DRERIP Ecosystem Conceptual Model: Mercury

California Department of Fish and Wildlife (CDFW) | January 24th, 2008

Mercury has been identified as an important contaminant in the Delta, based on elevated concentrations of methylmercury (a toxic, organic form that readily bioaccumulates

Mercury has been identified as an important contaminant in the Delta, based on elevated concentrations of methylmercury (a toxic, organic form that readily bioaccumulates) in fish and wildlife. There are health risks associated with human exposure to methylmercury by consumption of sport fish, particularly top predators such as bass species. Original mercury sources were upstream tributaries where historical mining of mercury in the Coast Ranges and gold in the Sierra Nevada and Klamath-Trinity Mountains caused contamination of water and sediment on a regional scale. Remediation of abandoned mine sites may reduce local sources in these watersheds, but much of the mercury contamination occurs in sediments stored in the riverbeds, floodplains, and the Bay-Delta, where scouring of Gold-Rush-era sediment represents an ongoing source. Conversion of inorganic mercury to toxic methylmercury occurs in anaerobic environments including some wetlands. Wetland restoration managers must be cognizant of potential effects on mercury cycling so that the problem is not exacerbated. Recent research suggests that wetting-drying cycles can contribute to mercury methylation. For example, high marshes (inundated only during the highest tides for several days per month) tend to have higher methylmercury concentrations in water, sediment, and biota compared with low marshes, which do not dry out completely during the tidal cycle. Seasonally inundated flood plains are another environment experiencing wetting and drying where methylmercury concentrations are typically elevated. Stream restoration efforts using gravel injection or other reworking of coarse sediment in most watersheds of the Central Valley involve tailings from historical gold mining that are likely to contain elevated mercury in associated fines. Habitat restoration projects, particularly those involving wetlands, may cause increases in methylmercury exposure in the watershed. This possibility should be evaluated. The DRERIP mercury conceptual model and its four submodels (1. Methylation, 2. Bioaccumulation, 3. Human Health Effects, and 4. Wildlife Heath Effects) can be used to understand the general relationships among drivers and outcomes associated with mercury cycling in the Delta. Several linkages between important drivers and outcomes have been identified as important but highly uncertain (i.e. poorly understood). For example, there may be significant wildlife health effect of mercury on mammals and reptiles in the Delta, but there is currently very little or no information about it. The characteristics of such linkages are important when prioritizing and funding restoration projects and associated monitoring in the Delta and its tributaries.

DRERIP Ecosystem Conceptual Model: Pyrethroids

California Department of Fish and Wildlife (CDFW) | February 27th, 2008

To illustrate the applicability of the general model outlined in Delta Chemical Stressors conceptual model Werner et al. (2008), we are providing an example of its implem

To illustrate the applicability of the general model outlined in Delta Chemical Stressors conceptual model Werner et al. (2008), we are providing an example of its implementation for a specific group of contaminants, synthetic pyrethroid insecticides.  Although numerous different pyrethroids exist, the members of this group share many chemical and toxicological characteristics. The US EPA’s decision to phase out certain uses of organophosphate insecticides because of their potential for causing toxicity in humans has led to their gradual replacement by pyrethroids, a class of synthetic insecticides applied in both urban and agricultural areas. They are applied in urban areas primarily for structural pest control, in agricultural areas on crops such as almonds, alfalfa, cotton, lettuce, pistachios, and peaches, and in the home in pet sprays and shampoos. In 2005, five pyrethroids were among the top 21 agricultural insecticides by acres treated in California: lambdacyhalothrin (rank 7), permethrin (rank 9), esfenvalerate (rank 11), cypermethrin (rank 14) and cyfluthrin (rank 21) (California Department of Pesticide Regulation, Pesticide Use Reporting database: www.cdpr.ca.gov). Both winter storm runoff, as well as irrigation return water may be important routes of transport into aquatic systems. Pyrethroids at toxic concentrations have been detected in the majority of sediment samples collected from water bodies draining agricultural areas in the Central Valley (Weston et al., 2004; California Regional Water Quality Control Board Agricultural Waiver Program, 2007), as well as from urban creeks in the Bay/Delta region (Amweg et al., 2006; Woudneh and Oros, 2006 a, b). Pyrethroid concentrations toxic to aquatic life were detected in water samples from Central Valley agricultural drains and creeks (Central Valley Regional Water Quality Control Board, 2005; Bacey et al., 2005), and tributaries to San Francisco Bay (Woudneh and Oros, 2006 a, b). Aquatic organisms, in particular insects, crustaceans and fish, are highly sensitive to pyrethroid insecticides (Oros and Werner, 2005). Acute toxicity to fish and aquatic invertebrates is generally observed at concentrations below 1 ?g/L, and sublethal effects have been reported at low ng/L concentrations. Although it is difficult to model sublethal responses to toxicants and predict ecotoxicological impact or risk, measures of sublethal effects are likely to be as important, or more important, than the measures of acute or chronic lethal effects to accurately assess the consequences of contaminant exposure. All pyrethroids are potent neurotoxicants (Bradbury and Coats, 1989; Shafer and Meyer, 2004), can inhibit ATPases (Litchfield, 1985), and have immunosuppressive effects (Madsen et al., 1996; Clifford et al., 2005). In addition, these compounds and their breakdown products can disrupt hormone-related functions (Go et al., 1999; Tyler et al., 2000; Perry et al., 2006; Sun et al., 2007). As pyrethroid concentrations in the Delta would be expected to peak during the winter/spring storm season (Werner et al. 2004, 2006), as well as after peak agricultural application in the summer and fall (Weston et al., 2004), early life-stages of important Delta fish species or their prey may be directly exposed to these contaminants. The storm season coincides with the spawning and rearing period of several important fish such as the delta smelt, which spawns from February to June (Moyle, 1976). Juvenile fish depend on planktonic crustaceans, small insect larvae, and mysid shrimp as their major food items (Moyle 1976), which are highly sensitive to pyrethroids. It has been suggested that urban and agricultural pesticide use in the Central Valley and Delta region might play a role in the pelagic organism declines observed in the upper estuary (Oros and Werner, 2005).

Drinking water nitrate and human health: An updated review

Multidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute (MDPI) | July 23rd, 2018

Drinking Water Notification Levels and Response Levels: An Overview

California State Water Resources Control Board (SWRCB) | February 6th, 2020

The Division of Drinking Water’s precursor, the Drinking Water Program of the California Department of Public Health (CDPH), and earlier, the California Department of H

The Division of Drinking Water’s precursor, the Drinking Water Program of the California Department of Public Health (CDPH), and earlier, the California Department of Health Services, CDHS, established health-based advisory levels, called “notification levels” (referred to as “action levels" through 2004), as needed since the early 1980s. These have been used to provide information to public water systems and others about certain non-regulated chemicals in drinking water that lack maximum contaminant levels (MCLs).  When chemicals are found at concentrations greater than these levels, certain requirement and recommendations apply.  Generally, notification levels have been established in response to actual contamination of drinking water supplies, e.g., perchlorate, which now has an MCL. However, notification levels for a number of chemicals were established in anticipation of possible contamination, such as from a hazardous waste site containing many pesticides (in the 1980s), or from a Superfund site (in the 2000s).  Chemicals for which notification levels are established may eventually be regulated by MCLs (through a formal regulatory process), depending on the extent of contamination, the levels observed, and the risk to human health. Most, however, have not proceeded to MCLs. Once established, a notification level generally stays in place, unless it is replaced by an MCL.On occasion, though, we have revised the numeric value of an individualnotification level to reflect new risk assessment information on the particularchemical. For some of the chemicals that had advisory levels established early on, if noMCL was adopted and the need for the notification level had passed, the advisory levelwas archived. Archived advisory levels may nevertheless be updated to reflect any newrisk information that may become available, and may be used as notification levels ifneeded. To date, of the 93 chemicals for which notification levels have been established; 40 now have MCLs. Of the remaining 53 chemicals, 29 are chemicals with current notification levels. 24 are chemicals with archived advisory levels (AALs). Note that following adoption of an MCL, the notification level is no longer used. For more about AALs and notification levels, go to: http://www.waterboards.ca.gov/drinking_water/certlic/drinkingwater/NotificationLevels.shtml. 

Drinking Water Quality Report 2018

Los Angeles Department of Water & Power (LADWP) | September 2nd, 2019

Dry Me a River: Ecological Effects of Drought in the Upper San Francisco Estuary

University of California, Davis (UC Davis) | May 24th, 2024

EcoAtlas - Lake Tahoe Environmental Improvement Program: Tool Integration White Paper

San Francisco Estuary Institute (SFEI) | February 1st, 2016

Ecological Health in the Nation’s Streams, 1993–2005

U.S. Geological Survey (USGS) | July 2nd, 2013

This report summarizes a national assessment of the ecological health of streams done by the U.S. Geological Survey's (USGS) National Water-Quality Assessment Program (NA

This report summarizes a national assessment of the ecological health of streams done by the U.S. Geological Survey's (USGS) National Water-Quality Assessment Program (NAWQA). Healthy functioning stream ecosystems provide society with many benefits, including water purification, flood control, nutrient recycling, waste decomposition, fisheries, and aesthetics. The value to society of many of these benefits is substantial; for example, sportfishing in the United States generates an estimated annual economic output of $125 billion, including more than 1 million jobs (National Research Council, 2005; American Sportfishing Association, 2008). Continued monitoring and assessment of the Nation’s streams is needed to support informed decisions that will safeguard this important natural and economic resource. The quality of streams and rivers is often assessed with measures of the chemical or physical properties of water. However, a more comprehensive perspective is obtained if resident biological communities are also assessed. Guidelines to protect human health and aquatic life have been established for specific physical and chemical properties of water and have become useful yardsticks with which to assess water quality. Biological communities provide additional crucial information because they live within streams for weeks to years and therefore integrate through time the effects of changes to their chemical or physical environment. In addition, biological communities are a direct measure of stream health—an indicator of the ability of a stream to support aquatic life. Thus, the condition of biological communities, integrated with key physical and chemical properties, provides a comprehensive assessment of stream health.

Ecological Limits of Hydrologic Alteration: Environmental Flows for Regional Water Management

U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) | March 20th, 2008

Worldwide, water conflicts are escalating as cities, industries, agriculture, and energy producers compete for limited freshwater supplies. At the same time, there is a g

Worldwide, water conflicts are escalating as cities, industries, agriculture, and energy producers compete for limited freshwater supplies. At the same time, there is a growing awareness of the need to maintain adequate freshwater flows in rivers, lakes, floodplains, aquifers, and estuaries to sustain biodiversity and the many benefits derived from the healthy, functioning ecosystems upon which local communities and economies depend. Efficient, integrated water resource management systems help  governments provide for growing human populations while protecting and restoring healthy freshwater ecosystems. The integration of ecological considerations into water management has been hampered by the difficulty, cost, and time required for determining environmental flows -- the quantity, timing, and quality of water flows required to sustain freshwater and estuarine ecosystems and the human livelihoods and well-being that depend on these ecosystems.  Environmental flow assessments scientifically evaluate tradeoffs between alteration of natural water flow patterns by humans and consequent changes in ecological health.

Effects of ferric sulfate and polyaluminum chloride coagulation enhanced treatment wetlands on Typha growth, soil and water chemistry

Science of the Total Environment (Elsevier) | January 15th, 2019

Land surface subsidence is a concern in many deltas worldwide as it contributes to water quality degradation, loss of fertile land and increased potential for levee f

Land surface subsidence is a concern in many deltas worldwide as it contributes to water quality degradation, loss of fertile land and increased potential for levee failure. As a possible solution to these concerns, on-site coagulation enhanced treatment wetlands (CETWs), coagulation water treatment followed by wetland passage serving as a settling basin, were implemented in a field-scale study located on a subsided island of the Sacramento-San Joaquin Delta in northern California under three treatments; coagulation with polyaluminum chloride (PAC), coagulation with ferric sulfate and an untreated control. Because CETWs offer a relatively novel solution for water quality improvement and subsidence reversal due to its low-infrastructure requirements and in-situ nature, effects from these systems remain uncharted and they may have adverse effects on plant biomass production that also contribute to sediment accretion. This study focuses on the effect CETWs had on the growth of Typha spp.; the dominant vegetation in the wetlands. Plant growth parameters and nutrient content were measured in conjunction with soil, pore water and surface water chemistry. Soil analysis indicated there was no intermixing of newly formed flocs and original soil material. Where there was significant deposition of floc, PAC treatment reduced phosphateconcentrations and ferric sulfate treatment increased total Fe concentrations in surrounding water compared to the control. Results indicated coagulation treatments had no negative effects on Typha leaf nutrient content, Typha growth or allometric parameters. Additionally, no signs of plant toxicity such as necrosis, wilting or chlorosis were observed in any of the treatments. Overall, this study suggests that CETWs are viable treatment option for water quality improvement and sediment accretion while having no negative impact on the growth of Typha plants.