Dry Year Program (1978)

California State Water Resources Control Board (SWRCB) | January 1st, 1978

The importance of water was emphasized to all Californians during the 1975-76 water year. A high pressure system persisted off the West Coast for months, preventing Pacif

The importance of water was emphasized to all Californians during the 1975-76 water year. A high pressure system persisted off the West Coast for months, preventing Pacific storms from depositing moisture on major areas of the State. As a consequence, the 1975-76 period turned out to be the third driest water year in recorded State history, being surpassed only by the droughts of 1923-24 and 1930-31. With most of the State•s surface reservoirs substantial l y depleted and meager prospects for normal runoff, Governor Brown - on the last day of 1976 - announced an eight-point drought emergency program. In effect, the emergency program marshaled the resources and personnel of all state agencies in an effort to ease, as much as possible, the social and economic impact on Californians if the drought should continue for a second year . As it developed, 1976-77 became the driest year of record, amply justifying the Governor's foresight. The State Water Resources Control Board (State Board) role in the emergency program was to develop a program of water conservation in cooperation with the University of California; to determine the quantity of water which could be expected in critically dry areas; and to protect the priority of uses of that limited supply in accordance with the State's water rights law. This was particularly important in the case of agriculture, the State's No. 1 industry. It appeared likely that the available supply of water would not meet the needs of farms and orchards for the full growing season or meet the full demand of municipal and industrial users and instream needs. The State Board was concerned that water users would inadvertently interfere with the water rights of others unless forewarned of the extent of availability of water to them. In addition, the warnings would be conducive to early implementation of conservation measures. The State Board established the Dry Year Program as a function within its Division of Water Rights ( Division) . This program, designed to protect and enforce the priorities of users of surface water had four objectives : 1. To identify critical drought-impacted areas in Northern and Central California. 2. To provide information on water conservation and shortage to diverters in these areas. 3. To assure that the limited water supply available would be used in accordance with established rights. 4. To take enforcement action against violations of permit and license conditions, illegal diversions and waste or unreasonable use of water.

Dynamical and Thermodynamical Causes of Large-Scale Changes in the Hydrological Cycle over North America in Response to Global Warming

American Meteorological Society (AMS) | October 15th, 2014

The mechanisms of model-projected atmospheric moisture budget change across North America are exam- ined in simulations conducted with 22 models from phase 5 of t

The mechanisms of model-projected atmospheric moisture budget change across North America are exam- ined in simulations conducted with 22 models from phase 5 of the Coupled Model Intercomparison Project. Modern-day model budgets are validated against the European Centre for Medium-Range Weather Forecasts Interim Re-Analysis. In the winter half year transient eddies converge moisture across the continent while the mean flow wets the west from central California northward and dries the southwest. In the summer half year there is widespread mean flow moisture divergence across the west and convergence over the Great Plains that is offset by transient eddy divergence. In the winter half year the models project drying for the southwest and wetting to the north. Changes in the mean flow moisture convergence are largely responsible across the west but intensified transient eddy moisture convergence wets the northeast. In the summer half year widespread declines in precipitation minus evaporation (P 2 E) are supported by mean flow moisture divergence across the west and transient eddy divergence in the Great Plains. The changes in mean flow convergence are related to increases in specific humidity but also depend on changes in the mean flow including increased low-level divergence in the U.S. Southwest and a zonally varying wave that wets the North American west and east coasts in winter and dries the U.S. Southwest. Increased transient eddy fluxes occur even as low-level eddy activity weakens and arise from strengthened humidity gradients. A full explanation of North American hydroclimate changes will require ex- planation of mean and transient circulation changes and the coupling between the moisture and circulation fields.

Economic Analysis of the 2014 Drought for California Agriculture

University of California, Davis (UC Davis) | July 15th, 2014

California is enduring its third driest year on record as agricultural, urban and environmental demands for water are at an all-time high. This report presents an assessm

California is enduring its third driest year on record as agricultural, urban and environmental demands for water are at an all-time high. This report presents an assessment of the economic impacts of the 2014 drought on crop production, livestock and dairies using a suite of models.  This analysis extends the preliminary estimates of the Central Valley drought impacts released May 19, 2014 (Howitt et al. 2014) to include:  •Broadened coverage of the Statewide Agricultural Production Model (SWAP) to include majoragricultural areas on California's central and south coasts and inland farms of the Imperial,Coachella and Palo Verde valleys, •Updated SWAP agricultural production and economic impact estimates for the Central Valleyusing the most current data available, •Estimated Central Valley impacts if the drought persists through 2015 and 2016, includingeconomic effects and the impact of increasing groundwater depletion and pumping depths usingthe California Department of Water Resources’ (DWR) C2VSIM model, •Estimated fallowing of cropland due to drought using the SWAP model, •Estimated losses to dairies and livestock using a supply elasticity approach based on pasturelosses and feed crop prices, and •Comments on the preliminary draft from various state agencies. The study finds that the 2014 drought will result in a 6.6 million acre-foot reduction in surface water available to agriculture. This loss of surface water will be partially replaced by increasing groundwater pumping by 5 million acre-feet.  The resulting net water shortage of 1.6 million acre-feet will cause losses of $810 million in crop revenue and $203 million in dairy and other livestock value, plus additional groundwater pumping costs of $454 million. These direct costs to agriculture total $1.5 billion. The total statewide economic cost of the 2014 drought is $2.2 billion, with a total loss of 17,100 seasonal and part-time jobs. Table ES-1 summarizes the key findings of the study. 

Economic Analysis of the 2015 Drought for California Agriculture

University of California, Davis (UC Davis) | August 17th, 2015

In 2015 California agriculture is facing its fourth year of severe drought. As in 2014, irrigation districts and farmers are showing more resilience to the drough

In 2015 California agriculture is facing its fourth year of severe drought. As in 2014, irrigation districts and farmers are showing more resilience to the drought than many had anticipated. Groundwater substitution has again greatly reduced crop fallowing and job losses. Water trading and operational flexibility also have significantly reduced the costs of the drought, and preservation of the most valuable crops has helped buffer economic impacts. However, the effects of drought are unevenly distributed over regions. In some regions with limited groundwater reserves the economic and employment impacts are very severe. In others, there is an increased cost of expanded groundwater use which is partially offset by high crop prices. Just as the economic impacts of the drought have grown modestly since 2014, continuation of the drought to 2016 or beyond with similar intensity is likely to slowlyerode the state’s agricultural production and employment.

Economic Analysis of the 2016 California Drought on Agriculture

University of California, Davis (UC Davis) | August 15th, 2016

Persistent dry conditions over the past few years have put California’s irrigated agriculture under severe water stress. Improved precipitation during the win

Persistent dry conditions over the past few years have put California’s irrigated agriculture under severe water stress. Improved precipitation during the winter and spring of 2016, and favorable market conditions, among other factors, have improved prospects for agriculture in 2016. However, water supply restrictions for temperature, endangered species, and salinity management continue to challenge some farming regions. We present an analysis of the economic impact of the 2016 drought on California’s agriculture. The analysis relies on a suite of models and data to estimate responses to water scarcity. The Statewide Agricultural Production Model (SWAP, Howitt et al. 2012) is calibrated to average year water conditions and used to simulate the response of agriculture to changes in water availability. SWAP model output is linked to the IMPLAN input­output model and used to estimate changes in gross revenues, employment, and value added across all related sectors ofthe economy. The report is structured as follows. First, we summarize 2016 water supply conditions for agriculture. Next, we present the results of an economic analysis of impacts to agriculture using the SWAP model, and impacts to ancillary industries using the IMPLAN model. We conclude with a discussion of policy implications, limitations, and future analyses. Several appendices provide further details on groundwater availability and cost, land fallowing, consumptive use, livestock and dairies, employment, and regional economic impacts.

Economic consequences of optimized water management for a prolonged, severe drought in California

American Geophysical Union (AGU) | May 21st, 2010

If abrupt climate change has occurred in the past and may be more likely under human forcing, it is relevant to look at the adaptability of current infrastructure system

If abrupt climate change has occurred in the past and may be more likely under human forcing, it is relevant to look at the adaptability of current infrastructure systems to severe conditions of the recent past. Geologic evidence suggests two extreme droughts in California during the last few thousand years, each 120–200 years long, with mean annual streamflows 40%–60% of the historical mean. This study synthesized a 72-year drought with half of mean historical inflows using random sampling of historical dry years. One synthetic hydrological record is used, and sensitivity to different interpretations of the paleo record is not evaluated. Economic effects and potential adaptation of California’s water supply system in 2020 to this drought is explored using a hydro-economic optimization model. The model considers how California could respond to such an extreme drought using water trading and provides best‐case estimates of economic costs and effects on water operations and demands. Results illustrate the ability of extensive, intertied, and flexible water systems with heterogeneous water demands to respond to severe stress. The study follows a different approach to climate change impact studies, focusing on past climate changes from the paleorecord rather than downscaled general circulation model results to provide plausible hydrologic scenarios. Adaptations suggested for the sustained drought are similar for dry forms of climate warming in California and are expensive but not catastrophic for the overall economy but would impose severe burdens on the agricultural sector and environmental water uses.

Economic Impacts of the 2020–22 Drought on California Agriculture

University of California, Merced (UC Merced) | November 22nd, 2022

California just ended its third consecutive year of drought, resulting in the driest three-year period in the instrumental record. Multi-year deficits in precipitation in

California just ended its third consecutive year of drought, resulting in the driest three-year period in the instrumental record. Multi-year deficits in precipitation in the state’s usually wetter northern regions have been compounded by increased crop evaporative demands, leading to water scarcity impacts to agriculture across the state. Although 2020 was a dry year, water reserves stored during the wetter years of 2017 and 2019 greatly diminished drought impacts during that year. The water outlook changed rapidly in 2021—the third driest water year on record with the highest evaporative demand. The northern regions of the state—including the Sacramento Valley, the Scott and Shasta valleys, the Pit River valleys (northern intermountain valleys), and the Russian River—faced unusually dry conditions. Drought emergency conditions in 2021 were proclaimed first in the Russian River, Scott River and Shasta River basins, which faced subsequent curtailments. Water curtailments were extended to the Sacramento Valley later in the season. Water for local agriculture, ecosystems, exports, and water quality protection in the Sacramento-San Joaquin Delta were compromised by low water reserves. Atmospheric rivers in October and December 2021 provided temporary drought relief for a portion of the state, but record low precipitation from January-September allowed for extreme drought conditions to reign into the 2022 water year. To overcome persistent precipitation deficits and below-average storage in major reservoirs, the state again implemented water rights curtailments and low water deliveries from the State Water Project. The US Bureau of Reclamation announced reduced Central Valley Project deliveries—including unprecedented cutbacks to senior contractors in the Sacramento Valley—and local agencies implemented cutbacks as a first tier of drought response measures. Compared with the 2021 water year, however, 2022 brought less severe water cutbacks in the San Joaquin Valley. This report provides estimates of the economic impacts to agriculture for first three years of the current drought, which began in 2020. We use a combination of climate, hydrologic, agricultural and economic models, supplemented by informal surveys of irrigation districts and remote sensing data. The study includes nearly 88% of the 8.7 million acres of irrigated crop area in the state (LandIQ, 2019) excluding idle land. Our preliminary analysis for 2020–21 (Medellín-Azuara et al. 2022), focused on the Central Valley, and also examined the Russian River basin (North Coast), and northern intermountain valleys in Siskiyou, Shasta, and Modoc counties. Here, we expanded our spatial coverage to include the Central Coast, South Coast, and Colorado River.

Economic tradeoff between domestic well impact and reduced agricultural production with groundwater drought management: Tulare County, California (USA), case study

Hydrogeology Journal (Springer) | November 8th, 2021

Formal policy analysis can aid resource management where groundwater is used intensively. Approaches for developing equitable and effective pumping allocations for drough

Formal policy analysis can aid resource management where groundwater is used intensively. Approaches for developing equitable and effective pumping allocations for drought are evaluated in the context of the 2012–2016 drought in Tulare County, California, USA. Potential economic impacts of policy alternatives on two user groups with conflicting interests are considered. Tradeoffs between losses of agricultural profit and response costs for domestic wells that run dry are estimated for various maximum groundwater depth policies. A welfare maximizing approach for identifying policies that limit depth to groundwater is evaluated and found to be ineffective because agricultural opportunity costs are much larger than domestic well costs. Adding a fee for additional drought groundwater pumping is proposed as a more impactful and balanced management policy approach. For the case study presented, a fee range of $300 to $600/acre-foot ($300–$600/1,233 m3) yielded an effective groundwater management policy for reducing domestic well impacts from drought and balancing agricultural impacts of drought with the need to replenish additional drought pumping in wetter years. Recent management policies enacted in the study area agree with this finding. These results may provide a useful perspective for analytically examining and developing groundwater management policies near the study area and elsewhere.

Effects of high temperatures on threatened estuarine fishes during periods of extreme drought

Journal of Experimental Biology (The Company of Biologists) | March 1st, 2016

Climate change and associated increases in water temperatures may impact physiological performance in ectotherms and exacerbate endangered species declines. We used an in

Climate change and associated increases in water temperatures may impact physiological performance in ectotherms and exacerbate endangered species declines. We used an integrative approach to assess the impact of elevated water temperature on two fishes of immediate conservation concern in a large estuary system, the threatened longfin smelt (Spirinchus thaleichthys) and endangered delta smelt (Hypomesus transpacificus). Abundances have reached record lows in California, USA, and these populations are at imminent risk of extirpation. California is currently impacted by a severe drought, resulting in high water temperatures, conditions that will become more common as a result of climate change. We exposed fish to environmentally relevant temperatures (14°C and 20°C) and used RNA sequencing to examine the transcriptome-wide responses to elevated water temperature in both species. Consistent with having a lower temperature tolerance, longfin smelt exhibited a pronounced cellular stress response, with an upregulation of heat shock proteins, after exposure to 20°C that was not observed in delta smelt. We detected an increase in metabolic rate in delta smelt at 20°C and increased expression of genes involved in metabolic processes and protein synthesis, patterns not observed in longfin smelt. Through examination of responses across multiple levels of biological organization, and by linking these responses to habitat distributions in the wild, we demonstrate that longfin smelt may be more susceptible than delta smelt to increases in temperatures, and they have little room to tolerate future warming in California. Understanding the species-specific physiological responses of sensitive species to environmental stressors is crucial for conservation efforts and managing aquatic systems globally.

Emergency Drought Barriers

Delta Stewardship Council (Delta Council) | April 26th, 2022