Water Temperature Modeling Platform Mid-Term Review

Delta Stewardship Council (Delta Council) | October 21st, 2021

Water Wasted to the Sea?

University of California, Davis (UC Davis) | July 15th, 2017

Water, Sanitation, and Climate Change in the United States Series, Part 2

Pacific Institute | October 15th, 2024

In the United States, federal, tribal, state, and local laws and policies exist to govern the provision of water and sanitation services to communities and homes. The law

In the United States, federal, tribal, state, and local laws and policies exist to govern the provision of water and sanitation services to communities and homes. The laws are designed to ensure the protection of public health and the environment; deliver sufficient, safe water for drinking, bathing, cooking, and other household needs; and remove and treat domestic (i.e., household) waste. People without complete plumbing or safe water live within the “water access gap.” As explored in the first report in this series, climate change—from extreme temperatures to droughts, floods, extreme storms, and wildfires—is making it hard to close this gap and keep it from growing. Water and sanitation systems in frontline communities already feel the disproportionate “first and worst” impacts of climate change to these systems and to their access to water and sanitation. Laws and policies should help anticipate and plan  or the incremental and catastrophic impacts of climate change and protect those most harmed by the effects. Unfortunately, in most cases, the climate is changing faster than the law can respond, thereby leaving frontline communities’ water and sanitation systems vulnerable to damage or destruction. This is part two in the three-part Water, Sanitation, and Climate Change in the United States series. Click here for part one and here for part three.

Watershed Action Plan Santa Ana Region - Riverside County

Riverside County | January 18th, 2017

The Watershed Action Plan (WAP) for the Santa Ana Watershed Region of Riverside County (SAR) and its Permittees is a requirement of the Riverside County Municipal Separat

The Watershed Action Plan (WAP) for the Santa Ana Watershed Region of Riverside County (SAR) and its Permittees is a requirement of the Riverside County Municipal Separate Storm Sewer System (MS4), Permit Order No. R8-2010-0033 as adopted by the Santa Ana Regional Water Quality Control Board (Regional Board) in January 29, 2010 (2010 MS4 Permit). The purpose of this requirement is to coordinate existing watershed approaches to address water quality and hydromodification impacts resulting from urbanization within the SAR. This requirement is to be achieved by evaluating existing programs relating to the integration of water quality, stream protection, stormwater management, and re-use strategies with land planning policies, ordinances, and plans within each jurisdiction to the maximum extent practicable (MEP). Throughout implementation of the 2010 MS4 Permit along with the development of this plan, the Regional Board has emphasized that the plans for each jurisdiction should address cumulative impacts of development on vulnerable streams; preserve or restore, consistent with the MEP standard, the structure and function of streams; and protect surface water and groundwater quality.

Watershed Condition, Turbidity, and Implications for Anadromous Salmonids in North Coastal California Streams

California State Water Resources Control Board (SWRCB) | May 21st, 2008

It is widely acknowledged that historically intensive human disturbances increased erosion and sediment delivery rates to extreme levels in the 1950s through the 1970s ac

It is widely acknowledged that historically intensive human disturbances increased erosion and sediment delivery rates to extreme levels in the 1950s through the 1970s across the north coast, and are likely continuing to affect turbidity durations to some degree. A more controversial question is to what extent contemporary land use is affecting present-day erosion, sediment delivery and turbidity. Using turbidity exceedence levels to indicate watershed disturbance, we approached this question from several perspectives. Part A of this report follows up and expands on an earlier analysis (Klein, 2003) for which turbidity data sets from only eight sites were available. In the present study, annual turbidity data sets were assembled from up to 28 continuous turbidity and stage recording stations located on small streams in the northcoast region from Del Norte County in the north to Mendocino County in the south. Data spanning three water years (WY2003-2005) were processed to calculate lengths of time turbidity was higher than several thresholds. Turbidity thresholds ranged from 25 (frequently cited in the salmonid literature as causing ill effects when exceeded) to 1000 FNU. Turbidity exceedence analyses, similar to conventional flow exceedence analyses, were also performed, allowing comparison of turbidity levels at various exceedence probabilities. Part B of this report uses turbidity relationships to harvest rate to model potential effects on anadromous salmonids within a cumulative watershed effects (CWE) framework. To evaluate CWEs on anadromous salmonids and the stream ecosystem, annual turbidigraphs were produced from WY1991 through WY2005 at annual average harvest rates of 0% to 6% for an 8 mi2 old second-growth watershed in North Coastal California. The turbidigraphs were very conservative in that they used the ‘Lower Bound Lines’ to estimate turbidity from discharge, rather than a line of best fit. Turbidity thresholds established at 10, 25, and 50 FNU were applied to assess chronic background, moderate, and severe stress to stream ecosystems in each water year. A simple model of smolt growth and survival-to-adult-return (SAR), as influenced by the annual turbidigraph, indicated the minimum supportable adult steelhead population size could be more than halved at the 2% average annual timber harvest rate compared to that supported by an old second-growth watershed.

Watershed Modeling for the Santa Clara River in Southern California

Ventura County Public Works Agency (VCPWA) | July 24th, 2019

A calibrated watershed hydrologic model of the Santa Clara River (SCR) Watershed was developed for use as a tool for watershed planning, resource assessment, and ultima

A calibrated watershed hydrologic model of the Santa Clara River (SCR) Watershed was developed for use as a tool for watershed planning, resource assessment, and ultimately, water quality management purposes. The study was a joint effort of the Ventura County Watershed Protection District (VCWPD), Los Angeles County Department of Public Works (LACDPW), and U.S. Army Corp of Engineers Los Angeles District. The modeling package used for the study was the U.S. EPA Hydrologic Simulation Program – FORTRAN (HSPF). The SCR main stem flows east-to-west from the San Gabriel Mountains of central Los Angeles County to its mouth at the Pacific Ocean near the cities of Ventura and Oxnard. The 4,263 square kilometer watershed includes rapidly urbanizing valleys and extensive agriculture, and is subject to severe flooding and erosion. There are four large reservoirs within the watershed. Although the Santa Clara River watershed remains primarily in a natural physical state, the flow regime within the watershed is highly engineered to optimize water deliveries and aquifer recharge. The SCR Watershed was segmented into 209 subwatersheds and 192 stream reaches, based on precipitation patterns, drainage boundaries, hydrography, stream gage locations, and impaired water segments. Each land segment was further subdivided into individual model segments based on land use/cover categories. A long-term data base of 46 years of model input data (precipitation, evaporation, diversions, POTWs, etc.) was developed. The model was calibrated and validated to observed flow at multiple locations, using both graphical and statistical model-data comparisons. Long-term simulations were run to assess the impacts of alternative conditions (baseline, natural) on flow and flood frequencies. The model was also used to generate design storm event hydrographs for selected return intervals with synthetic input rainfall hyetographs for the corresponding rainfall return period developed from available rain gage data. The design storm results were submitted to FEMA for the Flood Insurance Study currently underway.

Watershed-scale Evaluation of Agricultural BMP Effectiveness in Protecting Critical Coastal Habitats: Final Report on the Status of Three Central California Estuaries

Central Coast Regional Water Quality Control Board (CCRWQCB) | April 30th, 2010

Along California's Central Coast, the Pajaro, Salinas, and Santa Maria Rivers drain to coastal estuaries that provide essential habitat for early life stages of commercia

Along California's Central Coast, the Pajaro, Salinas, and Santa Maria Rivers drain to coastal estuaries that provide essential habitat for early life stages of commercially and recreationally important marine fish species, threatened anadromous fish species, migratory birds, and other wildlife. These are the largest watersheds on the central coast and each contains year-round, intensively cultivated agricultural land that supports a $3.5 billion/year industry producing most of the nation's lettuce, artichokes, and crucifer crops. Runoff from irrigated agriculture constitutes a significant portion of river flow during most of the year, and a number of studies have documented pesticide occurrence and biological impacts in these watersheds. Evidence of pesticide impacts has encouraged diverse stakeholders to begin implementing farm management practices (MPs) to reduce pesticide concentrations and toxicity in agricultural runoff. This project is designed to complement ongoing evaluations of individual MPs with measurements of pesticide concentrations throughout the estuarine environments, including the water column, sediments, and in resident biota. Biological effects were measured at the organism and community levels. Chemical analyses emphasized pesticide impacts because previous research in these watersheds has indicated these are the primary chemicals of concern impacting beneficial uses. A broad suite of pesticides were measured, including legacy organochlorines, widely-used organophosphates, increasingly-used pyrethroids, herbicides and fungicides. Sampling in the three estuaries was conducted from January 2008 until October 2009. A total of fifteen sampling events were conducted in each estuary, and these were divided between eleven irrigation season events and four storm events. Storm and irrigation monitoring included water toxicity and chemistry analyses for pesticides. Samples were collected at multiple stations in the estuaries and in key tributaries flowing to the estuaries. In addition, sediment toxicity was assessed at eight estuary stations and the tributary stations during three irrigation season sampling events. Benthic community characterizations were also conducted in May and October 2008. All sediment samples were analyzed for pesticides, as well as grain size and total organic carbon. Pesticide analyses in resident fish and sand crab tissues were conducted once in each estuary. The goal of this project was to establish a baseline of estuary conditions with respect to pesticide impacts as MPs are beginning to be implemented.

West False River Drought Salinity Barrier Final EIR

California Department of Water Resources (DWR) | November 8th, 2024

With the proposed project, a temporary drought salinity barrier would be installed in West False River up to two times over 10 years, with each installation remaining in

With the proposed project, a temporary drought salinity barrier would be installed in West False River up to two times over 10 years, with each installation remaining in place for up to 20 months over two consecutive calendar years. The barrier would be installed if a drought were to occur during the 2026–2035 period and the drought conditions indicate that a barrier in West False River would be an effective tool to preserve upstream reservoir storage for health, safety, and regulatory releases, while preventing saltwater intrusion into the central and southern portions of the Sacramento–San Joaquin Delta (Delta). The drought salinity barrier would be constructed only if DWR, in cooperation with other State and federal agencies, determines that drought conditions have reduced water storage in Northern California reservoirs to critical levels, such that projected Delta outflow would be insufficient to control increased salinity intrusion into the Delta. 

West False River Drought Salinity Barrier Project Environmental Impact Report (Draft)

California Department of Water Resources (DWR) | July 7th, 2022

The California Department of Water Resources (DWR) proposes to the install the West False River Drought Salinity Barrier Project (proposed project). During drought condit

The California Department of Water Resources (DWR) proposes to the install the West False River Drought Salinity Barrier Project (proposed project). During drought conditions, water stored in upstream reservoirs may be insufficient to repel salinity moving upstream from San Francisco Bay. Without the protection of the drought salinity barrier in West False River, saltwater intrusions could affect more than 27 million Californians who rely on the Sacramento–San Joaquin Delta (Delta) for at least a portion of their water supply; could render Delta water unusable for agricultural needs; and could reduce the value of habitat for aquatic species. DWR installed emergency drought barriers in West False River in 2015 and 2021–2022 in response to drought conditions to protect water quality in the interior Delta. Installation of a drought salinity barrier in West False River has been shown to be an effective tool for reducing the intrusion of saltwater into the Central and South Delta based on these previous installations (see Section 1.2, “Project Background,” in Chapter 1; California Department of Water Resources 2019).

West Valley Watershed Assessment 2018: Baseline Ecological Condition Assessment of Southwest San Francisco Bay Creeks in Santa Clara County; Calabazas, San Tomas Aquino, Saratoga, Sunnyvale East and West

San Francisco Estuary Institute (SFEI) | May 1st, 2019

This report describes baseline information about the amount and distribution of aquatic resources, and evaluates the overall ecological conditions of streams using the Ca

This report describes baseline information about the amount and distribution of aquatic resources, and evaluates the overall ecological conditions of streams using the California Rapid Assessment Method (CRAM), for the West Valley watershed in Santa Clara County; consisting of Sunnyvale East and West Channels, Calabazas Creek, San Tomas Aquino and Saratoga creeks (subsequently referred to in this document as San Tomas-Saratoga), and many smaller tributaries.