Replenishing Groundwater in the San Joaquin Valley

Public Policy Institute of California (PPIC) | April 1st, 2018

The San Joaquin Valley—which has the biggest imbalance between groundwater pumping and replenishment in the state—is ground zero for implementing the 2014 Sustainable

The San Joaquin Valley—which has the biggest imbalance between groundwater pumping and replenishment in the state—is ground zero for implementing the 2014 Sustainable Groundwater Management Act (SGMA). Expanding groundwater recharge could help local water users bring their basins into balance and make a dent in the long-term deficit of nearly 2 million acre-feet per year. The experience with recharge in 2017?the first wet year since the enactment of SGMA?offers valuable insights in how to expand recharge. A survey of valley water districts’ current recharge efforts revealed strong interest in the practice, and a number of constraints. The following actions are needed to better capitalize on future opportunities: Clarify rules on water available for recharge. The State Water Board needs to develop an expeditious process for enabling water users to capture surface water when it is available. Beyond the legal aspects of establishing rights for diversion and storage, an essential part of this process is technical: developing a simple, rapid way to determine when river flows exceed water required for environmental purposes and downstream users. Evaluate infrastructure capacity. One of the key challenges for expanding recharge is that most available flows are in the northern part of the valley, while most of the overdraft?and best recharge lands?are in the south. In addition, these flows are mainly available for just a few months. A top priority is to evaluate opportunities for improving the use of existing infrastructure (conveyance facilities, surface reservoirs, and recharge basins) and determine where additional investments are warranted. A big bottleneck is likely to be regional conveyance, which is inadequate for capturing and moving high flows to suitable recharge locations. Improve recharge on farmland. Active recharge on farmland may be one of the most promising ways to capture water cost-effectively in wetter years, but it is low relative to its potential. Significantly ramping up this practice will require addressing a suite of technical issues and establishing incentives. Address regulatory barriers. State and federal agencies need to improve processes for approving construction of new recharge projects, moving recharge water through their conveyance facilities, and enabling more flexibility in where water is stored. Water managers and growers also need guidelines from the state for implementing on-farm recharge in ways that are consistent with water quality rules. Strengthen groundwater accounting. Better accounting of water going into and out of groundwater basins is key to sustainable management. It is also needed for developing incentives for growers to recharge, encouraging recharge partnerships, and informing decisions on new investments. Making the most of recharge opportunities will require high levels of cooperation among a wide variety of stakeholders. Local and regional partnerships?for capturing and moving water efficiently, making new investments, and devising projects that bring multiple benefits?are key to helping the region manage this critical resource over the long-term.

Report of the State Engineer to the Legislature of the State of California - Session of 1881

State of California | January 3rd, 1880

Report on an Integrated Regional Water Management Plan for the San Joaquin Valley of California

U.S. Bureau of Reclamation (USBR) | May 1st, 2016

A major investment has been made through California voter-approved general obligation bonds to incentivize regional water infrastructure and management solutions that imp

A major investment has been made through California voter-approved general obligation bonds to incentivize regional water infrastructure and management solutions that improve self-sufficiency, reduce water use impacts and support environmental protection and restoration. The program, put into California water statutes in 2002, and managed by the California State Department of Water Resources (DWR), is called Integrated Regional Water Management Planning (IRWMP). This planning tool, along with other water management strategies, actions and activities that have emerged, were ultimately intended to be elevated to an aggregate effort for the entire San Joaquin Valley into a Valley-wide integrated water plan. The aggregate effort was included as a goal in federal legislation (PL 111-11, Section 10101). The legislation included funding for the California Water Institute (CWI) at California State University, Fresno to prepare a report on the Valley-wide activities.

Report on the Delta Drought Response Pilot Program for Water Year 2023

Sacramento-San Joaquin Delta Conservancy | July 24th, 2024

This report describes the 2023 Delta Drought Response Pilot Program (DDRPP/Program), provides an analysis of the Program’s effectiveness, and describes the Program outc

This report describes the 2023 Delta Drought Response Pilot Program (DDRPP/Program), provides an analysis of the Program’s effectiveness, and describes the Program outcomes, including findings and recommendations for application in future agricultural water conservation programs. The DDRPP launched in January 2022 as a response to the continuing risk of drought in the Sacramento-San Joaquin Delta Watershed. This report focuses on the results of the 2023 Program, with a brief analysis comparing both years of the Program. For detailed information on the 2022 Program and 2022 analysis, see the 2022 DDRPP Final Report (Sacramento-San Joaquin Delta Conservancy, 2023).

Residential Water Conservation and the Rebound Effect: A Temporal Decomposition and Investigation

American Geophysical Union (AGU) | April 25th, 2023

Resilience by Design

City of Los Angeles | January 7th, 2016

Resilience by Design presents the recommendations of the Mayoral Seismic Safety Task Force, the members of which are listed in the Acknowledgements Section of this docume

Resilience by Design presents the recommendations of the Mayoral Seismic Safety Task Force, the members of which are listed in the Acknowledgements Section of this document.  These recommendations address the city’s greatest vulnerabilities from earthquakes with significant and attainable solutions to: • Protect the lives of our residents • Improve the capacity of the City to respond to earthquakes • Prepare the City to recover quickly from earthquakes • Protect the economy of the City and all of Southern California. The Mayoral Seismic Task Force evaluated four areas of seismic vulnerability, namely: • Pre-1980 “ non-ductile reinforced concrete” buildings • Pre-1980 “soft-first- story ” buildings • Water system infrastructure ( including impact on firefighting capability) • Telecommunications infrastructure

Resilient by Design Bay Area Challenge Briefing Book

San Francisco Estuary Institute (SFEI) | July 1st, 2017

The Resilient by Design Bay Area Challenge Briefing Book is intended as a reference guide for Design Teams as they embark on the Challenge. The aim is to provide com

The Resilient by Design Bay Area Challenge Briefing Book is intended as a reference guide for Design Teams as they embark on the Challenge. The aim is to provide compilation of useful existing resources and context pertaining to resilience in the Bay Area.

Resilient Landscape Vision for the Calabazas Creek, San Tomas Aquino Creek, and Pond A8 Area: Bayland-Creek Reconnection Opportunities

San Francisco Estuary Institute (SFEI) | May 1st, 2018

This report proposes a multi-faceted redesign of the South San Francisco Bay shoreline at the interface with Calabazas and San Tomas Aquino creeks. Recognizing the opport

This report proposes a multi-faceted redesign of the South San Francisco Bay shoreline at the interface with Calabazas and San Tomas Aquino creeks. Recognizing the opportunities presented by changing land use and new challenges, such as accelerated sea-level rise, we explore in this report a reconfigured shoreline that could improve ecosystem health and resilience, reduce maintenance costs, and protect surrounding infrastructure. 

Resilient Los Angeles

City of Los Angeles | March 1st, 2018

Los Angeles has always been a global destination for dreamers, doers, thinkers, and creators. We have blue skies and pristine beaches and a rich culture of diversity, c

Los Angeles has always been a global destination for dreamers, doers, thinkers, and creators. We have blue skies and pristine beaches and a rich culture of diversity, creativity, and entrepreneurism. The opportunities of tomorrow are limitless, as we work to build Los Angeles into a vibrant, thriving model city of the 21st century. Yet this dream comes with the growing pressures of our susceptibility to the impacts of climate change and aging infrastructure. We are all deeply aware that it is a question of when, not if Los Angeles will face the next Big One—whether it’s an earthquake, flood, heatwave, fire, or other disaster with long-term impacts. While we have made great strides over the past 25 years, it’s time to do more—to strengthen and create new partnerships, to change the way our government collaborates and to empower and secure our communities—so that we can work together to make L.A. a global model of resilience. Building a more resilient Los Angeles starts with addressing the needs of our most vulnerable populations and neighborhoods. Too often, those who are least equipped to handle the effects of catastrophic events end up suffering the most. And empowering our most vulnerable—children, immigrants, and lower-income residents, among others—is not just about emergency preparedness. It is about directly addressing those underlying daily stresses—such as poverty, financial security, and affordable housing—and ensuring that all Angelenos feel safe and secure in their daily lives. It also means bringing neighbors together to strengthen our collective resources and social bonds and innovating creative solutions along the way.

Responses and impacts of atmospheric rivers to climate change

Nature Portfolio (Springer Nature) | March 9th, 2020

Atmospheric rivers (ARs) are characterized by intense moisture transport, which, on landfall, produce precipitation which can be both beneficial and destructive. ARs in C

Atmospheric rivers (ARs) are characterized by intense moisture transport, which, on landfall, produce precipitation which can be both beneficial and destructive. ARs in California, for example, are known to have ended drought conditions but also to have caused substantial socio-economic damage from landslides and flooding linked to extreme precipitation. Understanding how AR characteristics will respond to a warming climate is, therefore, vital to the resilience of communities affected by them, such as the western USA, Europe, East Asia and South Africa. In this Review, we use a theoretical framework to synthesize understanding of the dynamic and thermodynamic responses of ARs to anthropogenic warming and connect them to observed and projected changes and impacts revealed by observations and complex models. Evidence suggests that increased atmospheric moisture (governed by Clausius–Clapeyron scaling) will enhance the intensity of AR-related precipitation — and related hydrological extremes — but with changes that are ultimately linked to topographic barriers. However, due to their dependency on both weather and climate-scale processes, which themselves are often poorly constrained, projections are uncertain. To build confidence and improve resilience, future work must focus efforts on characterizing the multiscale development of ARs and in obtaining observations from understudied regions, including the West Pacific, South Pacific and South Atlantic.