Delta Vision Strategic Plan -- from Phil Isenberg, 1939-2023

State of California | October 17th, 2008

When it was created by Governor Schwarzenegger’s Executive Order S-17-06 in 2006, the charge of the Delta Vision Blue Ribbon Task Force (Task Force) was nothing less th

When it was created by Governor Schwarzenegger’s Executive Order S-17-06 in 2006, the charge of the Delta Vision Blue Ribbon Task Force (Task Force) was nothing less than to create a vision to repair the ecological damage to the Sacramento-San Joaquin River Delta (Delta), and then prepare a strategic plan which would sustain the Delta in future decades while ensuring a reliable water supply for the two-thirds of California’s population who depend in whole or in part on water from the Delta.

Delta Water Facilities Peripheral Canal Preliminary Design Report (Draft Copy)

California Department of Water Resources (DWR) | July 31st, 1973

Determination Regarding Appeals of the Certification of Consistency by the California Department of Water Resources for California WaterFix

Delta Stewardship Council (Delta Council) | November 8th, 2018

For background and associated materials, go to the Delta Stewardship Council 

For background and associated materials, go to the Delta Stewardship Council 

DISB Review of Bay Delta Conservation Plan/California WaterFix Partially Recirculated Draft EIR/EIS

Delta Stewardship Council (Delta Council) | October 1st, 2015

We have reviewed the partially Recirculated Draft Environmental Impact Report/ Supplemental Draft Environmental Impact Statement for the Bay Delta Conservation Plan/Calif

We have reviewed the partially Recirculated Draft Environmental Impact Report/ Supplemental Draft Environmental Impact Statement for the Bay Delta Conservation Plan/California WaterFix (herein, "the Current Draft"). We focused on how fully and effectively it considers and communicates the scientific foundations for assessing the environmental impacts of water conveyance alternatives. The review is attached and is summarized below. The Current Draft contains a wealth of information but lacks completeness and clarity in applying science to far-reaching policy decisions. It defers essential material to the Final EIR/EIS and retains a number of deficiencies from the Bay Delta Conservation Plan Draft EIR/EIS. The missing content includes: 1. Details about the adaptive-management process, collaborative science, monitoring, and the resources that these efforts will require; 2. Due regard for several aspects of habitat restoration: landscape scale, timing, long-term monitoring, and the strategy of avoiding damage to existing wetlands; 3. Analyses of how levee failures would affect water operations and how the implemented project would affect the economics of levee maintenance; 4. Sufficient attention to linkages among species, landscapes, and management actions; effects of climate change on water resources; effects of the proposed project on San Joaquin Valley agriculture; and uncertainties and their consequences; 5. Informative summaries, in words, tables, and graphs, that compare the proposed alternatives and their principal environmental and economic impacts. The effects of California WaterFix extend beyond water conveyance to habitat restoration and levee maintenance. These interdependent issues of statewide importance warrant an environmental impact assessment that is more complete, comprehensive, and comprehensible than the Current Draft.

DISB Review of the Draft EIR/EIS for the Bay Delta Conservation Plan

Delta Stewardship Council (Delta Council) | May 15th, 2014

The Delta Reform Act of 2009 (§85320(c)) instructs the Delta Independent Science Board to review the Bay Delta Conservation Plan (BDCP) Draft Environmental Impact Report

The Delta Reform Act of 2009 (§85320(c)) instructs the Delta Independent Science Board to review the Bay Delta Conservation Plan (BDCP) Draft Environmental Impact Report/Environmental Impact Statement (DEIR/DEIS) and to submit our comments to the Delta Stewardship Council and the California Department of Fish and Game. We have focused our review on the adequacy of the science and the validity of the conclusions drawn from that science. The accompanying document constitutes our legislatively mandated review. We commend the preparers of the Draft BDCP documents for assembling and analyzing mountains of scientific information, and for exploring environmental impacts of many proposed BDCP actions. The preparers faced a bewildering array of regulatory requirements and economic, social, and political pressures. We find, however, that the science in this BDCP effort falls short of what the project requires. We highlight our concerns in the attached report. The report, in turn, draws on our detailed responses to charge questions from the Delta Stewardship Council (Appendix A) and on our reviews of individual chapters in the DEIR/DEIS (Appendix B). Our concerns raise issues that, if not addressed, may undermine the contributions of BDCP to meeting the co-equal goals for the Delta.

DISB Review of the Final EIR/EIS for California WaterFix

Delta Stewardship Council (Delta Council) | June 19th, 2017

The Delta Reform Act of 2009 directs the Delta Independent Science Board to review environmental impact assessments of the Bay Delta Conservation Plan (now California Wat

The Delta Reform Act of 2009 directs the Delta Independent Science Board to review environmental impact assessments of the Bay Delta Conservation Plan (now California WaterFix). Here, in our fifth such review, we focus on the adequacy of the scientific information presented in the final Environmental Impact Report (EIR)/Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) for the California WaterFix by revisiting the six main concerns we raised in our September 2015 review of the Recirculated Draft EIR/Supplemental EIS. We discuss improvements and shortcomings. We also comment on the need to improve impact assessments for scientific evaluation and effective stakeholder engagement. The Final EIR/EIS contains a wealth of detail and considerable insight. This version improves on its predecessors but retains some persistent shortcomings. Improved content on adaptive management is still short on detail about how adaptive management would be implemented under changing and uncertain conditions. Summaries and comparisons, more abundant than before, lack insightful syntheses and graphics that ease comprehension of the vast amount of material presented. Expanded discussion of Delta levees stops short of evaluating interactions with water supply reliability and neglects changing views of earthquake hazards. Long-term effects are better addressed in several ways, but with insufficient attention to uncertainties in defining the No Action Alternative and to the interplay between California groundwater sustainability and Delta water supplies. Other content missing includes evaluation of environmental effects of water use south of the Delta. Evaluation of ecosystem impacts, though extensive, retains gaps on using restoration as mitigation. The completion of our reviews of the Final EIR/EIS and its predecessors prompt us to reflect more broadly on the use and communication of science in the Delta and more specifically on the false trade off between thoroughness and intelligibility that has become common in environmental impact assessments. Overwhelming readers with content that addresses the many scientific issues related to a proposed project and its alternatives, while neglecting the thoughtful presentation and synthesis of insights and performance trade offs among alternatives, diminishes the value of this important document as a comparative guide to the expected environmental effects of the alternatives considered.

Ecological Studies of the Sacramento-San Joaquin Estuary, A Decennial Report 1961-1971

California Department of Fish and Wildlife (CDFW) | June 15th, 1972

Economic Analysis of Stage I of the California WaterFix Costs and Benefits to Urban and Agricultural Participants

California Department of Water Resources (DWR) | February 12th, 2018

The California WaterFix, considered initially as part of the Bay Delta Conservation Plan, is a foundational component of the state’s Water Action Plan. It add

The California WaterFix, considered initially as part of the Bay Delta Conservation Plan, is a foundational component of the state’s Water Action Plan. It addresses environmental, seismic, water quality and climate change threats to the existing water conveyance infrastructure in the Delta and complements efforts to improve ecological functions being advanced by the state’s California EcoRestore program. During this planning process that now spans more than 11 years, economic principles for measuring costs and benefits have been applied over time in various reports to review the values of water system and ecosystem improvements and to help advance public discussion and debate. Such cost-benefit analyses have gone beyond what is legally required because of the statewide significance of the project. This most recent analysis is intended to help examine the evolved project and the related costs and benefits of the potenti al participants in both the urban and agricultural sectors. After several years of analysis, the California Department of Water Resources is considering an option to implement the California WaterFix project in two Stage s. Stage I would consist of two 3,000-cfs intakes connected to one 40-ft diameter tunnel. From the intakes, water would be conveyed by gravity flow to a 6,000-c fs pumping plant that lifts it into Clifton Court Forebay. Stage II of the California WaterFix would consist of an additional 3,000-cfs intake connected to a second tunnel. Because not all aspects of financing and project participation have been decided at present, this report considers Stage I costs and benefits in multiple alternative scenarios. These scenarios include whether i) low - interest federal financing will be available to cover a share of project costs, ii) revenues will be collected for federal contractors’ use of up to 1,000-cfs of the Stage I project or whether the State Water Contractors will make use of the entire capa city , and iii) trading of project capacity will be allowed among t he State Water Contractors . Participants in Stage II of the California WaterFix are not currently known. Depending on the evolution of environmental regulations, water demands and climate, state and federal water agencies may decide to implement Stage II at some point in the future. At that time, a detailed cost - benefit analysis of Stage II can be completed. The analysis described in this report concludes that Stage I of the California WaterFix passes a cost - benefit test for SWP urban and agricultural agencies under all scenarios analyzed . T he ability of project participants to trade their shares in the project is highly beneficial to SWP agricultural agencies, as is the availability of federal low - interest financing . The analysis also indicates that federal contractors south of the Delta receive benefits in excess of costs from the use of up to 1,000-cfs of Stage 1 project capacity. The State Water Project contractors would also receive positive net benefits were they to use all 6,000-cfs of capacity.

Economic Sustainability Plan for the Sacramento-San Joaquin Delta

Delta Protection Commission (DPC) | July 19th, 2012

The Sacramento-San Joaquin River Delta is a unique place of economic, environmental, historic, and cultural significance. The land and water resources of the Delta suppor

The Sacramento-San Joaquin River Delta is a unique place of economic, environmental, historic, and cultural significance. The land and water resources of the Delta support significant agricultural and recreation economies, and the Delta also has an important role as an infrastructure hub for water, energy, and transportation. The region’s rich history boasts of bustling, river-based commerce before the automobile age, and its cultural uniqueness includes the only rural town in America build by early Chinese immigrants. As the largest estuary on the west coast of the Americas, the Delta also is a place of striking natural beauty and ecological significance that is struggling with serious environmental degradation problems. Although surrounded by growing cities, the Delta remains a highly-productive agricultural area with rural charms, landscapes, and waterscapes not found elsewhere in California. In recent years, there has been great concern over increasing environmental degradation in the Delta and over court decisions that reduced the quantity of water delivered to southern California through the state and federal water project intakes in the south Delta to protect endangered fish. Combined with additional concerns about the stability of the Delta’s levee system, these concerns led the California legislature to pass the Delta Reform Act of 2009. The Act created the Delta Stewardship Council and charged it with developing a Delta Plan to achieve the coequal goals of “providing a more reliable water supply for California and protecting, restoring, and enhancing the Delta ecosystem.” Recognizing the potential impact of the Delta Plan on the people and economy of the Delta, the Delta Reform Act stated that the coequal goals of water supply reliability and restoring the Delta ecosystem “shall be achieved in a manner that protects and enhances the unique cultural, recreational, natural resource, and agricultural values of the Delta as an evolving place.” Among the measures to address this goal, the Delta Protection Commission was tasked with developing this Economic Sustainability Plan to inform the Delta Stewardship Council’s development of the Delta Plan. The Legislature established the following guidelines for the Economic Sustainability Plan in the Delta Reform Act of 2009: "The economic sustainability plan shall include information and recommendations that inform the Delta Stewardship Council’s policies regarding the socioeconomic sustainability of the Delta region. (b) The economic sustainability plan shall include, but not be limited to, all of the following: 1) Public safety recommendations, such as flood protection recommendations. 2) The economic goals, policies, and objectives in local general plans and other local economic efforts, including recommendations on continued socioeconomic sustainability of agriculture and its infrastructure and legacy communities in the Delta. 3) Comments and recommendations to the Department of Water Resources concerning its periodic update of the flood management plan for the Delta. 4) Identification of ways to encourage recreational investment along the key river corridors, as appropriate. Since a key purpose of this Economic Sustainability Plan is to inform the Delta Plan under development by the Delta Stewardship Council, this report analyzes the impact of key policies being considered for the plan on the economic sustainability of the Delta. Many of the most significant proposals for the Delta are being developed in the Bay Delta Conservation Plan (BDCP). The policy proposals can be grouped into four categories: 1) water conveyance, 2) habitat creation, 3) levees, and 4) land use regulation. The report also considers many aspects of economic sustainability in the Delta that are unrelated to these water policy proposals including economic development recommendations in the 2008 Delta Vision Strategic Plan.

Fish Bulletin 133. Ecological Studies of The Sacramento-San Joaquin Estuary Part 1: Zooplankton, Zoobenthos, and Fishes of San Pablo and Suisun Bays, Zooplankton and Zoobenthos of the Delta

California Department of Fish and Wildlife (CDFW) | September 9th, 1965

The Sacramento and San Joaquin Rivers have a common estuary. These two streams meet in the center of California's central valley to form the Delta (Figure 1). A hundred y

The Sacramento and San Joaquin Rivers have a common estuary. These two streams meet in the center of California's central valley to form the Delta (Figure 1). A hundred years ago the Delta was an extensive tidal marsh, but it has been almost entirely reclaimed for agriculture. The Delta now includes about 738,000 acres of land and water, 700 miles of navigable channels, and 30 large, below sea level islands. About 39,000 acres are covered by water. Some Delta channels are edged with narrow stretches of intertidal marsh but most of them have steep banks of mud or are covered with large cobbles to prevent erosion. They vary in width from a few hundred feet to a mile and are seldom more than 30 to 40 feet deep. In some areas there are small "waste" islands that flood during high tides. These waste islands and levees that surround all Delta channels are covered with an assortment of emergent aquatic plants, grasses, forbs, shrubs, and trees. Water heading toward the sea from the Delta passes through Suisun Bay, which is merely the wide combination of the Sacramento and San Joaquin Rivers below the Delta. Thirty-six percent of Suisun Bay is flooded by less than 3 feet of water at mean lower-low tide, and at this stage about 3,000 acres of intertidal zone is exposed. Richard Painter (see p. 40) has included a map of the 6-foot contour. From Suisun Bay the water flows through the 6-mile long and up to 100 feet deep Carquinez Strait into San Pablo Bay. Almost 60 percent of San Pablo Bay's 73,000 acres is less than 6 feet deep at mean lower-low tide. San Pablo Bay has a much more extensive intertidal area than Suisun Bay. San Pablo Bay water flows into San Francisco Bay and then through the narrow Golden Gate into the Pacific Ocean. The investigations reported on in this bulletin were geographically limited to the upper and middle portions of the estuary—from the Delta through San Pablo Bay. We have not investigated below San Pablo Bay. McCarty et al (1962) described south San Francisco Bay, and Storrs, Selleck, and Pearson (1964) described north San Francisco Bay. Gillian (1957) wrote an interesting and useful popular account of the entire bay.