Groundwater Management and Safe Drinking Water in the San Joaquin Valley

Water Foundation | June 2nd, 2020

Groundwater Management Principles and Strategies to Monitor, Analyze and Minimize Impacts to Drinking Water Wells: A Framework for State Action to Support Drought Resilient Communities

California Department of Water Resources (DWR) | December 15th, 2021

This framework was developed in response to support drinking water access for groundwater-dependent communities.

This framework was developed in response to support drinking water access for groundwater-dependent communities.

Groundwater Simulation and Management Models for the Upper Klamath Basin, Oregon and California

U.S. Geological Survey (USGS) | May 5th, 2012

The upper Klamath Basin encompasses about 8,000 square miles, extending from the Cascade Range east to the Basin and Range geologic province in south-central Oregon and n

The upper Klamath Basin encompasses about 8,000 square miles, extending from the Cascade Range east to the Basin and Range geologic province in south-central Oregon and northern California. The geography of the basin is dominated by forested volcanic uplands separated by broad interior basins. Most of the interior basins once held broad shallow lakes and extensive wetlands, but most of these areas have been drained or otherwise modified and are now cultivated. Major parts of the interior basins are managed as wildlife refuges, primarily for migratory waterfowl. The permeable volcanic bedrock of the upper Klamath Basin hosts a substantial regional groundwater system that provides much of the flow to major streams and lakes that, in turn, provide water for wildlife habitat and are the principal source of irrigation water for the basin’s agricultural economy. Increased allocation of surface water for endangered species in the past decade has resulted in increased groundwater pumping and growing interest in the use of groundwater for irrigation. The potential effects of increased groundwater pumping on groundwater levels and discharge to springs and streams has caused concern among groundwater users, wildlife and Tribal interests, and State and Federal resource managers. To provide information on the potential impacts of increased groundwater development, and to aid in the development of a groundwater management strategy, the U.S. Geological Survey, in collaboration with the Oregon Water Resources Department and the Bureau of Reclamation, has developed a groundwater model that can simulate the response of the hydrologic system to these new stresses. The groundwater model was developed using the U.S. Geological Survey MODFLOW finite-difference modeling code and calibrated using inverse methods to transient conditions from 1989 through 2004 with quarterly stress periods. Groundwater recharge and agricultural and municipal pumping are specified for each stress period. All major streams and most major tributaries for which a substantial part of the flow comes from groundwater discharge are included in the model. Groundwater discharge to agricultural drains, evapotranspiration from aquifers in areas of shallow groundwater, and groundwater flow to and from adjacent basins also are simulated in key areas. The model has the capability to calculate the effects of pumping and other external stresses on groundwater levels, discharge to streams, and other boundary fluxes, such as discharge to drains. Historical data indicate that the groundwater system in the upper Klamath Basin fluctuates in response to decadal climate cycles, with groundwater levels and spring flows rising and declining in response to wet and dry periods. Data also show that groundwater levels fluctuate seasonally and interannually in response to groundwater pumping. The most prominent response is to the marked increase in groundwater pumping starting in 2001. The calibrated model is able to simulate observed decadal-scale climate-driven fluctuations in the groundwater system as well as observed shorter-term pumping-related fluctuations. Example model simulations show that the timing and location of the effects of groundwater pumping vary markedly depending on the pumping location. Pumping from wells close (within a few miles) to groundwater discharge features, such as springs, drains, and certain streams, can affect those features within weeks or months of the onset of pumping, and the impacts can be essentially fully manifested in several years. Simulations indicate that seasonal variations in pumping rates are buffered by the groundwater system, and peak impacts are closer to mean annual pumping rates than to instantaneous rates. Thus, pumping effects are, to a large degree, spread out over the entire year. When pumping locations are distant (more than several miles) from discharge features, the effects take many years or decades to fully impact those features, and much of the pumped water comes from groundwater storage over a broad geographic area even after two decades. Moreover, because the effects are spread out over a broad area, the impacts to individual features are much smaller than in the case of nearby pumping. Simulations show that the discharge features most affected by pumping in the area of the Bureau of Reclamation’s Klamath Irrigation Project are agricultural drains, and impacts to other surface-water features are small in comparison. A groundwater management model was developed that uses techniques of constrained optimization along with the groundwater flow model to identify the optimal strategy to meet water user needs while not violating defined constraints on impacts to groundwater levels and streamflows. The coupled groundwater simulation-optimization models were formulated to help identify strategies to meet water demand in the upper Klamath Basin. The models maximize groundwater pumping while simultaneously keeping the detrimental impacts of pumping on groundwater levels and groundwater discharge within prescribed limits. Total groundwater withdrawals were calculated under alternative constraints for 2 Groundwater Simulation and Management Models for the Upper Klamath Basin, Oregon and California drawdown, reductions in groundwater discharge to surface water, and water demand to understand the potential benefits and limitations for groundwater development in the upper Klamath Basin. The simulation-optimization model for the upper Klamath Basin provides an improved understanding of how the groundwater and surface-water system responds to sustained groundwater pumping within the Bureau of Reclamation’s Klamath Project. Optimization model results demonstrate that a certain amount of supplemental groundwater pumping can occur without exceeding defined limits on drawdown and stream capture. The results of the different applications of the model demonstrate the importance of identifying constraint limits in order to better define the amount and distribution of groundwater withdrawal that is sustainable.

Groundwater sustainability and land subsidence in California’s Central Valley

Water (MDPI) | April 22nd, 2024

The Central Valley of California is one of the most prolific agricultural regions in the world. Agriculture is reliant on the conjunctive use of surface-water and groundw

The Central Valley of California is one of the most prolific agricultural regions in the world. Agriculture is reliant on the conjunctive use of surface-water and groundwater. The lack of available surface-water and land-use changes have led to pumping-induced groundwater-level and storage declines, land subsidence, changes to streamflow and the environment, and the degradation of water quality. As a result, in part, the Sustainable Groundwater Management Act (SGMA) was developed. An examination of the components of SGMA and contextualizing regional model applications within the SGMA framework was undertaken to better understand and quantify many of the components of SGMA. Specifically, the U.S. Geological Survey (USGS) updated the Central Valley Hydrologic Model (CVHM) to assess hydrologic system responses to climatic variation, surface-water availability, land-use changes, and groundwater pumping. MODFLOW-OWHM has been enhanced to simulate the timing of land subsidence and attribute its inelastic and elastic portions. In addition to extending CVHM through 2019, the new version, CVHM2, includes several enhancements as follows: managed aquifer recharge (MAR), pumping with multi-aquifer wells, inflows from ungauged watersheds, and more detailed water-balance subregions, streamflow network, diversions, tile drains, land use, aquifer properties, and groundwater level and land subsidence observations. Combined with historical approximations, CVHM2 estimates approximately 158 km3 of storage loss in the Central Valley from pre-development to 2019. About 15% of the total storage loss is permanent loss of storage from subsidence that has caused damage to infrastructure. Climate extremes will likely complicate the efforts of water managers to store more water in the ground. CVHM2 can provide data in the form of aggregated input datasets, simulate climatic variations and changes, land-use changes or water management scenarios, and resulting changes in groundwater levels, storage, and land subsidence to assist decision-makers in the conjunctive management of water supplies.

Groundwater Sustainability Assessments: A Review of the Department of Water Resources’ Determinations on Groundwater Sustainability Plans in Critically Overdrafted Basins

Groundwater Leadership Forum (GLF) | August 31st, 2022

Of the 46 GSPs submitted in January 2020, the Department of Water Resources (DWR) determined eight GSPs to be adequate and 34 GSPs to be incomplete. In this paper we eval

Of the 46 GSPs submitted in January 2020, the Department of Water Resources (DWR) determined eight GSPs to be adequate and 34 GSPs to be incomplete. In this paper we evaluate to what extent DWR’s determinations provide oversight on the key issues of drinking water, disadvantaged communities, the environment, stakeholder involvement,and climate change. We summarize the corrective actions that DWR is recommending or requiring, as well as compare DWR’s determinations to the assessment of 31 GSPs that we conducted in 2020. We also reviewed the 11 comment letters submitted by the State Water Resources Control Board (SWRCB), 25 comment letters submitted by the California Department of Fish and Wildlife (CDFW), and seven comment letters submitted by the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration’s National Marine Fisheries Service (NMFS) to compare deficiencies identified in GSPs across agencies.

Groundwater Sustainability Plan for the Las Posas Valley Basin

Fox Canyon Groundwater Management Agency (FCGMA) | December 13th, 2019

The Fox Canyon Groundwater Management Agency (FCGMA, or the Agency), has developed this Groundwater Sustainability Plan (GSP) for the Las Posas Valley Basin (LPVB; DWR B

The Fox Canyon Groundwater Management Agency (FCGMA, or the Agency), has developed this Groundwater Sustainability Plan (GSP) for the Las Posas Valley Basin (LPVB; DWR Basin 4-008) in compliance with the 2014 Sustainable Groundwater Management Act (SGMA) (California Water Code, Section 10720 et seq.). FCGMA is one of three Groundwater Sustainability Agencies (GSAs) in the LPVB. The other two GSAs are the Camrosa Water District GSA–Las Posas Valley and the Las Posas Valley Outlying Areas GSA. This GSP is the sole GSP prepared for the LPVB, and covers the entire LPVB, including all areas of the LPVB outside of FCGMA’s jurisdiction. The purpose of this GSP is to define the conditions under which the groundwater resources of the entire LPVB, which support agricultural, municipal and industrial, and environmental uses, will be managed sustainably in the future. Although the California Department of Water Resources (DWR) has defined the LPVB as a single groundwater basin, the western and eastern parts of the basin are hydraulically separated from each other by the Somis Fault, a geologic feature that inhibits groundwater flow across it. As a result, groundwater conditions on the west side of the fault in the Fox Canyon Aquifer and Grimes Canyon Aquifer, two primary aquifers in the LPVB, differ from conditions on the east side of the fault. Furthermore, the Epworth Gravels Aquifer, located on the east side of the fault is hydrologically separated from the Fox Canyon Aquifer and Grimes Canyon Aquifer. Hydrologic differences in the controls on, and responses to, both recharge and groundwater production necessitate the definition of three separate management areas in the LPVB. These three management areas are the West Las Posas Management Area (WLPMA), the East Las Posas Management Area (ELPMA), and the Epworth Gravels Management Area. The hydrologic conditions, sustainable yield, and sustainability criteria are discussed and defined by management area throughout this GSP. Historical groundwater production in the LPVB has resulted in chronic declines in groundwater levels and loss of groundwater in storage in parts of each of the three management areas. In the WLPMA, the average rate of groundwater production between 2015 and 2017 was approximately 14,000 acre-feet per year (AFY). In the ELPMA and the Epworth Gravels Management Area, the average rate of groundwater production between 2015 and 2017 was approximately 20,500 AFY and 1,500 AFY, respectively. Numerical groundwater simulations indicate that if these production rates were carried into the future, groundwater elevations in each of the management areas of the LPVB would not recover during multi-year cycles of drought and recovery. In order to determine the sustainable yield of each management area, combinations of projects and management actions were explored to estimate the rate of groundwater production that would prevent chronic declines in groundwater elevation and ongoing loss of groundwater storage in the future. Additionally, in the WLPMA, the numerical groundwater model simulations were used to assess the influence of groundwater conditions on the adjacent Oxnard Subbasin. In the ELPMA, numerical groundwater simulations were also used to assess zones of the Fox Canyon Aquifer that are most prone to conversion from confined to unconfined conditions. The rate of groundwater production that avoids chronic water level declines, loss of storage, potential land subsidence, and impacts to adjacent basins is referred to as the sustainable yield for each management area. With the currently available projects and management actions, the sustainable yield of the WLPMA is approximately 12,500 AFY, with an uncertainty estimate of ±1,200 AFY (Table ES-1). In the ELPMA, the total sustainable yield (including the Epworth Gravels Management Area) is estimated to be 17,800 AFY ±2,300 AFY. For the Epworth Gravels Management Area only, the sustainable yield is estimated to be approximately 1,300 AFY. Except for the Epworth Gravels Management Area, both the historical (1985–2015) and recent (2015–2017) groundwater production rates exceeded the upper end of the future sustainable yield estimates (Table ES-1). Adoption of this GSP represents the first step in achieving groundwater sustainability within the. LPVB, as required by SGMA. SGMA requires that groundwater in each of the management areas of the LPVB be managed sustainably within 20 years of adoption of the GSP. SGMA also requires that this GSP be evaluated at a minimum of every 5 years after adoption. As part of the 5-year evaluation process, the sustainable yield will be refined and adjusted. These refinements will be based on new data, additional studies undertaken to fill data gaps, and groundwater modeling. Refinements and adjustments will also be made to the minimum threshold groundwater levels developed to avoid undesirable results, the measurable objective groundwater levels that account for the need to continue groundwater production during drought cycles and the associated interim milestones to help gauge progress toward sustainability over the next 20 years. The required 5-year evaluations will also examine both new water supply projects, and the potential impacts of extractions rates on groundwater elevations and sustainability in the LPVB. Additional modeling is recommended during the 5-year update process to understand how changes in pumping and additional new water supply projects can increase the overall sustainable yield of the different management areas of the LPVB. As this understanding improves, projects to support increases in the overall sustainable yield can be developed.

Groundwater Sustainability Plan for the Northern and Central Delta-Mendota Regions

San Luis & Delta-Mendota Water Authority (SLDMWA) | November 30th, 2019

Table of Contents Executive Summary Introduction Plan Area Governance and Administration Outreach and Communication Basin Setting Sustainable M

Table of Contents Executive Summary Introduction Plan Area Governance and Administration Outreach and Communication Basin Setting Sustainable Management Criteria Sustainability Implementation Plan Implementation Technical Studies Appendices A. Coordination Agreements B. Common Chapter C. Outreach Documentation D. Water Budget Model Documentation E. Hydrographs for Sustainable Management Criteria F. Quality Assurance Program G. Noticing and Adoption Implementation H. Elements Guide

Groundwater Sustainability Plan for the Oxnard Subbasin

Fox Canyon Groundwater Management Agency (FCGMA) | December 13th, 2019

The Fox Canyon Groundwater Management Agency (FCGMA, or the Agency) has developed this Groundwater Sustainability Plan (GSP) for the Oxnard Subbasin (Subbasin; DWR Basin

The Fox Canyon Groundwater Management Agency (FCGMA, or the Agency) has developed this Groundwater Sustainability Plan (GSP) for the Oxnard Subbasin (Subbasin; DWR Basin 4-004.02) of the Santa Clara River Valley Groundwater Basin (DWR Basin 4-004), in compliance with the 2014 Sustainable Groundwater Management Act (SGMA; California Water Code, Section 10720 et seq.). The purpose of this GSP is to define the conditions under which the groundwater resources of the entire Oxnard Subbasin, which support agricultural, municipal and industrial, and environmental uses, will be managed sustainably in the future. Historical groundwater production has resulted in seawater intrusion in the five primary aquifers of the Subbasin. These aquifers have been divided into an Upper Aquifer System, which comprises the Oxnard and Mugu Aquifers, and a Lower Aquifer System, which comprises the Hueneme, Fox Canyon, and Grimes Canyon Aquifers. The average rate of groundwater production from the Upper Aquifer System between 2015 and 2017 was approximately 40,000 acre-feet per year (AFY). The average production from the Lower Aquifer System between 2015 and 2017 was approximately 29,000 AFY. Numerical groundwater simulations indicate that if these production rates were carried into the future, seawater intrusion would continue in the Subbasin and the area currently impacted by concentrations of chloride greater than 500 milligrams per liter would grow. The landward extent of this area is referred to as the saline water impact front. Combinations of projects and management actions were explored to estimate the rate of groundwater production that would prevent future expansion of the area of the Subbasin currently impacted by concentrations of chloride greater than 500 milligrams per liter. This rate of groundwater production is referred to as the sustainable yield. With the currently available projects and management actions, the sustainable yield of the Upper Aquifer System, was calculated to be approximately 32,000 AFY, with an uncertainty of ± 4,100 to 6,000 AFY. The sustainable yield of the Lower Aquifer System was calculated to be approximately 7,000 AFY, with an uncertainty of ± 2,300 to 3,600 AFY. Adoption of this GSP represents the first step in achieving groundwater sustainability within the Oxnard Subbasin by 2040, as required by SGMA. Evaluation of this GSP is required at a minimum of every 5 years following submittal to the California Department of Water Resources (DWR). As part of the 5-year evaluation process, the sustainable yield for each aquifer system will be refined and adjusted. These refinements will be based on new data, additional studies undertaken to fill data gaps, and groundwater modeling. Refinements and adjustments will also be made to the minimum threshold water levels developed to avoid undesirable results, the measurable objective water levels that account for the need to continue groundwater production during drought cycles and the associated interim milestones to help gauge progress toward sustainability over the next 20 years. In order to minimize the pumping reductions required to achieve sustainable management of the Subbasin, investment in large-scale projects to increase water supply, provide the infrastructure to redistribute pumping, and/or directly control seawater intrusion should be investigated. Basin optimization studies, groundwater modeling, and project feasibility studies will be conducted over the next 5 years to explore practicable processes and approaches to increasing the sustainable yield of the Oxnard Subbasin.

Groundwater Sustainability Plan for the Pleasant Valley Basin

Fox Canyon Groundwater Management Agency (FCGMA) | December 13th, 2019

The Fox Canyon Groundwater Management Agency (FCGMA, or the Agency) has developed this Groundwater Sustainability Plan (GSP) for the Pleasant Valley Basin (PVB; DWR Basi

The Fox Canyon Groundwater Management Agency (FCGMA, or the Agency) has developed this Groundwater Sustainability Plan (GSP) for the Pleasant Valley Basin (PVB; DWR Basin 4-006), in compliance with the 2014 Sustainable Groundwater Management Act (SGMA) (California Water Code, Section 10720 et seq.). FCGMA is one of three Groundwater Sustainability Agencies (GSAs) in the PVB. The other two GSAs are the Camrosa Water District–Pleasant Valley GSA and the Pleasant Valley Outlying Areas GSA. This GSP is the sole GSP prepared for the PVB, and covers the entire PVB, including all areas of the PVB outside of FCGMA’s jurisdiction. The purpose of this GSP is to define the conditions under which the groundwater resources of the entire PVB, which support agricultural, municipal and industrial, and environmental uses, will be managed sustainably in the future. The PVB shares a boundary and is in hydraulic communication with Oxnard Subbasin (Subbasin; DWR Basin 4-004.02) to the west. The boundary between the PVB and the Oxnard Subbasin is associated with a change in character of recent and older alluvial deposits. In the PVB, these deposits are finer grained and are, in general, less suitable for groundwater production than the coarser-grained sediments of the same age in the Oxnard Subbasin. There is no corresponding change in character in the deeper aquifers, including the Fox Canyon Aquifer, which are continuous across the boundary between the PVB and the Oxnard Subbasin. Groundwater production from wells on either side of the boundary between the PVB and the Oxnard Subbasin influences groundwater elevations and the direction of groundwater flow across this boundary. Historical groundwater production from the PVB and Oxnard Subbasin combined has resulted in seawater intrusion in the aquifers of the Subbasin. In the PVB, the average rate of groundwater production between 2015 and 2017 was approximately 13,200 acre-feet per year (AFY). In 2015, approximately 53% of the production from the Lower Aquifer System, which comprises the Hueneme, Fox Canyon, and Grimes Canyon Aquifers, and 47% of the production from the Upper Aquifer System, which comprises the older alluvium in the PVB, and the Oxnard and Mugu Aquifers in the Oxnard Subbasin. Numerical groundwater simulations indicate that if these production rates were carried into the future, groundwater elevations in the PVB would not recover during multi-year cycles of drought and recovery, and seawater intrusion would continue in the Oxnard Subbasin. The landward extent of the area in the Subbasin currently impacted by concentrations of chloride greater than 500 milligrams per liter is referred to as the “saline water impact front.” Combinations of projects and management actions were explored to estimate the rate of groundwater production that would allow groundwater elevations in the PVB to recover during multi-year cycles of drought and recovery, and prevent future landward migration of the saline water impact front. This rate of groundwater production is referred to as the sustainable yield. With the currently available projects and management actions, the sustainable yield of the PVB was estimated to be approximately 11,600 AFY, with an uncertainty of ± 1,200 AFY. At the upper bound of the uncertainty estimate (12,600 AFY), the estimated sustainable yield of the PVB is 600 AFY lower than the 2015–2017 average production rate. Adoption of this GSP represents the first step in achieving groundwater sustainability within the PVB by 2040, as required by SGMA. Evaluation of this GSP is required at a minimum of every 5 years following submittal to the California Department of Water Resources (DWR). As part of the 5-year evaluation process, the sustainable yield will be refined and adjusted. These refinements will be based on new data, additional studies undertaken to fill data gaps, and groundwater modeling. Refinements and adjustments will also be made to the minimum threshold groundwater levels developed to avoid undesirable results, the measurable objective groundwater levels that account for the need to continue groundwater production during drought cycles and the associated interim milestones to help gauge progress toward sustainability over the next 20 years. In order to minimize the pumping reductions required to achieve sustainable management of the PVB, investment in projects to increase water supply, provide the infrastructure to redistribute pumping, and/or directly control seawater intrusion in the Oxnard Subbasin should be investigated. Inter-basin optimization studies, groundwater modeling, and project feasibility studies are recommended over the next 5 years to explore practicable processes and approaches to increasing the sustainable yield of the PVB. Due to size, this file has been divided. Part 1, Part 2, Part 3, Part 4, Part 5, Part 6

Groundwater Sustainability Plan for the San Joaquin River Exchange Contractors Groundwater Sustainability Plan (GSP) Group in the Delta-Mendota Subbasin

San Joaquin River Exchange Contractors GSA (SJREC GSA) | December 13th, 2019