Making the Delta a Better Place for Native Fishes

Orange County Coastkeeper | March 1st, 2018

The Sacramento-San Joaquin Delta is the heart of California’s water delivery system, connecting the precipitation-rich regions of the north with the dry farmlands and

The Sacramento-San Joaquin Delta is the heart of California’s water delivery system, connecting the precipitation-rich regions of the north with the dry farmlands and demanding urban areas of the south and coast, including the Bay Area. Scarce water resources create conflicts between people and fishes; as demand by people for water grows, less water is available for the environment. This white paper explores the ways to keep the native fishes, and the functional ecosystems they require, from disappearing. Our analysis is fish-oriented because salmon, smelt, and other declining fishes are major drivers of decisions on where to focus aquatic restoration efforts.  The goals of this white paper are to first provide a brief introduction to the Delta and then to describe why restoration of native fishes and natural processes is such a challenge in this system. We follow this with some general guidelines for restoration projects in the Delta and apply those guidelines with a project evaluation tool. We used this tool to evaluate 26 projects, mostly part of EcoRestore, to provide insights to help determine action items. We then present 17 action items, listed below, some of which can be accomplished fairly quickly, some that will take longer, and few that will have to be continuous. But taken together, our recommended actions could significantly improve the welfare of native fishes and help to create a novel aquatic ecosystem with many desirable features.

Maladaptation to drought: a case report from California, USA

Sustainability Science (Springer) | October 15th, 2015

The interactions between natural water availability and societal water demand and management are complex. In response to gaps in empirical research of the adaptive capaci

The interactions between natural water availability and societal water demand and management are complex. In response to gaps in empirical research of the adaptive capacity of social and environmental systems to climate stresses, we provide an assessment of responses to water scarcity during a multi-year drought in California. In particular, we use Barnett and O’Neill’s (Global Environ Change 20:211–213, 2010) criteria for maladaptation to examine responses in the agricultural and energy sectors to a multi-year (2007–2009) California drought. We conclude that despite evidence in both sectors of resiliency to the impacts of the drought, some of the coping strategies adopted increased the vulnerability of other systems. These other systems include California’s aquatic ecosystems and social groups that rely on those ecosystems for their health or employment; future generations whose resources were drawn down in the near-term, where otherwise those resources would have been available at a later time; and current and future generations who were, or will be, exposed to the effects of increased greenhouse gas emissions. This case study demonstrates that California’s current strategies for dealing with long or severe droughts are less successful than previously thought when short- and long-term impacts are evaluated together. This finding is particularly relevant given projections of more frequent and severe water shortages in the future due to climate change. This study recommends a shift from crisis-driven responses to the development and enactment of long-term mitigation measures that are anticipatory and focus on comprehensive risk reduction.

Managing a cyanobacteria harmful algae bloom “hotspot” in the Sacramento – San Joaquin Delta, California

Journal of Environmental Management (Elsevier) | December 10th, 2023

Managing California’s Freshwater Ecosystems: Lessons from the 2012-16 Drought

Public Policy Institute of California (PPIC) | November 16th, 2017

The 2012–16 drought caused unprecedented stress to California’s ecosystems and pushed many native species to the brink of extinction. It also tested the laws, policie

The 2012–16 drought caused unprecedented stress to California’s ecosystems and pushed many native species to the brink of extinction. It also tested the laws, policies, and institutions charged with protecting the environment. Eight case studies on environmental water management during the drought reveal both strengths and weaknesses in federal, state, and local response that can inform how California addresses future droughts. Three areas of reform hold promise for improving ecosystem conditions and reducing conflict: * Improve water accounting. Drought management requires accurate and timely information about water use and availability and about likely environmental response to changes in water supply. But California’s current tracking systems are neither timely nor transparent. To address these gaps, environmental water accounting and ecosystem monitoring systems need an overhaul. * Prepare for drought. With a few significant exceptions, environmental water managers were unprepared for the environmental consequences of an extended drought, and were forced to make ad hoc decisions during a crisis. Developing watershed-level plans that set ecosystem priorities and identify trade-offs would help managers anticipate drought and drive implementation of habitat investments and water allocation. Annual watering plans that guide management under different types of water years would better engage and inform water users. * Develop ecosystem water budgets. Current methods of allocating water to support ecosystem health rely on minimum flow standards that are unevenly enforced and often insufficient during drought. Ecosystem water budgets, which allocate a portion of water to the ecosystem within watersheds, could enable more flexible and effective water management during dry times. Although state and federal agencies have important

Managing California’s Freshwater Ecosystems: Lessons from the 2012–16 Drought

Public Policy Institute of California (PPIC) | November 9th, 2017

The 2012–16 drought caused unprecedented stress to California’s ecosystems and pushed many native species to the brink of extinction. It also tested the laws, policie

The 2012–16 drought caused unprecedented stress to California’s ecosystems and pushed many native species to the brink of extinction. It also tested the laws, policies, and institutions charged with protecting the environment. Eight case studies on environmental water management during the drought reveal both strengths and weaknesses in federal, state, and local response that can inform how California addresses future droughts.

Managing California’s Water: From Conflict to Reconciliation

Public Policy Institute of California (PPIC) | April 5th, 2011

In this book, we explore solutions for the modern era, when water management must become more balanced and flexible to support both economic prosperity and environmental

In this book, we explore solutions for the modern era, when water management must become more balanced and flexible to support both economic prosperity and environmental sustainability. We start by reviewing the history of how California has adapted to changes and conflicts in water management in the past—slowly, controversially, and imperfectly—but with remarkable success. We then lay out a variety of promising principles and directions for improving water management in California for contemporary and anticipated future conditions.

Managing Freshwater Discharge to the San Francisco Bay/Sacramento-San Joaquin Delta Estuary―The Scientific Basis for an Estuarine Standard

San Francisco Estuary Project | October 26th, 1992

Aquatic resources of the Sacramento-San Joaquin Delta and upper portions of San Francisco Bay have undergone significant declines over the past several decades. Species c

Aquatic resources of the Sacramento-San Joaquin Delta and upper portions of San Francisco Bay have undergone significant declines over the past several decades. Species characteristic of the Delta and rivers, such as striped bass and salmon, began to decline during the late 1970s. Prolonged drought, large diversions of fresh water, and dramatic increases in populations of introduced aquatic species during the 1980s and 1990s brought a number of indigenous aquatic species to extremely low levels. Species that spend more of their lives downstream of the Delta, including Delta smelt, longfin smelt, and many zooplankton, maintained large populations through the 1970s, but declined sharply after the mid-1980s. Declines in aquatic resources have led to curtailed fishing seasons, to petitions for endangered species status, and general concern about the health of the estuarine ecosystem.

Managing to End Groundwater Overdraft in California’s Central Valley with Climate Change

University of California, Davis (UC Davis) | July 14th, 2016

Several water management cases with climate change are modeled to assess the effects of ending long-term groundwater overdraft in the Central Valley using the Cal

Several water management cases with climate change are modeled to assess the effects of ending long-term groundwater overdraft in the Central Valley using the California Value Integrated Network (CALVIN) model, a hydro-economic optimization model of California’s water system. CALVIN optimizes water management decision-making for the lowest net operating and water scarcity cost over an 82-year period of unimpaired inflows. Recent updates to the CALVIN model include, input hydrology, network representation, agricultural demand and shortage penalties, and hydropower improvements. Management cases evaluated include changes in outflow and inflow requirements for the Sacramento-San Joaquin Delta (Delta), and prohibiting long-term groundwater overdraft. Cases were analyzed over an 82-year modified historical record with a warmer, drier climate, and compared to historical hydrology results. A modelled warmer, drier climate reduces average inflows overall by about 28% and shifts stream flows towards winter and away from spring. Results show large water scarcities south of the Delta without Delta exports, especially for agriculture. Allowing for increased water transfers, Delta exports, conjunctive use, and water recycling and desalination reduces the water supply effects of groundwater overdraft and climate change.

Mark/Recapture Experiments at Clifton Court Forebay to Estimate Pre-Screening Loss to Juvenile Fishes: 1976-1993

California Department of Fish and Wildlife (CDFW) | September 30th, 1997

From October 1976 through November 1993, the California Department of Fish and Game conducted mark/recapture experiments at Clifton Court Forebay, designed to estimate pr

From October 1976 through November 1993, the California Department of Fish and Game conducted mark/recapture experiments at Clifton Court Forebay, designed to estimate pre-screen loss to entrained juvenile fishes. Ten studies were conducted; eight evaluated losses to hatchery-reared juvenile chinook salmon, and two evaluated losses to hatchery-reared juvenile striped bass. Pre-screen loss was calculated from the proportion of marked fish released at the radial gates that were subsequently recaptured during salvage operations at Skinner Fish Facility. The proportion was adjusted for handling mortality, fish facility louver effiCiency, and any subsampling at the facility. Studies were conducted across a wide range of environmental conditions and State Water Project operations, with a wide range in the size ofexperimental fish. Pre-screen loss estimates for juvenile chinook salmon were 63-99%. Potential biases in estimates of pre-screen loss may be due to (1) the calculation for pre-screen loss, (2) underrepresentative and over-representative salvage of experimental fish at Skinner Fish Facility, and (3) the introduction of experimental fish directly into Clifton Court Forebay. A multiple-regression analysis of pre-screen loss to juvenile salmon showed that 91% of the variance in pre-screen loss can be explained by export rate, experimental fish size, and water temperature. 

Memo: Issues Related to Overlap between Pre-1914 and Riparian Water Right Claims in the Delta

California State Water Resources Control Board (SWRCB) | December 15th, 2017

To: Michael Patrick George, Delta Watermaster From: Micah Green, Water Rights Analyst Re: Issues Related to Overlap between Pre-1914 and Riparian Water Right Claims in

To: Michael Patrick George, Delta Watermaster From: Micah Green, Water Rights Analyst Re: Issues Related to Overlap between Pre-1914 and Riparian Water Right Claims in the Delta Date: December 15, 2017 Pursuant to your request, I have researched an issue raised in the course of my review of responses to the Division of Water Rights’ 2015 Information Order submitted by water right claimants within the Legal Delta. I. Question Presented Under California water law and within the Legal Delta, are there any circumstances under which riparian and appropriative rights can “overlap” becoming indistinguishable or inseparable such that either or both may be lawfully exercised at the election of the holder? II. Short Answer It is possible to perfect both riparian and appropriative water rights for beneficial use on the same parcel. However, riparian and appropriative rights are distinct property interests that must be separately established. There is no California precedent recognizing “overlapping” or “intertwined” water rights, and water laws against hoarding and non-use operate to preclude the duplicative exercise of water rights.