Merced Groundwater Subbasin Groundwater Sustainability Plan

Merced Subbasin Groundwater Sustainability Agency (MSGSA) | November 12th, 2019

Merced Groundwater Subbasin Groundwater Sustainability Plan (Revised)

Merced Subbasin Groundwater Sustainability Agency (MSGSA) | July 6th, 2022

Due to size, this file has been divided into six part. Part 1, Part 2, Part 3, Part 4, Part 5, Part 6

Due to size, this file has been divided into six part. Part 1, Part 2, Part 3, Part 4, Part 5, Part 6

Merced River Watershed Flood-MAR Reconnaissance Study

California Department of Water Resources (DWR) | November 15th, 2023

DWR, in partnership with the Merced Irrigation District (MID), is conducting a preliminary study using flood waters for managed aquifer recharge that can reduce flood ris

DWR, in partnership with the Merced Irrigation District (MID), is conducting a preliminary study using flood waters for managed aquifer recharge that can reduce flood risk, increase surface and groundwater supply reliability, and enhance ecosystems in the Merced River Basin. This Merced River Reconnaissance Study (study) is exploring the potential, feasibility, and effectiveness of Flood-MAR concepts, testing theories, and assessing strategies in overcoming barriers and challenges to project planning and implementation. The study will assess current conditions of the Merced River watershed and the vulnerability of these watershed management characteristics to a range of potential climate change futures. The study will also describe the public and private benefits that may be achieved through Flood-MAR strategies and quantify a range of benefits that Flood-MAR could provide in or adjacent to the Merced River watershed.

Mid-Kaweah Groundwater Sustainability Agency 2022 First Amended Groundwater Sustainability Plan

Mid-Kaweah Groundwater Sustainability Agency (MKGSA) | July 27th, 2022

Due to size, this file has been divided. Part 1, Part 2, Part 3, Part 4, Part 5, Part 6, Part 7, Part 8, Part 9

Due to size, this file has been divided. Part 1, Part 2, Part 3, Part 4, Part 5, Part 6, Part 7, Part 8, Part 9

Mid-Kaweah Groundwater Sustainability Agency Groundwater Sustainability Plan

Mid-Kaweah Groundwater Sustainability Agency (MKGSA) | December 18th, 2019

Midcoast Groundwater Study Phase III, San Mateo County, California

San Mateo County | June 4th, 2010

San Mateo County ‘Midcoast’ extends from northern Half Moon Bay to Devils Slide along Highway 1. It encompasses the communities of Montara, Moss Beach, Seal Cove, Pri

San Mateo County ‘Midcoast’ extends from northern Half Moon Bay to Devils Slide along Highway 1. It encompasses the communities of Montara, Moss Beach, Seal Cove, Princeton, El Granada, and Miramar. Domestic water is supplied to the southern part of the region by Coastside County Water District (CCWD), providing services from Half Moon Bay to Princeton, and by Montara Water and Sanitary District (MWSD) on the north, servicing Montara and Moss Beach. Private wells are scattered through both service districts and outlying areas. With the exception of CCWD, which meets much of its demand through long-term contractual agreements with San Francisco Public Utilities Commission, the source of domestic water is from local surface water and groundwater resources. The carrying capacity of the local resources may be considered as the population that can be sustained using conservation measures during an extended drought without undue stress to valued natural habitats.

Middle Santa Ana River Watershed TMDL Task Force

Santa Ana Watershed Project Authority (SAWPA) | July 5th, 2018

The Task Force is an 18-agency collaborative effort organized by the Santa Ana Watershed Project Authority. It was formed in January 2006 to coordinate water quality impr

The Task Force is an 18-agency collaborative effort organized by the Santa Ana Watershed Project Authority. It was formed in January 2006 to coordinate water quality improvement activities related to bacteria in the Middle Santa Ana River Watershed. The activities were designed to manage or eliminate sources of bacterial indicators in local waterbodies. The Task Force supports on-going source investigation efforts to identify major sources of bacterial indicators and to understand how to best address them. Task Force resources are allocated on a risk-reduction priority basis in order to achieve compliance where it will provide the greatest improvement in public health.

Mitigating land subsidence in the Coachella Valley, California, USA: An emerging success story

International Association of Hydrological Sciences (IAHS) | April 22nd, 2020

Groundwater has been a major source of agricultural, municipal, and domestic water supply since the early 1920s in the Coachella Valley, California, USA. Land s

Groundwater has been a major source of agricultural, municipal, and domestic water supply since the early 1920s in the Coachella Valley, California, USA. Land subsidence, resulting from aquifer-system com- paction and groundwater-level declines, has been a concern of the Coachella Valley Water District (CVWD) since the mid-1990s. As a result, the CVWD has implemented several projects to address groundwater overdraft that fall under three categories – groundwater substitution, conservation, and managed aquifer-recharge (MAR). The implementation of three projects in particular – replacing groundwater extraction with surface water from the Colorado River and recycled water (Mid-Valley Pipeline project), reducing water usage by tiered-rate costs, and increasing groundwater recharge at the Thomas E. Levy Groundwater Replenishment Facility – are potentially linked to markedly improved groundwater levels and subsidence conditions, including in some of the historically most overdrafted areas in the southern Coachella Valley. Groundwater-level and subsidence monitoring have tracked the effect these projects have had on the aquifer system. Prior to about 2010, water levels persistently declined, and some had reached historically low levels by 2010. Since about 2010, however, groundwater levels have stabilized or partially recovered, and subsidence has stopped or slowed substantially almost every- where it previously had been observed; uplift was observed in some areas. Furthermore, results of Interferometric Synthetic Aperture Radar analyses for 1995–2017 indicate that as much as about 0.6 m of subsidence occurred; nearly all of which occurred prior to 2010. Continued monitoring of water levels and subsidence is necessary to inform the CVWD about future mitigation measures. The water management strategies implemented by the CVWD can inform managers of other overdrafted and subsidence-prone basins as they seek solutions to reduce overdraft and subsidence.

Modeling Cost, Energy, and Total Organic Carbon Trade-Offs for Stormwater Spreading Basin Systems Receiving Recycled Water Produced Using Membrane-Based, Ozone-Based, and Hybrid Advanced Treatment Trains

American Chemical Society (ACS) | January 31st, 2019

To address water scarcity, cities are pursuing options for augmenting groundwater recharge with recycled water. Ozone-based treatment trains comprising ozone and biologic

To address water scarcity, cities are pursuing options for augmenting groundwater recharge with recycled water. Ozone-based treatment trains comprising ozone and biologically activated carbon potentially offer cost-effective alternatives to membrane-based treatment, the standard process for potable reuse in numerous countries. However, regulations in multiple states effectively limit the extent to which ozone-based treatment alone can produce recycled water for groundwater recharge. To investigate the trade-offs between treatment costs and regulatory constraints, this study presents methods for modeling and optimizing designs for (1) producing recycled water using membrane-based treatment, ozone-based treatment, and hybrid treatment trains comprising ozone-based treatment with a membrane sidestream, and (2) delivering that water to stormwater spreading basins. We present a case study of Los Angeles, CA, to demonstrate the model’s application under realistic conditions, including regulations that limit spreading recycled water based on its concentration of total organic carbon and the extent of dilution. While the membrane-based treatment train exhibits economies of scale, we demonstrate how regulatory constraints create a diseconomies of scale effect for hybrid treatment systems because larger scales necessitate a higher proportion of recycled water undergo membrane treatment. Nevertheless, relative to membrane-based treatment, we identify opportunities for ozone-based or hybrid treatment trains to reduce treatment costs and energy use by up to 62% and 59%, respectively, for systems with up to 1 m3/s (23 million gallons per day) mean water recycling rate, potentially lowering the barrier for decentralized water recycling systems. This modeling approach could inform planning and policy regarding recycled water projects for groundwater recharge through spreading basins and, with additional modification, other potable reuse applications.

Modeling guides groundwater management in a basin with river–aquifer interactions

California Agriculture (UCANR) | March 13th, 2018

The Sustainable Groundwater Management Act (SGMA) of 2014 seeks to maintain groundwater discharge to streams to support environmental goals. In Scott Valley, in Siskiyou

The Sustainable Groundwater Management Act (SGMA) of 2014 seeks to maintain groundwater discharge to streams to support environmental goals. In Scott Valley, in Siskiyou County, the Scott River and its tributaries are an important salmonid spawning habitat, and about 10% of average annual Scott River stream flow comes from groundwater. The local groundwater advisory committee is developing groundwater management alternatives that would increase summer and early fall stream flows. We developed a model to provide a framework to evaluate those alternatives. We first created a water budget for the Scott Valley groundwater basin and integrated the detailed, spatiotemporally distributed water budget results into a computer model of the basin that simultaneously accounted for groundwater flow, stream flow and landscape water fluxes. Different conceptual representations (using the MODFLOW RIV package and MODFLOW SFR package) of the stream–aquifer boundary provided significantly different results in the seasonal dynamics of groundwater–surface water fluxes. As groundwater sustainability agencies draw up plans to meet SGMA requirements, they must choose and test simulation tools carefully.