Groundwater Basins in California

California Department of Water Resources (DWR) | November 1st, 1952

Section 229 of the Water Code directs that the California Department of Public Works, acting by and through the State Engineer, shall "investigate conditions of the quali

Section 229 of the Water Code directs that the California Department of Public Works, acting by and through the State Engineer, shall "investigate conditions of the quality of all the waters within the State, including saline waters, coastal and inland, as related to all sources of pollution of whatever nature and shall report thereon to the Legislature and to the appropriate regional water pollution control board annually, and may recommend any steps which might be taken to improve or protect the quality of such waters." In order to carry out the intent of Section 228 of the Water Code with respect to investigations of quality of ground waters within the State, it has been necessary first to compile available geologic data in order to locale and define the approximate boundaries of the more important ground water basins. A base index map showing the principal areas of groundwater storage in the State of California has not been previously prepared.  Such a map has been complied for this report in order to establish a uniform name and numbering system for groundwater basins, which can be expanded as new areas of ground water storage are identified, or as it is found necessary to divide the larger areas into subbasins.  It will serve as a basis for the planning of future investigations of the groundwater resources of California. This report identifies alluvial or valley fill areas which contain the principal groundwater resources in California.  However, the report is necessarily not complete because of lack of information for many areas of the state. In general, the areas of groundwater storage indentified include: (a) the major alluvium-filled areas of known groundwater storage and extraction; (b) the extensive areas of alluvial-fill in the Colorado, Mojave, and Basin and Range desert areas which may contain usable groundwater, though little is known of their storage capacity or recharge; and (c) some of the smaller alluvium-filled areas which may furnish a portion of local domestic, irrigation, municipal, and industrial water supplies.

Guidance for Climate Change Data Use During Groundwater Sustainability Plan Development

California Department of Water Resources (DWR) | April 12th, 2018

This Guidance Document was developed to help Groundwater Sustainability Agencies (GSAs) incorporate California Department of Water Resources (DWR)-provided climate change

This Guidance Document was developed to help Groundwater Sustainability Agencies (GSAs) incorporate California Department of Water Resources (DWR)-provided climate change and related data into their Groundwater Sustainability Plans (GSPs). The purpose of this Guidance Document is as follows: • Provide relevant data and tools for GSAs to incorporate climate change into their GSPs. • Provide an analysis approach using the provided data and tools that incorporates the best available science and best available information to date. This Guidance Document focuses on the use of DWR-provided climate change data and provides documentation about the following: • Climate change data development approach • Climate change data development methods and processes • Applications for using the provided climate change data • Climate change data assumptions and limitations This Guidance Document provides a process for using DWR-provided climate change data for computing projected water budgets and serves as a companion document to the water budget best management practices (BMPs)2 and the modeling BMP3. For Sustainable Groundwater Management Act (SGMA) implementation purposes, the use of climate change data can help with the following: • Developing projected water budgets • Long-term planning of groundwater basin sustainability • Assessing projects and management actions by performing sensitivity analyses of projected conditions • Adaptive Management

Implementing SGMA: Results from a Stakeholder Survey

University of California, Davis (UC Davis) | August 26th, 2019

The Sustainable Groundwater Management Act (SGMA) of 2014 represents a historic transition to collective groundwater resource management and has the potential to signif

The Sustainable Groundwater Management Act (SGMA) of 2014 represents a historic transition to collective groundwater resource management and has the potential to significantly reduce groundwater overdraft in California. A total of 260 groundwater sustainability agencies (GSAs) recently formed to collectively manage groundwater resources in the 127 high and medium priority groundwater basins of the state. The simultaneous formation of hundreds of new governing agencies is an unprecedented institutional effort with very few examples to learn from. As GSAs move towards the design and deliberation of their groundwater sustainability plans (GSPs), assessments on the process up until now can directly inform development processes that are still taking place. This report summarizes the results from a state-wide survey that targeted SGMA participants.

Independent Review Panel (IRP) Report for the 2017 Long-term Operations Biological Opinions (LOBO) Biennial Science Review (January 24, 2018)

Delta Stewardship Council (Delta Council) | January 31st, 2018

Interagency Ecological Program Science Strategy 2020 – 2024: Investment Priorities for Interagency Collaborative Science

Interagency Ecological Program (IEP) | April 20th, 2019

The IEP Science Strategy is one of three organizing documents that together set the course for annual (IEP Annual Work Plan), 5-year (IEP Science Strategy), and 5

The IEP Science Strategy is one of three organizing documents that together set the course for annual (IEP Annual Work Plan), 5-year (IEP Science Strategy), and 5+ year (IEP Strategic Plan) organization planning for the Program. The Science Strategy is where the Science Management and Coordinators Teams articulate what they understand as the most pressing suite of subjects requiring additional data collection for management-relevant purposes for the IEP 9-Agency collective. The Science Strategy serves the additional purpose of providing a 5-year focus of planning effort to even-out short-term (annual) imperatives that change depending on mutable Agency directives.

Interagency Ecological Program Science Strategy: Needs for near-term science in five areas of emphasis

Interagency Ecological Program (IEP) | March 4th, 2016

The mission of the Interagency Ecological Program (IEP) is to provide and integrate relevant and timely ecological information for management of the Bay-Delta ecosystem a

The mission of the Interagency Ecological Program (IEP) is to provide and integrate relevant and timely ecological information for management of the Bay-Delta ecosystem and the water that flows through it. This is accomplished through collaborative and scientifically sound monitoring, research, modeling, and synthesis efforts for various aspects of the aquatic ecosystem. Building on the IEP Strategic Plan, which identifies the long-term goals and strategies to be implemented by the IEP to achieve its mission, the IEP Science Strategy provides direction to interagency science used to inform the management and ecological interests of IEP agencies in the near-term, and is one of a number of inputs used to shape the IEP Annual Work Plans. While the IEP Strategic Plan states that the Science Strategy be drafted for a 3-5 year horizon, a shorter 2-year timeframe for this first IEP Science Strategy has been adopted to allow for a more flexible internal development and review process, as well as feedback from the Bay-Delta research and stakeholder community.

Interagency Ecological Program’s Ability to Provide Science Supporting Management of the Delta

Delta Stewardship Council (Delta Council) | November 15th, 2019

Juvenile Production Estimate (JPE) Calculation and Use/Application of Survival Data from Acoustically-tagged Chinook Salmon Releases Report

Delta Stewardship Council (Delta Council) | February 21st, 2014

Each year, NOAA’s National Marine Fisheries Service (NMFS) estimates the number of juvenile winter-run Chinook salmon expected to enter the Delta. NMFS’ June 4, 2009

Each year, NOAA’s National Marine Fisheries Service (NMFS) estimates the number of juvenile winter-run Chinook salmon expected to enter the Delta. NMFS’ June 4, 2009, biological and conference opinion on the long-term operation of the Central Valley Project and State Water Project provides an incidental take limit on natural juvenile winter-run based on the juvenile production estimate.

Marine heatwaves need clear definitions so coastal communities can adapt

Nature Portfolio (Springer Nature) | April 3rd, 2023

Measuring and Interpreting Multilayer Aquifer-System Compactions for a Sustainable Groundwater-System Development

American Geophysical Union (AGU) | March 23rd, 2021

Ever decreasing water resources and climate change have driven the increasing use of groundwater causing land subsidence in many countries. Geodetic sensors such as InSAR

Ever decreasing water resources and climate change have driven the increasing use of groundwater causing land subsidence in many countries. Geodetic sensors such as InSAR, GPS and leveling can detect surface deformation but cannot measure subsurface deformation. A single‐well, single‐depth extensometer can be used to measure subsurface deformation, but it cannot delineate the depths of major compaction and provide insight about the deformation mechanism throughout a complex aquifer system, unless man extensometers at different depths are used. We present a multilayer compaction well (MLCW), installed in a borehole, that uses magnetic rings to detect stratum compaction at 25 depths as deep as 300 m below land surface. Our laboratory and field assessments indicate 1 mm precision and accuracy for one single‐depth magnetic reading. We tested the performance of MLCW by measuring aquifer‐system compaction over the proximal, middle, and distal fans of the Choushui River Alluvial Fan (CRAF) that has long experienced severe land subsidence. The MLCW measurements were used to create time‐depth diagrams of compaction, showing different compaction rates at different layers of aquifers and aquitards to identify the depths of major compactions. The elastic (reversible) and inelastic (irreversible) compactions from MLCW were used in stress‐strain analyses to estimate skeletal specific storages and the safe groundwater levels, below which groundwater extractions have caused irreversible compactions. The hydrogeological parameters derived from MLCW measurements can help governmental agencies to determine effective land‐use and water‐use policies, and ascertain the best strategy for utilizing artificial recharge to prevent land subsidence and achieve sustainable groundwater management.