System Reoperation, Phase 3 Appendix D: Ecosystem Evaluation

California Department of Water Resources (DWR) | August 21st, 2017

Senate Bill (SB) X2 1 mandated and allocated resources for “planning and feasibility studies to identify potential options for the reoperation of the state's flood prot

Senate Bill (SB) X2 1 mandated and allocated resources for “planning and feasibility studies to identify potential options for the reoperation of the state's flood protection and water supply systems that will optimize the use of existing facilities and groundwater storage capacity.” Specifically, SB X2 1 stipulated that the studies shall be designed to determine the potential to achieve integration of flood protection and water supply systems to increase water supply reliability and flood protection, improve water quality, and provide for ecosystem protection and restoration. For this evaluation, a suite of ecosystem evaluation metrics were developed to evaluate the effects of reoperation scenarios simulated in Phases II and III of the SRP. Phase II reoperation scenarios were used to develop and test the ecosystem evaluation framework, and to quantify the effects of reoperation at Shasta and Oroville paired with conjunctive use and spring pulse flows. The next step was studying the ecosystem effects of Forecast-Based-Operation (FBO) at Shasta and Oroville combined with conjunctive use and spring pulse flows. Finally, t additional scenarios were developed and evaluated to explore the sensitivity of ecosystem performance to FBO and the potential for reoperation to enhance major ongoing ecosystem restoration efforts in the system. The purpose of this report is to document and describe the methods and results from the ecosystem evaluation to date, and to outline additional steps that could optimize reoperation scenarios for ecosystem improvement. RELATED DOCUMENTS: System Reoperation Study, Phase 1: Plan of Study System Reoperation Study, Phase 2: Strategy Formulation and Refinement System Reoperation Study, Phase 2: Appendix A: Forecast?Based Operations Analysis System Reoperation Study, Phase 2: Appendix B: Tradeoff Analysis System Reoperation Study, Phase 3 Report: Assessment of Reoperation Strategies System Reoperation, Phase 3: Appendix C: State Water Project and Central Valley Project Integrated Operations Analysis System Reoperation, Phase 3 Appendix D: Ecosystem Evaluation

System Reoperation, Phase 3: Appendix C: State Water Project and Central Valley Project Integrated Operations Analysis

California Department of Water Resources (DWR) | August 21st, 2017

The California Department of Water Resources (DWR) is conducting a system reoperation study (SRS) in cooperation with other state and federal agencies, local water distri

The California Department of Water Resources (DWR) is conducting a system reoperation study (SRS) in cooperation with other state and federal agencies, local water districts, groundwater managers, and other stakeholders to identify potential strategies for reoperation of the statewide flood protection and water supply systems. The opportunity to reoperate portions of California’s statewide water system to yield increased water resources–related benefits was recognized by the State Legislature in Senate Bill (SB) X2 1 (Perata, 2008 – Water Code Section 83002.5). In support of the legislative objectives, DWR developed the SRS to identify viable reoperation strategies and understand how integrated management can: • Improve the reliability of municipal and irrigation water supply • Reduce flood hazards • Restore and protect ecosystem function and habitat conditions • Buffer the hydrologic variations expected from climate change • Improve water quality A component of the SRS is to evaluate how operational improvements of the state and federal water Projects in California may increase water supply and enhance ecosystem function and habitat. The Central Valley Project (CVP) generally has more storage and less conveyance flexibility; the opposite is generally true for the State Water Project (SWP). The SWP and CVP are operated by DWR and the U.S. Bureau of Reclamation (Reclamation), respectively. The operation of the two Projects is coordinated in accordance with the 1986 Coordinated Operating Agreement and other agreements. Though the operation is coordinated, the SWP and CVP are operating as two distinct units. They each have different contractual obligations and operating constraints. Operational improvements using strengths and assets of both Projects may result in improved operational efficiency and help achieve goals of the SRS. The purpose of this effort is to assess potential benefits of operating the SWP and CVP as a single, integrated Project. RELATED DOCUMENTS: System Reoperation Study, Phase 1: Plan of Study System Reoperation Study, Phase 2: Strategy Formulation and Refinement System Reoperation Study, Phase 2: Appendix A: Forecast?Based Operations Analysis System Reoperation Study, Phase 2: Appendix B: Tradeoff Analysis System Reoperation Study, Phase 3 Report: Assessment of Reoperation Strategies System Reoperation, Phase 3: Appendix C: State Water Project and Central Valley Project Integrated Operations Analysis System Reoperation, Phase 3 Appendix D: Ecosystem Evaluation

Temporary Urgency Change Petition for February 1, 2023, through March 31, 2023

California State Water Resources Control Board (SWRCB) | February 13th, 2023

The Burns-Porter Act: A California High Water Mark

State Water Contractors (SWC) | April 2nd, 1984

The Decline of Striped Bass in the Sacramento-San Joaquin Estuary, California

American Fisheries Society (AFS) | July 1st, 1985

The abundance of young striped bass Morone saxatilis in the Sacramento-San Joaquin Estuary has suffered an unsteady but persistent decline from population levels that wer

The abundance of young striped bass Morone saxatilis in the Sacramento-San Joaquin Estuary has suffered an unsteady but persistent decline from population levels that were high in the middle 1960s. The decline was particularly severe in 1977 and abundance of young striped bass has been low every subsequent year. The adult striped bass population also has fallen during the past 20 years, but the exact period over which the decline occurred and the rate of decline are not clear. The adult population is now about one-quarter of its former size and there is little sign of recovery. We believe the Sacramento-San Joaquin striped bass population and the fishery that it supports are in serious danger. The cause is most likely one or more of four factors. (1) The adult population is now so low that egg production may be inadequate. (2) The plankton food supply of young striped bass in the western Sacramento-San Joaquin Delta and Suisun Bay has been greatly reduced each spring. Diversion of water from the delta for agricultural purposes is a prime suspect for the decrease in food production. (3) Large numbers of young fish are lost by entrainment in water diversions. (4) The population is stressed by toxic substances such as petrochemicals and pesticides. Additional studies are underway to help determine the principal cause(s) of the striped bass decline.

The Delta Plan

Delta Stewardship Council (Delta Council) | May 16th, 2013

The Delta Plan is a comprehensive, long-term management plan for the Delta. Required by the 2009 Delta Reform Act, it creates new rules and recommendations to further the

The Delta Plan is a comprehensive, long-term management plan for the Delta. Required by the 2009 Delta Reform Act, it creates new rules and recommendations to further the state’s coequal goals for the Delta: Improve statewide water supply reliability, and protect and restore a vibrant and healthy Delta ecosystem, all in a manner that preserves, protects and enhances the unique agricultural, cultural, and recreational characteristics of the Delta. Now the Council is considering updates to the Delta Plan. For information about the amendment process, please click here. Developed through eights drafts, hundreds of hours of public meetings and thousands of public comments over two years, the Delta Plan is guided by the best available science and is founded on cooperation and coordination among federal, State and local agencies. The Delta Plan is enforceable through regulatory authority in the Delta Reform Act that requires state and local agencies to be consistent with the Delta Plan. The Delta Plan was unanimously adopted by the Delta Stewardship Council on May 16, 2013. Subsequently its 14 regulatory policies were approved by the Office of Administrative Law, a state agency that ensures the regulations are clear, necessary, legally valid, and available to the public. The Delta Plan became effective with legally-enforceable regulations on September 1, 2013.

The Draft State Water Project Delivery Capability Report 2021

California Department of Water Resources (DWR) | December 31st, 2021

The California Department of Water Resources (DWR) has authority under state law to construct, operate, and maintain the State Water Project (SWP) to manage, store and de

The California Department of Water Resources (DWR) has authority under state law to construct, operate, and maintain the State Water Project (SWP) to manage, store and deliver water for the benefit of the State. This report is intended to provide information about the key factors affecting the operation of the SWP in California, its long-term capability as a source of water for beneficial use, and an estimate of its current delivery capability. This report meets the requirements of Attachment B to the Monterey Plus Settlement Agreement of May 2003. Water provided by the SWP is a major source of the water supplies available to many SWP contractors. SWP contractors consist of 29 public entities that include cities, counties, urban water agencies, and agricultural irrigation districts. SWP contractors’ local/-regional water users have long-term contracts with the DWR for all, or a portion of their water supply needs. Thus, the delivery capability of water from the SWP system is an important component in the water supply planning of its recipients, and ultimately affects the amount of water available for beneficial use in California. The availability of these water supplies may be highly variable. A sequence of relatively wet water years1 may be followed by a varying sequence of dry or critically dry years. Having good and reliable estimates on how much water each contractor will receive each year —- whether it be a wet water year, a critical year, or somewhere in between -- gives contractors a better sense of the degree to which they may need to implement increased conservation measures, or plan for new facilities or back up sources of water to meet their needs. The geography of California and the infrastructure of water transfer from the source areas, located in the Sierra Mountain Range, to areas of demand for water, makes the Sacramento-San Joaquin Delta a key feature of the SWP’s ability to deliver water to its agricultural and urban contractors in the North Bay, the South Bay, California Central Valley, and Southern California. All but five of the 29 SWP contractors receive water deliveries by diversions from the Delta. These water diversions are pumped by either the Harvey O. Banks or Barker Slough pumping plants. DWR and the United States Bureau of Reclamation (USBR), the managing entities of the two statewide systems of water transfer in California, face numerous challenges in the operation of their diversion facilities in the Delta, and are regulated by several state and federal agencies to maintain, and enhance the Delta’s long-term sustainability. Maintaining suitable quality of water flowing in the channels of the Delta for the numerous in-basin beneficial uses, and the protection of endangered and threatened fish species are important factors of concern for the operators of the Delta export diversion facilities. Ongoing regulatory restrictions, such as those aimed at protecting the estuary’s resident and migratory fish species, are major challenges to a reliable and sustainable water delivery capability of both, SWP and the Central Valley Project (CVP) systems. Complications induced by climate change also pose the threat of increased variability in the frequency and magnitude of floods and droughts. The projected sea level rise caused by the increase in average temperature complicate efforts to manage salinity levels in the channels affected by tides. Additionally, higher ocean levels could result in more frequent water quality degradation in the Delta channels requiring additional Delta outflow to maintain water quality objectives. The 2021 Final Main Report (released at the end of March 2022) may include further information on climate change. Previously, the climate change scenario results were only discussed and presented in the Technical Addendum which is not published during the draft phase of the Delivery Capability Report (DCR). Other challenges include continued subsidence of Delta islands, many of which are already below sea level and supported by relatively unstable levee systems. Thus, the threat of a catastrophic levee failure becomes more significant as water pressure increases against the already fragile levees. The analyses in this report factor in all the current regulations governing SWP and CVP operations in the Delta and assumptions about water uses upstream in the Sacramento River and San Joaquin River watersheds. Analyses were conducted that determined the amounts of water that SWP contractors receive and the amounts of water they choose to hold for use in a subsequent year. SWP Delta exports have decreased since 2005, although the bulk of the change occurred between 2005 and 2009 and in 2019. The former reduction is due to the Delta regulations which constrained exports that culminated in the federal Biological Opinions (BiOps) which went into effect in 2008-2009. These BiOps restricted operations of the CVP and SWP diversion pumps. The later reduction is due to two main factors: 1) the amended Coordinated Operation Agreement (COA) with accompanying project operation changes which reduced SWP exports and increased CVP exports, and (2) a more conservative operation of Lake Oroville by the SWP. Many of the same assumptions on SWP operations described in the 2019 Report remains the same in this update for 2021, however, there were a few notable changes. These include the transition from CalSim II to CalSim 3 and CVP and SWP operational refinements. As a result, the differences between the 2019 and 2021 Reports can be attributed primarily to differences in hydrology, spatial and temporal expansion, more explicit groundwater and surface water interaction representation, and operational refinements. The most salient findings in this report are: Under existing conditions, the estimated average annual delivery of Table A water for this 2021 Report is 2,309 thousand acre-feet (TAF)/year, 105 TAF less than the 2,414 TAF/year estimated for the 2019 Report (Table 5-2). The likelihood of existing condition SWP Article 21 deliveries (supplemental deliveries to Table A water) being greater than 20 TAF/year has decreased by 20% relative to the likelihood presented in the 2019 Report (Figure 5-7).

The Final State Water Project Delivery Capability Report 2019

California Department of Water Resources (DWR) | August 26th, 2020

The California Department of Water Resources (DWR) has authority under state law to construct, operate, and maintain the State Water Project (SWP) to manage, store and de

The California Department of Water Resources (DWR) has authority under state law to construct, operate, and maintain the State Water Project (SWP) to manage, store and deliver water for the benefit of the State. This report is intended to provide information about the key factors affecting the operation of the SWP in California, its long-term capability as a source of water for beneficial use, and an estimate of its current delivery capability. This report meets the requirements of Attachment B to the Monterey Plus Settlement Agreement of May 2003. Water provided by the SWP is a major source of the water supplies available to many SWP contractors. SWP contractors consist of 29 public entities that include cities, counties, urban water agencies, and agricultural irrigation districts. SWP contractors’ local/regional water users have long-term contracts with the California Department of Water Resources (DWR) for all, or a portion of their water supply needs. Thus, the delivery capability of water from the SWP system is an important component in the water supply planning of its recipients, and ultimately affects the amount of water available for beneficial use in California. The availability of these water supplies may be highly variable. A sequence of relatively wet water years1 may be followed by a varying sequence of dry or critically dry years. Having good and reliable estimates on how much water each water user under contract with DWR will receive in a given year—whether it be a wet water year, a critical year, or somewhere in between—gives Contractors a better sense of the degree to which they may need to implement increased conservation measures, or plan for new facilities or back up sources of water to meet their needs. The geography of California and the infrastructure of water transfer from the source areas, located in the Sierra Mountain Range, to areas of demand for water, makes the Sacramento-San Joaquin Delta a key feature of the SWP’s ability to deliver water to its agricultural and urban Contractors in the North Bay, the South Bay, California Central Valley, and Southern California. All but five of the 29 SWP Contractors receive water deliveries by diversions from the Delta. These water diversions are pumped by either the Harvey O. Banks or Barker Slough pumping plants. DWR, and the United States Bureau of Reclamation (USBR), the managing entities of the two statewide systems of water transfer in California, face numerous challenges in the operation of their diversion facilities in the Delta, and are regulated by several state and federal agencies to maintain, and enhance the Delta’s long-term sustainability. Maintaining suitable quality of water flowing in the channels of the Delta for the numerous in-basin beneficial uses, and the protection of endangered and threatened fish species, are important factors of concern for the operators of the Delta export diversion facilities. Ongoing regulatory restrictions, such as those aimed at protecting the estuary’s resident and migratory fish species are major challenges to a reliable, and at the same time, sustainable water delivery capability of both, SWP and the Central Valley Project (CVP) systems. Complications induced by climate change also pose the threat of increased variability in floods and droughts, and the projected sea level rise, caused by the increase in average temperature, complicate efforts to manage salinity levels in the channels affected by tides. Higher ocean levels could result in more frequent water quality degradation in the Delta channels requiring additional outflow from the Delta to maintain water quality objectives, and reduced delivery capability. Among the other challenges are continued subsidence of Delta islands, many of which are already below sea level, maintained by relatively unstable levee system, and the related threat of a catastrophic levee failure as water pressure increases on fragile levees. The analyses in this report factor in all the current regulations governing SWP and CVP operations in the Delta and upstream, and assumptions about water uses upstream in the Sacramento River and San Joaquin River watersheds. Analyses were conducted that considered the amounts of water that SWP Contractors use, and the amounts of water they choose to hold for use in a subsequent year.

The Monterey Amendments to State Water Project Contracts: A History

California Water Impact Network (C-WIN) | February 28th, 2010

Policy statement: C-WIN works to overturn the Monterey Plus amendments to the State Water Project contracts. To return the state mandated "Urban Preference"; to require t

Policy statement: C-WIN works to overturn the Monterey Plus amendments to the State Water Project contracts. To return the state mandated "Urban Preference"; to require the contracts to reflect water that is really there; to stop the abusive pumping of water that is not surplus; and to return the Kern Water Bank to the public to firm up the urban preference for the 22 million urban water users south of the Delta in times of drought. Drought from 1987 to 1992, and again in 1994, financial crisis among state water contractors, and the prospect of tighter regulation of Delta exports by the State Water Project (SWP) by the state and federal government provoked the project’s most serious crisis. In 1994 four of the SWP contractors, including the Metropolitan Water District of Southern California (MWD) and the Kern County Water Agency which together control about 75 percent of State Water Project allocations, and representatives from Paramount Farming (a private company), met secretly in Monterey to attempt to resolve their water shortage dilemma. The result was the Monterey Amendments to the State Water Project water service contracts.

The Monterey Plus Amendments to State Contracts: “Paper Water” and the Kern Water Bank Giveaway: A C-WIN Policy Brief

California Water Impact Network (C-WIN) | January 1st, 2012

Changes secretly made to the State Water Project by water contractors and the California Department of Water Resources in the 1990s, known as the Monterey Plus Amendments

Changes secretly made to the State Water Project by water contractors and the California Department of Water Resources in the 1990s, known as the Monterey Plus Amendments, caused ecological destruction in the Delta and made water supplies for State Water Project customers much more expensive and less reliable.