Water Distribution System Efficiency: An Essential or Neglected Part of the Water Conservation Strategy for Los Angeles County Water Retailers?

University of California, Los Angeles (UCLA) | November 2nd, 2015

The water governance system in Los Angeles County is complex and fragmented. Potable water supply in metropolitan Los Angeles County relies on over 100 water retailers, b

The water governance system in Los Angeles County is complex and fragmented. Potable water supply in metropolitan Los Angeles County relies on over 100 water retailers, both public and private. It is unclear how the current system with many small water retailers will succeed in promoting integrated water resource management. Among other changes, there will need to be a shifting of water supply sources from predominantly imported to more local resources through conservation, recycled water usage, stormwater capture and groundwater management. The institutional capacity of water retailers to instigate this transition will depend heavily on their capacity to maintain reliable water deliveries without significant losses from leakage and failing infrastructure. Additionally, with drought conditions prevalent in eleven of the last fourteen years in California, and increasing evidence of climate change impacts on all water resources in California, it is crucial that water retailers minimize water losses through their distribution systems to match the increasingly stringent conservation efforts required of their customers, and to efficiently utilize scarce supplies.  Until this year, existing regulations for water agencies in California only requested information about system losses for potable water systems with more than 3000 connections. These numbers were reported through Urban Water Management Plans every five years. However, loss estimates through breaks and leaks have not been separated out from other non-revenue uses of water. To date, the most effective efforts to monitor water losses in California are voluntary and limited to members of the California Urban Water Conservation Council. To understand water distribution efficiency in urban Los Angeles County, we developed a questionnaire regarding leakage monitoring, system-wide water losses, and the implementation of pre-emptive best management practices. We surveyed 10 of the approximate total of 100 water retailers. The sample was representative of retailers of many types, sizes, and geographical locations in metropolitan Los Angeles and divided into tiers of size (small, mid-sized and large) based on the number of connections served. The survey questionnaire also addressed other metrics including per capita water consumption, leakage volumes, water loss estimation methodology, water loss estimates and infrastructure monitoring and replacement. The survey indicated several findings. First, the percentage of water loss due to breaks and leaks, though possibly misrepresentative, is still a widely used metric to measure water losses. Sixty percent of the agencies sampled still monitor only ‘unaccounted for water’ and not ‘real losses’. Retailers that do measure real losses reported them to be between 3-4% of total water supplied, which is an improbably low compared to international estimates as elaborated in the literature review section. Different water retailers were divided on the efficacy of leak detection technologies, which demands more education on available leak detection technology and their usage.  Larger retailers reported greater use of most of the best management practices addressed by our survey to maintain storage and distribution systems. Most small retailers did not report prioritizing adoption and implementation of best management practices to minimize water loss. Also, small Mutual Water Companies that we contacted did not have information on distribution water losses available publicly. To improve water efficiency, small retailers could pool resources and expertise to better detect, monitor and reduce distribution water losses. Investor-owned utilities and special water districts serve a large customer base, but as a group, they were least responsive of all the sample water retailers we contacted. In summary, California water regulations should aim at recommending crucial best management practices, ensuring accurate and verifiable water loss monitoring and prescribing an effective water loss metric and maximum acceptable standard as a roadmap for water retailers 

Water Facilities Including a Peripheral Canal [Proposition 9]

Department of Justice (DOJ) | June 9th, 1982

Water Forward 2024 Plan Report - Austin's 100 Year Plan

City of Austin | December 6th, 2024

Water Forward 2024 is Austin’s 100-year integrated water resource plan. The purpose of Water Forward is to develop and implement diverse and environmentally conscious w

Water Forward 2024 is Austin’s 100-year integrated water resource plan. The purpose of Water Forward is to develop and implement diverse and environmentally conscious water management strategies to adapt to growth, drought, and climate change and ensure a sustainable, resilient, equitable, and affordable water future for our community for the next 100 years. Austin Water has developed this plan to address near- and long-term water needs through a collaborative process in alignment with guiding principles crafted to reflect the Austin community’s values. 

Water from the Colorado River

Metropolitan Water District of Southern California (MWD) | July 1st, 1931

It is the purpose of this booklet to outline the Boulder Canyon Dam project on the Colorado River and the Metropolitan Aqueduct. Furthermore, it seems pertinent to indica

It is the purpose of this booklet to outline the Boulder Canyon Dam project on the Colorado River and the Metropolitan Aqueduct. Furthermore, it seems pertinent to indicate the extent of the population, industrial and agricultural resources of the Metropolitan area, which stand behind and urgently require Colorado River development.

Water is a master variable: Solving for resilience in the modern era

Water Security, Elsevier | November 21st, 2019

Resilience is increasingly recognized as an imperative for any prospect of sustainable development, as it relates to our ability to sustain human well-being and progress

Resilience is increasingly recognized as an imperative for any prospect of sustainable development, as it relates to our ability to sustain human well-being and progress under the planetary and societal changes that we face now and into the future. Yet, we are ill-prepared to meet this challenge. We neither fully understand nor manage consistently for resilience of the human and natural systems that we must steward through extraordinary change. A unifying approach and common currency would help us to understand and manage for resilience under uncertain futures. Water is an essential, defining element in human and natural systems. Human civilization and water systems have co-evolved as a coupled system, with the majority of natural freshwater systems transformed to meet our demands. Shifting patters of water availability in space and time will define key pathways and tipping points for our resilience, and thus requirements for water system resilience must guide the trajectories and boundaries of human development. Here, we consider the thesis that water offers a key to unlocking the complex challenge of designing and managing for the resilience of coupled human-natural systems. We examine what constitutes a resilient system, what drives freshwater resilience, and how pathways to human resilience may be charted and navigated through the medium of water. Our theoretical treatise frames a portfolio of research that tests this thesis, including modeling and applications to water and water-dependent systems.

Water Recommendations to the Next President

Pacific Institute | September 14th, 2020

The United States faces several severe and worsening water problems. Continuing to neglect these problems will impoverish and sicken this and future generations,

The United States faces several severe and worsening water problems. Continuing to neglect these problems will impoverish and sicken this and future generations, destroy beneficial aquatic ecosystems, and threaten our economy and food supply. Smart water policies will create hundreds of thousands of jobs, improve public health, and speed our economic recovery. In this letter, we offer a short assessment of four key problems and specific recommendations for addressing them.

Water requirement of Urban Green Infrastructure under climate change

Science of the Total Environment (Elsevier) | June 16th, 2023

The increased uncertainty of rainfall and high urban temperatures resulting from climate change present challenges for water management in Urban Green Infrastructure (UGI

The increased uncertainty of rainfall and high urban temperatures resulting from climate change present challenges for water management in Urban Green Infrastructure (UGI). UGI is an important component of cities, and it plays a crucial role in addressing various environmental issues (e.g., floods, pollutants, heat islands, etc.). Effective water management of UGI is essential to ensure its environmental and ecological benefits in the face of climate change. However, previous studies have not adequately investigated water management strategies for urban-scale GI under climate change scenarios. This study aims to estimate the current and future water requirement and effective rainfall (rainwater stored in the soil and plant roots available for plant evaporation) to determine the irrigation requirement of UGI during periods of rainfall deficit under current and future climate conditions. The results indicate that the water requirement for UGI will continue to increase under both RCP4.5 and RCP8.5 climate scenarios, with a higher increase projected under RCP8.5. For instance, the average water requirement for UGI is currently 731.29 mm, and it is projected to increase to 756.45 mm (RCP4.5) and 816.47 mm (RCP8.5) in summer during the period of 2081–2100, assuming low managed water stress condition. In addition, the water requirement of UGI in Seoul is the highest in June (approximately 125–137 mm) and the lowest in December or January (about 5–7 mm). While irrigation is unnecessary in July and August due to sufficient rainfall, other months in Seoul require irrigation when rainfall is insufficient. For example, continuous insufficient rainfall from May to June 2100 and April to June 2081 would need >110 mm (RCP4.5) of irrigation requirement even under high managed water stress condition. The findings of this study provide a theoretical foundation for water management strategies in current and future UGI settings.

Water Wasted to the Sea?

University of California, Davis (UC Davis) | July 15th, 2017

Water, Sanitation, and Climate Change in the United States Series, Part 2

Pacific Institute | October 15th, 2024

In the United States, federal, tribal, state, and local laws and policies exist to govern the provision of water and sanitation services to communities and homes. The law

In the United States, federal, tribal, state, and local laws and policies exist to govern the provision of water and sanitation services to communities and homes. The laws are designed to ensure the protection of public health and the environment; deliver sufficient, safe water for drinking, bathing, cooking, and other household needs; and remove and treat domestic (i.e., household) waste. People without complete plumbing or safe water live within the “water access gap.” As explored in the first report in this series, climate change—from extreme temperatures to droughts, floods, extreme storms, and wildfires—is making it hard to close this gap and keep it from growing. Water and sanitation systems in frontline communities already feel the disproportionate “first and worst” impacts of climate change to these systems and to their access to water and sanitation. Laws and policies should help anticipate and plan  or the incremental and catastrophic impacts of climate change and protect those most harmed by the effects. Unfortunately, in most cases, the climate is changing faster than the law can respond, thereby leaving frontline communities’ water and sanitation systems vulnerable to damage or destruction. This is part two in the three-part Water, Sanitation, and Climate Change in the United States series. Click here for part one and here for part three.

Who makes decisions about California's water?

Restore the Delta | January 9th, 2023

This project collected and created data on California's water managers at the state, local and individual level to determine their race and gender. At the State level, we

This project collected and created data on California's water managers at the state, local and individual level to determine their race and gender. At the State level, we used the State Workforce Analysis to examine the race and gender of water-related state executives. At the local level, we coded about 1500 directors of water agencies for race and gender and then compared each board to the race and gender of the agency service areas. At the individual level, we coded nearly 14,000 individual rights holders for race. The results were not surprising. At every level, the people who make decisions about California's water are more white and more male than the population of California. At the local agency level, boards of directors are 86% White and 79% male. At the individual level, 91% of small named water rights holders have last names that code as White.