Shop – California Water Library

Page

Showing
91-101 of 128

Per Page

Sort By

Quantifying the Eroded Volume of Mercury-Contaminated Sediment Using Terrestrial Laser Scanning at Stocking Flat, Deer Creek, Nevada County, California, 2010–13

U.S. Geological Survey (USGS) | July 7th, 2016

Summary

High-resolution ground-based light detection and ranging (lidar), also known as terrestrial laser scanning, was used to quantify the volume of mercury-contaminated sedime

High-resolution ground-based light detection and ranging (lidar), also known as terrestrial laser scanning, was used to quantify the volume of mercury-contaminated sediment eroded from a stream cutbank at Stocking Flat along Deer Creek in the Sierra Nevada foothills, about 3 kilometers west of Nevada City, California. Terrestrial laser scanning was used to collect sub-centimeter, three-dimensional images of the complex cutbank surface, which could not be mapped non-destructively or in sufficient detail with traditional surveying techniques. The stream cutbank, which is approximately 50 meters long and 8 meters high, was surveyed on four occasions: December 1, 2010; January 20, 2011; May 12, 2011; and February 4, 2013. Volumetric changes were determined between the sequential, three-dimensional lidar surveys. Volume was calculated by two methods, and the average value is reported. Between the first and second surveys (December 1, 2010, to January 20, 2011), a volume of 143 plus or minus 15 cubic meters of sediment was eroded from the cutbank and mobilized by Deer Creek. Between the second and third surveys (January 20, 2011, to May 12, 2011), a volume of 207 plus or minus 24 cubic meters of sediment was eroded from the cutbank and mobilized by the stream. Total volumetric change during the winter and spring of 2010–11 was 350 plus or minus 28 cubic meters. Between the third and fourth surveys (May 12, 2011, to February 4, 2013), the differencing of the three-dimensional lidar data indicated that a volume of 18 plus or minus 10 cubic meters of sediment was eroded from the cutbank. The total volume of sediment eroded from the cutbank between the first and fourth surveys was 368 plus or minus 30 cubic meters.

View Document Download Now Email

Recent advances in understanding flow dynamics and transport of water-quality constituents in the Sacramento–San Joaquin River Delta

University of California, Davis (UC Davis) | December 1st, 2016

Summary

This chapter describes advances during the past decade in understanding flow dynamics and how water-quality constituents, such as salinity, heat, oxygen, nutrients, conta

This chapter describes advances during the past decade in understanding flow dynamics and how water-quality constituents, such as salinity, heat, oxygen, nutrients, contaminants, and more, move within California’s Sacramento-San Joaquin River Delta. Water-quality constituents are affected by water diversions and other human manipulations of flow and they greatly affect the quantity and quality of habitats in the Delta. Along with human intervention, the Pacific Ocean, the Central Valley watershed, and the atmosphere, are a few drivers of flow and transport in the Delta. These drivers provide a conceptual framework for presenting recent findings. The tremendous expansion of acoustic and optical instruments utilized in the Delta over the past decade has greatly improved our understanding of how tidal variability affects flow and transport. Sediment is increasingly viewed as a diminishing resource needed to sustain habitat and tidal marsh, especially as sea level rises. Connections between the watershed, Delta, and San Francisco Bay that have been studied recently highlight that a landscape view of this system is needed rather than consideration of each region individually. Interactions of multiple drivers and information gaps are discussed.

View Document Download Now Email

Regional Monitoring Program (RMP) for Water Quality in the San Francisco Bay, Multi-Year Plan 2020 Annual Update

San Francisco Estuary Institute (SFEI) | January 6th, 2020

Summary

In 1992 the San Francisco Bay Regional Water Board passed Resolution No. 92-043 directing the Executive Officer to send a letter to regulated dischargers requiring the

In 1992 the San Francisco Bay Regional Water Board passed Resolution No. 92-043 directing the Executive Officer to send a letter to regulated dischargers requiring them to implement a regional multi-media pollutant monitoring program for water quality (RMP) in San Francisco Bay. The Water Board’s regulatory authority to require such a program comes from California Water Code Sections 13267, 13383, 13268 and 13385. The Water Board offered to suspend some effluent and local receiving water monitoring requirements for individual discharges to provide cost savings to implement baseline portions of the RMP, although they recognized additional resources would be necessary. The Resolution also included a provision that the requirement for a RMP be included in discharger permits. The RMP began in 1993, and over ensuing years has been a successful and effective partnership of regulatory agencies and the regulated community.

View Document Download Now Email

Resilient landscape vision for Lower Walnut Creek

San Francisco Estuary Institute (SFEI) | November 30th, 2016

Summary

Lower Walnut Creek (Contra Costa County, CA) and its surrounding landscape have undergone considerable land reclamation and development since the mid-nineteenth century.

Lower Walnut Creek (Contra Costa County, CA) and its surrounding landscape have undergone considerable land reclamation and development since the mid-nineteenth century. In 1965, the lower 22 miles of Walnut Creek and the lower reaches of major tributaries were converted to flood control channels to protect the surrounding developed land. In the recent past, sediment was periodically removed from the lower Walnut Creek Flood Control Channel to provide flow capacity and necessary flood protection. Due to the wildlife impacts and costs associated with this practice, the Contra Costa County Flood Control and Water Conservation District (District) is now seeking a new channel management approach that works with natural processes and benefits people and wildlife in a cost-effective manner. Flood Control 2.0 project scientists and a Regional Science Advisory Team (RSAT) worked with the District to develop a long-term management Vision for lower Walnut Creek that could result in a multi-benefit landscape that restores lost habitat and is resilient under a changing climate. Development of the Vision began with technical analyses focused on understanding past and present landscape functioning and the changes to key processes and landscape features over the past 150 to 200 years. The key findings from these analyses include the following: • Landscape change – During the mid-19th century, lower Walnut Creek was surrounded by a continuous expanse of tidal wetlands occupying approximately 5,000 acres. Perennial freshwater marsh, willow thicket, and alkali meadow formed a large non-tidal wetland complex that adjoined the tidal marsh on its southern end. Over the past century and a half, the non-tidal wetland complex has been lost completely and the tidal wetland area has decreased by 40%. The remaining marsh areas are highly fragmented and cut-off from Walnut Creek by engineered levees. The loss of tidal wetland area has resulted in a substantial decrease in tidal prism and contributed to current in-channel sediment accumulation issues. Around the mouth of Walnut Creek, sediment accumulation has caused the position of the shoreline to expand into the Bay by up to half a mile. • Sediment accumulation – Since 1965, approximately 1.4M cubic yards of sediment have been removed from lower Walnut Creek, with approximately 70% coming from the tidal zone downstream of head of tide (i.e., the inland extent of tidal inundation at mean higher high water). Repeat channel cross-section surveys indicate that the channel quickly fills in with sediment following dredging events (due in large part to decreased tidal prism and associated channel scour capacity) and that the channel bed elevation is currently at or near “quasi-equilibrium.” A channel sediment budget for 1965-2007 indicates that approximately 80% of the watershed-derived sediment made it through lower Walnut Creek and out to the Bay, while the remaining 20% was likely deposited directly following channel construction and subsequent dredging events.

View Document Download Now Email

Resilient Landscape Vision for Lower Walnut Creek: Baseline Information and Management Strategies

San Francisco Estuary Institute (SFEI) | November 1st, 2016

Summary

Lower Walnut Creek (Contra Costa County, CA) and its surrounding landscape have undergone considerable land reclamation and development since the mid-nineteenth century.

View Document Download Now Email

Resilient Landscape Vision for the Calabazas Creek, San Tomas Aquino Creek, and Pond A8 Area: Bayland-Creek Reconnection Opportunities

San Francisco Estuary Institute (SFEI) | May 1st, 2018

Summary

This report proposes a multi-faceted redesign of the South San Francisco Bay shoreline at the interface with Calabazas and San Tomas Aquino creeks. Recognizing the opport

This report proposes a multi-faceted redesign of the South San Francisco Bay shoreline at the interface with Calabazas and San Tomas Aquino creeks. Recognizing the opportunities presented by changing land use and new challenges, such as accelerated sea-level rise, we explore in this report a reconfigured shoreline that could improve ecosystem health and resilience, reduce maintenance costs, and protect surrounding infrastructure.

View Document Download Now Email

Reversal in estuarine sand supply driven by Holocene sea level rise: A model for sand transport in large structural estuaries, San Francisco Bay, California, USA

Elsevier | July 26th, 2024

Summary

Coastal sand supply is a critical component of shoreline stability in the face of modern threats to coastal zones such as sea level rise or anthropogenic sediment extract

Coastal sand supply is a critical component of shoreline stability in the face of modern threats to coastal zones such as sea level rise or anthropogenic sediment extraction. Understanding the natural and anthropogenically perturbed dynamics of coastal systems has become a pressing challenge for coastal communities, such as the San Francisco Bay area in the United Sates, a large structurally controlled estuary system where stakeholders seek to balance the extraction of coastal sand resources for economic use and ensure sufficient sand supply for sustaining natural coastal environments. Developing accurate and comprehensive models of sand inputs and transport pathways in different types of coastal systems is imperative to balancing these competing needs. While estuarine sediment transport has been well-studied in many systems globally, structurally controlled estuaries in tectonically active settings have received relatively less attention. The prevailing hypothesis for sediment transport through San Francisco Bay describes active input and transport of sand from a large integrated regional catchment, through multiple subembayments, and out to Pacific coast beaches; a model contrary to prevailing understanding of highstand estuarine sediment transport in most settings. We test this model by applying comprehensive sand provenance analysis to surface and near-surface sand deposits in and around San Francisco Bay coupled with sand residence time data from optically stimulated luminescence (OSL) dating. New provenance results include sand petrography modal abundances, bulk geochemistry, and U-Pb detrital zircon geochronology from 27 Holocene samples throughout the San Francisco Bay region. Collectively, these new results highlight marked sediment provenance and residence time differences between San Francisco Bay structural subembayments. In particular, distinct compositional differences and OSL ages exist between sand in the bayhead region of the estuary (OSL ages ca. 4 ka; Sacramento River/local provenance) and sand from the more distal bay regions and the Pacific coast (OSL ages ca. 1 ka; integrated Sierra Nevada provenance). These provenance differences better support a revised sand input and transport model with disconnected depocenters across three structurally restricted subembayments from bayhead to the Pacific coast. New data suggest that at present the bayhead region receives limited supply from the Sacramento-San Joaquin Delta drainage with subsidiary supply from local circum-bay drainages. Sand deposited in the region from the Pacific coast through the inlet (Golden Gate) and into the estuary consists of a combination of tidal winnowing and reworking of “relic” sand from lowstand periods combined with sand eroded from Pacific coast sea cliffs, and sand supply from local Coast Range drainages. These results suggest that sand is likely not transported directly to the Pacific coast from the Sacramento-San Joaquin Delta under modern conditions. Moreover, it is likely that structural constrictions between the main estuary and outer coast and between estuary subembayments cause abrupt cessation of sediment input from the main regional drainage during marine flooding, a feature likely common to large structurally controlled estuaries globally. This revised model for San Francisco Bay sand transport illustrates the need for research targeted at interpreting natural sand transport pathways in coastal systems where coarse sediment supply is a sustainability concern.

View Document Download Now Email

River Floods Under Wetter Antecedent Conditions Deliver Coarser Sediment to the Coast

American Geophysical Union (AGU) | April 13th, 2025

Summary

Increasing hydrologic volatility—more extreme rain, and larger variations between wet and dry years—has become apparent in some regions, but few data exist to determi

Increasing hydrologic volatility—more extreme rain, and larger variations between wet and dry years—has become apparent in some regions, but few data exist to determine how intensifying hydrologic extremes affect sedimentary systems. Using uniquely high-resolution records of fluvial suspended sediment and coastal morphology, we quantify sedimentary responses from a steep, 357-km2 watershed in California under extreme wet and dry hydrologic conditions. In years with multiple 2- to 10-year floods, fluvial sediment coarsened significantly as the wet season progressed, with late-season floods delivering dominantly sand-sized material to the coast. Greater and coarser sediment supply under wetter antecedent conditions affected nearshore geomorphic evolution for 4–5 years. The watershed and coastal changes we documented point to an increasing role of sediment-related hazards (flooding and hillslope erosion) and resources (nearshore accretion) as wet seasons intensify.

View Document Download Now Email

Sand Supply to San Francisco Bay from the Sacramento and San Joaquin Rivers of the Central Valley, California

U.S. Geological Survey (USGS) | October 30th, 2024

Summary

Sediment from the Central Valley via the Sacramento-San Joaquin Delta (Delta) and Suisun Bay is a primary source of sand to San Francisco Bay, California. Sand is mined f

Sediment from the Central Valley via the Sacramento-San Joaquin Delta (Delta) and Suisun Bay is a primary source of sand to San Francisco Bay, California. Sand is mined from San Francisco Bay for commercial purposes, such as for use in concrete for construction. To better understand the supply of sand to Suisun Bay and San Francisco Bay, the U.S. Geological Survey (USGS), in cooperation with the San Francisco Bay Estuary Institute (SFEI) and the San Francisco Bay Conservation Development Commission (BCDC), initiated this study to compile and synthesize historical data and estimate the total sediment and sand portion of sediment exiting the Delta to Suisun Bay for a 20-year period between water years 2001 and 2020.

View Document Download Now Email

SediMatch Factsheet

San Francisco Estuary Institute (SFEI) | June 1st, 2018

Summary

SediMatch is a collaborative program of the San Francisco Bay Joint Venture (SFBJV), the San Francisco Bay Conservation and Development Commission (BCDC), the San Franc

SediMatch is a collaborative program of the San Francisco Bay Joint Venture (SFBJV), the San Francisco Bay Conservation and Development Commission (BCDC), the San Francisco Estuary Institute (SFEI), the San Francisco Estuary Partnership (SFEP), and others to bring together the wetland habitat restoration, flood control, and dredging communities to discuss challenges and find mutually beneficial strategies to increase reuse of dredged sediment at habitat restoration sites.

View Document Download Now Email

← Prev

Page : 10

Type

Best Management Practice (1)
California Water Plan (1)
Case study (2)
Conference proceedings (2)
Fact sheet (5)
Handbook/Guide (1)
Journal Article (34)
Letter (3)
magazine (15)
Model (11)
Plan (2)
Report (60)
Research Article (2)
Strategy (2)
Technical Report (3)
White Paper (1)

Topic

Agriculture (1)
Climate Change (12)
Ecosystem & Species Management (35)
Ecosystem Restoration (26)
Estuary News (15)
Federal Water Quality (1)
Fisheries (7)
Flood Management (22)
Geochemistry (1)
Geochemistry (1)
Geohydrology (10)
Geohydrology (2)
Groundwater (2)
History (7)
Infrastructure (7)
Integrated Regional Water Management (1)
Invasive Species (1)
Landscape Reform (1)
Levees (2)
Modeling (12)
Non Point Pollution Sources (2)
People & Water (1)
Planning & Management (13)
Pollutants (18)
Sacramento-San Joaquin Delta (56)
Salinity (2)
State Water Quality (2)
Storage (8)
Stormwater (8)
Uncategorized (1)
Upper Watershed Management (8)
Water & Energy (1)
Water Project Operations (7)
Water Quality (61)
Water Quality Monitoring (33)
Water Supply (4)
Wetland Mitigation (20)

Keywords

agricultural drainage (2)
agriculture (2)
agriculture water use and efficiency (1)
allocations (1)
anadromous fish (1)
atmospheric rivers (2)
benthic macroinvertebrates (5)
bioassessment (1)
California Water Plan (2)
Central Valley (1)
climate change (12)
Colorado River (6)
dam removal (1)
debris flow (6)
Delta conveyance (1)
ecosystem management (18)
ecosystem restoration (4)
environmental justice (1)
Estuary News (15)
fisheries (10)
flood management (22)
floodplain restoration (17)
flows (5)
Groundwater Exchange (1)
habitat restoration (6)
history (6)
infrastructure (7)
invasive species (1)
irrigation (1)
land use (10)
levees (6)
managed aquifer recharge (MAR) (1)
mercury (8)
microplastics (3)
modeling (12)
monitoring (32)
native fish (6)
nutrients (1)
pesticides (3)
planning and management (4)
poll (1)
pollutants (25)
recycled water (2)
risk assessment (4)
Sacramento–San Joaquin Delta (59)
salinity (2)
Salton Sea (2)
science management (4)
sea level rise (8)
sediment (128)
snowpack (1)
State Water Project (SWP) (1)
storage (8)
stormwater (6)
streams (6)
subsidence (2)
Surface Water Ambient Monitoring Program (SWAMP) (1)
upper watershed management (3)
wastewater (5)
water and energy (1)
water project operations (4)
water quality (61)
water rights (1)
water supply (4)
water supply forecasting (1)
water transfers (1)
wetlands (15)
wildfire (1)

Publisher

American Association for the Advancement of Science (AAAS) (2)
American Chemical Society (ACS) (1)
American Geophysical Union (AGU) (5)
American Society of Civil Engineers (ASCE) (1)
California Department of Fish and Wildlife (CDFW) (1)
California Department of Water Resources (DWR) (2)
California State University, Monterey Bay (CSUMB) (1)
California State Water Resources Control Board (SWRCB) (1)
Chemosphere (Elsevier) (1)
Ecological Society of America (Wiley) (2)
Elsevier (1)
Estuaries and Coasts (Springer) (3)
Frontiers in Water (Frontiers) (1)
Heliyon (Elsevier) (1)
Journal of Hydrology (Elsevier) (1)
Journal of Paleolimnology (Springer) (1)
National Marine Fisheries Service (NMFS) (1)
Nature Portfolio (Springer Nature) (8)
PLOS (1)
Public Policy Institute of California (PPIC) (1)
River Research and Applications (Wiley) (1)
San Francisco Estuary Institute (SFEI) (36)
San Francisco Estuary Partnership (SFEP) (14)
Science of the Total Environment (Elsevier) (2)
Scientific American (2)
Sedimentary Geology (Elsevier) (1)
U.S. Bureau of Reclamation (USBR) (1)
U.S. Forest Service (USDA) (1)
U.S. Geological Survey (USGS) (24)
U.S. Global Change Research Program (1)
University of California, Davis (UC Davis) (3)
Utah State University (1)
Ventura County Watershed Protection District (1)
Water Resources Research, American Geophysical Union (AGU) (1)
Water, Multidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute (MDPI) (1)

Basin

Chemehuevi Valley 7-043 (1)
Coachella Valley - Desert Hot Springs 7-021.03 (1)
Coachella Valley - Indio 7-021.01 (1)
Coachella Valley - Mission Creek 7-021.02 (1)
Coachella Valley - San Gorgonio Pass 7-021.04 (1)
Downtown 2-040 (1)
Eel River Valley 1-010 (1)
Gilroy-Hollister Valley - Llagas Area 3-003.01 (1)
Middle Amargosa Valley - 6-020 (1)
Napa-Sonoma Valley - Napa-Sonoma Lowlands 2-002.03 (1)
Needles Valley 7-044 (1)
Petaluma Valley 2-001 (1)
Pittsburgh Plain 2-004 (1)
Santa Clara Valley - Santa Clara 2-009.02 (1)

Hydrological Region

Central Coast (11)
Colorado River (9)
Lower Basin States and Mexico - Colorado River (12)
National (10)
North Coast (16)
North Lahontan (6)
Sacramento River (41)
San Francisco Bay (75)
San Joaquin River (35)
South Coast (14)
South Lahontan (7)
Tulare Lake (7)
Upper Basin States - Colorado River (6)

Reset

Search for:

CONTACT