California Natural Resources Agency (CNRA) | August 27th, 2018
Summary
Examining human impacts, responses, and challenges to extreme climatic events can give insight into needed directions for climate adaptation to reduce future risks. Thi
Examining human impacts, responses, and challenges to extreme climatic events can give insight into needed directions for climate adaptation to reduce future risks. This study focuses on the 2012-2016 Drought in California, documenting how small self-sufficient drinking water systems were affected and challenged by, and responded to the extreme event. The majority of small, self-sufficient water systems in the state serve rural, low income communities, and many have low technical, managerial, and financial capacity compared to larger systems. This increases the risk that these drinking water systems will be disproportionately impacted by droughts or other disruptions. To assess the impact of drought on small water systems, we employed an iterative approach to gathering perspectives and experiences from drinking water system managers across the state. The goal of employing these iterative methods is to better understand the breadth and scope of impacts, responses, and barriers to dealing with the 2012- 2016 Drought. The first stage of the data collection involved interviewing managers of drinking water systems, which were transcribed and analyzed using semi-grounded theory methods. To cross-check and advance findings from interviews in additional locations, we conducted three small regional workshops and then a larger policy forum. Multiple data collection methods allowed us to gather insights about experiences from nearly 200 water managers. This project uses local knowledge to document the social dimensions within drinking water systems during the 2012-2016 Drought and expresses the value of local knowledge in reflecting on future drinking water system needs in response to extreme events.
We found that drinking water systems, despite size or government project water reliance, experienced a similar set of drought impact, response, and barrier categories (e.g., water quantity and water quality). However, within these categories, the types of impacts, responses, and barriers differed based on both system size and water source portfolio. Common disadvantages that hinder drought resilience, and thus climate adaptation, of small self-sufficient drinking water systems include: staff capacity; financial burden of revenue loss during drought compounded with increased need for staff time for additional reporting; customer awareness and outreach challenges; and consolidation. We found that consolidation is valuable but in many case needs more state support to implement and incentivize. From a long term perspective, the absence of expressed duty and lack of concern for risks of climate change among water managers indicates a major dearth in adaptation planning among these drinking water systems. Documentation of experiences from the 2012-2016 Drought can be used to inform future planning for droughts and more broadly climate change.