Past Groundwater Drought in the North American Cordillera

American Geophysical Union (AGU) | November 11th, 2024

Petaluma Valley Groundwater Sustainability Plan

Petaluma Valley Groundwater Sustainability Agency | December 8th, 2021

Due to size, this file has been divided Part 1, Part 2, Part 3, Part 4, Part 5, Part 6, Part 7

Due to size, this file has been divided Part 1, Part 2, Part 3, Part 4, Part 5, Part 6, Part 7

Petaluma Valley Historical Hydrology and Ecology Study

San Francisco Estuary Institute (SFEI) | March 1st, 2018

This study examines the historical hydrology and ecology of the Petaluma River watershed prior to major Euro-American modification, and analyzes landscape changes over th

This study examines the historical hydrology and ecology of the Petaluma River watershed prior to major Euro-American modification, and analyzes landscape changes over the past two centuries. Synthesizing information from hundreds of archival documents, the research reconstructs the historical form and function of wetland, riparian, and aquatic habitats and stream channels throughout the watershed, providing insights into habitat extent and distribution, streamflow and sediment dynamics, vegetation composition, wildlife support, and landscape change. Findings from this research can be used to help set restoration targets and to prioritize multi-benefit opportunities to restore wildlife habitat, enhance flood protection, increase groundwater recharge, and improve sediment management. This Executive Summary highlights key findings from the study. 

Piru Basin Groundwater Sustainability Plan

Fillmore and Piru Basins Groundwater Sustainability Agency | December 16th, 2021

The Piru Basin (the Basin) is managed (along with the downslope Fillmore Basin) by the Fillmore and Piru Basins Groundwater Sustainability Agency (Agency). The Basin is p

The Piru Basin (the Basin) is managed (along with the downslope Fillmore Basin) by the Fillmore and Piru Basins Groundwater Sustainability Agency (Agency). The Basin is planned to remain sustainable over the Sustainable Groundwater Management Act (SGMA) implementation and sustainability period, based on the current understanding of historical, current (2019), and projected (2022 through 2072) groundwater conditions in relation to the sustainability indicators specified in SGMA. A sustainability indicator refers to any of the effects caused by groundwater conditions occurring throughout the basin that, when significant and unreasonable, cause undesirable results. The Agency, with consideration of feedback from active stakeholder engagement, has identified and planned for the prevention of significant and unreasonable undesirable results.

Piru Basin Groundwater Sustainability Plan Final (Revised)

Fillmore and Piru Basins Groundwater Sustainability Agency | July 8th, 2024

Due to size, this file has been divided. Part 1, Part 2, Part 3, Part 4, Part 5, Part 6, Part 7, Part 8, Part 9, Part 10, Part 11, Part 12, Part 13

Due to size, this file has been divided. Part 1, Part 2, Part 3, Part 4, Part 5, Part 6, Part 7, Part 8, Part 9, Part 10, Part 11, Part 12, Part 13

Pixley Irrigation District Groundwater Sustainability Plan

Pixley Irrigation District Groundwater Sustainability Agency (PIDGSA) | January 21st, 2020

Pixley Irrigation District Groundwater Sustainability Plan (Revised)

Pixley Irrigation District Groundwater Sustainability Agency (PIDGSA) | July 27th, 2022

The Tule Subbasin is designated by DWR as a critically overdrafted basin with an estimated subbasin average overdraft of 115,300 acre-feet per year. The Agencies estimat

The Tule Subbasin is designated by DWR as a critically overdrafted basin with an estimated subbasin average overdraft of 115,300 acre-feet per year. The Agencies estimated annual average overdraft within the Tule Subbasin is 70,000 acre-feet per year. The overdraft conditions have caused issues for those reliant on groundwater pumping, which include municipal, domestic, and agriculture users. Other issues generated from the overdraft include areas of land subsidence, which predominantly occur in the northwestern portion of the Agency. A sample of the Pixley GSP is displayed below. Due to size, this full 2,421-page document must be downloaded from the Department of Water Resources.

Pleasant Valley Groundwater Sustainability Plan

Pleasant Valley Groundwater Sustainability Agency | February 22nd, 2022

Pleasant Valley Groundwater Sustainability Plan (Revised)

Pleasant Valley Groundwater Sustainability Agency | July 9th, 2024

Due to size, this file has been divided. Part 1, Part 2

Due to size, this file has been divided. Part 1, Part 2

Policy Considerations for Managing Agricultural Nitrogen to Reduce Groundwater Contamination in California

California Roundtable on Agriculture and the Environment (CRAE) | May 28th, 2013

Recent research, including “The California Nitrogen Assessment”1 and the UC Davis Report for the SWRCB SBX2 1 Report to the Legislature2, has produced an important co

Recent research, including “The California Nitrogen Assessment”1 and the UC Davis Report for the SWRCB SBX2 1 Report to the Legislature2, has produced an important collection of data about how nitrogen compounds move in the environment. Members of the California Roundtable on Agriculture and the Environment (CRAE) share an interest in meaningfully addressing water quality challenges while maintaining a healthy and prosperous agriculture sector. Because of the serious health concerns associated with nitrate in groundwater, CRAE members agree that the immediate goal should be to find cost-effective solutions to cleaning up drinking water supplies or providing safe alternate sources of drinking water to affected communities. We support ongoing efforts, such as the governor’s Drinking Water Task Force, to address this important issue. While CRAE’s ultimate interest is in addressing the full range of water quality challenges related to agriculture—from drinking water to legacy issues, groundwater to surface water, and nitrate to Total Maximum Daily Loads (TMDLs)—and supporting improved nutrient management broadly speaking, the group has chosen to focus specifically on the longer-term challenge of reducing nitrate loading in groundwater from agricultural sources. Recognizing that a range of research and policy processes to address the harmful impacts of excess reactive nitrogen-based compounds in the environment are ongoing, CRAE stakeholders agreed that a focus on preventing further contamination of groundwater from nitrate is an area where CRAE has a unique opportunity to contribute. Furthermore, we anticipate that approaches to reduce nitrate loading that adhere to the considerations below will simultaneously improve other challenges, including air quality, energy use, and climate change. Nitrate contamination is projected to increase in the coming years as legacy contributions work their way through the soil profile. The short-term remediation of groundwater basins is so costly as to be practically impossible. Therefore, CRAE has concentrated on intermediate and longer-term groundwater quality issues by helping to find practical solutions to groundwater quality challenges. Reflecting our membership composition, our focus is on the contribution of agricultural sources of nitrate in particular. CRAE has compiled the following set of key facts on our state of knowledge about nitrogen management and a set of considerations to inform related policy and programs focused on improving water quality.