water which it carries, especially during the flood seasons. But the quantity of detritus which it holds in solution is enormous, and is nearly equal to that carried down by the Mississippi at certain seasons of the year, owing to the topography of the region which drains into it. An idea of the quantity of water carried by the Colorado at different times of the year can be gained, when it is stated that actual measurements indicate a flow ranging as high as 30,000 cubic feet per second. It is estimated that if the silt and other material brought down the river in the course of a year were spread evenly over a given 'surface, it would cover no less than 35,000 acres to a minimum depth of one foot. Consequently, the Colorado is almost as much of a "land maker" as the Mississippi, acting like a gigantic suction dredge in carrying away the material in its vicinity and depositing it upon the lowlands near its mouth and in the Gulf of California.

The Pulse of the Bay 2019: Pollutant Pathways

San Francisco Estuary Institute (SFEI) | September 26th, 2019

Pollutants make their way to San Francisco Bay from near and far. Some pollutants come from the other side of the world, such as the mercury that is emitted into the atmo

Pollutants make their way to San Francisco Bay from near and far. Some pollutants come from the other side of the world, such as the mercury that is emitted into the atmosphere by coal-fired power plants in Asia, transported across the Pacific Ocean by the wind, and deposited on the surface of the Bay and in the Bay watershed. Some pollutants come from the far corners of the Bay’s watershed, which encompasses 40% of the land surface of California. Mercury used in historic gold mining regions in the Sierra Nevada is still flowing downstream into Central Valley rivers, through the Delta, and into the Bay.  Most pollutants, however, originate from activities closer to home in the small, local watersheds that surround the Bay. Rain that falls onto yards, roofs, parking lots, streets, farms, pastures, and other surfaces in the watersheds picks up pollutants and carries them to the Bay through an intricate network of thousands of miles of storm drain pipes, culverts, and creeks. Most of this stormwater flows to the Bay without any form of pollutant removal.  Another parallel and intricate network of thousands of miles of pipes carries wastewater from homes, business, and industries through sewage collection systems to municipal wastewater treatment plants. These treatment plants are highly effective at removing most pollutants from the wastewater stream, but some are not effectively treated and pass through to the Bay.  Some industrial operations, such as the Bay Area’s petroleum refineries, are large enough to warrant having their own wastewater treatment facilities that remove pollutants so the effluent can be safely discharged into the Bay, reused in plant operations, or applied to land.  Disposal of dredged material at designated sites within the Bay is another activity that introduces pollutants to specific areas in the Bay, but in this case the pollutants are simply transferred from one part of the Bay to another. Much of the pollutant mass in dredged material is also removed from the Bay via disposal in the ocean or beneficial reuse in wetlands and upland sites. This edition of the Pulse of the Bay features articles on the four major pollutant pathways that are the primary focus of Bay water quality managers: municipal wastewater, industrial wastewater, stormwater, and dredging and dredged material disposal.

The Science and Prediction of Post-Fire Debris Flows in the Western United States

U.S. Forest Service (USDA) | August 1st, 2017

Debris flows are among the most destructive hydrological consequences of fires in steep watersheds. The high likelihood of catastrophic wildfires in the western U

Debris flows are among the most destructive hydrological consequences of fires in steep watersheds. The high likelihood of catastrophic wildfires in the western United States and the encroachment of human activities into steep fire-prone areas have created the need to better understand, predict, and mitigate these hazards. This article highlights recent advances in understanding post-fire debris-flow generation and provides an overview of the evolution of hazard assessments in the western United States. Specific emphasis is placed upon free, publicly available toolsdeveloped by the U.S. Geological Survey (USGS) and available for analyses in support of Burned Area Emergency Response (BAER) and Emergency Watershed Protection (EWP) program activities. These tools consist of empirical models that predict the likelihood, potential volume, and the rainfall intensity-duration thresholds for debris flows in recently burned watersheds.

The Treatment of Sediment-Carrying Mountain Streams in Europe, and its Application to California

Scientific American | September 12th, 1885

The debris question, so important to the interests of this State, is full of interesting features. It is of such intricate and complicate nature that only the most care

The debris question, so important to the interests of this State, is full of interesting features. It is of such intricate and complicate nature that only the most careful and impartial investigations of all the conditions bearing upon it can bring about its successful solution. The desire to contribute a small share to such has moved the writer to investigate what has been done in reference to sediment-carrying rivers, torrential streams, etc., in other parts of the world. The Alps in the southern and central part of Europe afford the best opportunity to study this question, as they have a great many such watercourses, which have damaged and partially continue to destroy the valleys by raising  the river bed and destroying adjoining agricultural ands by erosion or filling in. Certain portions of these, however, have been very successfully improved by comparatively simple and inexpensive means. The source of the detritus there is natural wash, and inno case hydraulic mining. In California the conditions are somewhat different, since the natural as well as the artificial source of the detritus must be considered.

Trapping of Suspended Sediment by Submerged Aquatic Vegetation in a Tidal Freshwater Region: Field Observations and Long-Term Trends

Estuaries and Coasts (Springer) | July 14th, 2020

Widespread invasion by non-native, submerged aquatic vegetation (SAV) may modify the sediment budget of an estuary, reducing the availability of inorganic sediment requir

Widespread invasion by non-native, submerged aquatic vegetation (SAV) may modify the sediment budget of an estuary, reducing the availability of inorganic sediment required by marshes to maintain their position in the tidal frame. The instantaneous trapping rate of suspended sediment in SAV patches in an estuary has not previously been quantified via field observations. In this study, flows of water and suspended sediment through patches of invasive SAV were measured at three tidally forced, freshwater sites, all located within the Sacramento-San Joaquin Delta in California. An acoustic Doppler current profiler deployed from a roving vessel provided velocity and backscatter data used to quantify fluxes of both water and suspended sediment. Sediment trapping efficiency, defined as instantaneous net trapped flux divided by incident flux, was positive in 24 of 29 cases, averaging + 5%. Coupled with 3 years of measured sediment flux data at one site, this suggests that trapping averages 3.7 kg m−2 year−1. This estimate compares favorably with the mean mass accumulation rate of 3.8 kg m−2 year−1 estimated from dated sediment cores collected at the study sites. Long-term measurements made upstream reveal a strong negative trend (− 1.8% year−1) in suspended sediment concentration, and intra-annual changes in both suspended sediment concentration and percent fines. The large footprint and high spatial density of invasive SAV coupled with declining sediment supply are diminishing downstream suspended sediment concentrations, potentially reducing the resiliency of marshes in the Delta and lower estuary to future sea-level rise.

Trends in nitrogen, phosphorus, and sediment concentrations and loads in streams draining to Lake Tahoe, California, Nevada, USA

Science of the Total Environment (Elsevier) | August 19th, 2020

Lake Tahoe, a large freshwater lake of the eastern Sierra Nevada in California and Nevada, has 63 tributaries that are sources of nutrients and sediment to the lake. The

Lake Tahoe, a large freshwater lake of the eastern Sierra Nevada in California and Nevada, has 63 tributaries that are sources of nutrients and sediment to the lake. The Tahoe watershed is relatively small, and the surface area of the lake occupies about 38% of the watershed area (1313 km2). Only about 6% of the watershed is urbanized or residential land, and as part of a plan to maintain water clarity, wastewater is exported out of the basin. The lake's clarity has been diminishing due to algae and fine sediment, prompting development of management plans. Much of the annual discharge and nutrient load to the lake results from snowmelt in the spring and summer months. To understand the relative importance of land use, climate, forest management, and other factors affecting trends in nutrient stream concentrations and loads, a Weighted Regression on Time Discharge and Season (WRTDS) model simulated these trends over a time frame of >25 years (mid-1970s to 2017). All studied locations generally show nitrate concentration and load trending down. Ammonium concentration and load initially trended down then increased continuously after 2005. Some locations show initially decreasing orthophosphate trends, followed by small significant increases in concentration and loads starting around 2000 to 2005. Total Kjeldahl nitrogen, total phosphorus and suspended sediment mostly trended downward. Overall, the trends in various forms of nitrogen were observed at most sites irrespective of the degree of development and indicate a change in ecological conditions is affecting the nitrogen cycle throughout the watershed, most likely attributable to forest aggradation and fire suppression. Ratios of bioavailable nitrogen in the form of nitrate and ammonium to orthophosphate have also trended downward during the period of record suggesting a shift of these streams from phosphorus limited to nitrogen limited.

USGS Science at Work in the Delta Estuary

U.S. Geological Survey (USGS) | November 19th, 2013

The San Francisco Bay and Sacramento-San Joaquin Delta form one of the largest estuaries in the United States. The “Bay-Delta” system provides water to more than 25 m

The San Francisco Bay and Sacramento-San Joaquin Delta form one of the largest estuaries in the United States. The “Bay-Delta” system provides water to more than 25 million California residents and vast farmlands, as well as key habitat for birds, fish, and other wildlife. To help ensure the health of this crucial estuary, the U.S. Geological Survey, in close cooperation with partner agencies and organizations, is providing science essential to addressing societal issues associated with water quantity and quality, sediment transportation, environmental contamination, animal health and status, habitat restoration, hazards, ground subsidence, and climate change.

Water and Suspended-Sediment Flux Measurements at the Golden Gate, 2016-2017

San Francisco Estuary Institute (SFEI) | December 1st, 2017

Sediment is an important resource for San Francisco Bay (SFB), in the context of restoration projects, dredging operations, ecosystem health, and contaminant transport an

Sediment is an important resource for San Francisco Bay (SFB), in the context of restoration projects, dredging operations, ecosystem health, and contaminant transport and fate. Understanding the transport and fate of sediment in SFB is important to ecosystem researchers and managers. Previous studies have shown that sediment exchange at the estuary-ocean boundary of SFB (Golden Gate inlet) is the most poorly understood element of the SFB sediment budget, owing to logistical challenges that inhibit routine field observations, and the fact that net flux is a small fraction of the instantaneous peak values experienced on a daily basis. Improved understanding of sediment exchange at the estuary-ocean boundary of SFB is essential to updating SFB-wide sediment budgets, which account for sources, sinks, and storage of sediment (and sediment-associated contaminants). In this study, field observations of water and suspended-sediment fluxes at the Golden Gate were made over one ebb tide and one flood tide on three occasions: 1) 21-22 March 2016, following a large storm event that triggered the first flow into Yolo Bypass flood control structure since 2011 2) 23 June of 2016, during a period of low freshwater inflow; 3) 27-28 February 2017, following several large storms of the wettest winter in northern California in recorded history.

World’s largest dam removal reverses coastal erosion

Nature Portfolio (Springer Nature) | September 27th, 2019